The True Replay of the Internet Bubble Is Web3, Not AI

marsbitОпубликовано 2026-03-13Обновлено 2026-03-13

Введение

Author TVBee argues that Web3, not AI, is the true reenactment of the 2000 dot-com bubble. The article compares the three sectors: the historical internet bubble, the current AI boom, and Web3. During the 2000 bubble, capital was focused on the supply side with many unprofitable companies, while demand-side applications were scarce due to limited internet access and primitive technology. In contrast, the current AI boom is primarily driven by infrastructure leaders like NVIDIA and AMD, which have substantial profits. Demand-side applications, such as various AI models and tools, are growing and integrating into more use cases, though the ecosystem is still developing. Web3, however, is criticized for its significant supply-side speculation with high valuations based on minimal revenue (e.g., ZKsync's $1.76B市值 vs. $458 daily income). Demand-side applications are limited mostly to DeFi, memecoins, and prediction markets, with much activity driven by airdrop farming rather than genuine utility. The author concludes that Web3, with its hype-driven capital and lack of practical products, mirrors the 2000 bubble most closely. Predictions include a likely U.S. stock market correction (but not a crash), a moderate impact on Bitcoin, and a prolonged, painful consolidation for altcoins to separate valuable projects from speculative ones. The author warns that the altcoin market decline since late 2024 is not yet over.

Author: TVBee

Both stock market and crypto players are worried that AI might repeat the 2000 internet bubble, but in reality, Web3 is the true replay of the internet bubble.

Bubble: Supply-Side Self-Indulgence, Lackluster Demand

During the 2000 internet bubble phase, capital was self-indulgent on the supply side. Many internet-listed companies had no profits or cash flow, yet their stock prices soared wildly.

On the other end, internet applications on the demand side were pitifully few... Before 2000, there was no Douyin or Kuaishou, no Alibaba or JD.com, no WeChat.

The mainstream internet applications at the time were only the雏形 of QQ like OICQ, MSN and other chat software, download tools like FlashGet and NetAnts, information platforms like Yahoo,网易, and搜狐, basic applications like Google Search and email, and the early stages of e-commerce like Amazon and eBay, which had very few users.

At that time, there was no mobile internet. Personal computers were considered luxury items, and most households in China did not have one. Monitors were those big, bulky CRT monitors. Laptops were as thick as bricks, and internet access relied on dial-up connections through telephone lines. Even older were the storage media; the primary storage was floppy disks—yes, the A drive. Their capacity was only 1.44MB, not even enough to hold a single moderately sized image today.

It's worth mentioning that there were single-player games back then, but they were pixelated games.

AI: Infrastructure Leaders Soar, Products Growing

Looking at the AI industry, stock prices have surged, but the main gainers are AI leaders, primarily in infrastructure—NVIDIA, AMD, SK Hynix, Samsung, Micron... This is because AI requires extensive training before deployment. On the supply side, AI does not have the exaggerated bubble seen in 2000. At least these leading AI companies do have considerable profits.

On the demand side, we can at least see Gemini, Claude, GPT, Doubao... various UGC applications. And the recently popular Lobster, the newly launched Perplexity Personal Computer... the highly eye-catching AI robots at the Spring Festival Gala... Although the breadth of AI products still can't be compared to that of the internet in 2000, this is because AI development has high infrastructure requirements. AI needs to develop its infrastructure first before it can integrate into more types of applications.

Web3: Technology as a Gimmick, Applications Few and Far Between

Circulating Market Cap and Profit

Now look at the Web3 industry. Various technological narratives emerge one after another, but how many applications actually have users? Aside from a handful of DeFi leaders, there might only be MEME platforms, prediction markets, and Perp DEXs, with much of the activity in the latter two coming from interaction behaviors driven by airdrop expectations.

Corresponding to the scarcity of products on the demand side is the self-indulgence on the supply side.

⏵ Example from the ZK track: ZKsync with a daily income of $458 has a circulating market cap of $176 million, equivalent to a P/E ratio of 1052.

⏵ Example from the L2 track: Optimism with a daily income of $2,427 has a circulating market cap of $253 million, equivalent to a P/E ratio of 285.

⏵ Example from the L1 track: Sei with a daily income of $3,564 has a circulating market cap of $424 million, equivalent to a P/E ratio of 327.

And there's Blast with a daily income of -$6...

If we follow stock market logic, shareholders of the first three projects would have to wait 1052 years, 285 years, and 327 years respectively to break even, and this doesn't even include the infrastructure and operational costs required to keep these chains running.

Although these ecosystems are not meant to break even and profit from on-chain revenue, for shareholders, i.e., token holders, this is a nightmare...

What Web3 Applications Are There?

Now, what Web3 applications are there?

Former applications like the metaverse,链游, inscriptions, social... and probably some others we can't even remember are almost never mentioned now.

Currently, besides DeFi and RWA, the only ones with users are almost just meme coins, prediction markets, and perp DEXs. Among these, meme coins are PvP among existing capital, and part of the activity in prediction markets and Perp DEXs is still driven by interaction behaviors due to airdrop expectations.

Compared to the internet applications mentioned from 2000, Web3 applications are truly few and far between...

Final Thoughts

Therefore, the sector that is truly indulging on the supply side while lacking achievement on the demand side is not AI, but Web3.

US stock market players overlap with those from 26 years ago. Investors and Wall Street are deliberately avoiding a repeat of history. AI has a bubble, but it differs from the 2000 internet bubble.

Instead, it's the younger Web3 field where capital is speculating on technology on the supply side, while the demand side has few truly practical products. This is the true reappearance of the 2000 internet bubble.

Based on the reasoning of a moderate AI泡沫 and a high Web3泡沫:

  • First, the US stock market will correct, but a crash like in 2000 is unlikely.
  • Second, BTC, which is correlated with US stocks, will be moderately affected.
  • Third, just like the 2000 internet bubble,山寨币 will continue to be washed out, forming a painful process of separating the wheat from the chaff. This process might be even longer than I imagine.

So far,山寨币 have generally been falling for about 15 months since the end of 2024, but this is not the end.

Don't believe the talk that山寨币 have bottomed out. Some have, others have no bottom.

Связанные с этим вопросы

QAccording to the article, which sector is more likely to repeat the 2000 internet bubble: AI or Web3?

AThe article argues that Web3 is more likely to repeat the 2000 internet bubble, not AI.

QWhat was a key characteristic of the supply side during the 2000 internet bubble?

AA key characteristic was that capital was indulging in self-amusement on the supply side, with many internet companies having no profits or cash flow but their stock prices soared wildly.

QHow does the article describe the current state of Web3 applications?

AThe article describes Web3 applications as scarce and lacking truly practical products, with only a handful like some DeFi leaders, meme platforms, prediction markets, and perpetual DEXs having users, some of which are driven by airdrop expectations.

QWhat is the article's view on the profitability and valuation of major Web3 infrastructure projects like ZKsync, Optimism, and Sei?

AThe article highlights their extremely high Price-to-Earnings (PE) ratios (e.g., 1052 for ZKsync) based on meager daily revenues, suggesting it would take centuries for token holders to recoup their investment, representing a nightmare for them.

QWhat are the article's three main predictions based on its analysis of AI and Web3 bubbles?

A1. The U.S. stock market will correct but is unlikely to crash like in 2000. 2. Bitcoin, being associated with U.S. stocks, will be moderately affected. 3. Altcoins will continue to be washed out in a painful process of eliminating the false and preserving the true, which may be a prolonged cycle.

Похожее

Understanding CPO (Co-Packaged Optics) in One Article: Why Nvidia Is Willing to Spend $3.2 Billion on a Fiber?

NVIDIA and Corning announced a multi-year strategic partnership on May 6, 2026, with NVIDIA committing up to $3.2 billion to support Corning's U.S. expansion. This investment will triple Corning's manufacturing plants and significantly boost its optical fiber and communications production capacity. The core driver behind this massive investment is the fundamental shift from copper to optical interconnect technology within AI data centers. As GPU clusters scale, copper wires face critical limitations: severe signal attenuation over distance, high energy consumption for signal integrity, and excessive heat generation. Optical fiber, transmitting light instead of electrical signals, solves these issues with minimal loss, near-light speed, and lower power needs. The article outlines a three-stage evolution of data center interconnect: 1. **Traditional Copper Interconnects:** The mainstream solution of the 2010s, now being phased out due to scaling bottlenecks. 2. **Pluggable Optical Modules:** The current mainstream, where modules convert electrical signals to light externally. This process still introduces energy loss and latency. 3. **CPO (Co-Packaged Optics):** The next-generation technology where the optical engine is integrated directly with the GPU chip package. This drastically reduces the electrical signal travel distance to mere millimeters, slashing power consumption and latency while boosting data density. NVIDIA CEO Jensen Huang has identified CPO as an essential core technology for AI infrastructure. NVIDIA's investment signifies a strategic shift from being a buyer to actively controlling its supply chain for critical components. With demand for specialized optical fiber far outstripping supply—evidenced by soaring prices—securing long-term manufacturing capacity has become a competitive necessity. While Corning's expansion may pressure some suppliers, a projected global fiber supply gap of 5-15% over the next few years creates a significant opportunity window, particularly for Chinese manufacturers competitive in optical preforms, chips, and modules. Ultimately, NVIDIA's move is not about chasing a trend but an engineering imperative. The transition to light-based interconnects like CPO is driven by the physical limits of copper, marking a definitive step in the ongoing AI computing revolution.

marsbit1 мин. назад

Understanding CPO (Co-Packaged Optics) in One Article: Why Nvidia Is Willing to Spend $3.2 Billion on a Fiber?

marsbit1 мин. назад

KOL's Perspective: Why Is SOL Set to Rise from This Point?

**Summary: Why SOL is Positioned for Growth at This Level** The article argues that SOL is poised for an upward move from its current price point, citing several key factors. Primarily, SOL has just broken out of a 4-month consolidation phase. This breakout signals a return of risk appetite to the broader crypto market, as SOL is seen as a key indicator of overall crypto health. The token's ownership has reportedly shifted from short-term traders and tourists to long-term accumulators, leading to low volume. Any meaningful increase in trading activity could thus trigger significant upward momentum. Fundamental strengths include strong institutional adoption, integration with DeFi and RWAs (Real-World Assets), and the potential benefits from the Clarity Act. Despite its high volatility—having dropped 70% from its all-time high but still up 12x from its bear market low—SOL is highlighted as one of the few tokens from the last cycle to reach new highs. It boasts a robust ecosystem of applications, users, and protocols. Future catalysts include the expected influx of AI developers following the Miami Accelerate conference, which focused on AI on Solana. Furthermore, Solana is positioned as the premier chain for memecoin activity, a trend expected to continue and drive network usage and fees. The article concludes that recent price action reflects a healthy transfer to long-term holders, setting the stage for growth.

marsbit51 мин. назад

KOL's Perspective: Why Is SOL Set to Rise from This Point?

marsbit51 мин. назад

Those Pre-Bitcoin PoW Protocols Have Recently Been Reimplemented

This article details a recent surge in replicating pre-Bitcoin Proof-of-Work (PoW) protocols, specifically focusing on Hal Finney's 2004 RPOW (Reusable Proofs of Work). Within five days in May 2026, multiple independent builders in the Bitcoin/cypherpunk community launched projects inspired by this early electronic cash proposal. The initiative began with Fred Krueger's `rpow2.com`, a centralized but auditable system that replaced RPOW's original IBM 4758 hardware with Ed25519 signatures. Initially a faithful replica, it later adopted Bitcoin-like features (21M supply cap, difficulty adjustment) and a controversial 5.24% founder allocation. This sparked rapid forks, including `rpow4.com` which incorporated full Bitcoin parameters, a prediction market (`rpowmarket.com`), and a DEX (`rpow2swap.com`). Concurrently, Mike In Space created a prototype of Wei Dai's 1998 b-money proposal (`b-money.replit.app`), pushing the historical exploration even further back. The article contrasts these centralized, server-dependent experiments with Bitcoin's core innovation of decentralized, trustless consensus. It also highlights a parallel development: the `HASH` project on Ethereum, which uses smart contract hooks to enable a purely fair-launch, browser-mineable PoW token with 0% allocations to team or VCs. The collective activity is framed as a meme-driven, educational exploration of cypherpunk history rather than a serious financial movement, with all projects heavily disclaiming any investment value.

marsbit56 мин. назад

Those Pre-Bitcoin PoW Protocols Have Recently Been Reimplemented

marsbit56 мин. назад

South Korean Exchanges 'Battle' Regulators, Challenging the Boundaries of Enforcement and Legislation

South Korea's cryptocurrency industry is engaged in a rare, direct confrontation with regulators. The Financial Intelligence Unit (FIU), the primary anti-money laundering (AML) watchdog, has recently imposed heavy penalties on major exchanges like Upbit and Bithumb for alleged violations involving unregistered overseas VASPs and AML procedures. However, exchanges are now actively challenging these actions in court and through industry associations. In a significant shift, the Seoul Administrative Court ruled in favor of Upbit's operator, Dunamu, overturning part of an FIU-ordered business suspension. The court found the FIU's penalty criteria and justification insufficiently clear. Similarly, the court suspended the enforcement of a six-month business suspension against Bithumb pending a final ruling, citing potential irreversible harm to the exchange. Beyond legal battles, the industry is contesting proposed legislative amendments. The Digital Asset eXchange Alliance (DAXA) strongly opposes a draft rule that would mandate Suspicious Transaction Reports (STRs) for all crypto transfers over 10 million KRW (~$6,800). DAXA argues this "poison pill" clause violates legal principles and would overwhelm the STR system, increasing reports from 63,000 to an estimated 5.45 million annually for major exchanges, thereby crippling effective AML monitoring. This conflict highlights a structural tension in South Korea's crypto governance: comprehensive digital asset laws are still developing, while regulators rely heavily on AML enforcement. The industry's move from passive compliance to active legal and legislative challenges signifies a new phase, pressing for clearer rules and more proportionate enforcement. While short-term disputes may intensify, this clash could ultimately lead to a more mature and sustainable regulatory framework for South Korea's vibrant crypto market.

marsbit1 ч. назад

South Korean Exchanges 'Battle' Regulators, Challenging the Boundaries of Enforcement and Legislation

marsbit1 ч. назад

Торговля

Спот
Фьючерсы

Популярные статьи

Неделя обучения по популярным токенам (2): 2026 может стать годом приложений реального времени, сектор AI продолжает оставаться в тренде

2025 год — год институциональных инвесторов, в будущем он будет доминировать в приложениях реального времени.

1.8k просмотров всегоОпубликовано 2025.12.16Обновлено 2025.12.16

Неделя обучения по популярным токенам (2): 2026 может стать годом приложений реального времени, сектор AI продолжает оставаться в тренде

Обсуждения

Добро пожаловать в Сообщество HTX. Здесь вы сможете быть в курсе последних новостей о развитии платформы и получить доступ к профессиональной аналитической информации о рынке. Мнения пользователей о цене на AI (AI) представлены ниже.

活动图片