# Сопутствующие статьи по теме Regulation

Новостной центр HTX предлагает последние статьи и углубленный анализ по "Regulation", охватывающие рыночные тренды, новости проектов, развитие технологий и политику регулирования в криптоиндустрии.

Why Are Crypto Project Acquisitions Now Excluding Tokens?

Recent acquisitions in the crypto space, such as Circle’s purchase of Interop Labs (developers of Axelar Network), have sparked controversy by focusing on acquiring teams and intellectual property while excluding the native tokens. In the Axelar case, the AXL token and network remain independent, leading to a 15% price drop and community backlash. Similar patterns emerged in other acquisitions: Kraken’s Ink acquired Vertex Protocol’s team and tech but abandoned the VRTX token, causing a 75% crash. Pump.fun acquired Padre and invalidated its token without compensation, and Coinbase integrated Vector.fun’s tech without involving the TNSR token. These cases reflect a broader “acquihire” trend common in Web2, where companies acquire talent and tech but avoid equity or token obligations. In crypto, however, this often leaves retail token holders with no rights or financial benefits, as tokens are designed to avoid regulatory scrutiny as securities—offering utility or governance instead of ownership or profit-sharing. This has led to growing tension between project teams and token holders, exemplified by Aave’s recent governance proposal to assert DAO control over IP, equity, and revenue—highlighting the misalignment between token-based incentives and traditional equity structures. The trend raises fundamental questions about the value and rights attached to tokens in decentralized ecosystems.

marsbit12/18 01:12

Why Are Crypto Project Acquisitions Now Excluding Tokens?

marsbit12/18 01:12

Why Has the UAE, Built on Oil, Become a New Hotspot for the Crypto Industry?

The UAE, traditionally known for its oil wealth, is rapidly emerging as a major global hub for the cryptocurrency industry. Despite recent market volatility, the country is actively hosting crypto conferences and attracting top institutions and professionals. A key driver is proactive regulatory development. The UAE incorporated crypto into its "2031 National Investment Strategy" and introduced a "Tokenization Regulatory Sandbox Guide" in 2025, establishing a coordinated federal and local regulatory framework. Dubai's Virtual Assets Regulatory Authority (VARA) has already licensed 36 companies, while Abu Dhabi's global market recognizes crypto as a regulated financial instrument. This regulatory clarity has drawn major players like OKX, which established a significant local presence. Substantial capital deployment from the oil-rich nation further fuels growth. A record $2 billion investment was made in Binance by Abu Dhabi's MGX. State investment vehicles, including Mubadala, have significantly increased their Bitcoin ETF holdings, collectively exceeding $1.5 billion. The UAE also offers powerful incentives: zero tax on crypto profits for individuals, up to 50 years of corporate tax exemption in free zones, and a coveted Golden Visa for top talent or those investing crypto profits. These policies led to a 300% surge in Dubai blockchain company registrations in 2025. A recent law granting the digital dirham the same legal status as physical cash is set to further integrate with and empower the crypto ecosystem, strengthening the Middle East's role in digital finance. The UAE is strategically leveraging crypto assets to transition into the digital economy.

marsbit12/18 00:06

Why Has the UAE, Built on Oil, Become a New Hotspot for the Crypto Industry?

marsbit12/18 00:06

Buryatia Supports Strengthening the Ban on Cryptocurrency Mining

The government of Buryatia has supported the introduction of a year-round ban on cryptocurrency mining, citing a severe existing electricity deficit. The regional Ministry of Transport, Energy, and Road Infrastructure stated that the ban is a measure to stabilize the power supply and ensure the rational use of resources. The energy deficit in Buryatia and two neighboring regions—Irkutsk Oblast and Zabaykalsky Krai—reaches nearly 3,000 MW. Previously, restrictions were only in place during the high-load winter period from November 15 to March 15. This follows a previous report that the Russian government plans to introduce a year-round mining ban in southern Buryatia and Zabaykalsky Krai starting in 2026. Earlier in 2025, mining was restricted until spring 2031 in several energy-deficient Russian territories, including regions of the North Caucasus and occupied Ukrainian territories, where the ban is year-round. Seasonal restrictions were applied in Buryatia, Zabaykalsky Krai, and southern Irkutsk Oblast during the heating season, though the governor of Irkutsk later secured a full ban for his region. Buryatia and Zabaykalsky Krai had previously requested a full ban, but a decision was postponed in June to first assess the financial impact on the power grid and prepare a regulatory framework for redistributing miners' power capacity to social facilities. Despite this, the Ministry of Energy stated in September that it saw no grounds for new mining bans, claiming it had received no requests from regional authorities and that the national power system was handling the load.

RBK-crypto12/17 15:38

Buryatia Supports Strengthening the Ban on Cryptocurrency Mining

RBK-crypto12/17 15:38

RWA Weekly Report|On-Chain Total Value Rises Again; U.S. SEC Issues Crypto Asset Custody Guidance (12.10-12.17)

RWA Weekly Report: On-Chain Value Rebounds; SEC Issues Crypto Custody Guidance (Dec 10–17) The total distributed asset value (DAV) of real-world assets (RWA) on-chain rose to $18.74 billion, up 1.63% from the previous week, ending a period of stagnation. The represented asset value (RAV) increased 4.92% to $410.38 billion, marking the largest weekly gain in two months. The number of asset holders grew by over 14,000 to 575,752. Stablecoin market cap slightly declined to $300.18 billion, but user numbers increased by 1.42% to 210.72 million. U.S. Treasuries remained the largest asset class but decreased marginally to $8.7 billion. Commodity assets grew to $3.2 billion, while private credit saw a modest rise to $2.4 billion. Public equities and non-U.S. government debt also increased, whereas private equity slightly declined. Key developments include the U.S. Congress urging the SEC to allow cryptocurrencies in 401(k) plans, the SEC releasing crypto custody guidance emphasizing wallet risks, and approving DTCC to custody tokenized stocks and RWAs on blockchain. Nasdaq proposed extending trading hours to 23 hours daily to align with crypto markets. Visa began USDC settlement via Solana for U.S. banks. Ondo Finance announced plans to launch tokenized stocks and ETFs on Solana in early 2026 after the SEC closed its investigation without charges. MSX (STONKS) reported a record $2 billion in daily trading volume and is preparing for potential official tokenized stock adoption following Nasdaq’s SEC application.

Odaily星球日报12/17 11:15

RWA Weekly Report|On-Chain Total Value Rises Again; U.S. SEC Issues Crypto Asset Custody Guidance (12.10-12.17)

Odaily星球日报12/17 11:15

Selling Assets While Racing for a Bank Charter: What's the Rush at PayPal?

Facing intense pressure from the shifting financial landscape, PayPal is making two seemingly contradictory moves: selling off $7 billion in "Buy Now, Pay Later" loan assets while simultaneously applying for an industrial bank charter (ILC) to establish "PayPal Bank." The core reason is a strategic pivot to escape the vulnerabilities of its current "rent-a-license" model. For years, PayPal's massive lending business relied on WebBank's charter, making it a "middleman" whose core operations were dependent on a partner. A recent crisis involving a similar intermediary, Synapse, which froze user funds, highlighted the extreme risk of this model. Furthermore, in a high-interest-rate environment, PayPal is missing out on billions in profit by parking its 430 million users' funds at partner banks instead of leveraging them as low-cost deposits to earn interest and lending revenue itself. The urgency is amplified by the existential threat of stablecoins. PayPal's own stablecoin, PYUSD, is issued by a partner, Paxos. As regulators move to grant such partners official banking status and new legislation like the GENIUS Act takes shape, control over stablecoin issuance—and its near-zero-fee model—is shifting to licensed entities. This directly threatens PayPal's core business, which relies on high transaction fees for e-commerce payments. To survive, PayPal must control the entire financial stack. The asset sale was a crucial prerequisite for the bank application. By offloading the risky loan assets, PayPal presented a "clean" balance sheet to regulators (the FDIC), drastically increasing its chances of approval for the highly coveted ILC charter. This charter is a rare "backdoor" that allows commercial companies like PayPal to operate a bank without the parent company becoming a heavily regulated bank holding company. PayPal is racing against time. Regulatory scrutiny on ILCs is increasing, and this window of opportunity may soon close. The bank charter is not just about loans; it's an option for the future—allowing PayPal to legally custody crypto assets, connect to DeFi protocols, and transform from a payment processor into a full-scale asset manager for the Web3 era. This is a desperate bid for survival: to become the J.P. Morgan of crypto or risk becoming a relic of the early internet.

marsbit12/17 10:15

Selling Assets While Racing for a Bank Charter: What's the Rush at PayPal?

marsbit12/17 10:15

活动图片