# Bài viết Liên quan CLARITY Act

Trung tâm Tin tức HTX cung cấp những bài viết mới nhất và phân tích chuyên sâu về "CLARITY Act", bao gồm xu hướng thị trường, cập nhật dự án, phát triển công nghệ và chính sách quản lý trong ngành tiền kỹ thuật số.

CLARITY Act Delays Have Become a Compliance Crisis, Not Just a Political Impasse

A year after the passage of three landmark digital asset bills in the U.S. House of Representatives, two have become law, while the critical CLARITY Act remains stalled in the Senate. This bill, which would definitively classify digital assets as either securities (SEC-regulated) or commodities (CFTC-regulated), has evolved from a political issue into a pressing compliance deadline for businesses. The ongoing delay perpetuates significant regulatory uncertainty, forcing companies to navigate a "regulation by enforcement" landscape that complicates governance, risk management, and strategic planning. With the Senate's legislative window rapidly closing before the August recess, the failure to pass the CLARITY Act could postpone comprehensive market structure legislation for years. Major sticking points in the Senate include ethical concerns over officials' crypto holdings, law enforcement opposition to certain liability shields, potential loopholes in stablecoin regulations, and vacancies at the key regulatory agencies (SEC and CFTC). This impasse stands in contrast to other jurisdictions, like South Africa, which are advancing with clear regulatory frameworks. Regardless of the legislative outcome, compliance leaders are urged to proactively audit their digital asset exposures, document their compliance rationale, and prepare contingency plans for both regulatory scenarios. The clarity promised by Congress remains incomplete, and businesses must prepare for either outcome.

marsbit07/17 10:10

CLARITY Act Delays Have Become a Compliance Crisis, Not Just a Political Impasse

marsbit07/17 10:10

CLARITY Act Delays Have Become a Compliance Crisis, Not Just a Political Stalemate

The article discusses the ongoing delay in the US Senate regarding the CLARITY Act, a bill intended to clarify the regulatory status of digital assets as either securities under the SEC or commodities under the CFTC. A year after the House passed it, this inaction is creating a concrete governance, risk, and compliance crisis for businesses, moving beyond mere political gridlock. While related bills for stablecoins and CBDC prohibitions have become law, the comprehensive CLARITY Act remains stalled. The delay creates profound uncertainty for companies on fundamental rules for exchanges, custodians, and all market participants. Without clear congressional action, regulatory classification depends on shifting enforcement actions and presidential administrations, making stable compliance impossible. The Senate's window for action is narrowing, with key votes needed before the August recess. Several major issues are blocking passage, including ethical concerns over crypto holdings by officials, law enforcement opposition to certain provisions, perceived loopholes for stablecoin rewards, and regulatory agency vacancies at the SEC and CFTC. Bipartisan support is fragile. Further delay risks postponing the legislation until 2030, perpetuating a costly "regulation by enforcement" environment. In contrast, passage would provide a durable regulatory framework. Regardless of the outcome, compliance leaders are urged to immediately map their digital asset exposures, prepare governance materials for both scenarios, and stress-test their arrangements. The article concludes that while the Senate's action is uncertain, corporate preparedness is not.

Foresight News07/17 09:31

CLARITY Act Delays Have Become a Compliance Crisis, Not Just a Political Stalemate

Foresight News07/17 09:31

The Controversial Issue of the CLARITY Act in the Digital Markets: Should Stablecoins Be Allowed to Generate Yield?

Controversy Over the CLARITY Act: Should Stablecoins Be Allowed to Generate Yield? This article examines the ongoing debate in U.S. regulation regarding whether stablecoins should be permitted to generate interest for holders. It traces the regulatory evolution from the GENIUS Act, which imposed a blanket prohibition on issuer-paid stablecoin yield to protect traditional banking, to the recent bipartisan Tillis-Alsobrooks compromise on the CLARITY Act. The compromise introduces a key distinction: strictly prohibiting "passive yield" (rewards for merely holding) while potentially allowing "activity-based yield" tied to specific on-chain actions like providing liquidity or governance participation. A critical "economic equivalency test" is proposed to determine if a reward is functionally equivalent to a bank deposit interest payment. The analysis highlights significant implementation challenges for regulators. It questions their capacity to perform the nuanced, substantive reviews required to differentiate between genuine activity-based rewards and cleverly disguised passive interest schemes within complex DeFi protocols and smart contracts. The article concludes that this shift represents a move from regulating specific entities ("entity-based regulation") to overseeing entire financial behaviors and ecosystems ("ecosystem-based regulation"). This transition, while aiming for market stability, may signal the end of the crypto industry's earlier unconstrained "wild west" era.

marsbit07/15 10:40

The Controversial Issue of the CLARITY Act in the Digital Markets: Should Stablecoins Be Allowed to Generate Yield?

marsbit07/15 10:40

活动图片