# Сопутствующие статьи по теме Tokenomics

Новостной центр HTX предлагает последние статьи и углубленный анализ по "Tokenomics", охватывающие рыночные тренды, новости проектов, развитие технологий и политику регулирования в криптоиндустрии.

Why Do 85% of Token Launches Ultimately Become Expensive 'Funerals'?

According to Arrakis Research, 85% of tokens launched in 2025 ended the year with negative returns, highlighting a systemic failure in token design rather than market conditions. Token Generation Events (TGEs) are not celebrations but "open gladiator arenas" where flawed economic models are exploited. Key failures include excessive Fully Diluted Valuations (FDV) over $1 billion, which had a 100% failure rate, and low initial circulation, leading to massive sell pressure upon unlocks. Only 9.4% of tokens that dropped in their first week recovered. The report identifies four critical success factors: 1. **Sybil Resistance:** Filtering out airdrop farmers (e.g., LayerZero’s efforts reduced initial sell-off). 2. **Revenue-Based Airdrops:** Treating airdrops as customer acquisition costs tied to real protocol usage. 3. **Ready Infrastructure:** Staking, governance, and custody must be operational at launch to provide utility and retain holders. 4. **Effective Market Makers:** Choosing transparent market-making services that provide liquidity depth, not artificial demand. The ultimate goal is achieving decentralization in development, governance, value distribution, and participation. Success requires building genuine demand through protocol utility, not marketing hype. Tokens must be designed to withstand inherent sell pressure from airdrop recipients, exchanges, and market makers from day one.

marsbit02/24 09:21

Why Do 85% of Token Launches Ultimately Become Expensive 'Funerals'?

marsbit02/24 09:21

Ending Zero-Sum Games: An In-Depth Research Report on Web3 Incentive Engineering and Odyssey Behavioral Dynamics

The report "Ending Zero-Sum Games: A Deep Dive into Web3 Incentive Engineering and Odyssey Behavioral Dynamics" analyzes the evolution of Web3 incentive mechanisms, arguing that traditional airdrop and points-based models have led to inefficiency, Sybil attacks, and low user retention. It proposes a shift from volume-based metrics to value-based unit economics, where user lifetime value (LTV) must exceed customer acquisition cost (CAC). The new paradigm defines incentives as a combination of Credit (e.g., SBTs), Privileges (e.g., governance rights), and Revenue Rights (e.g., real yield). A key framework classifies users into three behavioral archetypes: Gamma (profit-driven farmers), Beta (engaged explorers), and Alpha (long-term builders). Successful incentive design must encourage migration from Gamma to Alpha by making authentic contribution more profitable than farming. The report introduces technical solutions to ensure incentive compatibility (IC): - A Dynamic Difficulty Adjustment (DDA) mechanism to auto-calibrate task complexity. - A Proof of Value (PoV) model to measure "contribution density" (liquidity, time, governance activity). - A ZK-based behavioral attestation layer for private, Sybil-resistant user verification. Finally, the Odyssey model is envisioned to evolve from a marketing campaign into a native, embedded protocol (GaaS - Growth-as-a-Service) with interoperable credit across ecosystems, fostering a shift from speculative engagement to sustainable, value-aligned collaboration.

marsbit02/11 13:47

Ending Zero-Sum Games: An In-Depth Research Report on Web3 Incentive Engineering and Odyssey Behavioral Dynamics

marsbit02/11 13:47

A New Paradigm in Tokenomics? When Backpack Makes VCs 'Delay Gratification'

The article discusses Backpack's innovative tokenomics model, which challenges conventional practices in the cryptocurrency industry. Unlike typical projects where teams and venture capitalists (VCs) receive immediate token allocations, Backpack allocates 100% of liquid tokens to users at TGE. The remaining 37.5% of tokens, traditionally reserved for teams and investors, are locked in a corporate vault and tied to the company’s eventual IPO. This structure ensures that internal stakeholders can only benefit after a successful IPO, with an additional one-year lock-up period post-IPO to prevent early sell-offs. Backpack’s approach emphasizes long-term alignment with user interests and project sustainability. The token distribution prioritizes community incentives, with 25% of tokens released at TGE to reward users and NFT holders. Future unlocks are tied to product milestones, ensuring that new token releases contribute more value to the ecosystem than they dilute the token’s price. Additionally, Backpack prioritizes regulatory compliance, currently serving only 48% of global regions to adhere to legal standards. Its goal is to build a hybrid platform integrating crypto and traditional financial services. Market reactions are mixed: Backpack is reportedly seeking funding at a $1 billion valuation, but predictions about its token FDV reflect uncertainty. Ultimately, Backpack’s model represents a shift toward transparency, long-term value, and user-centric growth in Web3.

marsbit02/10 14:42

A New Paradigm in Tokenomics? When Backpack Makes VCs 'Delay Gratification'

marsbit02/10 14:42

活动图片