# Сопутствующие статьи по теме Security

Новостной центр HTX предлагает последние статьи и углубленный анализ по "Security", охватывающие рыночные тренды, новости проектов, развитие технологий и политику регулирования в криптоиндустрии.

Will Quantum Computing Kill Bitcoin and Mining? Is This Alarmist?

The article addresses the recurring concern that quantum computing could break Bitcoin's encryption and disrupt mining. It references a Google Quantum AI white paper from March 2026, which suggests that the resources needed for a quantum computer to crack Bitcoin’s elliptic curve digital signature algorithm (ECDSA) have been reduced by about 20 times. Under ideal conditions, such an attack could theoretically derive a private key from a public key in roughly 9 minutes using 500,000 physical qubits. However, the threat is not immediate. Current quantum processors, like Google’s Willow (105 qubits) or IBM’s Condor (~1,121 qubits), are far from the scale required. The risk primarily targets transaction signatures—especially during the brief window when a transaction is broadcast but not yet confirmed, or when public keys have been historically exposed. It is estimated there is only a 10% probability of a “quantum break” by 2032. The impact on mining is considered negligible. Research indicates that quantum mining would require astronomically high qubit counts and energy—far exceeding entire national grids—making it economically and physically infeasible. The broader solution lies in post-quantum cryptography (PQC). Standards like ML-DSA and SLH-DSA are being developed, and Bitcoin improvement proposals such as BIP 360 aim to reduce quantum vulnerability by modifying transaction structures to avoid exposing public keys. While quantum computing poses a future risk to all public-key encryption systems—not just Bitcoin—the cryptocurrency ecosystem has time to adapt. Upgrades and migration to quantum-resistant algorithms are underway, ensuring the network evolves ahead of the threat.

marsbit04/11 14:40

Will Quantum Computing Kill Bitcoin and Mining? Is This Alarmist?

marsbit04/11 14:40

Weekly Editor's Picks (0404-0410)

Weekly Editor's Picks (0404-0410) provides in-depth analysis on key trends often missed in fast-moving news cycles. Key themes include: - **Macro & Geopolitics**: Analysis of Trump's threat-based economic strategy suggests a pattern of pressure and negotiation impacting markets. The energy crisis is deepening, with oil potentially reaching $120–150 due to structural shifts, not temporary disruption. The situation in the Hormuz Strait is a complex blend of military action and commercial diplomacy. - **Investing & Markets**: Q2 is expected to be volatile, with alpha opportunities in AI infrastructure, resources, and aerospace. Gold may hit new highs, potentially reaching $6000. A warning is issued about seemingly profitable but high-risk arbitrage strategies in crypto oil perpetuals. - **Crypto & DeFi**: Bear market strategies profiting from spreads and fees are highlighted. Analysis suggests the crypto market cap could fall another 30%. The platform Hyperliquid is noted for growing weekend crude trading but faces hurdles with institutional adoption. - **Other Highlights**: Meme coin trading is described as a highly competitive, youth-dominated game. Anthropic is reported to have developed a powerful AI model (Mythos) but is delaying its release over security concerns. The column also covers airdrop guides and recent controversies in prediction markets. The weekly hotlist supplements with key news: a US-Iran ceasefire and its market impact, potential Bitcoin oil fees, stablecoin developments in Hong Kong, and updates from institutions like Bitwise, Polymarket, and SpaceX.

marsbit04/11 03:48

Weekly Editor's Picks (0404-0410)

marsbit04/11 03:48

Aave Mired in a Crisis of Confidence: Service Providers Exit En Masse, Failures in Technology, Governance, and Risk Control

Aave, a leading DeFi lending protocol, is facing a severe internal crisis marked by the departure of key service providers, raising concerns about its governance, security, and future direction. The crisis began when Chaos Labs, the protocol's long-time risk management provider, terminated its relationship with Aave. The firm cited financial losses, the exit of other major contributors, and fundamental disagreements over the risk architecture of the upcoming Aave V4. Aave Labs declined Chaos Labs' demands for a significant fee increase and exclusive control over key functions like risk management and oracle services. This exit followed the departure of two other critical partners. BGD Labs, the primary technical contributor to Aave V3, accused Aave Labs of forcing an aggressive transition to V4 by limiting V3 development and devaluing its work. Subsequently, the Aave Chan Initiative (ACI), a major governance service provider, announced its planned exit, criticizing Aave Labs for centralizing power and controlling a large portion of voting tokens. The conflict highlights a central paradox within DAOs: the tension between founder-led vision and decentralized governance, and between long-term protocol health and short-term capital interests. Aave Labs is pushing for a more integrated and efficient "Aave Will Win" model with V4, arguing it is necessary for competing at an institutional level. However, critics warn this centralization comes at the cost of the protocol's decentralized credibility and increases systemic risk. The immediate impacts include a potential security downgrade, a loss of institutional knowledge, and damaged community trust. While Aave Labs views this as a painful but necessary transition, the market is watching cautiously as the protocol navigates this period of significant internal turmoil.

marsbit04/10 10:14

Aave Mired in a Crisis of Confidence: Service Providers Exit En Masse, Failures in Technology, Governance, and Risk Control

marsbit04/10 10:14

活动图片