White Supremacists Lean On Crypto, Says Anti-Defamation League Report on Extremists

CoinDeskPolicy发布于2024-01-11更新于2024-01-12

文章摘要

The report says white supremacist groups are drawn to crypto funding, but the amounts are relatively small, and it doesn't make a case that digital assets are paying for illeg...

White supremacist groups in the U.S. have sometimes been funded by crypto, according to a report from the Anti-Defamation League (ADL) that analyzed about $140,000 in transactions connected to 15 extremist groups or individuals last year.

The ADL, a New York-base advocacy group that counters antisemitism and extremism, focused on the movement of bitcoin, and saw that supporters used a wide array of digital assets platforms to get money in the hands of hate groups, though there was no assertion that the money was directly used for illegal action, such as domestic terrorism. And the review suggested the bitcoin received from supporters was often shifted back into the traditional financial system via U.S. banks.

10

"Extremists have increasingly turned to cryptocurrency due to the mistaken belief that the technology offers anonymity and is impervious to deplatforming," noted the report from the ADL's Center on Extremism, examining how the assets made their way into the hands of white nationalists. "Neither of these assumptions are accurate, but extremists have benefited from the lenient practices of cryptocurrency platforms, which often allow extremists to use their services."

Advertisement
Advertisement

About half of the transactions tracked by the ADL went through U.S. exchange Kraken, with others flowing through Binance, Coinbase and other platforms, according to the report. The biggest recipient was white nationalist publishing operation Counter-Currents.

The ADL recommends the crypto companies "update their policies to explicitly prohibit the use of their cryptocurrency exchanges to fund hate and extremism-related activities." It also suggested regulators should limit tokens that aim to shield privacy.

"Continued vigilance in the cryptocurrency space, as well as other financial technology spaces, and responsible moderation by the underlying platforms, are needed to combat the financial elements of this rise in antisemitism, extremism and hate," the organization concluded in its report.

Exchanges push back

For their part, crypto exchanges argue that they're combating illegality and that cryptocurrency transactions are often conducted in plain sight – unlike in banking.

A Kraken spokesperson said the company is disappointed the ADL wrote its report "without engaging us in any dialogue" about its know-your-customer policies and money laundering protections.

"Kraken is vigilant in enforcing these policies and taking proactive steps to prevent Kraken's services from being used as a vehicle for money laundering, terrorist financing or any other illicit activity," the spokesperson said in a statement.

Advertisement
Advertisement

Similarly, Coinbase Chief Policy Officer Faryar Shirzad responded that the company "does not tolerate any illegal activity – of any size – on or using the Coinbase exchange," adding that "our terms of service make this clear."

Shirzad said that the U.S. exchange is under "clear rules around anti-money laundering and sanctions that apply to fiat and crypto." He said the report erred in its "failure to differentiate law-abiding, regulated US exchanges from offshore companies that have served as major hubs for illegal activity," and he added that case is still the preferred medium for criminals who "want to avoid the transparent nature of the blockchain."

While the crypto firms defended their efforts to stave off illegality, the report didn't make specific accusations about the money funding illicit activity.

Extremist groups also rely on the traditional financial system, from online payments to credit cards to bank accounts, where the transparency the ADL used in its review isn't publicly available. But banning the groups from the mainstream financial network tends to raise questions of censorship.

Banks such as JPMorgan Chase & Co. have given large amounts of money to anti-hate groups including the Anti-Defamation League. But the banks' internal programs to review customers who have ties to extremist organizations are difficult to assess from the outside.

Edited by Nikhilesh De.

你可能也喜欢

以太坊基金会临时执行董事发声:我们的使命是什么?

以太坊基金会(EF)临时联合执行董事 Aerugo 发文明确了基金会的核心使命:确保以太坊始终是真正无需许可、保障用户自主权的基础设施,能够抵御审查、开源自由、私密安全,并支持大规模的自主协调。 文章首先明确了EF的“不为”:不追求自身重要性或商业吸引力,不服务短期投机者,也不推广所有应用。其核心作用是“消除弱点”,防御以太坊在协议、访问、用户和机构各层可能出现的榨取性、控制性或监视性风险。具体工作重点包括: 1. **自身实践**:将EF薪酬与财务转向以太坊原生资产,以身作则使用其力图改进的技术栈。 2. **对抗有害MEV**:将其视为核心威胁而非次要市场问题,致力于从系统层面降低MEV提取,防止交易流程被特权供应链把控,维护可信中立执行。 3. **强化隐私**:认为缺乏严格隐私默认设置的公链实为监控平台,必须优先实现强大的无条件隐私保护。 4. **保障质押去中心化**:视质押为协议安全基石,防止其集中在少数发行者或运营商手中。 5. **维护访问层自主性**:确保用户和机构能自主、抗胁迫地访问以太坊,而非通过削弱其核心价值的妥协方式。 同时,EF也致力于“抓住机遇”,推动以太坊发展为:抗量子攻击的全球基础设施;具备完全自主可验证、最小化有害MEV的协议栈;私密、尊重尊严的普通数字现金与协调平台;用户拥有完整主权的个人AI代理钱包;以及在机构场景中凭借其可信中立性胜出,而非沦为后端工具。 文章最后提及了近期的人员变动与“衍生公司”问题,强调离职原因多样,EF尊重所有贡献者但不会公开讨论个人事宜。对于从EF分离出去的项目,EF将谨慎评估资助,标准在于其是否对实现以太坊核心使命(无需许可、自主权等)至关重要,而非出于人情或延续旧项目。EF明确表示对以太坊的发展方向并非中立,将全力支持并优先推进那些保障其核心特性的工作。

链捕手27分钟前

以太坊基金会临时执行董事发声:我们的使命是什么?

链捕手27分钟前

读博最后一年转方向,拿到OpenAI offer:我的面试之路充满「意外」

布朗大学博士生Yong Zheng-Xin(中文名应为“永正新”)将在下个月以Astra Fellow身份加入OpenAI,专注于AI安全研究(AI Safety Research)。他在博士最后一年从多语言大模型研究方向转向AI安全领域,并分享了求职过程中的六个“意外”发现: 1. **论文数量并非关键**:获得面试和工作机会,真正起作用的往往只有一两篇高质量论文,甚至无需论文,更看重当场解决问题的能力。 2. **面试形式高度多样**:除了常规技术面试,还可能涉及系统设计、并行编程,甚至考察使用AI智能体的能力。 3. **工作试用期渐成常态**:尤其是在AI初创公司,候选者可能需要与团队合作完成一项有时长达一周的有偿任务,这会影响同时准备其他面试。 4. **时机至关重要**:就业市场的热点、职位需求窗口期、个人研究作品的走红时机,都会极大影响求职过程和结果。 5. **研究职位鲜有“留用”机会**:与软件工程岗位不同,研究类职位(如实习、奖学金结束后)通常仍需经历完整的面试流程才能转正。 6. **面试内容常与研究方向无关**:尽管他转向了AI安全领域,但许多面试环节并未专门考察该领域的知识,而是评估其作为AI研究员的综合基础能力。 他建议,在准备面试时要广泛学习,夯实基础,并可根据情况合理要求调整面试时间。最终,他对自己能获得满意的工作机会感到庆幸。

marsbit38分钟前

读博最后一年转方向,拿到OpenAI offer:我的面试之路充满「意外」

marsbit38分钟前

渣打银行再唱 50 倍狂想曲,为 AAVE“画饼”剑指 3500 美元

渣打银行发布研报,预测DeFi借贷协议AAVE的代币价格有望在2030年底前上涨50倍,达到3500美元。其核心逻辑基于两大趋势预判:一是到2030年DeFi总锁仓量(TVL)将增长37倍至约2.7万亿美元,主要受稳定币扩张和现实世界资产(RWA)上链驱动;二是RWA在DeFi中的渗透率将从目前的3.5%大幅提升至30%。报告认为,Aave凭借其高效业务模式、V4新架构的跨链流动性能力以及稳定币GHO的费率捕获,能将这些宏观红利转化为实际协议收入。 文章指出,Aave目前以借贷赛道约一半的TVL,占据了该赛道超过80%的协议留存收益,展现出强大的盈利能力。灰度(Grayscale)的报告也认为AAVE是现金流驱动型资产,当前价格被低估。 然而,报告也揭示了Aave面临的挑战。其点对池(Peer-to-Pool)借贷模型存在固有缺陷,导致大量资金闲置,造成每年数千万美元的“无形损失”,资本效率偏低。此外,4月发生的KelpDAO安全事件暴露了该模式在极端情况下的脆弱性。新兴协议如Morpho正以更高的资本效率从效率端发起挑战。 综上,渣打银行的“50倍狂想”描绘了传统金融对资产上链的巨大期望,但Aave要实现万亿资产规模的愿景,仍需在狂想与现实之间,解决其结构性短板,夯实发展地基。

链捕手2小时前

渣打银行再唱 50 倍狂想曲,为 AAVE“画饼”剑指 3500 美元

链捕手2小时前

交易

现货
合约
活动图片