Trump’s WLFI Is About to Become a US Bank — Biggest Test Case for Crypto and Accountability

ccn.comОпубликовано 2026-01-08Обновлено 2026-01-08

Введение

Trump-affiliated World Liberty Financial (WLFI) has applied for a U.S. national trust bank charter through its subsidiary WLTC Holdings LLC. If approved by the Office of the Comptroller of the Currency (OCC), the entity would operate as a federally regulated trust bank focused on issuing and redeeming its USD1 stablecoin, converting other major stablecoins, and providing custody services. This move aims to integrate crypto with traditional finance under federal oversight. WLFI’s application has intensified political tensions, with Democrats introducing bills to prevent public officials from profiting from crypto ventures, citing conflicts of interest. Critics also raise concerns over WLFI’s alleged ties to sanctioned entities and the Trump family’s substantial profits from the project. Despite controversies, WLFI has grown rapidly, raising $550 million in token sales and securing a $2 billion investment from Abu Dhabi. The approval process will test the regulatory landscape for crypto and political accountability.

Key Takeaways

  • Trump-affiliated WLFI applied for an OCC trust bank charter to issue/custody USD1 under federal rules.
  • USD1 has become one of the fastest-growing stablecoins through partnerships.
  • WLFI has been involved in a number of controversies and scandals since its launch.

President Donald Trump-backed World Liberty Financial (WLFI), a decentralized finance (DeFi) protocol, has filed for a United States national trust bank charter.

This marks a significant step by WLFI toward integrating with traditional finance and stress testing for the cryptocurrency and U.S. banking sectors, given the project’s affinity with the President.

Is WLFI Becoming a U.S. Bank?

Yes, WLFI is actively pursuing a banking charter, but it’s not aiming for a full-service commercial bank.

On Jan. 7, WLFI announced that its subsidiary, WLTC Holdings LLC, submitted a de novo application to the Office of the Comptroller of the Currency (OCC) for a national trust bank charter.

The proposed entity, World Liberty Trust Company (WLTC), would focus on stablecoin operations, including:

  • Issuing and redeeming USD1.
  • Offering conversions from other major stablecoins (e.g., USDT, USDC) to USD1.
  • Providing custody services for fiat currencies and stablecoins.
  • Managing reserves backing USD1.

The proposed banking charter, if approved, would enable WLFI to operate under federal oversight, thereby enhancing its legitimacy and facilitating direct integration with the U.S. financial infrastructure.

This approval could position WLFI as a “digital-first bank” for crypto services, initially targeting institutional clients and later expanding to retail.

The Political Stress Test

WLFI is not the only crypto company eyeing a banking charter in the U.S. after the regulatory nod for crypto companies to enter the banking industry.

Other crypto firms like Ripple and Kraken have pursued similar charters. However, WLFI’s political connections could expedite or complicate the process.

If approved, it could pressure legacy banks and accelerate the adoption of crypto in critical sectors.

WLFI’s bank bid exemplifies the clash between crypto innovation and political oversight, amplified by Trump’s dual role as president and beneficiary.

Proponents view it as a win for U.S. crypto leadership, aligning with Trump’s pro-crypto stance. Critics, primarily Democrats, view it as self-dealing, where policy favors personal gain.

In May 2025, Rep. Stephen Lynch introduced the “Stop TRUMP in Crypto Act,” barring presidents, VPs, Congress members, and families from owning/controlling digital assets or trading with non-public info.

Similar bills, such as the “End Crypto Corruption Act” and amendments to stablecoin legislation aimed at prohibiting officials from profiting, were blocked by Republicans.

WLFI’s banking charter ambition has intensified political tensions, with Democrats pushing legislation to curb Trump’s crypto ventures amid allegations of conflicts of interest and national security risks.

The political showdown tests the future of crypto’s regulation. Trump’s deregulation contrasts with Democratic calls for transparency.

This could set precedents for how political figures engage with crypto, potentially influencing global adoption or triggering stricter U.S. rules.

WLFI Rapid Growth and Controversies

WLFI and USD1 are gaining prominence rapidly, driven by aggressive partnerships, exchange listings, and regulatory pursuits, though scandals have cast shadows on their trajectory.

The DeFi project run by Trump’s family members was launched in 2024. It raised $550 million in token sales by mid-2025.

The project also saw $2 billion in investment from Abu Dhabi. Its stablecoin launch turned out to be a success with billions in volume and market cap just weeks after launch.

However, the rapid rise came with its own share of controversies. Primary concerns include conflicts of interest, with reports indicating that the Trump family has profited hundreds of millions from token sales and holdings.

Allegations have surfaced of token sales linked to sanctioned entities. This includes connections to North Korean hackers and Russian-linked firms, raising national security fears.

However, WLFI and the administration have denied wrongdoing.

Other issues involve blacklisting large investors amid allegations of manipulation and broader concerns about foreign investments in the project.

Top Trending Crypto Articles
  • Best Exchanges Check Out Our Recommended Exchanges Here
  • Buy Crypto Fast How To Buy Crypto with a Credit Card Now
  • Safe Crypto Gambling See Our Picks for the Best Crypto Gambling Sites

Связанные с этим вопросы

QWhat type of bank charter is WLFI applying for and what is its primary focus?

AWLFI is applying for a national trust bank charter through its subsidiary WLTC Holdings LLC. The primary focus of the proposed entity, World Liberty Trust Company (WLTC), would be stablecoin operations, including issuing and redeeming USD1, converting other major stablecoins to USD1, providing custody services for fiat and stablecoins, and managing the reserves backing USD1.

QHow have WLFI and its stablecoin USD1 achieved rapid growth?

AWLFI and USD1 achieved rapid growth through aggressive partnerships, exchange listings, and regulatory pursuits. The project raised $550 million in token sales by mid-2025 and secured a $2 billion investment from Abu Dhabi. Its stablecoin launch was successful, achieving billions in trading volume and market capitalization within weeks.

QWhat are the main political controversies surrounding WLFI's banking charter application?

AThe main political controversy stems from WLFI's affiliation with former President Donald Trump and his family, who have reportedly profited hundreds of millions from the project. Democrats have introduced legislation like the 'Stop TRUMP in Crypto Act' to bar officials from owning digital assets, citing conflicts of interest and potential self-dealing. Critics also allege national security risks due to connections with sanctioned entities.

QWhat specific allegations of misconduct have been made against WLFI?

AWLFI has faced allegations of conflicts of interest, with the Trump family profiting from token sales. There have also been allegations of token sales linked to sanctioned entities, including connections to North Korean hackers and Russian-linked firms, raising national security concerns. Additionally, the project has been accused of blacklisting large investors amid allegations of manipulation.

QHow does WLFI's pursuit of a banking charter fit into the broader context of crypto regulation in the U.S.?

AWLFI's application is part of a broader trend of crypto firms like Ripple and Kraken seeking banking charters following regulatory nods for crypto companies to enter the banking industry. However, WLFI's political connections have intensified the debate, creating a clash between crypto innovation and political oversight. The outcome could set precedents for how political figures engage with crypto and influence future U.S. crypto regulation, balancing between Trump's pro-crypto, deregulatory stance and Democratic calls for transparency and stricter rules.

Похожее

GitHub, Transfixed by AI

On the night of February 9th, GitHub suffered a major outage caused by a simple configuration change—reducing a cache refresh interval from 12 to 2 hours—that triggered a cascade of failures. This was not an isolated event, but part of a broader pattern. In early 2026, GitHub experienced at least 8 major incidents, failing to meet its promised 99.9% availability. These outages stemmed from structural issues: explosive growth in load, tight service coupling, and insufficient protection against abnormal traffic. This unprecedented load is driven by AI Agents. In 2025, GitHub handled ~1 billion commits. By 2026, weekly commits reached 275 million, projecting to ~14 billion for the year—a 14x increase. AI tools like Claude Code now contribute 4.5% of all public repository commits, with weekly submissions surging 25x in just three months. AI-generated pull requests jumped from 4 million to 17 million per month in half a year. Unlike human developers, AI Agents work continuously, generating commits at a scale that overwhelms infrastructure designed for human rhythms. The surge also shattered GitHub's business model. Copilot's flat-rate pricing, based on assisting human developers, became unsustainable as Agentic AI sessions consumed resources worth hundreds of dollars for a few dollars in fees. In response, GitHub imposed usage limits and, by June 1st, shifted to a pay-per-use "AI Credits" system. Facing this new reality, GitHub realized a 10x scaling plan was insufficient. It announced a need to *redesign* its architecture for 30x current scale—decoupling services, adding fault isolation, and improving change management to prevent cascading failures. Other platforms like Stripe and AWS are facing similar challenges with AI Agents. Fundamentally, GitHub is transitioning from a human collaboration platform to an "exhaust pipe" for automated AI workflows. Its detailed post-mortem reports aim to maintain trust during this turbulent rebuild. The February outage was not just a technical glitch, but a signal of the software industry's entry into a new, AI-driven era.

marsbit14 мин. назад

GitHub, Transfixed by AI

marsbit14 мин. назад

Both Suffer Massive Losses Exceeding $90 Billion, Which Is in Greater Peril: Strategy or Bitmine?

Facing massive paper losses exceeding $90 billion each amidst a sharp market downturn, "Digital Asset Treasury" (DAT) giants Strategy and Bitmine find themselves in a precarious position, but with different underlying risks. Strategy, heavily invested in Bitcoin (BTC), faces significant financial strain. Its strategy relies heavily on debt, including convertible notes and preferred stock (STRC) requiring substantial dividend payments. With its cash reserves dwindling and BTC offering no staking yield for cash flow, Strategy's high leverage makes it vulnerable. A continued price decline could force asset sales to meet obligations, potentially creating a negative feedback loop. Its market value has already fallen sharply. In contrast, Bitmine, an Ethereum (ETH) holder, appears on firmer financial ground. It primarily funds its purchases through equity offerings (like ATM programs), avoiding debt pressure. It also generates income by staking a large portion of its ETH holdings. While not immune to market drops and shareholder dilution concerns, Bitmine maintains more flexibility, recently announcing a new preferred share offering to raise further capital. The core divergence lies in their financing: Bitmine uses equity (investor money), while Strategy uses debt (borrowed money). Consequently, Bitmine currently faces less immediate liquidity pressure than Strategy, which must navigate the dual challenge of servicing debt/dividends and a declining core asset (BTC) price.

marsbit21 мин. назад

Both Suffer Massive Losses Exceeding $90 Billion, Which Is in Greater Peril: Strategy or Bitmine?

marsbit21 мин. назад

Where the AI Bubble Really Is: Which Layer of Players Are Naked

AI Bubble: Where It Really Is and Who's Swimming Naked This analysis dissects the AI industry not as a single entity but as a five-layer pyramid, arguing that bubbles are concentrated in specific tiers, not uniformly distributed. **Key Distinction from the 2000 Dot-com Bubble:** Unlike 2000, where companies had stock prices before revenue, today's leading AI players have massive, contract-backed revenue driving their valuations. Core infrastructure demand is real, with every GPU running at full capacity for paying customers. **The Five-Layer Pyramid & Bubble Assessment:** * **L0 (Fab/Manufacturing) & Top L4 (Leading AI Apps): NO BUBBLE.** Companies like TSMC, NVIDIA, major cloud providers (Microsoft, Google, Meta, Amazon), and top AI labs have real revenues and orders. Supply is tightly constrained by TSMC's disciplined capacity control and physical limits like power/land for data centers, preventing a supply glut. * **L1 (Memory): BATTLEGROUND.** Sky-high HBM margins could signal a new structural cycle or a classic "boom before bust." The oligopoly of three major players may enforce supply discipline, making this a high-stakes bet. * **L2 (Interconnect/Optical Modules): BUBBLE TERRITORY.** Companies like Lumentum and AAOI have seen stock surges (4-10x) far outpacing revenue growth. This hardware segment has lower physical barriers to expansion than fabs, allowing speculation. It mirrors the 2000 bubble's epicenter—optics. * **L3 (Infrastructure/"GPU Landlords"): VULNERABLE.** GPU leasing companies profit from the current compute shortage but own no long-term moat. Their business model relies on a temporary bottleneck that will ease as big tech expands and new tech (e.g., potential space-based data centers) emerges. * **L4 Long Tail (VC-backed Startups): STRONG BUBBLE SIGNALS.** VC funding concentration in AI is twice that of the 1999 peak. Many startups with little revenue use the valuation logic of successful giants to justify their own, creating high risk of a "valuation crunch" when funding dries up. **Critical Risks to Monitor:** 1. **GPU Depreciation & Accounting:** Companies extending the assumed useful life of GPUs artificially boost profits. The true economic life depends on future generational leaps from NVIDIA. 2. **"GPU Credit" & Off-Balance-Sheet Leverage:** Emerging structures where shell companies borrow to buy GPUs and lease them out (with chipmakers sometimes investing) move debt off major balance sheets. This echoes the "vendor financing" of 2000 and the securitization risks of 2008, though currently small-scale. 3. **TSMC Abandoning Caution:** If the primary supply bottleneck (TSMC's conservative capacity planning) breaks, runaway supply could trigger a bust. 4. **Algorithmic Efficiency Breakthrough:** A major leap in software efficiency could drastically reduce the need for raw compute hardware, undermining the investment thesis. **Conclusion:** The AI boom is expensive and has frothy areas, but its core is underpinned by real demand and physical supply constraints. The bubble risk is layered: most present in optical components, GPU leasing, and the long-tail startup ecosystem, while the foundational chip manufacturing and leading application layers remain relatively solid—for now.

marsbit34 мин. назад

Where the AI Bubble Really Is: Which Layer of Players Are Naked

marsbit34 мин. назад

Торговля

Спот
Фьючерсы

Популярные статьи

Как купить S

Добро пожаловать на HTX.com! Мы сделали приобретение Sonic (S) простым и удобным. Следуйте нашему пошаговому руководству и отправляйтесь в свое крипто-путешествие.Шаг 1: Создайте аккаунт на HTXИспользуйте свой адрес электронной почты или номер телефона, чтобы зарегистрироваться и бесплатно создать аккаунт на HTX. Пройдите удобную регистрацию и откройте для себя весь функционал.Создать аккаунтШаг 2: Перейдите в Купить криптовалюту и выберите свой способ оплатыКредитная/Дебетовая Карта: Используйте свою карту Visa или Mastercard для мгновенной покупки Sonic (S).Баланс: Используйте средства с баланса вашего аккаунта HTX для простой торговли.Третьи Лица: Мы добавили популярные способы оплаты, такие как Google Pay и Apple Pay, для повышения удобства.P2P: Торгуйте напрямую с другими пользователями на HTX.Внебиржевая Торговля (OTC): Мы предлагаем индивидуальные услуги и конкурентоспособные обменные курсы для трейдеров.Шаг 3: Хранение Sonic (S)После приобретения вами Sonic (S) храните их в своем аккаунте на HTX. В качестве альтернативы вы можете отправить их куда-либо с помощью перевода в блокчейне или использовать для торговли с другими криптовалютами.Шаг 4: Торговля Sonic (S)С легкостью торгуйте Sonic (S) на спотовом рынке HTX. Просто зайдите в свой аккаунт, выберите торговую пару, совершайте сделки и следите за ними в режиме реального времени. Мы предлагаем удобный интерфейс как для начинающих, так и для опытных трейдеров.

1.4k просмотров всегоОпубликовано 2025.01.15Обновлено 2026.06.02

Как купить S

Sonic: Обновления под руководством Андре Кронье – новая звезда Layer-1 на фоне спада рынка

Он решает проблемы масштабируемости, совместимости между блокчейнами и стимулов для разработчиков с помощью технологических инноваций.

2.3k просмотров всегоОпубликовано 2025.04.09Обновлено 2025.04.09

Sonic: Обновления под руководством Андре Кронье – новая звезда Layer-1 на фоне спада рынка

HTX Learn: Пройдите обучение по "Sonic" и разделите 1000 USDT

HTX Learn — ваш проводник в мир перспективных проектов, и мы запускаем специальное мероприятие "Учитесь и Зарабатывайте", посвящённое этим проектам. Наше новое направление .

1.8k просмотров всегоОпубликовано 2025.04.10Обновлено 2025.04.10

HTX Learn: Пройдите обучение по "Sonic" и разделите 1000 USDT

Обсуждения

Добро пожаловать в Сообщество HTX. Здесь вы сможете быть в курсе последних новостей о развитии платформы и получить доступ к профессиональной аналитической информации о рынке. Мнения пользователей о цене на S (S) представлены ниже.

活动图片