# Risk İlgili Makaleler

HTX Haber Merkezi, kripto endüstrisindeki piyasa trendleri, proje güncellemeleri, teknoloji gelişmeleri ve düzenleyici politikaları kapsayan "Risk" hakkında en son makaleleri ve derinlemesine analizleri sunmaktadır.

Investor Names Condition for Effective Protection Against Crypto Scammers

An investor outlined conditions for effective protection against crypto scammers. A proposed bill introducing a 48-hour "cooling-off" period for withdrawing over 100,000 rubles to external crypto wallets or transferring over 300,000 rubles to third parties will not provide complete protection from fraudsters. While such a measure could reduce impulsive transfers, criminals can adapt their schemes to new limits, for example by splitting large transactions into smaller ones below the threshold. According to the expert, the main benefit of the pause is undermining the artificial urgency created by scammers who pressure victims psychologically. The two days allow a person to consult their bank, talk to relatives, or calm down. However, the cooling-off period alone is not a universal solution. An effective system should analyze a combination of risk factors: the transaction amount, the history of previous transfers, whether the wallet address is new, its ownership, and the device used for the operation. The expert suggested creating a mechanism for trusted wallets. Once a user verifies ownership of an address and adds it to a whitelist, subsequent transactions could proceed without constant delays, protecting users without hindering legitimate investors. A significant concern is the 48-hour delay's impact on the crypto market, where exchange rates can fluctuate noticeably within two days, imposing market risk on businesses or portfolio management. The expert concluded that the cooling-off period can reduce impulsive transfers and save some people, but it will only be effective as part of a smart, adaptive system, not as a rigid barrier for all transactions.

cryptonews.ru6 saat önce

Investor Names Condition for Effective Protection Against Crypto Scammers

cryptonews.ru6 saat önce

Cryptocurrency Transfers Abroad: What Changes for Russians Starting September 1st

From September 1, 2026, a new Russian law will legalize cryptocurrency transfers abroad for citizens. The regulations will allow sending crypto to personal foreign wallets and using it for payments to foreign businesses, provided established rules are followed. The law recognizes crypto as property and introduces a legal framework for its circulation, permitting both qualified and non-qualified investors (with an annual limit of 300,000 rubles for the latter) to buy cryptocurrencies and stablecoins. Notably, using crypto for domestic payments within Russia remains illegal and subject to fines. Companies can use crypto for foreign trade contracts, but these transactions remain under currency control and anti-money laundering (AML) scrutiny. Major banks are increasing oversight of crypto operations, requiring detailed explanations for business transactions, with stricter controls expected from July 2027. While providing new legal avenues, the article warns of risks. Users must choose transfer methods (exchanges, P2P platforms, crypto exchangers) carefully, considering fees, speed, and service reliability. Key risks include service providers freezing transactions, demanding documentation, or blocking accounts. Experts caution that even popular assets like Bitcoin can be tracked or potentially targeted, and sanctions may restrict access to international platforms. Ultimately, while legalized, cross-border crypto transfers will operate within a framework of enhanced state control over fund origins and counterparties.

cryptonews.ruDün 17:45

Cryptocurrency Transfers Abroad: What Changes for Russians Starting September 1st

cryptonews.ruDün 17:45

GensynAI's Jeff Amico States That Real-World Asset (RWA) Investors May Lose Creditor Rights

Jeff Amico of GensynAI warns that investors in Real-World Asset (RWA) tokenized lending pools may lack creditor rights in case of borrower default. He notes a common structure where users receive a yield-bearing stablecoin from a platform, but the underlying loan and collateral are held by separate legal entities. This setup means investors have no enforceable claims against the borrower, the special purpose vehicles (SPVs), or the collateral itself, relying instead on the platform's promise to return funds. Amico emphasizes that investors must first identify who legally owes them money and what credit enhancement mechanisms exist, rather than focusing solely on nominal yield. Protections like collateral or first-loss capital are meaningless unless the lien is properly perfected and an agent is designated to enforce it on the investor's behalf. Investors without a formal credit agreement are particularly vulnerable. He cites Pareto/FalconX as a better model where depositors are direct contractual creditors, though this comes with higher minimum investments and KYC requirements. This highlights a trade-off: the crypto industry's permissionless ideals often conflict with the legal protections required for secure lending. Amico argues that weak legal structures could limit the RWA sector's growth. Traditional finance offers a clear template with defined creditor rights and perfected liens. Tokenized lending needs infrastructure, like oracles, to verify off-chain loan agreement status and collateral perfection, as smart contracts cannot do this autonomously. Ultimately, transparency is key. Some investors may accept weaker protections for open access, while others may prefer stronger legal rights. The legal structure of a lending pool will be as critical as its advertised yield, especially during a default, determining whether a token holder has enforceable rights or merely a platform promise.

cryptonews.ruDün 17:41

GensynAI's Jeff Amico States That Real-World Asset (RWA) Investors May Lose Creditor Rights

cryptonews.ruDün 17:41

Is RWA Still Meaningful Without DeFi?

The article "Would RWA Still Matter Without DeFi?" argues that tokenizing real-world assets (RWA) alone, like putting a barcode on a container, is not transformative. True value emerges when these tokenized assets are integrated into decentralized finance (DeFi) ecosystems, enabling valuation, financing, hedging, trading, and loss management in a programmable, automated manner. Tokenization provides digital representation, but DeFi provides utility through leverage, liquidity, and composability. The core challenge lies in aligning the different "time clocks" of blockchain (fast, 24/7), traditional markets (limited hours), and asset redemption (slow processes), which creates liquidation risks and gaps. Effective RWA integration requires more than a token; it needs a full stack: legally enforceable rights, reliable data oracles, clear transfer rules, executable secondary liquidity, appropriate collateral parameters, and credible loss resolution paths. Liquidity is defined not by total value locked (TVL) but by the ability to exit a position under stress within a required timeframe. Risk management for RWAs must be modeled as a dependency graph, monitoring interconnected nodes like issuers, custodians, oracles, and liquidity pools for early warning signs beyond just price data. While tokenized government bonds serve as an initial "ping test," the future lies in more complex assets like computing power and energy, which require bespoke risk models. Tokenized stocks paired with perpetual futures present a major test, combining global equity ownership with crypto-native leverage, necessitating robust architectural safeguards like isolation and dynamic collateral rules. The conclusion is that without DeFi, RWA tokenization offers limited value—improving distribution and transparency. The significant opportunity arises when tokenized assets become functional components within open, programmable capital markets, where they can be used as collateral and facilitate complex financial strategies. The token is merely the barcode; the market operating system is the real machine.

marsbit2 gün önce 10:20

Is RWA Still Meaningful Without DeFi?

marsbit2 gün önce 10:20

The article "Strategy" examines in detail 6 securities built on bitcoin

In the article "Strategy," six securities based on Bitcoin are examined. Strategy Inc. (Nasdaq: MSTR) announced investor materials detailing its common stock and five preferred securities. Executive Chairman Michael Saylor emphasized this with the comment, "Six securities. One Strategy." While each targets different investor goals, all depend on Strategy's financial health and capital management decisions. The capital structure positions common shares of MSTR at the bottom, absorbing profit or loss after debt and priority claims. These shares represent a residual stake in the company's net reserves, including its software and capital markets businesses, but provide no direct claim on specific bitcoins. The five preferred securities offer varied cash flows and priority levels: - STRC: Variable cumulative dividends, currently 12% annually on a $100 stated value, with twice-monthly cash payments. - STRF: Higher priority, paying fixed 10% annual cumulative dividends with quarterly cash payments. - $STRK: Lower priority, combining 8% cumulative dividends with a conversion right into MSTR shares. - STRD: Offers 10% annual dividends but has the weakest claim; its quarterly cash dividends are non-cumulative. - STRE: Denominated in euros, offers 10% cumulative dividends on €100, with quarterly cash payments and a priority ranking between other issues. Strategy's broader "Digital Debt Capital" concept involves maintaining a dollar reserve for dividend and interest payments, and permitting limited Bitcoin sales to fund this reserve. However, this does not make the preferred securities direct, collateralized claims on the company's Bitcoin holdings. Investors face risks beyond Bitcoin's price volatility, including issuer credit risk, interest rate changes, dividend decisions, liquidity, and capital structure priority. These securities add potential dividend income to Bitcoin exposure, making returns contingent on the company's financial stability, Bitcoin's performance, and management's capital allocation decisions.

cryptonews.ru08/20 20:17

The article "Strategy" examines in detail 6 securities built on bitcoin

cryptonews.ru08/20 20:17

活动图片