# Сопутствующие статьи по теме Execution

Новостной центр HTX предлагает последние статьи и углубленный анализ по "Execution", охватывающие рыночные тренды, новости проектов, развитие технологий и политику регулирования в криптоиндустрии.

Interview with Jessie, Head of Investment and Incubation at ZetaChain: In the AI × Web3 Era, What's Truly Underestimated Is Execution

In an interview with Jessie, Head of Investment and Incubation at ZetaChain, she discusses the shift in Web3 infrastructure toward real-world adoption, especially in the AI era. ZetaChain 2.0 has launched with a focus on AI integration and introduced Anuma, a privacy-centric AI interface currently in testing. Jessie emphasizes that ZetaChain’s core metric is user growth, not TVL, with a goal of reaching 500k monthly active users. The platform aims to attract Web2 and AI developers rather than traditional Web3 builders, prioritizing real-world usage over crypto-native incentives. She notes that execution is the most undervalued aspect in AI × Web3—many projects have strong narratives but lack long-term commitment post-token launch. ZetaChain differentiates itself through continuous iteration and a focus on solving data privacy and interoperability challenges in a multi-model AI world. Anuma is positioned as a consumer-facing product for Web2 users, not just a demo for ZetaChain 2.0. The strategy avoids dependency on short-term incentives and instead focuses on sustainable, product-led growth.

marsbit02/13 00:53

Interview with Jessie, Head of Investment and Incubation at ZetaChain: In the AI × Web3 Era, What's Truly Underestimated Is Execution

marsbit02/13 00:53

Interview with Jessie, Head of Investment and Incubation at ZetaChain: In the AI × Web3 Era, Execution is Truly Underestimated

Jessie, Investment and Incubation Lead at ZetaChain, discusses the shift in Web3 infrastructure focus toward real-world adoption and user value in the AI era. ZetaChain 2.0 has launched with a strategic pivot to AI-integrated applications, emphasizing user growth over traditional metrics like TVL. The core goal is to achieve 500,000 monthly active users by focusing on product execution rather than speculative incentives. A key initiative is Anuma, a privacy-centric AI interface designed for mainstream users, reflecting ZetaChain’s commitment to building usable consumer products beyond Web3-native audiences. Jessie highlights that the most underestimated aspect of ZetaChain is its long-term execution capability and persistent iteration despite market conditions. The team is prioritizing collaboration with AI developers and Web2-native builders, avoiding the common pitfall of catering only to crypto-native users. Jessie argues that the AI × Web3 space suffers not from a lack of promising ideas, but from a shortage of teams willing to execute relentlessly and deliver real user value over time.

Odaily星球日报02/13 00:45

Interview with Jessie, Head of Investment and Incubation at ZetaChain: In the AI × Web3 Era, Execution is Truly Underestimated

Odaily星球日报02/13 00:45

Stop Saying ‘We Need Privacy’

Title: Stop Saying ‘We Need Privacy’ The article argues that "privacy" is not a single concept but rather five distinct problems in the context of blockchain and cryptocurrency. When people demand privacy, they are often referring to one of the following: 1. **Intent Privacy:** Hiding transaction details from observers before execution to prevent front-running by MEV bots. Solutions include private transaction delivery (e.g., Flashbots Protect) and encrypted mempools (e.g., Shutter Network). 2. **Value Privacy:** Concealing the amounts transferred. This is achieved through shielded systems (e.g., Zcash, Penumbra) that use cryptographic proofs to verify transactions without revealing values. Privacy can still be compromised by user behavior patterns. 3. **Graph Privacy:** Protecting the relationships and patterns of who transacts with whom. Techniques include pooled unlinkability (e.g., Tornado Cash mixers) and stealth addresses (e.g., ERC-5564) to break direct on-chain links between transactions. 4. **State Privacy:** Keeping DeFi positions, balances, and liquidation thresholds hidden. This requires storing state as private records and using zero-knowledge proofs (ZK-proofs) to validate state changes without revealing underlying data (e.g., Aztec). Composability and edge interactions remain challenges. 5. **Execution Privacy:** Hiding the computation logic itself, crucial for strategies like auctions or liquidations. Methods include using Trusted Execution Environments (TEEs) (e.g., Secret Network) or ZK-proofs for private execution. The article concludes that privacy often fails at the edges, such as at the RPC (Remote Procedure Call) layer, where providers can collect IP addresses and wallet information. The key is to ask which surface is being protected and where information might leak when users interact with the real world, rather than seeking a single winning privacy model.

比推02/13 00:39

Tiger Research: Realism is the Only Answer in the Cryptocurrency Downturn

Tiger Research argues that during the prolonged crypto market downturn, only projects grounded in realism and practical problems are demonstrating resilience. The report highlights three key examples: Hyperliquid, which addresses immediate trading friction by building a performant perp DEX; Canton Network, which provides a privacy-focused, compliant infrastructure for institutional finance and real-world assets (RWA); and Kite AI, which is building payment infrastructure for a future AI agent economy. The common thread is a focus on solving real, existing market problems with structurally sound solutions. To assess a project's practical viability, the analysis should focus on three core questions: what specific problem it solves, how the solution is structured, and whether the team has the execution capability. Ultimately, the ability to deliver practical utility is the most powerful fundamental in a bear market.

marsbit02/09 08:11

Tiger Research: Realism is the Only Answer in the Cryptocurrency Downturn

marsbit02/09 08:11

Farewell to 'Storytelling' for Funding: What Kind of Projects Can Survive Beyond 2026

Title: Beyond Storytelling: What Projects Will Survive Beyond 2026 The venture capital landscape in crypto has fundamentally shifted. In 2025, top market maker and investor Wintermute Ventures approved only 4% of the 600 projects it reviewed. This reflects a broader trend: total crypto VC deals plummeted 60% from 2024, with capital concentrating heavily in later-stage rounds (56% of total funding). The driver is a radical change in market structure. Institutional capital now dominates (75% of liquidity), but it is largely trapped in major assets like BTC and ETH. The altcoin narrative cycle collapsed from 61 days to just 19-20 days, leaving little time for money to flow to smaller projects. The traditional four-year bull cycle is broken; a 2026 recovery requires a major catalyst. Consequently, VC investment logic has moved from "spray and pray" to a survival-of-the-fittest model. Funding now targets projects that can prove viability from the seed stage. Key requirements for survival include: 1. **Hard Proof of Product-Market Fit:** Real data points are mandatory, such as 1,000+ active users or $100k+ in monthly revenue, with a DAU/MAU ratio above 50%. 2. **Capital Efficiency & Default Alive Status:** Startups must achieve "default alive" status, with monthly burn not exceeding 30% of revenue. Large, cash-burning teams are untenable. 3. **AI Integration & Technical Sophistication:** AI is no longer optional; it's essential for reducing development cycles and optimizing operations. Privacy tech like zero-knowledge proofs is critical for compliance, especially in RWA tokenization. 4. **Liquidity & Exchange Compatibility:** Projects must plan their exchange listing path from day one, ensuring compatibility with institutional liquidity channels like ETFs. For investors, the mandate is clear: adapt or fail. The new standard is not "how big the story can be" but "can this project prove its ability to generate revenue from seed." Investment must focus on AI-crypto fusion, compliance, and emerging markets. The era of betting on narratives is over; execution and sustainable profitability are now the only metrics that matter.

marsbit01/16 09:13

Farewell to 'Storytelling' for Funding: What Kind of Projects Can Survive Beyond 2026

marsbit01/16 09:13

The Truth About the Crypto Money Printer: Want to Make Money in 2026? Keep an Eye on These Three Directions

The article "Crypto’s Revenue Recipe" analyzes the revenue generation landscape in the crypto industry, highlighting key trends and drivers based on data from 2025. Total crypto protocol revenue doubled to over $16 billion in 2025, with stablecoin issuers like Tether and Circle dominating, accounting for 60% of total revenue. However, perpetual DEXs (e.g., Hyperliquid, EdgeX) emerged significantly, contributing 7-8% of industry revenue. Three core drivers are identified for 2026: 1. **Carry**: Revenue from holding and transferring assets (e.g., stablecoin interest earnings), though vulnerable to Fed rate cuts. 2. **Execution**: Perpetual DEXs gain traction by enabling low-friction, high-frequency trading and liquidity provision, challenging stablecoin dominance. 3. **Distribution**: Token launch platforms (e.g., pump.fun) leverage frictionless asset creation and distribution to capture incremental revenue. The article emphasizes the shift towards value transfer to token holders, with 19% of protocol revenue distributed via staking, dividends, buybacks, or burns in 2025—a sign of growing "economic ownership" rather than mere governance. Projects like Hyperliquid and pump.fun are cited for prioritizing holder rewards. In 2026, value distribution is expected to become standard for protocols aiming for fundamental-based token valuation.

比推01/13 18:54

The Truth About the Crypto Money Printer: Want to Make Money in 2026? Keep an Eye on These Three Directions

比推01/13 18:54

6th Man Ventures Founder: Forget the 'Token vs. Equity' Debate, What Really Needs to Be Trusted?

Mike Dudas, founder of The Block and 6th Man Ventures, argues that the debate between tokens and equity misses the point: the real question is what deserves trust. He suggests there is no one-size-fits-all answer to whether a "dual token + equity" structure works. Instead, the core principle is trusting a team that is not only exceptional but also long-term oriented, committed to building a founder-led, enduring business like Binance. Dudas notes that for application-layer projects requiring sustained leadership, tokens often underperform compared to equity. Many DeFi 1.0 founders have left their projects, which are now maintained by DAOs in "maintenance mode," struggling with slow and ineffective decision-making. Pure equity isn’t always superior either—tokens enable functions like fee discounts, staking for airdrops, and access rights, which equity can’t easily replicate. He proposes a hybrid model: an equity entity operates on a "cost-plus" basis to serve a token-driven protocol, aiming not to maximize its own profits but to maximize the token’s and ecosystem’s value. This requires high trust in the team, as token holders lack strong legal rights. Ultimately, success depends on the team’s capability, credibility, execution, vision, and action. The best tokens will thrive by 2026 if teams communicate well, conduct buybacks, enable substantive governance, and direct value to the token through utility.

marsbit01/12 08:09

6th Man Ventures Founder: Forget the 'Token vs. Equity' Debate, What Really Needs to Be Trusted?

marsbit01/12 08:09

Stop Gambling Within the Framework of Luck

Stop Gambling Under the Guise of Fortune Human instinct drives us to act quickly when facing problems, creating an illusion that action alone can ease the anxiety of the unknown. However, the greatest trap lies in the mismatch between rapid action and the resources invested. Most actions are merely pseudo-diligence aimed at alleviating anxiety. When the speed of action surpasses the precision of thought, the consumption of capital is no longer an investment—it becomes a gamble on luck. This is a common pitfall, and the ability to confront it and develop effective solutions truly separates individuals. The first step is to find your unique edge. Rather than following idealized or high-barrier methods, the author suggests using AI as a "cognitive leverage amplifier" to help identify personal strengths. By engaging in detailed self-analysis through AI conversations—discussing childhood, personality, investment experiences, and missed opportunities—one can uncover and refine their advantages through constructive dialogue and counterarguments. The second step involves building an execution framework. After identifying a direction, it’s crucial to establish a systematic approach that allows agile responses to dynamic market conditions. This framework is built through复盘 (review and reflection)—extracting underlying logical patterns from past experiences, such as recognizing similar opportunities like $AERO and $ZORA based on Coinbase’s strategic needs, and turning them into a reusable decision model: signal identification → logic verification → execution. In essence, the key is to know yourself. Most trading pain stems from a mismatch between personality and holdings. Abandon the fantasy of being all-capable; recognize your boundaries, cultivate your strengths, and use them within a structured framework to succeed.

marsbit01/05 05:38

Stop Gambling Within the Framework of Luck

marsbit01/05 05:38

Solana and Hyperliquid dominate 2025 chain revenue!

Solana and Hyperliquid are the top blockchain revenue generators in 2025, with Solana leading at $1.3 billion and Hyperliquid following with $816 million—both surpassing Ethereum. Solana maintains high transaction volumes and revenue despite stable TVL ($7B–$12B), driven by usage in DeFi, memecoin trading, and DePIN. Hyperliquid, a specialized derivatives platform, saw TVL grow from $2B to a $6B peak before stabilizing around $4.1B, with revenue remaining strong due to sustained trading activity. Both networks demonstrate that execution efficiency and high-throughput usage, rather than TVL size or social sentiment, are key to value capture in 2025.

ambcrypto12/26 19:23

Solana and Hyperliquid dominate 2025 chain revenue!

ambcrypto12/26 19:23

The Truth of Trading: A Numbers Game of Patterns and Probabilities

The Truth of Trading: A Numbers Game of Patterns and Probability Most traders fail not due to a lack of methods or information, but because they misunderstand the nature of trading. Mark Douglas, in "Trading in the Zone," redefines the market as a probabilistic environment where an edge only materializes over a sufficiently long period. Trading is not about prediction or seeking certainty; it is a numbers game of pattern recognition. A valid trading pattern does not guarantee that any single trade will be profitable. It merely indicates a historical probability of success. Each individual trade outcome is random, but the overall probability distribution over many trades is not. Traders must evaluate performance like a casino: focus on long-term expectation and repeated execution, not single wins or losses. Accepting that "anything can happen" is liberating. It removes the emotional sting from losses, enables disciplined stop-loss execution, and eliminates hesitation. The ideal "flow state" is not excitement but emotional neutrality—executing the plan without attachment to outcomes or need to be right. Ultimately, traders cannot control results, but they can control their execution. Success comes from emotional detachment and consistent repetition. When traders stop trying to prove themselves right and let the probabilities work over time, they align with the true nature of the market: a numbers game based on pattern recognition and disciplined repetition.

深潮12/26 02:45

The Truth of Trading: A Numbers Game of Patterns and Probabilities