Why Ripple’s XRP Is A Better Transaction Choice Compared To SWIFT

bitcoinistОпубликовано 2026-05-16Обновлено 2026-05-16

Введение

Crypto expert CharuSan argues that Ripple's XRP is superior to SWIFT for cross-border transactions, predicting SWIFT may need to integrate XRP to survive. He highlights XRP's On-Demand Liquidity (ODL) technology as faster and cheaper, freeing up trillions for banks instantly, while SWIFT is described as cumbersome and slow. CharuSan states that banks' main software is already integrated with Ripple, enabling rapid, widespread adoption. He believes SWIFT must adopt XRP as a liquidity layer to remain relevant, rather than staying a simple messaging service. While SWIFT is developing a distributed ledger on Ethereum's Linea with partners, CharuSan dismisses this move, noting Linea handles messaging trials but isn't a liquidity solution and incurs verification costs on Ethereum, making it non-viable for payments. In conclusion, CharuSan asserts that without integrating XRP, SWIFT is "doomed" to fade away. At the time of writing, XRP price was around $1.41.

Crypto pundit CharuSan has explained why Ripple’s XRP is a better choice for cross-border transactions than SWIFT. He also predicted that SWIFT is likely to integrate XRP at some point to avoid becoming redundant.

Why Ripple’s XRP Has A Competitive Edge Over SWIFT

In an X post, CharuSan said that SWIFT is cumbersome and slow, and will completely lose its competitive edge against XRP’s ODL technology, which frees up trillions of dollars for banks in seconds. He further noted that XRP addresses these banks’ pain points by enabling faster, cheaper payments, prompting them to reconsider their use of SWIFT.

In line with this, he opined that XRP will take over the market rapidly rather than gradually. The pundit also mentioned that the main software used by banks is already integrated with Ripple, which means that the technical path is ready. CharuSan added that there is no need to meet with 13,000 banks one by one, as a single update will integrate all banks into the system.

CharuSan noted that the real issue for SWIFT is whether it will add XRP to its system as a liquidity layer to keep up with the modern world or remain as a simple messaging service, which could cause it to lose its financial authority and eventually pack up. As such, he believes that SWIFT’s adoption of XRP’s technology at some point is a strategic necessity for the firm’s survival.

However, it is worth noting that SWIFT is developing its distributed ledger on Ethereum layer-2 Linea in partnership with ConsenSys and up to 30 banks. This is part of the firm’s move to expand from solely the messaging layer to an execution layer, enabling 24/7 cross-border payments.

Why The Linea Move Cannot Compare to Using XRP

CharuSan also opined that SWIFT cannot compete with XRP even with its move to develop a distributed ledger on Linea. He explained that Linea is a layer-2 infrastructure, and SWIFT’s experimentation with these networks is limited to messaging and asset-transfer trials. The pundit added that Linea is not a liquidity tool.

As such, CharuSan noted that although Linea aggregates transactions on its own, it still sends this data to the Ethereum network for verification, incurring a cost in the process. He indicated that such a process is not viable for cross-border payments, and so, SWIFT cannot compete with or be compared to XRP. The pundit reiterated that if SWIFT does not reach an agreement with Ripple and integrate XRP as a liquidity layer on its platform, it is “doomed” to fade away.

At the time of writing, the XRP price is trading at around $1.41, down over 4% in the last 24 hours, according to data from CoinMarketCap.

XRP trading at $1.41 on the 1D chart | Source: XRPUSDT on Tradingview.com

Связанные с этим вопросы

QWhat is the main reason CharuSan believes Ripple's XRP is superior to SWIFT for cross-border transactions?

ACharuSan believes XRP is superior because its ODL (On-Demand Liquidity) technology enables faster and cheaper cross-border payments, freeing up trillions of dollars for banks in seconds, unlike the slow and cumbersome SWIFT system.

QWhat does the article suggest is a strategic necessity for SWIFT's survival?

AThe article suggests that for SWIFT's survival, it is a strategic necessity to adopt XRP's technology, specifically by integrating XRP as a liquidity layer on its platform to keep up with modern financial demands.

QAccording to the article, why is SWIFT's development of a distributed ledger on Ethereum's Linea not a direct competitor to XRP?

ASWIFT's Linea initiative is not a direct competitor to XRP because Linea is a layer-2 infrastructure focused on messaging and asset-transfer trials, not a liquidity tool. Its process still relies on the Ethereum network for verification, incurring costs and making it non-viable for efficient cross-border payments.

QWhat technical advantage does Ripple's XRP have for bank integration, as mentioned by CharuSan?

ACharuSan mentions that the main software used by banks is already integrated with Ripple, meaning the technical path is ready, and a single software update could integrate all banks into the XRP system, eliminating the need for individual negotiations with thousands of banks.

QWhat was the price of XRP and its performance at the time the article was written?

AAt the time of writing, the XRP price was trading at around $1.41, down over 4% in the last 24 hours according to data from CoinMarketCap.

Похожее

Both Suffer Massive Losses Exceeding $90 Billion, Which Is in Greater Peril: Strategy or Bitmine?

Facing massive paper losses exceeding $90 billion each amidst a sharp market downturn, "Digital Asset Treasury" (DAT) giants Strategy and Bitmine find themselves in a precarious position, but with different underlying risks. Strategy, heavily invested in Bitcoin (BTC), faces significant financial strain. Its strategy relies heavily on debt, including convertible notes and preferred stock (STRC) requiring substantial dividend payments. With its cash reserves dwindling and BTC offering no staking yield for cash flow, Strategy's high leverage makes it vulnerable. A continued price decline could force asset sales to meet obligations, potentially creating a negative feedback loop. Its market value has already fallen sharply. In contrast, Bitmine, an Ethereum (ETH) holder, appears on firmer financial ground. It primarily funds its purchases through equity offerings (like ATM programs), avoiding debt pressure. It also generates income by staking a large portion of its ETH holdings. While not immune to market drops and shareholder dilution concerns, Bitmine maintains more flexibility, recently announcing a new preferred share offering to raise further capital. The core divergence lies in their financing: Bitmine uses equity (investor money), while Strategy uses debt (borrowed money). Consequently, Bitmine currently faces less immediate liquidity pressure than Strategy, which must navigate the dual challenge of servicing debt/dividends and a declining core asset (BTC) price.

marsbit10 мин. назад

Both Suffer Massive Losses Exceeding $90 Billion, Which Is in Greater Peril: Strategy or Bitmine?

marsbit10 мин. назад

Where the AI Bubble Really Is: Which Layer of Players Are Naked

AI Bubble: Where It Really Is and Who's Swimming Naked This analysis dissects the AI industry not as a single entity but as a five-layer pyramid, arguing that bubbles are concentrated in specific tiers, not uniformly distributed. **Key Distinction from the 2000 Dot-com Bubble:** Unlike 2000, where companies had stock prices before revenue, today's leading AI players have massive, contract-backed revenue driving their valuations. Core infrastructure demand is real, with every GPU running at full capacity for paying customers. **The Five-Layer Pyramid & Bubble Assessment:** * **L0 (Fab/Manufacturing) & Top L4 (Leading AI Apps): NO BUBBLE.** Companies like TSMC, NVIDIA, major cloud providers (Microsoft, Google, Meta, Amazon), and top AI labs have real revenues and orders. Supply is tightly constrained by TSMC's disciplined capacity control and physical limits like power/land for data centers, preventing a supply glut. * **L1 (Memory): BATTLEGROUND.** Sky-high HBM margins could signal a new structural cycle or a classic "boom before bust." The oligopoly of three major players may enforce supply discipline, making this a high-stakes bet. * **L2 (Interconnect/Optical Modules): BUBBLE TERRITORY.** Companies like Lumentum and AAOI have seen stock surges (4-10x) far outpacing revenue growth. This hardware segment has lower physical barriers to expansion than fabs, allowing speculation. It mirrors the 2000 bubble's epicenter—optics. * **L3 (Infrastructure/"GPU Landlords"): VULNERABLE.** GPU leasing companies profit from the current compute shortage but own no long-term moat. Their business model relies on a temporary bottleneck that will ease as big tech expands and new tech (e.g., potential space-based data centers) emerges. * **L4 Long Tail (VC-backed Startups): STRONG BUBBLE SIGNALS.** VC funding concentration in AI is twice that of the 1999 peak. Many startups with little revenue use the valuation logic of successful giants to justify their own, creating high risk of a "valuation crunch" when funding dries up. **Critical Risks to Monitor:** 1. **GPU Depreciation & Accounting:** Companies extending the assumed useful life of GPUs artificially boost profits. The true economic life depends on future generational leaps from NVIDIA. 2. **"GPU Credit" & Off-Balance-Sheet Leverage:** Emerging structures where shell companies borrow to buy GPUs and lease them out (with chipmakers sometimes investing) move debt off major balance sheets. This echoes the "vendor financing" of 2000 and the securitization risks of 2008, though currently small-scale. 3. **TSMC Abandoning Caution:** If the primary supply bottleneck (TSMC's conservative capacity planning) breaks, runaway supply could trigger a bust. 4. **Algorithmic Efficiency Breakthrough:** A major leap in software efficiency could drastically reduce the need for raw compute hardware, undermining the investment thesis. **Conclusion:** The AI boom is expensive and has frothy areas, but its core is underpinned by real demand and physical supply constraints. The bubble risk is layered: most present in optical components, GPU leasing, and the long-tail startup ecosystem, while the foundational chip manufacturing and leading application layers remain relatively solid—for now.

marsbit22 мин. назад

Where the AI Bubble Really Is: Which Layer of Players Are Naked

marsbit22 мин. назад

Торговля

Спот
Фьючерсы

Популярные статьи

Как купить S

Добро пожаловать на HTX.com! Мы сделали приобретение Sonic (S) простым и удобным. Следуйте нашему пошаговому руководству и отправляйтесь в свое крипто-путешествие.Шаг 1: Создайте аккаунт на HTXИспользуйте свой адрес электронной почты или номер телефона, чтобы зарегистрироваться и бесплатно создать аккаунт на HTX. Пройдите удобную регистрацию и откройте для себя весь функционал.Создать аккаунтШаг 2: Перейдите в Купить криптовалюту и выберите свой способ оплатыКредитная/Дебетовая Карта: Используйте свою карту Visa или Mastercard для мгновенной покупки Sonic (S).Баланс: Используйте средства с баланса вашего аккаунта HTX для простой торговли.Третьи Лица: Мы добавили популярные способы оплаты, такие как Google Pay и Apple Pay, для повышения удобства.P2P: Торгуйте напрямую с другими пользователями на HTX.Внебиржевая Торговля (OTC): Мы предлагаем индивидуальные услуги и конкурентоспособные обменные курсы для трейдеров.Шаг 3: Хранение Sonic (S)После приобретения вами Sonic (S) храните их в своем аккаунте на HTX. В качестве альтернативы вы можете отправить их куда-либо с помощью перевода в блокчейне или использовать для торговли с другими криптовалютами.Шаг 4: Торговля Sonic (S)С легкостью торгуйте Sonic (S) на спотовом рынке HTX. Просто зайдите в свой аккаунт, выберите торговую пару, совершайте сделки и следите за ними в режиме реального времени. Мы предлагаем удобный интерфейс как для начинающих, так и для опытных трейдеров.

1.4k просмотров всегоОпубликовано 2025.01.15Обновлено 2026.06.02

Как купить S

Sonic: Обновления под руководством Андре Кронье – новая звезда Layer-1 на фоне спада рынка

Он решает проблемы масштабируемости, совместимости между блокчейнами и стимулов для разработчиков с помощью технологических инноваций.

2.3k просмотров всегоОпубликовано 2025.04.09Обновлено 2025.04.09

Sonic: Обновления под руководством Андре Кронье – новая звезда Layer-1 на фоне спада рынка

HTX Learn: Пройдите обучение по "Sonic" и разделите 1000 USDT

HTX Learn — ваш проводник в мир перспективных проектов, и мы запускаем специальное мероприятие "Учитесь и Зарабатывайте", посвящённое этим проектам. Наше новое направление .

1.8k просмотров всегоОпубликовано 2025.04.10Обновлено 2025.04.10

HTX Learn: Пройдите обучение по "Sonic" и разделите 1000 USDT

Обсуждения

Добро пожаловать в Сообщество HTX. Здесь вы сможете быть в курсе последних новостей о развитии платформы и получить доступ к профессиональной аналитической информации о рынке. Мнения пользователей о цене на S (S) представлены ниже.

活动图片