XRP market structure echoes early 2022 as short-term buyers accumulate below cost bases

ambcryptoОпубликовано 2026-01-19Обновлено 2026-01-19

Введение

According to Glassnode data, XRP's on-chain market structure is mirroring conditions from early 2022, indicating a period of potential consolidation. Short-term buyers (active within one week to one month) are accumulating tokens at prices below the realized cost basis of the six-month to twelve-month holder cohort. This divergence creates distribution stress, as newer participants enter at lower prices while earlier buyers remain underwater, increasing psychological pressure to sell. The supply of XRP held at a loss has risen to approximately 26 billion, while supply in profit has declined to around 40 billion, confirming rising stress among holders. Price action remains fragile, with mixed momentum and struggles to sustain rebounds. The overall structure suggests XRP is entering a consolidation phase rather than a decisive trend reversal, with sustained upside requiring a reclamation of older cost bases and a reduction in loss-held supply.

XRP’s on-chain market structure is beginning to resemble conditions last seen in early 2022, according to new data from Glassnode. Short-term investors are accumulating tokens below the cost basis of longer-term holders.

Glassnode’s Realized Price by Age metric shows that wallets active in the one-week to one-month window are now buying XRP at prices below the realized cost basis of the six-month to twelve-month cohort.

This configuration historically reflects a period of distribution stress, where newer participants enter at lower prices while earlier buyers remain underwater.

In February 2022, a similar structure preceded a prolonged phase of consolidation and downside volatility, as holders who bought near local highs faced increasing psychological pressure to exit positions.

Short-term accumulation builds pressure on older XRP holders

The realized price bands highlight a growing divergence between short-term and mid-term holders. While newer participants appear willing to accumulate at current levels, the six- to twelve-month cohort continues to hold XRP at a higher average cost.

This dynamic can create persistent selling pressure over time. As prices struggle to regain prior cost bases, investors who bought during previous rallies may view rebounds as opportunities to reduce exposure, thereby limiting upside momentum.

Glassnode notes that when this structure persists, it often reflects a market caught between accumulation and distribution, rather than a clear trend reversal.

Supply-in-loss data confirms rising stress among holders

Additional on-chain data strengthens this interpretation. Glassnode’s Total Supply in Loss metric shows a steady increase in the amount of XRP held below cost basis, particularly following the recent pullback from late-2025 highs.

As of this writing, the supply in loss now stands around 26 billion.

Historically, rising supply in loss tends to coincide with weaker price performance, as confidence erodes among holders sitting on unrealized losses.

At the same time, supply in profit has been declining, suggesting fewer tokens are held at comfortable margins. As of this writing, it stands at around 40 billion.

This shift mirrors conditions observed during previous corrective phases, in which recovery required either a prolonged consolidation period or a decisive surge in new demand.

XRP price action remains fragile despite recent bounce

On the 12-hour price chart, XRP recently rebounded toward the $2.00–$2.10 zone after dipping below key short-term support levels. However, directional momentum remains mixed.

The Directional Movement Index [DMI] shows weakening trend strength, with no clear dominance from buyers or sellers.

While short-term rallies have emerged, they have struggled to sustain follow-through, reinforcing the idea that the market remains range-bound.

XRP also continues to trade well below its late-2024 and mid-2025 highs, keeping longer-term holders under pressure as price attempts to stabilize.

Market structure points to consolidation

The realized price divergence, rising supply in loss, and muted trend strength suggest XRP is entering a structural consolidation phase, rather than a decisive trend reversal.

While short-term accumulation may support price in the near term, sustained upside would likely require XRP to reclaim older realized cost bases and reduce the proportion of supply held at a loss.

Until then, the current setup closely resembles early 2022 conditions, when recovery proved slow and uneven despite intermittent rallies.


Final Thoughts

  • XRP’s on-chain structure signals growing tension between newer buyers and longer-term holders, echoing patterns seen ahead of extended consolidation phases in past cycles.
  • Unless price strength is sufficient to relieve pressure on older cohorts, the market may remain vulnerable to volatility and capped upside in the near term.

Связанные с этим вопросы

QWhat does Glassnode's Realized Price by Age metric reveal about the current XRP market structure?

AIt shows that short-term investors (active in the one-week to one-month window) are accumulating XRP at prices below the realized cost basis of the six-month to twelve-month cohort.

QWhat historical period does the current XRP market structure resemble, and what was the outcome then?

AIt resembles the structure seen in early 2022, which preceded a prolonged phase of consolidation and downside volatility.

QAccording to the article, what does a persistent divergence between short-term and mid-term holder cost bases often reflect?

AIt often reflects a market caught between accumulation and distribution, rather than a clear trend reversal.

QWhat do the 'Supply in Loss' and 'Supply in Profit' metrics indicate about the current state of the XRP market?

AThe 'Supply in Loss' has increased to around 26 billion, indicating rising stress, while the 'Supply in Profit' has declined to around 40 billion, suggesting fewer tokens are held at comfortable margins.

QWhat is required for a sustained price recovery in XRP according to the article's conclusion?

ASustained upside would require XRP to reclaim older realized cost bases and reduce the proportion of supply held at a loss.

Похожее

From Survival to Accelerated Growth: The Journey of Zcash's Three-Year Rise as Told by the Founder of ZODL

**From Survival to Accelerated Growth: Zcash Founder Details the 3-Year Rise** Three years ago, Zcash (ZEC) was a struggling pioneer in privacy technology, with a price near $30, low shielded supply (11%), and a community mired in governance disputes. Today, ZEC trades around $600, with over 31% of its supply (~$3B) in user-controlled shielded pools. This transformation resulted from breaking key constraints. First, **governance shackles were removed**. The old model guaranteed funding to two entities (ECC and ZF) regardless of performance, creating a monopoly. In 2024, ECC rejected further direct funding, forcing a change. The NU6 upgrade ended direct funding, allocating 8% to community grants and 12% to a protocol-controlled treasury for retroactive rewards, expiring in 2028 unless renewed by overwhelming consensus. The entities also relinquished their trademark-based veto power, freeing community governance. Second, the **product focus shifted** from pure cryptography to user growth. Previously, engineering excelled at privacy tech but failed to attract users. In early 2024, the team (later ZODL) pivoted to building products users wanted, like the Zodl wallet (default privacy, hardware support, cross-asset swaps). This drove shielded supply to grow over 400% in ZEC terms, with 86.5% of recent transactions being shielded, representing real user adoption. Third, the **narrative evolved** from the limiting "privacy coin" label to "unstoppable private money." This clarified Zcash's value proposition: a Bitcoin-like monetary policy with verifiable private payments via advanced cryptography. This structural narrative—protocol (Zcash), asset (ZEC), gateway (Zodl)—enabled broader exchange listings, institutional interest, and ETF filings. Finally, **organizational constraints were broken**. In early 2026, the ECC team left its non-profit structure after disputes over control, forming Zcash Open Development Lab (ZODL). ZODL raised $25M from top VCs (Paradigm, a16z, etc.), gaining the capital and agility of a startup to scale consumer products. Current metrics show strong momentum: social discussion volume for ZEC surged 15,245% in a year, with 81% positive sentiment. The focus is now on enhancing user experience (Zodl wallet), scalability (Tachyon project targeting Visa-level throughput with 25-second blocks), and post-quantum security (quantum-recoverable wallets coming soon). Zcash is positioned to become faster, more usable, scalable, and quantum-resistant.

marsbit2 мин. назад

From Survival to Accelerated Growth: The Journey of Zcash's Three-Year Rise as Told by the Founder of ZODL

marsbit2 мин. назад

Five Counterparty Risk Architectures: A Settlement-Layer Methodology for Classifying TradFi Models in Crypto Exchanges

**Summary:** This companion piece reframes the five TradFi-on-crypto exchange architectures, previously classified by "architectural fingerprint," through the lens of counterparty risk. The core question is: whose balance sheet bears the loss first in a stress scenario, and has it historically done so? Each of the five models corresponds to a distinct risk holder with its own documented failure modes. * **Model 1 (Stablecoin-Settled CEX Perpetuals):** Risk is held by the stablecoin issuer (e.g., reserve composition, bank connectivity) and the CEX's own book. History includes Tether's banking disconnections (2017) and reserve misrepresentations (CFTC 2021 Order). * **Model 2 (CFD Brokers):** Risk resides on the broker's balance sheet (B-book model). Regulatory differences (e.g., ESMA's mandatory negative balance protection vs. Mauritius FSC's lack thereof) define loss allocation rules, as seen in the 2015 SNB event (Alpari UK insolvency). * **Model 3 (Off-Chain Custody & Transfer Agent Chain):** Risk lies with the off-chain custodian/platform. User asset recovery depends on Terms of Use and corporate structure, exemplified by the Celsius bankruptcy ruling (2023) where Earn Account assets were deemed property of the estate. * **Model 4 (DEX Perpetual Protocols):** No single balance sheet bears risk. Loss absorption relies on a protocol's insurance fund and Auto-Deleveraging (ADL) mechanism, as demonstrated in the GMX V1 (2022) and dYdX v3 YFI (2023) incidents. * **Model 5 (Regulated CCP - DCM-DCO-FCM):** The most institutionalized model concentrates risk in the Central Counterparty (CCP). However, history shows CCPs can employ non-standard tools under extreme stress, such as mass trade cancellation (LME Nickel, 2022) or enabling negative price settlements (CME WTI, 2020). The report argues that regulatory choices and counterparty risk structures are co-extensive, not in an upstream-downstream relationship. It concludes with five separate observation checklists (not predictions) for monitoring the structural vulnerabilities of each risk model.

marsbit19 мин. назад

Five Counterparty Risk Architectures: A Settlement-Layer Methodology for Classifying TradFi Models in Crypto Exchanges

marsbit19 мин. назад

Торговля

Спот
Фьючерсы

Популярные статьи

Как купить S

Добро пожаловать на HTX.com! Мы сделали приобретение Sonic (S) простым и удобным. Следуйте нашему пошаговому руководству и отправляйтесь в свое крипто-путешествие.Шаг 1: Создайте аккаунт на HTXИспользуйте свой адрес электронной почты или номер телефона, чтобы зарегистрироваться и бесплатно создать аккаунт на HTX. Пройдите удобную регистрацию и откройте для себя весь функционал.Создать аккаунтШаг 2: Перейдите в Купить криптовалюту и выберите свой способ оплатыКредитная/Дебетовая Карта: Используйте свою карту Visa или Mastercard для мгновенной покупки Sonic (S).Баланс: Используйте средства с баланса вашего аккаунта HTX для простой торговли.Третьи Лица: Мы добавили популярные способы оплаты, такие как Google Pay и Apple Pay, для повышения удобства.P2P: Торгуйте напрямую с другими пользователями на HTX.Внебиржевая Торговля (OTC): Мы предлагаем индивидуальные услуги и конкурентоспособные обменные курсы для трейдеров.Шаг 3: Хранение Sonic (S)После приобретения вами Sonic (S) храните их в своем аккаунте на HTX. В качестве альтернативы вы можете отправить их куда-либо с помощью перевода в блокчейне или использовать для торговли с другими криптовалютами.Шаг 4: Торговля Sonic (S)С легкостью торгуйте Sonic (S) на спотовом рынке HTX. Просто зайдите в свой аккаунт, выберите торговую пару, совершайте сделки и следите за ними в режиме реального времени. Мы предлагаем удобный интерфейс как для начинающих, так и для опытных трейдеров.

1.3k просмотров всегоОпубликовано 2025.01.15Обновлено 2025.03.21

Как купить S

Sonic: Обновления под руководством Андре Кронье – новая звезда Layer-1 на фоне спада рынка

Он решает проблемы масштабируемости, совместимости между блокчейнами и стимулов для разработчиков с помощью технологических инноваций.

2.2k просмотров всегоОпубликовано 2025.04.09Обновлено 2025.04.09

Sonic: Обновления под руководством Андре Кронье – новая звезда Layer-1 на фоне спада рынка

HTX Learn: Пройдите обучение по "Sonic" и разделите 1000 USDT

HTX Learn — ваш проводник в мир перспективных проектов, и мы запускаем специальное мероприятие "Учитесь и Зарабатывайте", посвящённое этим проектам. Наше новое направление .

1.8k просмотров всегоОпубликовано 2025.04.10Обновлено 2025.04.10

HTX Learn: Пройдите обучение по "Sonic" и разделите 1000 USDT

Обсуждения

Добро пожаловать в Сообщество HTX. Здесь вы сможете быть в курсе последних новостей о развитии платформы и получить доступ к профессиональной аналитической информации о рынке. Мнения пользователей о цене на S (S) представлены ниже.

活动图片