# Сопутствующие статьи по теме Distribution

Новостной центр HTX предлагает последние статьи и углубленный анализ по "Distribution", охватывающие рыночные тренды, новости проектов, развитие технологий и политику регулирования в криптоиндустрии.

What are the characteristics and commonalities of tokens that have performed well after TGE in 2025?

In 2025, most tokens experienced significant price declines shortly after their Token Generation Event (TGE), but a few—such as ASTER, FOLKS, AVICI, and SENTIS—managed to sustain price increases. These tokens shared several key characteristics that contributed to their relative success: 1. **Token Distribution Over Hype**: Successful projects avoided large internal liquidity at TGE. Examples include AVICI (0% team allocation) and SENTIS (activity-based emissions). 2. **Reasonable Valuation**: Tokens launched at fair valuations, rather than during peak hype, allowed room for market reappreciation. AVICI, for instance, launched with a low FDV despite having a functional product. 3. Demonstrable Utility: Projects like ASTER (Perp DEX volume), FOLKS (lending scale), and AVICI (real-world card spending) showed observable usage rather than just promising future utility. 4. **Controlled Unlock Structures**: Linear and transparent token unlock schedules (e.g., SENTIS’s participation-based emissions) were better received than cliff-style unlocks. 5. **Exchange Listings as Accelerators, Not Foundations**: While major exchange support helped, it wasn’t sufficient alone. Strong fundamentals determined long-term performance. The market in 2025 shifted from rewarding potential to valuing structure: healthy circulation, fair distribution, real adoption, and predictable unlocks. Tokens that prioritized these elements demonstrated resilience post-TGE.

Odaily星球日报12/31 00:47

What are the characteristics and commonalities of tokens that have performed well after TGE in 2025?

Odaily星球日报12/31 00:47

"Fat Apps" Are Dead, Welcome to the Era of "Fat Distribution"

The article "Fat Apps Are Dead, Welcome to the Era of Fat Distribution" argues that crypto applications are becoming commoditized infrastructure, shifting value from the applications themselves to the distribution channels and front-end interfaces that control user access. The author traces the evolution of value accumulation theories in crypto, from the 2016 "Fat Protocol" thesis (value accrues to base layers like Ethereum) to the 2022 "Fat App" thesis (value accrues to applications like Uniswap that built liquidity and user experience). By 2025, the thesis has shifted again. Excessive investment in infrastructure has led to diminishing returns; technical improvements (e.g., minor reductions in oracle costs or interest rate optimizations) are now imperceptible to end-users. Users prioritize familiar interfaces over marginally better backend performance. Consequently, applications like Aave and Morpho are increasingly focusing on B2B partnerships, embedding their services as backends within other platforms (e.g., traditional fintech apps like Robinhood). The author posits that convincing an existing platform to integrate a feature is far easier than onboarding millions of new users to complex, native crypto workflows. A case study illustrates this: Coinbase directs its users' borrowing activity to Morpho on Base, even though competitors offer better rates, because the seamless, integrated user experience within the Coinbase app is more valuable to customers than optimizing for cost. The article concludes that while some apps will remain B2C, the new competitive moat is no longer liquidity or crypto-native UX, but rather control over distribution. The platforms that own the front-end and user relationships will capture the majority of the value.

marsbit12/19 07:55

"Fat Apps" Are Dead, Welcome to the Era of "Fat Distribution"

marsbit12/19 07:55

BitMEX Alpha: Could Western Union Be an Asymmetric Trade Opportunity in the Stablecoin Arena?

BitMEX Alpha explores whether Western Union (WU) represents an asymmetric investment opportunity in the stablecoin space. While stablecoins have reached a $250B market cap and serve as a critical "dollar API" for crypto, the most obvious investment target—Circle ($CRCL)—may not offer the best risk-reward due to high distribution costs and reliance on partners like Coinbase. In contrast, Western Union, with its established global distribution network of 200k+ physical agents and deep penetration in cash-heavy remittance corridors, is positioning itself to leverage stablecoin technology from the distribution side. WU already owns the last-mile channels that Circle must pay to access. By integrating its own dollar stablecoin (USDPT) and digital asset network, WU can maintain fee and FX spread revenue from its existing front-end while adding new income streams from on-chain settlement and float. WU trades at a distressed valuation (4x P/E, 10% dividend yield), pricing in digital disruption fears. However, it offers a deep-value, asymmetric bet on stablecoin adoption—a free option on its digital transformation, backed by strong cash flow. Circle, though a pure-play stablecoin issuer, faces margin compression and high customer acquisition costs. The report concludes that in the race for digital dollar adoption, controlling user access may be more valuable than minting tokens.

marsbit12/17 09:44

BitMEX Alpha: Could Western Union Be an Asymmetric Trade Opportunity in the Stablecoin Arena?

marsbit12/17 09:44

活动图片