# Сопутствующие статьи по теме Regulation

Новостной центр HTX предлагает последние статьи и углубленный анализ по "Regulation", охватывающие рыночные тренды, новости проектов, развитие технологий и политику регулирования в криптоиндустрии.

After Privacy Coins Surge, Does It Mean a Bear Market Is Coming?

The article explores the sharp rise in privacy coins like ZEC and XMR as a potential signal of an impending bear market in the crypto cycle. Historically, privacy tokens tend to surge when other narratives—such as DeFi or NFTs—lose momentum, often marking a final speculative push before a downturn. In 2017, coins like ZEC and XMR gained attention as "better Bitcoin" alternatives, fueled by technological appeal and hype. By late 2021 and early 2022, privacy projects like Aleo attracted massive investments, though they ultimately failed to deliver practical, mainstream adoption. The recent surge in late 2025, with ZEC rising 20x in three months, lacked clear catalysts but may reflect growing unease with increasing regulatory scrutiny and reduced financial privacy in crypto. While figures like Arthur Hayes and firms like a16z promoted "privacy-as-a-service," the author suggests this may have been a tactic to facilitate sell-offs rather than genuine growth. The piece argues that extreme privacy features—such as Monero’s fully anonymous transactions—often cater to illicit use cases rather than mainstream needs, making them a target for regulators and exchanges. Most users and regulators seek balanced privacy—protection without complete anonymity—which current privacy tokens fail to provide. Without addressing real-world utility and acceptable levels of privacy, these coins may remain the last resort in cyclical market pumps, often leaving investors at a loss.

marsbit01/31 08:05

After Privacy Coins Surge, Does It Mean a Bear Market Is Coming?

marsbit01/31 08:05

From Davos Confrontation to Capitol Hill: How Coinbase Became the Banking Industry's 'Legislative Enemy'

The article details the escalating conflict between Coinbase, the largest U.S. cryptocurrency exchange, and major Wall Street banks, as exemplified by a confrontation between Coinbase CEO Brian Armstrong and JPMorgan Chase CEO Jamie Dimon at the World Economic Forum in Davos. The core dispute centers on whether crypto exchanges should be allowed to pay yields, around 3.5%, to stablecoin holders—a practice banks argue is equivalent to paying interest on deposits and threatens to draw trillions of dollars away from traditional banking. Armstrong and the crypto industry advocate for free market principles, arguing banks could compete by raising their own deposit rates or entering the stablecoin market. This clash is playing out in Washington over the proposed Clarity Act, which could reshape financial regulations. Armstrong has become a powerful advocate, leveraging Coinbase's significant lobbying efforts and political donations to influence legislation. After he withdrew support for a Senate version of the bill that would have effectively banned such yields, a key vote was abruptly postponed, demonstrating his considerable influence. The article explores Armstrong's journey from a soft-spoken tech founder to a central figure in the policy debate, outlining Coinbase's ambition to become a "super app" that replaces traditional banks. With a new administration open to crypto, Armstrong is pushing for a compromise, such as creating a new category of regulated stablecoin issuers permitted to pay yields, as both sides vie to shape the future of American finance.

比推01/30 13:24

From Davos Confrontation to Capitol Hill: How Coinbase Became the Banking Industry's 'Legislative Enemy'

比推01/30 13:24

Preferred Entry-Level License for Encrypted Payments: Australia's DCE

An Introduction to Crypto Payment Licenses: Australia's DCE Option In the evolving regulatory landscape for crypto payments and stablecoin projects, Australia Digital Currency Exchange (DCE) has often been viewed as a relatively accessible entry path. Under the current framework, it does not require a financial license but involves registration with AUSTRAC and establishing an anti-money laundering (AML) system to conduct exchanges between cryptocurrencies and fiat currencies. However, by 2026, this understanding requires significant revision. Australian regulators are restructuring the overall regulatory logic for virtual asset services, not just adjusting a single "license." The key question is no longer whether DCE is feasible, but rather its position in the new regulatory structure—what it can and cannot accomplish. Currently, DCE is not a financial services license under the Corporations Act but an AML regulatory status under the Anti-Money Laundering and Counter-Terrorism Financing Act (AML/CTF Act). It focuses on obligations like KYC, transaction monitoring, and suspicious activity reporting, operating on an ex-post supervision model. By March 2026, major changes will take effect under the AML/CTF Amendment Act 2024. The reforms expand regulatory scope beyond currency exchanges to include virtual asset transfers and payments, introduce a mandatory registration confirmation from AUSTRAC before operations begin, and emphasize sustainable compliance capabilities over mere formal registration. Concurrently, ASIC is introducing a digital asset platform and custody framework, targeting services that hold private keys or manage client assets. This requires an Australian Financial Services License (AFSL), shifting oversight from AUSTRAC to financial services regulation. The core of Australian virtual asset regulation hinges on a functional divide: pure value transfer services fall under AUSTRAC’s AML oversight, while asset custody and management trigger ASIC’s financial services regime. For businesses considering DCE registration now, it remains a strategic step for establishing compliance history and preparing for future requirements. However, it is only a transitional foundation, not a long-term solution. Post-2026, all entities must adapt to the new registration confirmation process and stricter oversight. Ultimately, Australia’s approach integrates virtual asset services into existing legal frameworks through functional layering. Understanding the regulatory logic—especially concerning exchange, transfer, custody, and control—is more critical than focusing solely on the DCE registration.

marsbit01/30 13:17

Preferred Entry-Level License for Encrypted Payments: Australia's DCE

marsbit01/30 13:17

活动图片