The Wind of 'Proactive' AI Blows into Silicon Valley: Hark Secures $700 Million in Funding

marsbitОпубликовано 2026-05-28Обновлено 2026-05-28

Введение

Hark, an AI startup founded in late 2025, has raised $700 million in Series A funding at a $6 billion valuation. Led by Parkway Venture Capital with participation from NVIDIA, AMD Ventures, Intel Capital, Qualcomm Ventures, and Salesforce Ventures, the company aims to develop next-generation human-computer interfaces using a combination of proprietary foundational models and custom-built AI-native hardware. Founded by serial entrepreneur Brett Adcock, Hark envisions a system of multimodal devices equipped with agentic capabilities, end-to-end voice models, and personalized memory. This "active" AI approach seeks to move beyond passive chatbots, creating collaborative companions that anticipate needs and interact naturally within the real world. Adcock's experience with Figure, a humanoid robotics company, informs this hardware-focused venture. The article argues that while current AI is powerful, it remains confined to screens and traditional interfaces like chat. The next paradigm shift requires dedicated hardware that is always-on, possesses persistent memory, and enables intuitive interaction, potentially rivaling the impact of the iPhone. Hark is assembling a team with talent from Apple, Meta, Google, and Tesla to tackle this complex engineering challenge across models, hardware, and interaction design. Finally, the piece suggests Chinese startups may have an advantage in this "active" AI hardware space due to strong manufacturing ecosystems, a vast domestic market, an...

By | Alpha Community

An AI startup founded at the end of 2025, which hasn't even publicly launched a product yet, has secured $700 million in Series A funding, propelling its valuation to $6 billion. This round was led by Parkway Venture Capital, with participation from NVIDIA, AMD Ventures, Intel Capital, Qualcomm Ventures, and Salesforce Ventures.

It's evident that this company has raised a massive amount of capital in a short time and has received backing from the industry's top software and hardware tech giants.

This company, named Hark, has a clear focus: they aim to create the next generation of universal human-computer interface using a combination of "self-developed foundational models + custom hardware."

In essence, this is a new type of artificial intelligence interface. Its form is AI-native hardware, which can be broken down into a series of customized native hardware devices and computing devices equipped with agent capabilities, featuring end-to-end voice models and highly personalized memory. All these AI systems are multimodal, capable of understanding and interacting in natural ways.

When we saw Hark complete its funding round at a $6 billion valuation with simultaneous investment from NVIDIA and Qualcomm, we weren't surprised. Since 2024, Alpha Community has been strategically investing in the "proactive AI" direction—our early investment in Looki has already sold multimodal AI wearable devices to users worldwide, making it the world's highest-volume seller of multimodal wearable general intelligent devices; LightSail Technology has independently developed a native AI operating system for smart hardware and pioneered the category of AI headphones with visual perception capabilities.

Hark's massive funding round once again confirms an increasingly obvious trend: the next decade of AI is not just on screens, but even more so in the real world.

AI Has Gotten Smarter, But It's Still Using Old Shells and Interaction Methods

Hark was founded by Brett Adcock at the end of 2025, initially with a $100 million personal investment from him. Brett Adcock has previously founded companies like Archer, Figure, and Vettery.

Among them, Archer entered the electric vertical takeoff and landing (eVTOL) aircraft market and successfully went public. Figure is a humanoid robotics company. In 2024, Figure raised $675 million, and in September 2025, Figure completed over $1 billion in Series C funding, reaching a valuation of $39 billion. Its investors include Jeff Bezos, NVIDIA, Microsoft, OpenAI, etc.

Why would Brett Adcock want to start a company in the direction of "proactive" AI-native hardware? Because Figure's own path is essentially a systems engineering project of "AI + hardware + real-world interaction." Fundamentally, this shares a similar underlying technology stack with AI-native hardware; he knows where the pitfalls are. And recently, Figure's live demonstration of robots performing long-duration package sorting tasks indicates they have already solved some of these problems.

Image Source: Brett Adcock's Personal Website

In addition to Brett Adcock himself, Abidur Chowdhury has joined Hark as Head of Design. He was formerly a product design executive at Apple, involved in the design of products like the iPhone and Air. Hark has also attracted engineers from Apple, Meta, Google, Tesla, and leading AI labs to join, covering AI research, hardware engineering, and design.

Looking back at the history of personal hardware terminal development, it's actually a history of alternating advances in hardware form factors, interaction methods, and applications: hardware form factors and interaction methods evolve, giving rise to new applications, unlocking new capabilities, and spreading to a broader user base.

For example, when the PC form factor was established and its size became sufficiently small, coupled with the maturity of interaction interfaces like the mouse and GUI, it became easier for ordinary people to use. And with the proliferation of the internet, it moved from business and creative professional circles into the mass market.

The next breakthrough came with the iPhone. This breakthrough was not only about integrating computer and phone capabilities into a very small form factor but also about the multi-touch interaction method, which further lowered the interaction barrier, elevating the user base of smartphones (including tablets) by an order of magnitude compared to PCs.

Moreover, its App Store ecosystem directly became the software standard of the mobile internet era. In 2024, the global App Store ecosystem facilitated approximately $1.3 trillion in developer billings and sales.

Now, the problem with AI is that it has intelligence, strong software capabilities, but currently primarily operates and interacts through chat interfaces and non-AI-native devices like computers/phones. It lacks persistent memory of user identity and hardware specifically designed for intelligent interaction.

A preliminary industry consensus is that the next stage requires intelligent agent systems that can naturally interact with people and the real world. These systems need to anticipate needs, reduce cognitive load, and operate like collaborative partners rather than waiting for commands like traditional software.

Currently, at the software level, AI has already spawned super-startups like OpenAI and Anthropic with valuations approaching a trillion dollars. Once AI-native hardware further develops, its impact on the tech industry is likely to be on the scale of the iPhone.

However, for "proactive" AI-native hardware to mature is a complex engineering task. For instance, Hark needs to build this entire system across layers like models, AI hardware, interaction, and memory.

First, their models will possess agent capabilities, multimodal capabilities, and memory capabilities, able to remember who the user is, what they've said, and work across products and services the user already uses.

They will design AI-native hardware, integrated with Hark's foundational models. And judging from their recruitment for real-time voice infrastructure positions, their interaction interface is likely to start with voice.

Developing "Proactive" AI: Chinese Startups Hold an Advantage

Current AI, whether ChatBots or Agents, are temporarily just tools because they are trapped on screens. Only when people need them do they issue commands and get results.

Compared to these "passive" AIs, why is "proactive" AI important? Because it transforms AI from a tool into a collaborator. AI can, to a certain extent, independently think for people, act for people, and accomplish tasks.

Building a "proactive" AI system requires an AI-native hardware that combines software and hardware. It needs to possess perception, memory, intelligence, new and lower-barrier interaction methods, and needs to be always by the user's side (always on).

During the previous exploration period for AI hardware (e.g., smart speakers, etc.), it had perception but could only store, intelligence was insufficient, and interaction was rigid.

In the current new AI boom period, perception capabilities have further improved, AI memory and intelligence have made huge leaps, interaction is still being explored, but the exploration path has become initially clear.

True "proactive" AI has already taken a big step forward.

And for "proactive" AI to mature further, it's not a race for single-point breakthroughs. It requires the joint development and progress of foundational models, agent operating systems, personalized memory, and hardware terminals. The competition in AI-native hardware is a comprehensive one.

In innovating and exploring this field, Chinese startups have a greater chance of success. They possess three unique advantages: first, the manufacturing ecosystem advantage, with places like Shenzhen having the world's most complete supply chain foundation; second, the market scale advantage, as China is both the largest manufacturing country and the largest application market; third, the policy support advantage, with the country listing AI as a strategic priority, providing certainty for long-term investment.

Связанные с этим вопросы

QWhat is the main focus of Hark as described in the article?

AHark's main focus is to create the next-generation general human-machine interface using a combination of self-developed foundation models and custom hardware, aiming to develop AI-native hardware with agent capabilities, multimodal understanding, and personalized memory.

QWhich major technology companies participated in Hark's $7 billion Series A funding round?

AThe funding round was led by Parkway Venture Capital, with participation from NVIDIA, AMD Ventures, Intel Capital, Qualcomm Ventures, and Salesforce Ventures.

QAccording to the article, why does the founder Brett Adcock have relevant experience for starting Hark?

ABrett Adcock has relevant experience because he previously founded Figure, a humanoid robotics company, which operates on a similar 'AI + hardware + real-world interaction' systems engineering approach, giving him insight into the challenges in the AI-native hardware space.

QWhat does the article suggest is a key limitation of current AI systems that 'active' AI aims to solve?

AA key limitation of current AI systems is that they are primarily 'passive,' trapped behind screens (like chatbots or agents) and require explicit user commands. 'Active' AI aims to transform AI from a tool into a proactive collaborator that can think and act independently to assist users.

QWhat three advantages do Chinese startups have in developing 'active' AI, according to the article?

AAccording to the article, Chinese startups have three advantages: 1) Manufacturing ecosystem advantage, with complete supply chains in places like Shenzhen; 2) Market scale advantage, as China is both the largest manufacturer and a huge application market; 3) Policy support advantage, with AI being a national strategic priority providing long-term investment certainty.

Похожее

From Tokens to Machine Labor: AI is Shifting from Tool to "Worker"

The article "From Token to Machine Labor: AI is Evolving from Tool to 'Worker'" argues that the business model for AI is shifting beyond simply selling computational resources (tokens, GPU hours) or model access. Instead, a new "machine labor market" is emerging, where the core economic transaction is the purchase of economically useful work directly performed by software. The central thesis is that AI pricing will evolve through four stages: 1) raw tokens, 2) standardized LLM capabilities (e.g., text generation), 3) industry-specific labor markets (e.g., legal review, radiology), and finally 4) a programmable results market where tasks like resolving a support ticket are bid on and priced based on outcome. In this future, buyers will care less about *which* model or GPU completes a task and more about whether the work meets specified standards for accuracy, latency, and cost. This transition reframes the impact of AI on human labor. Rather than simple replacement, it suggests a re-coordination where machines handle standardized, verifiable work, freeing humans for roles involving oversight, context management, responsibility, and final judgment. In some cases, this "last 1%" of human input becomes more valuable as it enables the other 99% to be automated. Furthermore, as AI reduces the cost of work, demand may expand, creating larger markets (e.g., 24/7 customer service) rather than just cheaper versions of existing ones. The article concludes that while infrastructure (GPUs, models, tokens) remains crucial upstream, the market is converging on a simpler, tradeable unit: machine labor that can be defined, measured, priced, and procured based on contractible specifications.

marsbit9 мин. назад

From Tokens to Machine Labor: AI is Shifting from Tool to "Worker"

marsbit9 мин. назад

Xiaomi MiMo's 99% Price Cut is Not Marketing! Luo Fuli Posts on X to Refute Critics

The price of Xiaomi's MiMo-V2.5 series API has been permanently reduced by up to 99%, specifically for the "Input (Cache Hit)" cost, which covers users re-reading historical context in long conversations. MiMo's head, Luo Fuli, published a detailed technical blog to clarify that this drastic price cut stems from genuine engineering breakthroughs, not a marketing stunt or a simple price war. The core of the achievement lies in six key engineering optimizations. First, the model architecture adopts a Hybrid Sliding Window Attention (SWA), reducing the memory footprint (KVCache) to 1/7th of a traditional model. Second, a dual-pool memory management system actually utilizes these savings, allowing a single GPU to handle over 5 times more concurrent users. Third, an upgraded prefix caching mechanism achieves a cache hit rate of 93-95% for repeated reads, meaning most such requests bypass GPU computation entirely. Fourth, a self-developed distributed cache (GCache) utilizes idle SSD space on existing GPU servers, eliminating additional storage costs. Fifth, an intelligent scheduling system (LLM-Router) efficiently routes requests to maximize cache reuse and performance. Sixth, Multi-Token Prediction (MTP) accelerates the model's text generation ("output") side. Together, these systemic optimizations dramatically lower the real computational cost per request, enabling the 99% price reduction for cached inputs while reportedly maintaining positive gross margins. Luo Fuli's disclosure aims to shift the narrative from "price war" to a demonstration of substantive AI engineering progress.

marsbit2 ч. назад

Xiaomi MiMo's 99% Price Cut is Not Marketing! Luo Fuli Posts on X to Refute Critics

marsbit2 ч. назад

$26 Billion: An 'All-Chinese Team' Backs the World's Highest-Valued AI Programming Company

Cognition AI, the company behind the AI programmer "Devin," has raised over $1 billion in new funding at a valuation of $26 billion, just eight months after reaching a $10.2 billion valuation. The round was led by Lux Capital, General Catalyst, and 8VC. Founded by three young Chinese entrepreneurs with strong competitive programming backgrounds, Cognition initially gained fame with Devin, marketed as the world's first AI software engineer capable of handling tasks from start to finish. While its early demos were impressive, real-world usage revealed reliability and cost-effectiveness issues, leading to a significant price cut for Devin in 2025. A pivotal moment came when Cognition acquired the assets of AI IDE company Windsurf after a failed acquisition by OpenAI. This move gave Cognition a crucial developer-facing tool, allowing it to pursue a two-pronged strategy: Devin for autonomous task execution and Windsurf for integrated, collaborative coding within an IDE. This shift helped the company move away from the controversial "AI replacement" narrative towards a model of augmenting human engineers, particularly for repetitive or maintenance tasks. This strategic pivot is backed by strong commercial metrics. The company reports a 10x increase in enterprise usage this year, with an annual revenue run-rate of $492 million and a 50% month-over-month growth in enterprise Devin usage over the past six months. Its client list now includes major corporations like Goldman Sachs and Mercedes-Benz, as well as government agencies like NASA and the U.S. Army. Investors are betting on Cognition becoming a foundational piece of next-generation software engineering infrastructure, positioning it at the center of a hybrid future where AI agents and human developers work in tandem.

marsbit2 ч. назад

$26 Billion: An 'All-Chinese Team' Backs the World's Highest-Valued AI Programming Company

marsbit2 ч. назад

The Hottest 00s Generation on Wall Street

"Wall Street's Hottest '00s Phenom: The 25-Year-Old Fund Manager Who Bet on AI's 'Boring' Backbone" At just 25, Leopold Aschenbrenner, once fired by OpenAI, now runs a hedge fund worth $13.7 billion. His strategy? Betting against the consensus. While others chased AI chips, he invested early in the physical infrastructure powering the AI boom: electricity, data centers, and energy. Expelled from OpenAI's safety team in 2024, Aschenbrenner foresaw the coming bottleneck. He argued that AI progress would be limited not by algorithms, but by power, chip capacity, and space. Acting on this, he founded Situational Awareness LP to go long on these "old economy" assets. His bets have paid off spectacularly. His fund's assets soared from $255 million in late 2024 to $13.7 billion by Q1 2026. His portfolio is a direct reflection of his thesis: major long positions in fuel cell company Bloom Energy and data center/bitcoin mining firms like CleanSpark and Riot Platforms, which control critical land and power resources. Conversely, he holds massive put options against overheated semiconductor giants like NVIDIA and AMD. A notable exception was his bullish bet on storage company SanDisk, which surged ~160% in Q2. Aschenbrenner's vision is materializing. Tech giants like Amazon, Alphabet, and Meta are ramping up colossal capital expenditure on data centers. Global data center power consumption is projected to skyrocket, with AI accounting for over half by 2030. The demand for enabling technologies like optical fiber and modules is also exploding. His story underscores a fundamental truth of the AI era: the ethereal intelligence of algorithms rests on a very physical, heavy, and power-hungry foundation. The future is being built not just in code, but in concrete, copper, and kilowatts.

marsbit4 ч. назад

The Hottest 00s Generation on Wall Street

marsbit4 ч. назад

Review of Cathie Wood's Masterstroke Operation on Circle

A Recap of Cathie Wood's Masterful Trading in Circle's IPO This article analyzes the strategic moves made by ARK Invest's Cathie Wood around the IPO of Circle (CRCL). Despite her typical long-term, narrative-driven investment style, Wood executed a textbook "buy low, sell high" trade. Wood secured a core position of approximately 4.49 million shares at the $31 IPO price. The stock debuted at $69, surged to a high of $299 in June 2025 fueled by stablecoin regulatory news (the GENIUS Act), and then entered a prolonged decline. During this rally, ARK systematically sold around 1.7 million shares at an average price near $210, driven partly by internal fund rebalancing rules triggered by the stock's soaring weight. This move locked in substantial profits. As the stock later fell due to lockup expirations, new share issuance, and interest rate concerns—even dipping below $50—Wood began repurchasing shares. Starting in November 2025 around $86, she continued buying on the way down, eventually rebuilding her position to roughly the original size by Q1 2026. Key takeaways include: 1) Having a strong, independent long-term thesis (viewing Circle as critical digital dollar infrastructure). 2) Trading in tranches instead of trying to time exact tops or bottoms. 3) Maintaining strict position-sizing discipline, using rules to force profit-taking and preserve buying power. For most retail investors, chasing the dramatic "pop" at open is dangerous, as the subsequent 83% drawdown showed. Wood's success hinged on pre-IPO access, a clear investment thesis, and disciplined execution.

marsbit6 ч. назад

Review of Cathie Wood's Masterstroke Operation on Circle

marsbit6 ч. назад

Торговля

Спот
Фьючерсы

Популярные статьи

Неделя обучения по популярным токенам (2): 2026 может стать годом приложений реального времени, сектор AI продолжает оставаться в тренде

2025 год — год институциональных инвесторов, в будущем он будет доминировать в приложениях реального времени.

1.8k просмотров всегоОпубликовано 2025.12.16Обновлено 2025.12.16

Неделя обучения по популярным токенам (2): 2026 может стать годом приложений реального времени, сектор AI продолжает оставаться в тренде

Обсуждения

Добро пожаловать в Сообщество HTX. Здесь вы сможете быть в курсе последних новостей о развитии платформы и получить доступ к профессиональной аналитической информации о рынке. Мнения пользователей о цене на AI (AI) представлены ниже.

活动图片