# Base İlgili Makaleler

HTX Haber Merkezi, kripto endüstrisindeki piyasa trendleri, proje güncellemeleri, teknoloji gelişmeleri ve düzenleyici politikaları kapsayan "Base" hakkında en son makaleleri ve derinlemesine analizleri sunmaktadır.

Base Launches 'Human Verification', Is the Airdrop on the Agenda?

Base has launched "Base Verify Onchain," a new verification mechanism aimed at solving the problem of Sybil attacks and duplicate participation in on-chain activities like airdrops, rewards, voting, or minting. While blockchains can track wallet addresses, they cannot determine if multiple wallets belong to the same person. The system works by connecting off-chain identity verification with on-chain smart contract rules. Developers can set specific eligibility criteria in their contracts (e.g., requiring a verified X account or a Coinbase One membership). Users connect their wallet and sign a message, which is sent to Base Verify's off-chain service. This service checks if the user meets the pre-set conditions against verified credentials. If they do, it issues a short-lived cryptographic proof containing an identityHash. The application then submits this proof to the smart contract. The contract verifies the proof's validity, checks expiration, and crucially, uses the identityHash to ensure the same verified identity cannot participate more than once, even if using a different wallet address. This identityHash is unique per application contract, preventing cross-application tracking. Base Verify Onchain is positioned as a tool for reliably enforcing participation rules ("who" and "how many times") in specific on-chain scenarios. It is not a general identity system or KYC solution. Its announcement has sparked speculation about a potential future Base token airdrop, for which this tool could be used to prevent abuse. However, Base has previously stated that work on a network token is still in early exploration stages.

marsbit11 saat önce

Base Launches 'Human Verification', Is the Airdrop on the Agenda?

marsbit11 saat önce

Base Under Pressure

**Title: The Pressure Mounts for Base** Base, the Ethereum Layer 2 scaling solution backed by Coinbase, is facing significant pressure and public scrutiny from its leadership following the launch of Robinhood Chain. Base co-founder Jesse Pollak recently acknowledged strategic missteps, admitting that the chain's past focus on social and creator tokens (e.g., through Farcaster, Zora) failed to deliver sustainable adoption. He has refocused on core infrastructure, handing leadership of the Base App back to Coinbase's Cobie. While Base remains a top L2 contender alongside OP Mainnet and Arbitrum, and boasts the highest TVL (nearly $12B), its weaknesses are being highlighted by the new competitor. Key criticisms include its slow progress on decentralization. Base has faced issues with its single sequencer causing block production halts, and L2BEAT is reportedly considering downgrading its decentralization rating from Stage 1 to Stage 0. This contrasts sharply with the rapid initial success of Robinhood Chain, whose DEX quickly entered the top five by volume. The leadership styles of the parent companies are also being compared: Robinhood's CEO actively engages with new projects, while a recent incident where Coinbase's Brian Armstrong briefly changed his profile picture—sparking and then crashing a related meme token—drew community ire and mockery. Pollak stated Base is working with Coinbase on tokenized stocks backed 1:1 by real equity, differentiating it from Robinhood's derivatives model. However, the article argues that Base's most urgent task is to address its long-standing technical and trust issues. With more traditional finance players likely to emulate Robinhood's path, Base must use this competitive pressure to solidify its position as long-term financial infrastructure.

Foresight News07/21 08:46

Base Under Pressure

Foresight News07/21 08:46

Should Developers Build on Corporate Blockchains Like Base and Robinhood?

Should developers build on enterprise-backed public chains like Base, Robinhood, or Stripe's Tempo? While these chains offer enticing benefits—primarily access to the platform's existing user base for accelerated growth—they come with significant, well-documented risks stemming from the inherent conflict of interest when a company controls both the underlying chain and major on-chain applications. The core promise is traffic distribution: projects gain exposure through platforms like the Coinbase wallet or app. However, this model creates five major risks: 1. **Direct Competition**: The platform can leverage its data and position to launch and prioritize its own competing products, similar to Amazon creating private-label goods or Microsoft bundling Internet Explorer. 2. **Wallet Agnosticism**: Companion wallets (e.g., Coinbase Wallet) must support multiple chains and integrate top applications across the ecosystem to remain competitive, diluting the promised exclusive traffic advantage for the enterprise chain. 3. **Competitor Exclusion**: Rival platforms (e.g., Coinbase vs. Robinhood) have no incentive to promote applications built on a competitor's chain. 4. **Profit Extraction**: The party controlling end-users holds disproportionate bargaining power and can capture most of the value, squeezing protocol profits down to marginal cost. 5. **Unfulfilled Promises**: Promised traffic support can be deprioritized or withdrawn based on shifting corporate strategies. In contrast, neutral chains like Ethereum or Solana avoid these platform risks entirely. For developers considering enterprise chains, risk mitigation strategies include: evaluating substantial onboarding grants, seeking (though often weak) contractual guarantees, and, most crucially, pursuing a multi-chain strategy while building independent user acquisition channels. Enterprise chains may be useful for initial cold-start growth, but the ultimate goal should be cultivating a dedicated user base rather than long-term dependence on a single, conflicted platform.

marsbit07/21 02:00

Should Developers Build on Corporate Blockchains Like Base and Robinhood?

marsbit07/21 02:00

Three-Year 'Decentralization' Promise Falls Flat, Is Base Still Stagnating?

Three years after its launch, Coinbase's Layer-2 solution Base has failed to deliver on its decentralization promises, remaining a centrally controlled "Stage 0" network, according to industry monitor L2Beat. The article argues Base functions as a tool for Coinbase to offer unregulated fund transfers, bypassing Know Your Customer (KYC) and Anti-Money Laundering (AML) checks. Coinbase initially published a decentralization roadmap in 2023, pledging collaboration with Optimism. However, progress stalled. By February 2026, Coinbase abandoned this plan, consolidating all administrative control via two multi-signature wallets. Network outages in June 2026, requiring Coinbase to manually roll back the chain, underscored its centralized nature. The piece criticizes Base as an inefficient, unstable distributed database—a solved technical problem for decades—that adds blockchain complexity without achieving decentralization. All development and operations are handled by Coinbase employees, making Base a Coinbase product. Key questions are raised: Did Coinbase ever have a viable decentralization plan? Is full decentralization for Layer-2s feasible in the short term? How long should regulators tolerate a platform operating without required financial licenses? The author contends that after 40 months with no real decentralization progress, continued regulatory leniency is unjustified, potentially constituting unlicensed money transmission.

Foresight News07/20 09:03

Three-Year 'Decentralization' Promise Falls Flat, Is Base Still Stagnating?

Foresight News07/20 09:03

A Critical Review of Base Co-founder's "Letter of Self-Criticism"

Yesterday, Base co-founder Jesse Pollak published a self-critical post on X, reflecting on Base's successes and failures over the past two years. While his candor is commendable, the author argues his analysis still misses key points. Jesse admitted his primary mistake was heavily betting that onchain social platforms (like Farcaster) and creator tokens would drive mainstream crypto adoption. The author harshly criticizes this strategy, giving it a "0/100" score. They argue onchain social offers no superior user experience, and creator tokens, like Jesse's own $JESSE, fail to solve fundamental issues about value and creator adoption, unlike successful memecoins on other chains. The author is more forgiving regarding Base lagging in areas like perpetual DEXs and prediction markets, giving this an "80/100". They note strong competitors like Hyperliquid had unique advantages, and Base has found significant success in other narratives like AI and RWA. The author gives Jesse's overall reflection a "60/100" or passing grade. While Jesse now correctly sees multiple paths to adoption (stablecoins, payments, AI Agents) beyond just social, he, along with other industry leaders like Toly and Vitalik, still underestimates the powerful role of memecoins in driving mainstream awareness and adoption. The critique concludes that leaders often leverage memes for user acquisition but fail to genuinely embrace or thoughtfully develop the space, revealing a retreat from idealism and a disconnect from grassroots, viral growth mechanisms.

marsbit07/17 02:36

A Critical Review of Base Co-founder's "Letter of Self-Criticism"

marsbit07/17 02:36

Base Abandons Social Direction, Founder Admits Strategic Failure

Base, the Ethereum Layer-2 network often called the "L2 King," has formally ended its three-year "exploration era," with co-founder Jesse Pollak admitting its strategic focus on social applications was a mistake. In a recent statement, Pollak acknowledged that bets on social platforms like Farcaster and Zora, creator coins, and mini-apps failed to drive mainstream crypto adoption, leaving Base behind competitors in areas like perpetual contracts and payment solutions. He confirmed that Base's flagship app will now be managed by Cobie, a community leader, under Coinbase's oversight. Pollak's review highlighted Base's past struggles: leadership overemphasized a "creator economy" with limited real earnings for creators, development often followed trends set by Solana or BNB Chain, and a significant portion of on-chain activity was reportedly inflated. The vision of using social media to onboard billions to crypto clashed with the dominance of established Web2 platforms. Moving forward, Base will pivot to three core areas, as outlined by both Pollak and Coinbase CEO Brian Armstrong: **trading** (including tokenized stocks and memecoins), **payments** (leveraging global stablecoins), and **AI Agent services** (preparing for a machine-driven economy using crypto as native currency). This shift is seen as a return to crypto's fundamental strengths—finance and transactions. The strategic change coincides with personnel shifts at Coinbase, including the departure of executives like the Chief Legal Officer. Notably, Pollak himself has returned to hands-on coding. Furthermore, Coinbase reports that over 95% of its code is now AI-generated or assisted, with AI agents already performing work equivalent to about 1,200 employees—a trend expected to grow significantly, signaling how AI is reshaping the company's own operations as Base prepares to serve a future AI Agent economy.

Odaily星球日报07/16 07:59

Base Abandons Social Direction, Founder Admits Strategic Failure

Odaily星球日报07/16 07:59

活动图片