# Сопутствующие статьи по теме privacy

Новостной центр HTX предлагает последние статьи и углубленный анализ по "privacy", охватывающие рыночные тренды, новости проектов, развитие технологий и политику регулирования в криптоиндустрии.

Interview with Sui Founder: Leaving Meta at 50 to Start a Business, How to Rebuild the 'Foundation' for the Internet

Evan Cheng, co-founder and CEO of Mysten Labs (the core developer behind the Sui blockchain), shares his journey from working at Apple and Meta to starting his own venture in his 50s. He left Meta’s Libra (Diem) project due to creative constraints and a desire to build foundational internet infrastructure tailored for automation and AI agents. Cheng believes current web architecture is ill-suited for automation and aims to create a unified, efficient, and secure blockchain layer to support future automated interactions between humans, machines, and agents. He addresses key industry challenges, including misconceptions about blockchain (e.g., the "blockchain trilemma"), technical immaturity, and fragmented privacy and security models. Sui tackles these with its object-centric architecture, integrated privacy features, and a full-stack approach that offers iOS-like developer convenience. Sui has attracted major partners like CCP Games, who are building persistent, automated game economies on the network. Cheng also highlights DeepBook, Sui's native central limit order book, which acts as a shared liquidity hub to improve capital efficiency across DeFi applications. Despite market’s volatility, Cheng remains focused on long-term goals, emphasizing real-world adoption and the need for robust, scalable infrastructure beyond short-term speculation.

marsbit03/05 02:59

Interview with Sui Founder: Leaving Meta at 50 to Start a Business, How to Rebuild the 'Foundation' for the Internet

marsbit03/05 02:59

OpenClaw Endorses Venice.ai, VVV Token Surges Over 500% in One Month

OpenClaw, an open-source self-hosted AI agent platform, has listed Venice.ai—a privacy-focused, uncensored generative AI platform—as a recommended model provider. This endorsement comes shortly after OpenClaw’s founder publicly discouraged young people from engaging with cryptocurrency, creating a notable contrast. Venice.ai, founded by crypto OG Erik Voorhees, positions itself as a decentralized alternative to ChatGPT. It emphasizes user privacy by not storing any data on its servers; all content remains encrypted on the user’s local device. The platform offers two privacy modes: Private (using open-source models on decentralized GPUs) and Anonymized (removing user metadata from prompts). The project features a dual-token economy: - VVV: A capital asset used for staking (currently ~19% APY) and minting DIEM. - DIEM: Represents perpetual AI compute credit. 1 DIEM = $1 daily API credit, usable across Venice’s models. This structure allows high-frequency users to access AI services at a lower marginal cost over time. VVV’s price surged over 500% in a month, rising from ~$1.5 to ~$8.4. This growth is attributed to both supply constraints—including a permanent burn of unclaimed airdropped tokens and reduced annual emissions—and rising demand, especially after OpenClaw’s integration. With over 25,000 API users and a staking rate of 38.8% for VVV, Venice is positioning itself as a privacy-backend solution for the expanding AI agent ecosystem, blending crypto-economic incentives with scalable AI infrastructure.

Odaily星球日报03/04 02:31

OpenClaw Endorses Venice.ai, VVV Token Surges Over 500% in One Month

Odaily星球日报03/04 02:31

Same Case, Different Verdicts: Why Was Uniswap Acquitted While Tornado Cash Was Not?

In a landmark ruling, the New York Southern District Court dismissed a class-action lawsuit against Uniswap and its founder, Hayden Adams, holding them not liable for scam tokens traded on the platform. The court, presided over by Judge Katherine Polk Failla, compared the case to holding a self-driving car developer responsible for crimes committed using the vehicle, emphasizing that open-source developers should not bear responsibility for misuse by third parties. This decision contrasts sharply with the legal outcome for Tornado Cash developers. Despite the same judge being involved, Tornado Cash co-developer Roman Storm was convicted for operating an unlicensed money-transmitting business, while another developer, Alexey Pertsev, received a prison sentence in the Netherlands for money laundering. The U.S. Treasury had previously sanctioned Tornado Cash for allegedly facilitating over $7 billion in money laundering, including for North Korean hackers. The divergent rulings highlight a key regulatory stance: decentralization is permissible, but privacy tools enabling illicit activities face strict scrutiny. The author suggests that while Uniswap’s legal victory aligns with principles of developer immunity for open-source code, Tornado Cash’s case underscores that protocols knowingly aiding crime, especially at a state level, won’t be tolerated. The piece concludes by questioning if Uniswap, despite its legal win, should take more proactive steps to screen for scams to protect users, reflecting a broader responsibility within the DeFi ecosystem.

marsbit03/03 11:10

Same Case, Different Verdicts: Why Was Uniswap Acquitted While Tornado Cash Was Not?

marsbit03/03 11:10

活动图片