# Сопутствующие статьи по теме KYC

Новостной центр HTX предлагает последние статьи и углубленный анализ по "KYC", охватывающие рыночные тренды, новости проектов, развитие технологий и политику регулирования в криптоиндустрии.

When Notices Become Law: What Does the Draft Network Crime Prevention Law Mean for the Crypto World?

The draft "Cyber Crime Prevention Law" released by Chinese authorities on January 31, 2026, marks a significant shift from previous regulatory notices to formal legislation, fundamentally altering the legal landscape for cryptocurrency activities in China. Unlike earlier policies focused on financial risks, this law adopts a criminal governance approach, specifically targeting three core areas: OTC transactions, technical development, and public node operations. Key provisions include Article 26, which redefines "knowledge" in OTC trading, making it easier to prosecute those involved in transferring illicit funds using virtual currencies. Articles 19 and 31 extend liability to those providing technical support, such as developers or promoters, with Article 2 asserting extraterritorial jurisdiction over overseas entities serving Chinese users. Additionally, Article 40 requires blockchain nodes to monitor and block illegal activities, challenging the feasibility of permissionless networks. Legal experts note that while penalties may start with fines, severe cases could lead to criminal charges. The law reflects a broader trend from administrative bans to criminal regulation, emphasizing compliance through strict KYC, AML controls, and geo-blocking for Chinese users. For the crypto industry, this law establishes compliance as a critical survival threshold rather than an optional measure.

marsbit02/03 11:54

When Notices Become Law: What Does the Draft Network Crime Prevention Law Mean for the Crypto World?

marsbit02/03 11:54

Preferred Entry-Level License for Encrypted Payments: Australia's DCE

An Introduction to Crypto Payment Licenses: Australia's DCE Option In the evolving regulatory landscape for crypto payments and stablecoin projects, Australia Digital Currency Exchange (DCE) has often been viewed as a relatively accessible entry path. Under the current framework, it does not require a financial license but involves registration with AUSTRAC and establishing an anti-money laundering (AML) system to conduct exchanges between cryptocurrencies and fiat currencies. However, by 2026, this understanding requires significant revision. Australian regulators are restructuring the overall regulatory logic for virtual asset services, not just adjusting a single "license." The key question is no longer whether DCE is feasible, but rather its position in the new regulatory structure—what it can and cannot accomplish. Currently, DCE is not a financial services license under the Corporations Act but an AML regulatory status under the Anti-Money Laundering and Counter-Terrorism Financing Act (AML/CTF Act). It focuses on obligations like KYC, transaction monitoring, and suspicious activity reporting, operating on an ex-post supervision model. By March 2026, major changes will take effect under the AML/CTF Amendment Act 2024. The reforms expand regulatory scope beyond currency exchanges to include virtual asset transfers and payments, introduce a mandatory registration confirmation from AUSTRAC before operations begin, and emphasize sustainable compliance capabilities over mere formal registration. Concurrently, ASIC is introducing a digital asset platform and custody framework, targeting services that hold private keys or manage client assets. This requires an Australian Financial Services License (AFSL), shifting oversight from AUSTRAC to financial services regulation. The core of Australian virtual asset regulation hinges on a functional divide: pure value transfer services fall under AUSTRAC’s AML oversight, while asset custody and management trigger ASIC’s financial services regime. For businesses considering DCE registration now, it remains a strategic step for establishing compliance history and preparing for future requirements. However, it is only a transitional foundation, not a long-term solution. Post-2026, all entities must adapt to the new registration confirmation process and stricter oversight. Ultimately, Australia’s approach integrates virtual asset services into existing legal frameworks through functional layering. Understanding the regulatory logic—especially concerning exchange, transfer, custody, and control—is more critical than focusing solely on the DCE registration.

marsbit01/30 13:17

Preferred Entry-Level License for Encrypted Payments: Australia's DCE

marsbit01/30 13:17

活动图片