# Сопутствующие статьи по теме Leverage

Новостной центр HTX предлагает последние статьи и углубленный анализ по "Leverage", охватывающие рыночные тренды, новости проектов, развитие технологий и политику регулирования в криптоиндустрии.

$2.5 Billion Liquidated: Crypto Market Cursed with Following Declines but Not Rallies

A massive crypto market crash on January 31 led to $2.522 billion in liquidations, with Bitcoin falling below $78,000 (a 7.6% drop) and Ethereum plunging over 12% to under $2,400, erasing gains from mid-2025. Solana also dropped sharply, falling below $100. The sell-off was triggered by broader financial turmoil, beginning with escalating geopolitical tensions and accelerated by a severe crash in precious metals. Gold and silver saw dramatic drops—15.7% and 37%, respectively—after reports suggested former Fed official Kevin Warsh, perceived as hawkish, might be nominated as the next Fed chair. This sparked a repricing of expectations around U.S. monetary policy and a stronger dollar. The crypto market, positioned at the bottom of the risk asset hierarchy, suffered disproportionately—falling more sharply than traditional markets during downturns without matching their rallies. Major players were heavily impacted: trader Garrett Bullish saw over $700 million liquidated in a single position on Hyperliquid, while institutional entity Trend Research faces nearly $500 million in unrealized losses on its Ethereum holdings. Despite Bitcoin’s price relative to gold hitting historic lows—a signal some interpret as a potential long-term buying opportunity—the event underscores crypto’s current role as a high-risk asset vulnerable to macro shocks, lacking the stable store-of-value status of traditional safe havens. The market is now questioning what will sustain long-term holding through periods of deleveraging and uncertainty.

Odaily星球日报02/01 01:01

$2.5 Billion Liquidated: Crypto Market Cursed with Following Declines but Not Rallies

Odaily星球日报02/01 01:01

MicroStrategy's Defense Line Breached! Is Bitcoin Sliding Towards the 60,000s?

The cryptocurrency market is experiencing its darkest period of the year. Bitcoin (BTC) has sharply declined, with intraday losses reaching 9%, and its price briefly fell below $76,037—the volume-weighted average cost basis for MicroStrategy, the largest corporate holder of BTC. This marks the first time since October 2023 that Bitcoin has traded below this key level. As MicroStrategy’s highly leveraged position faces a major test, market panic is deepening. The company’s aggressive accumulation of Bitcoin near the $90,000 level earlier this year significantly raised its average purchase price. With BTC now near $75,000, MicroStrategy’s holdings of approximately 712,600 BTC have fallen into an overall unrealized loss for the first time this cycle. The sell-off is driven by tightening macro liquidity, weak demand, and forced liquidations of highly leveraged positions. Bitcoin has broken below key support levels, and despite being deeply oversold, buying interest remains weak. Analysts warn that if Bitcoin fails to reclaim $78,000 soon, it could fall toward the critical 200-week moving average near $68,000—a major technical and psychological support level. Some even suggest a further drop to $60,000 is possible if panic persists. This downturn reflects a broader market reset after a period of excessive leverage and speculation. While MicroStrategy may withstand short-term pressure due to its long-term debt structure, retail investors face a sharp reality check as expectations adjust downward.

比推01/31 19:44

MicroStrategy's Defense Line Breached! Is Bitcoin Sliding Towards the 60,000s?

比推01/31 19:44

"We Are Heartbroken by CEX": 4 Users Reveal Why They 'Defected' to Hyperliquid

"We Are Heartbroken by CEXs": Four Users Explain Why They Switched to Hyperliquid In 2025, Hyperliquid emerged as a major player in the perpetual futures DEX space. Founded and self-funded by Jeff, it achieved significant traction, at one point handling over 10% of Binance’s daily contract volume and dominating more than 70% of the perp DEX market. Four users shared their perspectives on why they moved from CEXs to Hyperliquid: - **User A (Web3 Researcher)**: Hyperliquid prioritizes transparency and user experience over decentralization. It functions like a CEX but with on-chain settlement, offering control and verifiable transactions. - **User B (Hyperliquid Enthusiast)**: Driven by profit, he found CEXs increasingly exploitative in 2024. Hyperliquid’s wealth effect, community culture, and successful token auctions attracted users and generated significant returns. - **User C (Airdrop Farmer)**: Hyperliquid’s substantial airdrop and sustainable revenue model stood out. Its appeal to international users (especially those restricted from regulated CEXs) and high referral rewards also contributed to growth. - **User D (Project Executive)**: The meme coin boom and low liquidity in traditional tokens forced him into leveraged trading. Hyperliquid’s unique community behavior (e.g., opposing CEX-listed tokens) created arbitrage opportunities. Hyperliquid’s success stems from its user-centric design, transparency, and strategic community building. External factors, including CEXs’ failures in fostering wealth creation and trust, further drove users toward decentralized alternatives. The platform’s rise highlights a shift in user preference toward链上 products when CEXs underdeliver.

marsbit01/30 10:08

"We Are Heartbroken by CEX": 4 Users Reveal Why They 'Defected' to Hyperliquid

marsbit01/30 10:08

The Watershed of Gold Certificates: The Collapse of Jierui and the Fundamental Differences with Tether

A significant divergence in the model of gold-backed platforms is highlighted by the collapse of Jierui in China and the expansion of Tether’s gold-backed stablecoin, XAUT. In late January, Jierui, a Shenzhen-based gold trading platform, failed amid a liquidity crisis. Users faced severe withdrawal restrictions, with many unable to access funds despite holding substantial gold and cash balances. The platform offered unfavorable settlement terms, exposing a classic model of unregulated financial risk. Jierui’s core flaw was its use of high-leverage “pre-set price” trading, where users bet on gold price movements against the platform—effectively an unhedged options market. When gold prices rose sharply in 2025–2026, the platform faced unsustainable liabilities, triggering a collapse. In contrast, Tether Gold (XAUT) operates on a fully reserved, 1:1 model—each token represents one ounce of physical gold, held in reserve. With over 140 tons of gold, Tether has become one of the world’s top gold holders. Its transparent, asset-backed approach has allowed it to thrive amid gold price appreciation, with its gold reserves gaining over $5 billion in value. Tether is further expanding its gold acquisitions and leveraging market opportunities through professional trading. While Jierui’s failure underscores the risks of opaque, leveraged structures, Tether’s growth demonstrates how digitized, verifiable gold assets can serve as a resilient store of value—especially in an era of geopolitical and financial uncertainty.

比推01/30 07:16

The Watershed of Gold Certificates: The Collapse of Jierui and the Fundamental Differences with Tether

比推01/30 07:16

活动图片