U.S. Treasury Sanctions UK Crypto Exchanges for Iran Sanctions Evasion

TheNewsCryptoОпубликовано 2026-01-31Обновлено 2026-01-31

Введение

The U.S. Treasury, through OFAC, has sanctioned two UK-based crypto exchanges, Zedcex and Zedxion, for allegedly enabling Iran to evade international financial sanctions. This marks the first time OFAC has targeted crypto exchanges for supporting Iran’s financial activities. The exchanges reportedly provided services to sanctioned Iranian entities, facilitating over $389 million in transactions and helping obscure fund flows using digital assets. Seven Iranian individuals, including businessman Babak Zanjani, were also designated. OFAC emphasized that digital assets do not exempt entities from sanctions enforcement and warned crypto platforms to strengthen compliance measures to avoid facilitating illicit finance.

The U.S. Treasury has sanctioned two crypto exchanges in the UK, Zedcex and Zedxion, for allegedly assisting Iran in evading U.S. and international financial sanctions. The sanctions were issued by OFAC, or the Office of Foreign Assets Control, at the U.S. Treasury. This is the first time that OFAC has sanctioned crypto exchanges for their role in Iran’s financial sector.

According to the U.S. Treasury, the two crypto exchanges provided users with access to financial services that supported Iranian individuals and entities who are subject to U.S. sanctions. OFAC further stated that the two crypto exchanges facilitated sanctioned persons in moving their funds through the international financial system using digital assets.

Targeted Individuals and Groups

In addition to the transactions, OFAC designated seven Iranian individuals to the blocklist. Also sanctioned was Babak Zanjani, an Iranian businessman with a past financial conviction record, who was reportedly freed for the sole purpose of facilitating funds for the regime.

According to Treasury officials, the group utilized cryptocurrency infrastructure to obscure the flow of funds and evade traditional banking controls. Blockchain analysis related to the designation reveals that wallet addresses associated with these entities facilitated over $389 million in transactions.

The Treasury emphasized that the use of digital assets does not provide a shield from sanctions enforcement and that crypto-related activities are still subject to US laws and regulations.

Implications for Crypto Compliance

OFAC emphasized that these sanctions are a strong statement about the enforcement of sanctions in the face of evolving financial technology. OFAC warned that crypto platforms that do not follow proper compliance procedures may be facilitating illicit finance and could be subject to enforcement action if they knowingly facilitate sanctioned jurisdictions or persons. The sanctions require U.S. persons to freeze all property and interests in property of the named entities and to prohibit all transactions involving them.

However, Treasury officials emphasized that all exchanges must have strong compliance programs regardless of their base. The actions against Zedcex and Zedxion indicate toughening of U.S. enforcement of evasion facilitated by crypto related to Iran. OFAC’s designation of the exchanges and the individuals involved in the transfer of illicit funds indicates that the digital asset industry is bound by U.S. sanctions laws.

Highlighted Crypto News:

Banking and Crypto Leaders Clash Over CLARITY Act Ahead of White House Policy Talks

TagsCrypto ExchangeIranIran GovernmentOFAC

Связанные с этим вопросы

QWhich UK crypto exchanges were sanctioned by the U.S. Treasury for Iran sanctions evasion?

AZedcex and Zedxion.

QWhich U.S. government agency issued the sanctions against the crypto exchanges?

AThe Office of Foreign Assets Control (OFAC) at the U.S. Treasury.

QWhat was the total value of transactions facilitated by the wallet addresses associated with the sanctioned entities, according to blockchain analysis?

AOver $389 million.

QBesides the crypto exchanges, how many Iranian individuals were designated to the blocklist by OFAC?

ASeven.

QWhat key message did OFAC emphasize regarding digital assets and sanctions enforcement?

AThe use of digital assets does not provide a shield from sanctions enforcement, and crypto-related activities are still subject to U.S. laws and regulations.

Похожее

Crypto is dead, Perps are forever

The crypto industry is shifting from a focus on creating native assets (like altcoins and protocol tokens) to becoming a "global asset pipeline." Native cryptocurrencies, except for Bitcoin, are seen as failing in their value storage and utility promises, with demand driven largely by speculation. Attention and liquidity are now moving toward real-world assets (RWAs) like U.S. stocks, bonds, gold, and oil traded on-chain via perpetual contracts (Perps). Stablecoins like USDT and USDC set the precedent, proving blockchain's core strength is efficient global settlement and transfer, not inventing new monetary systems. Meanwhile, assets like Ethereum and many DeFi tokens struggle as their narratives weaken against tangible traditional assets and the rapid real-world progress of AI. Perpetual contracts have emerged as a pivotal innovation. They simplify trading by offering pure price exposure to any asset, bypassing complexities of ownership, custody, and traditional market hours. Projects like Hyperliquid gained traction by combining CEX-like efficiency with on-chain transparency, capitalizing on post-FTX distrust, macroeconomic volatility, and the surge in demand for 24/7 stock trading. In conclusion, while the era of speculative native "crypto assets" may be over, perpetual contracts persist as the industry's most potent financial instrument—transforming all assets into globally accessible, constantly tradable instruments centered on price speculation.

marsbit7 мин. назад

Crypto is dead, Perps are forever

marsbit7 мин. назад

Tencent, Alibaba, ByteDance in a Battle for the Skill Store

Skill is becoming a key concept in the AI field, essentially serving as a structured "instruction manual" for AI Agents that specifies tool calls, decision logic, and output standards. This allows Agents to execute predefined tasks. As the number of Skills grows, distribution platforms have emerged. Major tech companies are swiftly entering this space. In March, Tencent, Alibaba, and ByteDance launched Skill stores within their respective Agent platforms. Subsequently, players like Zhipu AI, Meituan, and Xiaohongshu joined the fray. This competition for the "Skill store" is fundamentally a battle for the AI-era user entry point; whoever controls distribution controls the users. While ByteDance's Coze has experimented with paid Skills, most platforms offer them for free. The real value lies not in the stores themselves but in using them to attract and retain users within an ecosystem, driving revenue from services like cloud computing, model calls, or advertising. The landscape features three main player types: 1) **Internet giants** (e.g., Alibaba, ByteDance, Tencent, Meituan), leveraging Skills to drive traffic and monetize through their broader ecosystems (cloud services, transactions, ads). 2) **Large model companies** (e.g., Zhipu AI, Moonshot AI), using Skill stores to increase user engagement and monetize model API calls. 3) **Content platforms** (e.g., Xiaohongshu), treating Skills as a new content format to generate traffic and ad revenue. However, transforming Skill stores into a sustainable business faces significant hurdles. Key challenges include: the **difficulty in pricing Skills** due to inconsistent outputs across different models and contexts; **lack of cost transparency** (varying token consumption); **security risks** like Skill poisoning; and the **absence of standardized protocols** for development and evaluation. Unlike standardized mobile apps, Skills are often personalized workflows resistant to uniformity, which hinders the establishment of a reliable review and monetization system akin to the App Store. While there is genuine user demand for paid Skills—particularly in enterprise (e.g., contract review) and certain personal productivity scenarios—current platforms offer developers limited and unpredictable distribution. The future of Skill stores depends on overcoming these standardization, evaluation, and safety challenges to make acquiring a Skill as straightforward as downloading an app. For now, the stores function more as display shelves than robust marketplaces.

marsbit7 мин. назад

Tencent, Alibaba, ByteDance in a Battle for the Skill Store

marsbit7 мин. назад

The Crypto Scene Is Dead, Perpetual Swaps Are Eternal

The crypto industry is undergoing a fundamental shift. The era defined by minting novel, native digital assets (altcoins) is fading. These assets, lacking real-world cash flows or clear value, are losing relevance as attention and capital flow elsewhere. Two powerful external forces are reshaping the space. First, traditional assets like U.S. stocks, bonds, gold, and oil are being tokenized and traded on-chain. Second, the explosive growth of AI, with its tangible products, has overshadowed crypto's once-dominant "future narrative." This marks a critical pivot: crypto is transitioning from being a "factory for new assets" to becoming a "global conduit for existing assets." Its validated utility is not complex financial reinvention but efficient global settlement, transfer, and trading—the original promise of blockchain. Stablecoins like USDT and USDC exemplify this, offering faster dollar movement rather than replacing it. Consequently, native ecosystems like Ethereum face profound challenges. While still crucial infrastructure, ETH struggles to capture value as users interact with Layer 2s or trade traditional assets without needing to hold it. DeFi's grand narrative of rebuilding finance has narrowed to core needs like cheap transfers and deep liquidity. The true breakout innovation is the perpetual contract (Perp). It brilliantly bypasses the complexities of direct asset ownership (custody, compliance, dividends) by creating pure price exposure. Users can speculate on the price movement of *any* asset—NVIDIA, gold, oil—24/7, globally, and with leverage. This "price casino" model, while risky and ethically fraught, delivers unmatched liquidity and accessibility. Projects like Hyperliquid succeeded not by inventing new mechanics but by perfecting the timing and execution of this model. Key drivers included making on-chain Perps feel like centralized exchanges, post-FTX trust migration towards transparency, and rising demand to trade macro assets and equities round-the-clock. In conclusion, the crypto world's most enduring successes are the dollar (via stablecoins), Bitcoin, and trading. Its new frontier is not creating alternative assets but providing a seamless, perpetual trading layer—a new API—for the world's existing financial system. The age of native altcoins is over; the age of perpetual synthetic exposure has begun.

Odaily星球日报16 мин. назад

The Crypto Scene Is Dead, Perpetual Swaps Are Eternal

Odaily星球日报16 мин. назад

After Marvell's 32% Surge, the Chinese Chip Family Behind It Emerges

The stock price of Marvell Technology surged 32.5% on June 2nd, driven by NVIDIA CEO Jensen Huang highlighting its custom ASICs and optical interconnects as core to AI data center architecture. This event brought attention to the Chinese semiconductor family behind Marvell: the Dai siblings. The story centers on three siblings, all UC Berkeley graduates, whose three-decade entrepreneurial journey aligns with major semiconductor industry shifts. In 1995, youngest sister Dai Wei Li co-founded Marvell with her husband Sehat Sutardja and his brother, focusing on storage controllers. Eldest brother Dai Wei Min founded EDA company Ultima, later sold to Cadence, and later founded VeriSilicon (芯原) in China, becoming a leading semiconductor IP provider. Second brother Dai Wei Jin co-founded EDA firm Silicon Perspective (sold to Cadence) and GPU IP company Vivante, later acquired by VeriSilicon. The combined "Dai-Sutardja" family network extends beyond Marvell. Their ventures and investments form a comprehensive ecosystem for the post-Moore's Law, chiplet era. Key holdings include: Dream Big Semiconductor (AI SuperNICs, acquired by Arm), Alphawave (high-speed SerDes IP, acquired by Qualcomm), and Silicon Box (a chiplet advanced packaging foundry). VeriSilicon itself thrives on the AI ASIC and IP boom in China. Collectively, the family's AI infrastructure-related portfolio is estimated at over $22 billion. Their strategy represents a distinct path: building critical components for open standards and key manufacturing capacity in the chiplet era, rather than pursuing standalone AI chip dominance. While this path may not create the next NVIDIA, it has enabled repeated successful exits and sustained influence within the global semiconductor industry.

marsbit1 ч. назад

After Marvell's 32% Surge, the Chinese Chip Family Behind It Emerges

marsbit1 ч. назад

Торговля

Спот
Фьючерсы
活动图片