XRP hits 9-month low: Why Ripple is struggling despite strong fundamentals

ambcryptoОпубликовано 2026-02-01Обновлено 2026-02-01

Введение

XRP has hit a nine-month low of $1.60, down 9% in 2026, despite strong fundamentals. This decline is largely attributed to its near-perfect 0.998 correlation with Bitcoin, meaning it is heavily influenced by BTC's price movements and current market-wide FUD. However, Ripple demonstrates robust long-term prospects with significant ETF inflows, strategic regulatory licenses in Europe, a new Ripple Treasury, and an 11% increase in its Real-World Asset (RWA) Total Value Locked (TVL), reaching a record $235 million. The market awaits clarity from macro events and potential crypto legislation, like the CLARITY Act, which could provide a significant boost in the second half of the year.

Short-term volatility is still in play, but the market is clearly thinking long-term. All eyes are on the close of H1, when a lot of the uncertainty around crypto, such as macro signals and Fed policy, should start to settle.

Take the CLARITY Act, for example. If passed, it could give digital assets a serious legitimacy boost. Meanwhile, lingering questions around the Fed Chair might finally clear up, with markets already pricing in rate cuts.

In this mix, Ripple [XRP] is standing out.

As an L1 attracting ETF inflows, it’s clear that investors are betting on the long-term, even after recent FUD. And with more regulation on the horizon, there’s a real chance that XRP could gain even more steam in H2.

But here’s the question: What exactly are investors betting on?

No doubt, Ripple has kicked off 2026 with some strategic moves. From setting up a Ripple Treasury to securing regulatory licenses in multiple countries, the company is solidifying RLUSD’s use case across Europe.

Meanwhile, XRP is showing strong tokenization. Its RWA TVL is up 11% over the past 30 days, hitting a record $235 million. That’s another signal that its network fundamentals continue to attract institutional capital.

That said, the price hasn’t really reflected this growth. With a 9% pullback so far in 2026, XRP has slipped to $1.60 for the first time in nine months, effectively wiping out all the gains it made after the election cycle.

Naturally, the question arises: Is Ripple simply undervalued?

Bitcoin dictates the market, XRP feels the pressure

Altcoins are closely following Bitcoin [BTC] right now.

The current correlation between BTC and the altcoin market sits at 87%, which basically means Bitcoin is dictating the market. When it dips, the market bleeds. When BTC pumps, the rally usually drags everything up.

Ripple is a prime example. Despite solid inflows, its price is largely following BTC’s moves. In fact, as the chart shows, XRP is at the top of the table with a 0.998 reading, making it the most BTC-dependent altcoin.

Now, this is where Ripple’s recent breakdown starts to make sense.

Even with ETF flows, strategic partnerships, and licensing pointing to a long-term growth strategy, the current FUD around a government shutdown and other pressures is weighing on BTC, and, by extension, XRP.

Unsurprisingly, that’s putting a dent in Ripple’s long-term play.

XRP just broke the $1.80 support level, rattling conviction. Meanwhile, as long as BTC volatility keeps outrunning fundamentals, the impact of recent inflows will stay muted, leaving the token exposed to deeper corrections.


Final Thoughts

  • ETF inflows, strategic partnerships, regulatory progress, and record RWA TVL signal continued institutional interest, despite short-term FUD.
  • Ripple’s 0.998 correlation with Bitcoin means dips in BTC pressure XRP, keeping recent inflows from fully impacting the price and exposing it to deeper corrections.

Связанные с этим вопросы

QWhy is XRP's price struggling despite its strong fundamentals like ETF inflows and regulatory progress?

AXRP's price is struggling primarily due to its extremely high correlation (0.998) with Bitcoin. Despite strong fundamentals, Bitcoin's recent price dips, driven by factors like FUD around a potential shutdown and macroeconomic pressures, are dictating the market and pulling XRP's price down with it.

QWhat specific fundamental strengths does Ripple (XRP) currently have according to the article?

ARipple's fundamental strengths include attracting ETF inflows, securing regulatory licenses in multiple countries, setting up a Ripple Treasury, solidifying RLUSD's use case in Europe, and achieving a record $235 million in RWA TVL (Real World Asset Total Value Locked), which is up 11% in the past 30 days.

QWhat key event does the article suggest could provide a 'legitimacy boost' for digital assets?

AThe article suggests that if passed, the CLARITY Act could give digital assets a serious legitimacy boost.

QWhat support level did XRP recently break, and what was the significance of this break?

AXRP recently broke the $1.80 support level. This break rattled investor conviction and signaled potential for deeper price corrections.

QWhat is the current correlation between Bitcoin and the altcoin market, and what does this mean for altcoins like XRP?

AThe current correlation between Bitcoin and the altcoin market is 87%. This high correlation means that Bitcoin dictates the market; when its price dips, altcoins like XRP tend to fall, and when it rallies, it usually drags altcoin prices up with it.

Похожее

a16z: AI's 'Amnesia', Can Continuous Learning Cure It?

The article "a16z: AI's 'Amnesia' – Can Continual Learning Cure It?" explores the limitations of current large language models (LLMs), which, like the protagonist in the film *Memento*, are trapped in a perpetual present—unable to form new memories after training. While methods like in-context learning (ICL), retrieval-augmented generation (RAG), and external scaffolding (e.g., chat history, prompts) provide temporary solutions, they fail to enable true internalization of new knowledge. The authors argue that compression—the core of learning during training—is halted at deployment, preventing models from generalizing, discovering novel solutions (e.g., mathematical proofs), or handling adversarial scenarios. The piece introduces *continual learning* as a critical research direction to address this, categorizing approaches into three paths: 1. **Context**: Scaling external memory via longer context windows, multi-agent systems, and smarter retrieval. 2. **Modules**: Using pluggable adapters or external memory layers for specialization without full retraining. 3. **Weights**: Enabling parameter updates through sparse training, test-time training, meta-learning, distillation, and reinforcement learning from feedback. Challenges include catastrophic forgetting, safety risks, and auditability, but overcoming these could unlock models that learn iteratively from experience. The conclusion emphasizes that while context-based methods are effective, true breakthroughs require models to compress new information into weights post-deployment, moving from mere retrieval to genuine learning.

marsbit1 ч. назад

a16z: AI's 'Amnesia', Can Continuous Learning Cure It?

marsbit1 ч. назад

Can a Hair Dryer Earn $34,000? Deciphering the Reflexivity Paradox in Prediction Markets

An individual manipulated a weather sensor at Paris Charles de Gaulle Airport with a portable heat source, causing a Polymarket weather market to settle at 22°C and earning $34,000. This incident highlights a fundamental issue in prediction markets: when a market aims to reflect reality, it also incentivizes participants to influence that reality. Prediction markets operate on two layers: platform rules (what outcome counts as a win) and data sources (what actually happened). While most focus on rules, the real vulnerability lies in the data source. If reality is recorded through a specific source, influencing that source directly affects market settlement. The article categorizes markets by their vulnerability: 1. **Single-point physical data sources** (e.g., weather stations): Easily manipulated through physical interference. 2. **Insider information markets** (e.g., MrBeast video details): Insiders like team members use non-public information to trade. Kalshi fined a剪辑师 $20,000 for insider trading. 3. **Actor-manipulated markets** (e.g., Andrew Tate’s tweet counts): The subject of the market can control the outcome. Evidence suggests Tate’sociated accounts coordinated to profit. 4. **Individual-action markets** (e.g., WNBA disruptions): A single person can execute an event to profit from their pre-placed bets. Kalshi and Polymarket handle these issues differently. Kalshi enforces strict KYC, publicly penalizes insider trading, and reports to regulators. Polymarket, with its anonymous wallet-based system, has historically been more permissive, arguing that insider information improves market accuracy. However, it cooperated with authorities in the "Van Dyke case," where a user traded on classified government information. The core paradox is reflexivity: prediction markets are designed to discover truth, but their financial incentives can distort reality. The more valuable a prediction becomes, the more likely participants are to influence the event itself. The market ceases to be a mirror of reality and instead shapes it.

marsbit2 ч. назад

Can a Hair Dryer Earn $34,000? Deciphering the Reflexivity Paradox in Prediction Markets

marsbit2 ч. назад

Торговля

Спот
Фьючерсы
活动图片