# Сопутствующие статьи по теме USDT

Новостной центр HTX предлагает последние статьи и углубленный анализ по "USDT", охватывающие рыночные тренды, новости проектов, развитие технологий и политику регулирования в криптоиндустрии.

USDT Rating Controversy: S&P's 'Stability Scale', Tether's 'Market Debate', and the 'Shadow Central Bank' Transformation

The recent S&P Global downgrade of USDT's stability rating from "constrained" to "weak" has ignited a significant debate between traditional finance (TradFi) and the crypto ecosystem. S&P's decision was primarily based on concerns over Tether's reserve composition—now comprising ~24% in higher-volatility assets like Bitcoin and gold—and a perceived lack of governance transparency, fearing these assets could not be liquidated quickly in a mass redemption scenario. Tether countered by emphasizing its proven market resilience, having maintained its peg through multiple past crises, and its real-time reserve reporting. The core of the article identifies a fundamental clash in risk assessment frameworks: TradFi prioritizes redeemability and capital adequacy in extreme stress, while the crypto market's stability is underpinned by 24/7 on-chain liquidity and automated清算 mechanisms. The report further analyzes Tether's strategic shift from a simple stablecoin issuer to a "shadow central bank," diversifying its reserves into assets like BTC and gold for inflation hedging, yield generation, and de-dollarization. This strategy, while profitable in a bull market (e.g., $10B profit in 2025), introduces cyclical risks if asset prices fall. Looking forward, the article suggests the need for a dual-rating system: a traditional stability rating for redeemability and a new investment risk rating for收益 sustainability and exposure management, reflecting the evolving and divergent needs of the market.

marsbit12/12 02:17

USDT Rating Controversy: S&P's 'Stability Scale', Tether's 'Market Debate', and the 'Shadow Central Bank' Transformation

marsbit12/12 02:17

Bitcoin's Losses Against the Dollar Are 10 Times Lower Than Against the Ruble. How Did This Happen

The article analyzes Bitcoin's (BTC) significant 30%+ depreciation against the Russian ruble since the start of 2025, contrasting it with much smaller losses against major currencies like the US dollar (~3%). This disparity is attributed to the ruble's own substantial strengthening, which appreciated roughly 25% against the dollar over the same period. Consequently, while Bitcoin hit new all-time highs against the dollar, euro, and yen in late 2024, it failed to do so against the ruble. The piece further explains that the Russian ruble/Bitcoin exchange rate is not directly traded on major spot markets. Instead, it is calculated by converting the BTC/USD price using the current USD/RUB rate, leading to potential pricing discrepancies. This indirect method, coupled with the absence of major exchanges like Binance from the Russian market, has fragmented liquidity. The market now heavily relies on peer-to-peer (P2P) exchanges and over-the-counter trades using stablecoins like USDT, which often trade at a premium to the official dollar rate. These conditions have created a challenging environment, increasing fraud and "gray" schemes in P2P markets. The situation is further complicated by recent Russian legislation that impose criminal penalties for using "dropper" bank accounts (money mules) and restrict cash withdrawals, which are expected to significantly alter the crypto exchange landscape.

RBK-crypto12/11 21:30

Bitcoin's Losses Against the Dollar Are 10 Times Lower Than Against the Ruble. How Did This Happen

RBK-crypto12/11 21:30

Behind Cryptocurrency 'Thefts and Scams': Why Does Civil Relief Frequently Encounter Obstacles?

Behind the surge in cryptocurrency "thefts and scams", why does civil relief frequently hit roadblocks? This article explores the legal challenges through two representative cases. In Case 1, a company paid 800,000 USDT to a Chinese employee of an overseas exchange for a listing service, only to have the employee disappear. Despite cross-border complexities and initial police refusal to accept the report (citing the company’s foreign status and claims that crypto "is not protected by law"), lawyers eventually secured case acceptance by invoking criminal procedure rules and citing regulatory recognition of virtual assets as property. However, formal立案 (case filing) is still pending. Case 2 involved a woman scammed into transferring over RMB 3 million to a USDT exchanger for a fake investment. While police quickly arrested the exchanger, the main scammer remained abroad. The exchanger was released due to lack of criminal intent, and a civil lawsuit against them for unjust enrichment was rejected at filing. The judge indicated that even if accepted, such cases rarely succeed. The analysis highlights key obstacles: the "criminal procedure takes precedence" principle often blocks civil suits until criminal proceedings conclude; if a criminal judgment orders restitution, further civil claims are barred; and bypassing criminal reporting to file civilly usually results in the case being referred back to police, wasting time. Ultimately, when crypto crimes are involved, civil relief is extremely difficult. The more viable path remains criminal prosecution, despite its own challenges, as civil victories are exceptionally rare in practice.

marsbit12/09 19:39

Behind Cryptocurrency 'Thefts and Scams': Why Does Civil Relief Frequently Encounter Obstacles?

marsbit12/09 19:39

Tether's "Favorite Son" STABLE Crashes? Plunges 60% on First Day, Whale Jumping the Queue + No CEX Listing Sparks Trust Panic

Stable, a new Layer 1 blockchain heavily backed by Tether and Bitfinex, launched its mainnet and STABLE token on December 8. Despite significant pre-launch deposits totalling over $1.3 billion and strong market interest, the token’s first-day performance was highly disappointing. It opened around $0.036, briefly rose to nearly $0.046, then plummeted over 60% to a low of $0.015. Its fully diluted valuation (FDV) fell to $1.7 billion amid thin liquidity. The token’s not yet listed on major centralized exchanges like Binance or Coinbase, limiting its accessibility. The launch wass marred by controversy after a whale deposited hundreds of millions of USDT before the official start time, raising concerns about fairness and possible insider trading. This damaged trust in a project whose core narrative is transparency and reliability. Stable is designed as a stablecoin-focused chain with USDT as the native gas fee, aiming for a near gas-less user experience. It uses a custom DPoS consensus mechanism and is EVM-compatible. However, its tokenomics have raised concerns: STABLE tokens are used only for governance and staking, not fee payment, and 50% of the total 100 billion supply is allocated to the team, investors, and advisors with a one-year cliff. The project faces intense competition from established chains like Polygon, Tron, and Solana, as well as emerging stablecoin-specific L1s like Circle’s Arc and Paradigm-backed Tempo. Its success hinges on rapid execution, ecosystem development, and enterprise adoption planned for late 2025 to mid-2026. Early missteps and a lack of trust have cast doubt on its ability to compete.

marsbit12/09 18:11

Tether's "Favorite Son" STABLE Crashes? Plunges 60% on First Day, Whale Jumping the Queue + No CEX Listing Sparks Trust Panic

marsbit12/09 18:11

活动图片