India's Controversial Crypto Tax Should Be Cut After Failing to Achieve Aims, Think Tank Urges

CoinDeskPolicy发布于2023-11-08更新于2023-11-09

文章摘要

The government lost $420 million in potential revenue and failed to improve transparency because the tax regime prompted as many as 5 million crypto users to shift transaction...

  • India's controversial 1% tax deducted at source (TDS) crypto tax policy needs to be lowered to 0.01%, a technology think tank has proposed based on a new study.
  • India introduced a 30% tax on crypto profits and the 1% TDS on all transactions in July, 2022, resulting in traffic taking a nosedive and exchanges going into survival mode.

India's most controversial crypto policy, a 1% transaction tax deducted at source, needs to be lowered to 0.01% to help the government achieve its aims of boosting revenue and improving transparency, a New Delhi-based technology policy think tank said in a new study.

The tax, a form of income tax known as TDS, has prompted as many as 5 million crypto traders to move their transactions offshore, and has cost the government a potential $420 million in revenue since it was introduced in July, 2022, according to the study by the Esya Centre.

The findings in the "Impact Assessment of Tax Deducted at Source on the Indian Virtual Digital Asset Market" go one step further than the group's previous report, which revealed Indians moved more than $3.8 billion in trading volume from local to international crypto exchanges after the controversial crypto rules were announced. They show that, at least in part, the tax failed to achieve one of its stated aims: taxing people who are earning profits.

A D V E R T I S E M E N T
A D V E R T I S E M E N T

"While the VDA market in India is burgeoning, the benefits of the same are being reaped by offshore exchanges," said Vikash Gautam, the report's author, referring to virtual digital assets. "Data shows that two likely policy objectives of the tax – to curb speculation and create transparency around transactions – have not been achieved."

Prime Minister Narendra Modi’s government announced a 30% tax on crypto profits and the 1% TDS on all transactions in February, 2022. At the time, Finance Minister Nirmala Sitharaman said the intention behind the TDS, the more controversial of the levies, was to increase traceability in India’s crypto ecosystem. Domestic and international participants warned it could kill the industry, and Indian crypto traffic nosedived in the months following its implementation, forcing almost all major exchanges into survival mode.

A D V E R T I S E M E N T
A D V E R T I S E M E N T

Representatives of the domestic industry have pleaded with the authorities on numerous occasions to lower the taxes. In addition to tracing transactions, the intention behind TDS was to discourage "speculative activity," according to the study, which analyzed transaction volumes from 13,000 peer-to-peer (P2P) traders and surveyed crypto exchange executives.

The Finance Ministry had not responded to a CoinDesk request for comment on the study by publication time.

The study also urged the government to clarify the applicability of TDS to offshore platforms.

"It just isn't enforceable, as per stakeholders," Gautam said in an interview. "It is possible to be done with international cooperation, but we do understand it is a long process. Some of the other countries have some arrangements with international exchanges to track that."

Edited by Sheldon Reback.

你可能也喜欢

美债、AI、通胀不可兼得:BTC 押注哪一边?

本文探讨了美国当前面临的“三难困境”:即在稳定国债市场、支持AI投资周期与控制通胀三者之间难以兼顾。核心观点是,美国政府大概率会优先确保国债市场稳定和AI发展,容忍通胀持续处于高位。这一选择将为黄金和比特币提供持续性利好。 文章指出,长期美债收益率攀升至多年高位,是通胀风险、财政供给扩大、边际买盘不足以及AI基建争夺资金等多重因素叠加的结果。为压低长端收益率,财政部已采取回购长债、增加短期发行等措施,这实质上类似于“隐形QE”,可能释放流动性并加剧货币贬值预期。 黄金近期上涨主要反映了对美元信任下降、通胀担忧及货币贬值逻辑。比特币虽自诩“数字黄金”,但历史上与黄金走势并不完全同步。不过,近期在财政部政策影响下,比特币表现出与流动性宽松更强的关联性,其作为“贬值对冲资产”的潜力值得关注。 结论认为,若高通胀、高赤字与AI融资需求持续,当局维持国债稳定与增长的成本将是债务短期化、流动性支持常态化以及对通胀的更高考验,这将利好黄金与比特币。反之,若通胀回落、财政纪律改善或AI能自我融资,此判断则需修正。市场焦点应从“美联储何时降息”转向观察政府在此三角困境中的优先取舍。

marsbit18分钟前

美债、AI、通胀不可兼得:BTC 押注哪一边?

marsbit18分钟前

HBM正在被重新定义

随着AI大模型需求爆发,算力瓶颈转向存储带宽,HBM高带宽内存成为AI硬件迭代关键。在HotChips2026大会上,三星和SK海力士披露了HBM4技术路线,其演进逻辑从以往提升DRAM速率和堆叠层数,转向Base Die逻辑工艺升级、混合键合3D堆叠、EMIB异构封装三大创新方向,标志着HBM从单一存储器件向“存储+逻辑+封装+IP+EDA”一体化系统转型。 HBM4不再聚焦存储颗粒,而是重构底部Base Die。三星采用4nm逻辑工艺,集成PHY和内存控制逻辑以优化信号完整性;SK海力士与台积电合作使用12nm工艺,注重量产稳定性和散热。这种差异化使供应链和设计复杂度大增,HBM需与逻辑代工厂深度协同,周期拉长。 封装路线走向多元化:SK海力士评估英特尔EMIB技术作为CoWoS的补充,以降低成本和突破产能限制;堆叠内部键合技术则从MR-MUF向混合键合过渡,后者能提升集成度和散热,但预计2027-2028年才能规模化。热管理成为高堆叠HBM的核心挑战,厂商已推出内置导热组件等解决方案。 此外,高速IP和3D EDA工具链成为新壁垒。高速IP需适配多工艺架构,资源被少数厂商垄断;3D异构EDA工具链的缺失使跨工艺协同仿真困难,设计流程割裂。一体化设计工具和兼容性IP对HBM4量产至关重要。 总之,HBM产业进入系统竞争时代,技术路线分化、新旧工艺共存,架构、封装、工艺和软硬件生态的协同能力将决定未来竞争格局。

marsbit23分钟前

HBM正在被重新定义

marsbit23分钟前

3000元博20万的时代过去了,AI漫剧不是捡钱的风口

“3000元博20万的时代过去了,AI漫剧不是捡钱的风口。”近期,番茄小说平台实施新的版权合规要求,引发一批AI漫剧、AI绘画等账号集中停更。新规要求漫剧改编必须获得正式授权,并对视频时长、内容展示等作出严格限制,这成为压垮许多创作者的“最后一根稻草”。 此前,AI漫剧因低门槛、低成本被视为创业风口,创作者利用AI工具快速将网文批量生成动画短剧。然而,行业繁荣背后是投入产出比的严重失衡。一位创作者透露,日更五分钟的视频,算力和剪辑成本约510元,但6万播放量的收益仅45元。虽然早期有如《霍去病》等少数爆款以极低成本获得高额收益,但绝大多数个人创作者难以复制成功,陷入“不爆仅赚几十、爆了勉强覆盖成本”的困境。 更根本的问题在于版权。过去行业多采取“先上车后补票”模式,大量作品未经授权改编自网文,引发诸多侵权纠纷。新规之下,无法负担版权或无法及时获取授权的创作者只能选择停更。此举虽令部分追剧粉丝不满,但受到了网文作者的欢迎,他们中的许多人曾面临作品被侵权却维权困难的处境。 此外,AI漫剧内容同质化严重,多集中于重生、逆袭等爽文套路,导致观众审美疲劳。行业野蛮生长阶段已然结束,低垂的流量果实被摘尽。新规和即将施行的《微短剧发展管理办法》标志着行业进入洗牌期,淘汰只想赚快钱的从业者。未来,AI漫剧的下半场将“靠内容说话”,唯有那些尊重版权、坚持内容创作的创作者才能真正留下来。

marsbit24分钟前

3000元博20万的时代过去了,AI漫剧不是捡钱的风口

marsbit24分钟前

交易

现货
活动图片