Global Banking Regulator Proposes Changes to Criteria That Give Stablecoins Preferential Risk Treatment

CoinDeskPolicy发布于2023-12-13更新于2023-12-14

文章摘要

The Basel Committee for Banking Supervision wants to tighten requirements that allow stablecoins to qualify as less risky than unbacked cryptocurrencies like bitcoin.

The Basel Committee for Banking Supervision (BCBS) proposed revisions to the criteria for allowing stablecoins to be treated as less risky than unbacked cryptocurrencies such as bitcoin (BTC) in a consultative document published Thursday.

CoinDesk reported last week that the global banking regulator was looking to revise its classification criteria for stablecoins, which are cryptocurrencies designed to hold their value on par with reserve assets like the U.S. dollar. The consultation, released Thursday, lays out the proposed revisions in detail.

13.6K

The standard-setter has so far taken a tough stance on crypto, recommending the maximum possible risk weight of 1,250% for free-floating digital assets like bitcoin, which means banks have to issue capital to match their exposure. Banks are also not allowed to allocate more than 2% of their core capital to these riskier assets. The BCBS will not be making any changes to these standards, it said in a statement.

Advertisement
Advertisement

However, cryptos with "effective stabilization mechanisms" qualify for "preferential Group 1b regulatory treatment." This means stablecoins can be subject to "capital requirements based on the risk weights of underlying exposures as set out in the existing Basel Framework," instead of the tougher requirements set for bitcoin and the like.

Right now, stablecoins must be "redeemable at all times" to qualify for this preferential regulatory treatment. This ensures "only stablecoins issued by supervised and regulated entities that have robust redemption rights and governance are eligible for inclusion," the BCBS has said.

This story will be updated.

Edited by Sheldon Reback.

你可能也喜欢

美国大模型走向封闭,以安全之名

2026年6月,美国政府以安全为由,对前沿AI模型的发布实施管制。Anthropic的最强网络安全模型Mythos 5被要求下架后,仅获准有限恢复至约100家美国机构,其公众版Fable 5恢复时间未定。同时,OpenAI发布的新模型GPT-5.6系列也只对经政府审批的合作伙伴开放API。此事标志着美国政府首次成功介入商业AI模型的发布审批。 然而,涉事公司的安全评估显示,模型并未越过其自设的风险红线。OpenAI评估其模型不具备自主实施端到端网络攻击的能力;Anthropic则反驳政府的担忧基于一个狭窄、非通用的漏洞。行业批评政府的决策缺乏清晰的技术标准和透明的流程。有观点认为,管制行动的背后是模型能力的“可演示性”引发了政治担忧、竞争对手的举报以及新AI行政令寻求执法案例的需求。 文章回顾了上世纪90年代的“密码战争”,当时美国政府试图管制强加密技术的出口,最终因技术扩散无法遏制、损害美国企业竞争力而失败。历史镜鉴提示,对前沿AI的类似管制可能阻碍技术创新与产业投资,并将市场优势让位于以开源开放策略发展的竞争者。 评论指出,一个没有明确标准和时间表的审批流程,可能动摇前沿AI产业的商业逻辑,并将强大工具的访问权集中于少数特权机构,反而可能增加风险。全球开发者社区开始怀念模型自由发布、快速创新的时代,并将更多期待转向持续开放的中国大模型。

链捕手24分钟前

美国大模型走向封闭,以安全之名

链捕手24分钟前

交易

现货
活动图片