# Сопутствующие статьи по теме Policy

Новостной центр HTX предлагает последние статьи и углубленный анализ по "Policy", охватывающие рыночные тренды, новости проектов, развитие технологий и политику регулирования в криптоиндустрии.

Musk Casually Overturns the Rice Bowls of Crypto KOLs

Elon Musk's X platform has updated its paid partnership policy, causing significant disruption among crypto KOLs. The new rules mandate that all paid content must be clearly labeled with a "Paid Partnership" disclosure tag, replacing the previous "#ad" requirement. Additionally, reporting unlabeled paid promotions has been simplified to an anonymous form. Initially, the policy mistakenly included "cryptocurrency" in a list of prohibited promotion categories, but this was quickly corrected by X’s product lead, Nikita Bier, who clarified that the change was an error and not targeted at crypto or prediction markets. Despite this, the core policy changes still apply to crypto influencers. The new rules effectively end the era of "hidden advertisements" in crypto, where KOLs often promoted projects without disclosing paid arrangements. Many crypto projects and KOLs prefer undisclosed promotions to maintain an appearance of organic endorsement, as labeled ads may reduce credibility and trigger backlash from followers who might perceive them as scams. The anonymous reporting system has already led to penalties for several KOLs, including temporary bans and forced post removals. This has created uncertainty and fear within the community, as malicious or mistaken reports could easily target influencers. Some KOLs are protesting sarcastically by labeling all posts as "paid partnerships," while others consider migrating to crypto-friendly platforms like Binance Square, which may offer a more accommodating environment. However, given crypto’s niche size relative to the broader internet, X is unlikely to reverse its policy changes for this audience.

marsbit03/04 04:01

Musk Casually Overturns the Rice Bowls of Crypto KOLs

marsbit03/04 04:01

Deciphering the Dispute Between Anthropic and the War Department: What Does Trump Intend?

The article reflects on the decline of the American republic, drawing a metaphor between the gradual process of death—observed during the author’s father’s passing—and the slow erosion of democratic institutions. It examines the recent conflict between AI company Anthropic and the U.S. Department of War (DoW) as a symptom of this decay. Under both Biden and Trump administrations, Anthropic’s Claude AI was approved for use in classified environments, subject to two policy restrictions: no mass surveillance of Americans and no use in fully autonomous lethal weapons. The Trump administration later reversed its stance, opposing the idea of a private company imposing policy limits on military technology and threatening to designate Anthropic a "supply chain risk"—a move typically reserved for foreign-adversary companies. The author argues that this response reflects a broader breakdown in governance: the increased use of arbitrary state power, the decline of legislative process, and the erosion of property rights and predictable rule-of-law order. The confrontation raises fundamental questions about who should control advanced AI—private actors, the state, or yet-to-be-defined public mechanisms. While not causing institutional decline, the episode signals deeper dysfunction: the state’s willingness to coerce private entities and the blurring line between democratic oversight and government overreach. The author warns against equating "democratic control" with "government control" and calls for vigilance to protect civil liberties as AI and governance continue to evolve.

marsbit03/03 06:08

Deciphering the Dispute Between Anthropic and the War Department: What Does Trump Intend?

marsbit03/03 06:08

活动图片