US Stock Storage Fever Spreads to Crypto for the Third Time, VVV Leads 'AI Data Infrastructure' Sector Gains

marsbitОпубликовано 2026-05-11Обновлено 2026-05-11

Введение

U.S. stock storage rally spreads to crypto for the third time, with VVV leading the 'AI data infrastructure' sector. On May 11, Venice Token (VVV) surged 17.63% with $65.05M volume, followed by Chainbase, SQD, and Vana, rising 5-8%. This mirrors gains in U.S. storage stocks like SanDisk and Micron. The crypto AI narrative is shifting. The initial wave (May 6-7) saw pure storage tokens like FIL, AR, and STORJ rise, driven by spillover from the U.S. storage chip boom. The second wave saw broader DePIN sector gains. The current third wave has moved beyond pure storage to broader "AI infrastructure." VVV, a decentralized AI inference platform, leads due to its own catalysts like a token burn mechanism and partnership news, alongside the broader market trend. Notably, traditional storage tokens showed minimal gains (<4%) on May 11, indicating the rally is becoming more selective, focusing on projects with specific narratives like AI data or compute. The pattern suggests the sector rally may be in a later stage, with sustainability depending on whether the U.S. storage chip boom continues.

Author: Claude, Shenchao TechFlow

Shenchao Insight: The capital spillover effect of the US stock market's storage chip "super cycle" is recurring in the crypto market with a frequency of three times a week. On May 11, the 'AI Data Infrastructure' sector token Venice Token (VVV) surged 17.63% in a single day, leading the gains with a trading volume of $65.05 million; Chainbase, SQD, and Vana followed with gains between 5% and 8%. Meanwhile, the fuel hasn't died down on the US stock end. On May 8, SanDisk skyrocketed 16.60%, Micron Technology rose 15.49%, pushing its market cap past $842.2 billion, and accumulated a nearly 38% gain for the week. From FIL breaking out of its range on May 6, to IO soaring 69% in a single day on May 7, and VVV taking the baton this Monday, the market trend has extended from single storage leaders to the entire "AI Data + Inference Compute" infrastructure sector.

The crypto AI sector is up again today, but the narrative is quietly shifting.

If the story a week ago was "the three major storage leaders FIL, AR, and STORJ rising in tandem with US stocks SanDisk and Micron," then entering this week, the main market trend has spread from pure storage to a broader "AI infrastructure": AI inference compute (VVV), on-chain data networks (Chainbase), data indexing (SQD), user data DAOs (Vana) are taking turns leading the charge. However, the driving source behind all this remains unchanged: the still-burning storage chip frenzy in US stocks.

First Wave of Transmission: May 6, FIL/AR/STORJ Triple Rise

The first instance of follow-on gains in the crypto market occurred on May 6.

According to a BanklessTimes report on May 6, Filecoin (FIL) opened at $0.975 that day, reaching an intraday high of $1.161 and closing at $1.122, marking a single-day gain of 15.08%, breaking out of a sideways consolidation range that had lasted over three months since early February. FIL's spot trading volume for the day reached $372 million, a sharp 260.22% increase from the previous day; futures trading volume hit $816 million, up 213.63% sequentially. In the same sector, Storj gained 40% and Arweave rose 20% for the day.

Chinese crypto information channel Followin that day forwarded analyst Ao Ying's viewpoint, directly attributing this round of gains to capital spillover from US stock storage trading, stating "funds from equity market storage trading are repricing FIL." The logic chain is that AI infrastructure's consumption of storage capacity has already booked capacity through 2026; this supply-demand logic first gets priced in the US stock market, then transmits to crypto tokens pegged as "on-chain storage."

Second Wave Continuation: May 7, IO Soars 69% in a Day, DePIN Sector Follows Suit and Spreads

The market movement didn't stop after a single day. According to TradingView data cited by CoinMarketCap CMC AI, FIL rose another 15.5% on May 7, breaking through the key resistance level of $1.08 that it had failed to breach since February.

The sector's diffusion was even more dramatic, with IO surging 69% and STORJ rising another 30% on the same day. The second wave of gains indicates this is no longer a localized rally of "leaders rising alone while the long tail remains calm," but rather the DePIN (Decentralized Physical Infrastructure Networks) sector being systematically repriced by the market.

However, CoinMarketCap CMC AI also cited a bearish analysis on the same day, labeling FIL a "dead asset," citing the token's cumulative decline of 99% from its all-time high. This contradiction precisely reflects the current rift in the crypto storage sector: short-term beta-driven gains from capital spillover coexist with medium-to-long-term skepticism about business models.

Third Wave Diffusion: May 11, VVV Leads 'AI Data + Inference Compute' Gains

This Monday's rally saw the main theme shift from "pure storage" to broader "AI infrastructure."

Data shows VVV's current price is $17.83, with a market cap of $821 million and a single-day trading volume of $65.05 million, 5.7 times that of the second-ranked project in the sector, Chainbase. Ranks two through four in the sector were Chainbase (C, +8.25%), SQD (+5.65%), and Vana (VANA, +5.50%), with market caps ranging between $14 million and $54 million.

However, VVV is not strictly a storage token. According to a January 2025 report by The Block and Venice's official documentation, VVV is the native token of Venice, a decentralized AI inference platform founded by Erik Voorhees, positioned to "provide private, uncensorable inference services for AI Agents." Staking VVV allows users to proportionally share in the compute power revenue from the Venice API, without needing to pay per request.

VVV's leading gains have their own fundamental catalysts. According to a Phemex analysis on April 7, Venice permanently reduced its annual token inflation by 25% on February 10, 2026 (from 80 million to 60 million). On March 2, it surged 20% in a single day after OpenClaw announced selecting Venice as its primary inference model supplier. According to Messari data, Venice officially launched a "programmatic VVV buyback and burn" mechanism on April 15, where every Venice Pro subscription triggers a $1 on-chain token buyback and burn. CMC AI data shows that as of March, approximately 33 million VVV (42% of the initial supply) had been burned.

At this point, the crypto AI sector's story can be broken into two layers: the external factor is the spillover from the US stock storage frenzy, while the internal factor is that tokens like VVV, which have real deflation mechanisms and concrete partnership developments, are catalyzing themselves. The tokens that have delivered outsized gains in this rally almost all possess both layers of logic.

Four Genuine Storage Tokens Gained Less Than 4% Today

It's worth noting that the genuine storage projects are not among the top gainers on today's Surf list. Four traditional decentralized storage projects—AIOZ Network (+3.22%), Chia (+3.15%), Fluence (+2.79%), and Impossible Cloud Network (+1.33%)—all gained less than 4%. Last week's leaders, FIL, AR, and STORJ, don't even appear on this list.

This structural difference signals that the pure "storage beta transmission" rally might have entered its second stage. The first stage (May 6-7) was the catch-up rally of storage leaders. The second stage (this week) sees tokens with their own narrative catalysts taking the baton: VVV has its buy-and-burn mechanism, Chainbase carries the "AI data" label, while SQD and Vana belong to the "data network" concept. Capital is picking "tokens with a story" within the sector, rather than indiscriminately deploying funds.

Historically, this three-phase pattern of "leader catch-up → concept diffusion → capital cherry-picking" often signifies that a sector rally has entered its latter half. Future sustainability will depend on whether the US stock storage chip frenzy can maintain momentum. Based on the current supply-demand landscape of DRAM contract prices rising 58% to 63% and HBM capacity sold out through 2026, the story, at least from a fundamental perspective, is not over yet.

Связанные с этим вопросы

QWhat are the three major phases of the 'storage hype' spillover from the U.S. stock market into the crypto market as described in the article?

AThe three phases are: 1) Initial spillover on May 6th with leading storage tokens like FIL, AR, and STORJ rising. 2) Continuation and diffusion on May 7th, extending to the broader DePIN/AI infrastructure sector, highlighted by IO's surge. 3) Further diffusion on May 11th, where the rally spread from pure storage to 'AI data + inference compute' infrastructure, led by VVV and followed by projects like Chainbase, SQD, and Vana.

QWhy did VVV (Venice Token) experience a significant price increase on May 11th, according to the article?

AVVV's surge was driven by a combination of external and internal factors. Externally, it benefited from the ongoing spillover effect from the U.S. stock market's storage chip rally. Internally, it had specific fundamental catalysts: a permanent 25% reduction in annual token inflation in February 2026, a partnership announcement with OpenClaw in March that boosted its price, and the launch of a 'programmatic VVV buyback and burn' mechanism on April 15th, where every Venice Pro subscription triggers a $1 token buyback and burn.

QWhat key difference does the article highlight between the market performance on May 11th and the initial rallies on May 6th-7th?

AOn May 11th, the rally shifted from purely 'storage' tokens (like FIL, AR, STORJ) to a broader 'AI infrastructure' theme, including AI inference compute (VVV), on-chain data networks (Chainbase), data indexing (SQD), and user data DAOs (Vana). In contrast, the initial rallies on May 6th-7th were more focused on traditional decentralized storage龙头 tokens. Furthermore, on May 11th, actual storage projects like AIOZ Network and Chia saw minimal gains (<4%), indicating资金 was becoming more selective, focusing on projects with stronger narratives beyond just the storage beta.

QWhat is the primary external driver identified for the rallies in the crypto AI/data infrastructure sector throughout the discussed period?

AThe primary external driver is the capital spillover from the 'super cycle' boom in U.S. stock market storage chip companies, specifically the massive gains seen in stocks like美光科技 (Micron) and闪迪 (SanDisk). The article states that the logic is that AI infrastructure's huge demand for storage capacity, which has already driven up prices and valuations in traditional markets, is now being repriced into crypto tokens that represent 'on-chain storage' and related AI data infrastructure.

QAccording to the article, what does the current market structure (with selective gains in narrative-driven tokens) suggest about the stage of the sector's rally?

AThe article suggests that the market structure, moving from 'leader catch-up' to 'concept diffusion' and then to 'capital picking specific stories,' typically indicates the sector rally is entering its later stages. The sustainability from this point forward will depend more on whether the U.S. stock market storage hype continues and on the individual fundamentals of the crypto projects, rather than on broad, indiscriminate buying across the entire sector.

Похожее

Seeking Alpha's Hot Article: Why Might the U.S. Stock Market Crash in June?

In a recent Seeking Alpha article, financial professor and analyst Damir Tokic argues that the US stock market may be poised for a significant crash in June 2026. The core thesis centers on a "mega-bubble" in equities, particularly within the technology sector, which has driven the S&P 500 to near-record valuations, with a Shiller P/E ratio exceeding 40—a level comparable to the 2000 dot-com bubble. Tokic identifies two primary catalysts for a potential collapse. First, he points to unsustainable market exuberance fueled by what he terms the "Trump Stimulus"—massive AI capital expenditure by tech giants, which he believes is politically driven and cannot last. Second, and more urgently, he highlights the escalating Iran war as a critical threat. The ongoing closure of the Strait of Hormuz has created a severe global energy supply crunch. Strategic petroleum reserves are projected to hit critically low operational levels by June, potentially causing oil prices to spike above $200 per barrel and triggering a severe, supply-driven inflationary shock. This scenario, Tokic warns, would force the Federal Reserve's hand. Despite currently maintaining a dovish bias, the Fed would likely be compelled to officially pivot to a hawkish stance at its June FOMC meeting to combat soaring inflation and bond yields. He contends that such a shift—or even a failure to act, which would destroy Fed credibility—could be the trigger that punctures the market bubble. The resulting downturn, he concludes, could rival the bear markets of 2000 and 2008, advising investors to prepare for a major correction.

marsbit14 мин. назад

Seeking Alpha's Hot Article: Why Might the U.S. Stock Market Crash in June?

marsbit14 мин. назад

AI PC Battle: Bet on the Toll Booth, Not the Camp

**Title:** The AI PC Battle: Don't Bet on Sides, Bet on the Tollbooth **Summary:** The AI PC competition is moving beyond simple "x86 vs. Arm" narratives. The core investment thesis should focus on identifying which players can sustain margins, cash flow, and pricing power throughout the upgrade cycle, rather than backing a particular architecture. The opportunity is analyzed in three layers: 1. **The Advanced Foundry Tollbooth:** TSMC is positioned to collect "tolls" regardless of which chip designer wins, due to its dominant ~70% share in advanced semiconductor manufacturing, which is essential for high-end AI PC chips. 2. **Compute & Platform Spillover:** AMD represents an offensive in the x86 CPU+GPU space, while NVIDIA leverages its GPU and CUDA software stack dominance. Both benefit from the demand for increased local AI compute. 3. **Architecture Diffusion & Turnaround Plays:** ARM and Intel offer potential for significant upside (elasticity), but investments here require stricter discipline due to higher execution risks and competitive challenges. The industry is transitioning from concept to shipment validation. While short-term forecasts for AI PC adoption have been revised down slightly due to tariffs and procurement delays, the long-term trend towards AI becoming a standard PC feature remains intact. The key driver for upgrade cycles will be whether compelling enterprise applications (e.g., privacy-sensitive computing, low-latency inference) emerge beyond consumer-focused features like meeting summarization. Investment strategy should prioritize companies with platform-level advantages and recurring revenue streams. TSMC offers high certainty as the foundational tollbooth. AMD presents a strong offensive play within the established ecosystem. ARM and Intel are higher-risk, higher-potential-reward turnaround bets. The report cautions against chasing short-term hype and emphasizes a disciplined, long-term approach focused on buying ecosystem strength and cash-flow certainty after market enthusiasm subsides. **Key Risks:** Underwhelming AI PC applications slowing upgrade cycles; slow improvement in Windows on Arm compatibility; macro/tariff impacts on PC demand; potential advanced node supply-demand mismatches affecting TSMC; high overall AI sector valuations making stocks vulnerable to a risk-off shift in markets.

marsbit28 мин. назад

AI PC Battle: Bet on the Toll Booth, Not the Camp

marsbit28 мин. назад

Ten-Thousand-Word Analysis: From $10 to $290, MRVL Wins the Entire AI Era by 'Not Making GPUs'

Marvell Technology's stock price surged from under $10 in 2016 to a record $290 in June 2026, fueled not by making GPUs, but by dominating AI infrastructure connectivity. This analysis argues the market misvalues MRVL as merely a smaller Broadcom in custom AI chips, overlooking its true, unique position. Marvell's core strength lies in enabling high-speed data flow for AI clusters through three interconnected businesses. First, it holds a commanding ~70% market share in high-speed optical DSPs (essential for data center light modules), a deep-moat business with accelerating growth. Second, its custom AI chip design business serves hyperscalers like AWS, Microsoft, and Google, with a significant revenue pipeline despite lower margins. Third, stable cash flows come from Ethernet switch chips and enterprise storage controllers. Together, they form a full-stack "AI data movement" platform. CEO Matt Murphy's transformative leadership since 2016, involving strategic divestments, key acquisitions (like Inphi for optical DSPs), and securing long-term agreements with major cloud providers, repositioned the company. A pivotal $2 billion strategic investment from NVIDIA in 2026 underscored Marvell's critical role in the AI ecosystem, particularly through collaborations like NVLink Fusion. While Marvell faces risks—including client concentration (losing the Amazon Trainium3 design), lower-margin business mix, competitive threats, insider selling, and complex supply chains—its fundamentals remain strong. The optical interconnect moat is widening with the acquisition of Celestial AI (photonics fabric), and financial metrics show accelerating revenue growth and operating leverage. With a PEG ratio suggesting undervaluation relative to its growth, the thesis is that the market undervalues Marvell's monopolistic position in AI "plumbing" while overemphasizing its competitive custom chip segment. The story transcends investing, symbolizing how in any complex system—from the internet to AI—the value of "connection" ultimately surpasses that of individual "nodes."

marsbit58 мин. назад

Ten-Thousand-Word Analysis: From $10 to $290, MRVL Wins the Entire AI Era by 'Not Making GPUs'

marsbit58 мин. назад

AI Relay Stations Spark Heated Debate on Zhihu: Behind Cheap Tokens, What Are Users Really Worried About?

A discussion on Zhihu about "AI relay stations" shifted the niche developer topic of "cheap tokens" into broader user awareness. Users moved beyond simply questioning the legitimacy of these services to focus on practical concerns: Where do cheap tokens truly come from? Is the model being accessed the real one? Can relay stations see prompts, code, and API keys? For occasional users, are the risks worth it? The core debate centered less on price and more on trust. A primary worry is model authenticity—the risk of "model swapping," where users paying for a premium model might be routed to a cheaper one, creating an information asymmetry. Others argued that cost comparisons matter; while cheaper than official pay-as-you-go APIs, relay stations may not be the lowest-cost option versus subscriptions, domestic models, or free tiers, making user needs assessment crucial. Speculation about token sources ranged from legitimate bulk discounts to gray-area methods like account sharing or exploiting regional pricing. This opacity makes risk assessment difficult for users. Data security emerged as a critical concern, especially for enterprise use. When processing sensitive information like code, contracts, or client data, the inability to verify a relay station's data handling, retention, or access policies poses significant compliance and confidentiality risks. The evolving consensus suggests relay stations can be used cautiously for low-sensitivity, disposable tasks (e.g., summarizing public info, simple translation). However, they should not be the default for sensitive, professional, or production workflows involving proprietary data, Agents, or automated systems. Recommendations include avoiding large prepayments, not relying on a single service, using test prompts to monitor quality, anonymizing data where possible, and keeping official channels as backups. Ultimately, the discussion framed tokens not just as a billing unit but as a measure of real cost encompassing price, model integrity, data security, and service stability. The popularity of relay stations highlights user demand for affordable access, but the debate underscores a key trade-off: the savings from cheap tokens may come at the price of trust, transparency, and control over one's data and AI experience.

marsbit1 ч. назад

AI Relay Stations Spark Heated Debate on Zhihu: Behind Cheap Tokens, What Are Users Really Worried About?

marsbit1 ч. назад

Торговля

Спот
Фьючерсы
活动图片