# Сопутствующие статьи по теме DeFi

Новостной центр HTX предлагает последние статьи и углубленный анализ по "DeFi", охватывающие рыночные тренды, новости проектов, развитие технологий и политику регулирования в криптоиндустрии.

Crypto Winter is Near. Is Bitcoin Headed for a Deep Correction?

The cryptocurrency market is experiencing heightened anxiety, with high volatility and talks of a "crypto winter" fueling fears of a deep Bitcoin correction. While some investors are moving to stablecoins, others are looking at infrastructure projects built on Bitcoin. Despite being the foundational asset, Bitcoin's limitations—slow transactions, high fees, and lack of flexible smart contracts—hinder its use in DeFi and mass applications. This has increased interest in Layer 2 solutions. Infrastructure altcoins that aim to transform Bitcoin into a base for financial applications are gaining attention. Projects focusing on modular blockchains, virtual machines, and liquidity bridges are being viewed as potential leaders in the next cycle. Among them is Bitcoin Hyper and its token $HYPER, which positions itself as the first Bitcoin Layer 2 integrating the Solana Virtual Machine (SVM). This project aims to combine Bitcoin's security with Solana's high throughput, offering low latency and minimal fees. Bitcoin Hyper's architecture uses Bitcoin for finality and an SVM layer for real-time transactions and smart contracts. It claims to exceed Solana's performance with sub-cent fees, enabling DeFi, NFT platforms, and gaming applications using wrapped Bitcoin. The project has raised $29 million in its early sale, with on-chain data showing significant "smart money" interest. The $HYPER token features staking with high APY and governance rights. Bitcoin Hyper's goal is to address Bitcoin's core limitations, potentially making it a key infrastructure play that benefits from future Bitcoin growth.

bitcoinist12/08 18:10

Crypto Winter is Near. Is Bitcoin Headed for a Deep Correction?

bitcoinist12/08 18:10

Solana Lending Internal Conflict: The Power Struggle Behind Foundation Mediation

Over the weekend, a public dispute erupted between Solana's two leading lending protocols, Jupiter Lend and Kamino. The conflict originated from Jupiter's earlier marketing claims that its lending product featured "risk isolation," implying that different lending pools would not be exposed to cross-contagion in the event of an asset failure. However, after Jupiter Lend launched, the market observed that its design did not align with the conventional understanding of risk isolation. The protocol allows for the rehypothecation (re-use) of collateral across pools to improve capital efficiency, which critics argue creates potential channels for risk contagion. Kamino's co-founder, Marius Ciubotariu, publicly accused Jupiter of misleading users with false advertising and subsequently blocked a migration tool from Kamino to Jupiter Lend. The core of the debate lies in differing interpretations of "risk isolation." Jupiter and its supporters argue their model offers a balanced approach with independent pool configurations, while Kamino and its allies insist that any form of rehypothecation negates true risk isolation and constitutes a failure in disclosure. The dispute drew reactions from key ecosystem players. Multicoin Capital, an investor in Kamino, strongly criticized Jupiter, accusing the team of either incompetence or intentional deception. In contrast, the Solana Foundation President, Lily Liu, called for unity, urging the two projects to focus on growing the overall market share against competitors like Ethereum rather than engaging in internal conflict. The clash is seen as an inevitable result of intensifying competition in a shrinking market. Jupiter Lend has been rapidly capturing market share from the formerly dominant Kamino since its launch. In a tighter, post-market-crash environment where safety is a paramount concern, Kamino seized on a perceived vulnerability in Jupiter's product design to launch a competitive attack. The incident highlights the fierce battle for dominance in Solana's DeFi lending sector.

比推12/08 16:55

Solana Lending Internal Conflict: The Power Struggle Behind Foundation Mediation

比推12/08 16:55

Altcoin: The ETF Boom Explodes – XRP, SOL, LTC, HBAR, DOGE, LINK, and the Emergence of New Opportunities

While the spotlight has been on Solana (SOL) ETFs, which have attracted approximately $682 million in inflows, XRP ETFs have quietly surpassed them with $874 million, despite launching later. Simultaneously, a new wave of altcoin ETFs for LTC, HBAR, DOGE, and LINK has entered the market, each recording modest but stable inflows since their debut. Seven separate Solana ETFs have generated $618.62 million in net inflows, holding $915.08 million in assets under management, representing about 1.15% of Solana's market cap. In contrast, four XRP ETFs have attracted $874.28 million, with Canary's XRPC leading at $357 million. The newly launched altcoin ETFs for LINK, HBAR, LTC, and DOGE have collectively seen $133.46 million in net inflows. Grayscale's GLNK attracted $40.90 million, Canary's LTCC (Litecoin) drew $7.67 million, and its HBR (HBAR) ETF recorded $82.04 million. Two DOGE ETFs brought in $2.85 million. This expansion signals a new market phase of diverse choices and intense competition. However, these new altcoin ETFs remain far behind the established Bitcoin and Ethereum ETFs in terms of total capital. Amid this ETF boom, Bitcoin Hyper (HYPER) is emerging as a potential altcoin outside the traditional ETF scope. It's a Bitcoin Layer-2 project built on the Solana Virtual Machine (SVM), combining Solana's speed with Bitcoin's security. Having raised nearly $29 million in its presale, it offers a fixed supply of 21 billion tokens and 40% staking APY, positioning itself to unlock Bitcoin's potential in DeFi.

bitcoinist12/08 12:03

Altcoin: The ETF Boom Explodes – XRP, SOL, LTC, HBAR, DOGE, LINK, and the Emergence of New Opportunities

bitcoinist12/08 12:03

Polymarket Revival: The Mainstreaming of Crypto Prediction Markets and Future Prospects

Polymarket, a crypto-based prediction market platform, has made a significant comeback in 2025 by re-entering the U.S. market through regulatory-compliant means, including the acquisition of regulated trading and清算 entities. This resurgence is further supported by institutional capital investment and integration with mainstream platforms like the MetaMask wallet, allowing users to trade directly without leaving their wallets. Mainstream financial data platforms have also begun displaying prediction market data, increasing market visibility. Once viewed primarily as a gambling or speculative platform, Polymarket is increasingly recognized as a mechanism for information pricing in financial markets. Widespread participation from both retail and institutional users has made its probability assessments of future events more representative and liquid. Prediction market data is now being incorporated by traditional financial media and data platforms, highlighting its growing potential. However, challenges remain. Prediction markets are not always accurate, with studies showing limited predictive reliability in certain contexts. Questions about platform neutrality and business models have emerged, such as the employment of internal market makers, which could undermine trust. Information asymmetry and insider risks are inherent, potentially disadvantaging ordinary users when some participants access information early. Regulatory, tax, and disclosure requirements also present ongoing uncertainties. The revival and transformation of Polymarket signify a broader shift of prediction markets from niche experiments toward mainstream financial infrastructure. By converting public expectations into tradable probabilities, these markets may complement traditional analysis and polling, providing real-time, decentralized signals in areas like macroeconomics, policy, technology, and geopolitics. As traditional financial institutions invest in compliance and structured products, DeFi is evolving beyond an alternative asset pool to resemble traditional financial infrastructure. Prediction market applications are expanding beyond crypto to potentially include stocks, macroeconomic indicators, sports events, and tech product launches, tightening the link between crypto and the real world. If platforms like Polymarket continue on a path of compliance, stable operation, and integration with mainstream financial services, they could become next-generation market infrastructures—event-driven financial tools alongside stocks, bonds, and options. Key factors for development include platform neutrality, prediction accuracy, regulatory environment, participant diversity, and the maturity of related financial products. In summary, Polymarket’s comeback represents a move of prediction markets from the fringe into the core of financial systems, reflecting deeper changes in how information is priced and how financial infrastructure is rebuilt. This shift brings not only new trading methods but also potential changes in how investors perceive and engage with future events and asset valuation.

cointelegraph_中文12/08 11:26

Polymarket Revival: The Mainstreaming of Crypto Prediction Markets and Future Prospects

cointelegraph_中文12/08 11:26

Stablecoins at a Crossroads: Clear Regulations Drive Adoption, Systemic Risks Remain

Stablecoins are at a critical juncture, with regulatory clarity driving their rapid evolution from crypto trading tools to mainstream payment and settlement infrastructure. The U.S. GENIUS Act and the EU’s MiCA framework have established federal and regional standards for issuance, reserves, and auditing, accelerating their adoption. Market capitalization has surpassed $300 billion, with USD-pegged stablecoins dominating, though euro and other fiat-backed alternatives are growing. Use cases are expanding significantly, with enterprises adopting stablecoins for cross-border payments, payroll, and treasury management due to their 24/7 availability and low transaction costs. They are increasingly integrated into traditional finance as settlement and custody solutions. However, systemic risks remain. USD-pegged stablecoins face potential de-pegging risks, insufficient reserve transparency, and high centralization, which could trigger liquidity crises. Large holdings of sovereign bonds or fixed-income assets may also impact bond markets and monetary policy. The IMF has warned about financial stability risks and dollarization concerns. For stablecoins to mature into reliable, compliant, and interoperable digital infrastructure—rather than just survive—they require transparent issuance mechanisms, robust regulatory coordination, and effective systemic risk controls.

cointelegraph_中文12/08 11:03

Stablecoins at a Crossroads: Clear Regulations Drive Adoption, Systemic Risks Remain

cointelegraph_中文12/08 11:03

When Nasdaq Starts 'Putting Stocks on the Chain', What Are We Really Welcoming?

Nasdaq is advancing a proposal to move U.S. stock settlement onto the blockchain, which could fundamentally reshape the infrastructure of American capital markets. This shift aims to replace the current slow, manual, and multi-layered clearing system with real-time, automated on-chain settlement. While many discussions focus on surface-level changes like 24/7 trading, the core transformation is structural: moving from outdated T+2 (or even T+1) settlement to instantaneous, programmable, and transparent ledger-based clearing. This isn’t about making stocks “more Web3” but modernizing a financial system that still relies on processes from the 1970s. The existing system—with its custodians, sub-custodians, and clearing intermediaries—creates operational friction, risk, and cost, as seen during events like the GameStop trading halts and the FTX collapse. On-chain settlement could reduce the need for traditional custodial roles, compress arbitrage opportunities built on settlement delays, and turn static securities into dynamic, composable financial instruments. The move faces significant resistance from entrenched intermediaries who profit from the current structure, but the direction of change appears inevitable. As demonstrated by Hong Kong’s recent issuance of a green bond settled in one second (versus five days), tokenization of traditional assets is becoming an operational reality—not a conceptual experiment. When stocks migrate on-chain, other assets like bonds and derivatives may follow, leading to a quiet but profound shift in how global markets function. This isn’t just a change in technology; it’s a change in the nature of finance itself.

cointelegraph_中文12/08 10:33

When Nasdaq Starts 'Putting Stocks on the Chain', What Are We Really Welcoming?

cointelegraph_中文12/08 10:33

Solana's Two Leading Lending Protocols Clash, Foundation Steps In to Mediate

Summary: Over the weekend, a public dispute erupted between Solana's two leading lending protocols, Jupiter Lend and Kamino, centered on the definition of "risk isolation." The conflict began when Kamino's co-founder, Marius Ciubotariu, accused Jupiter Lend of misleading users. He argued that Jupiter's early marketing claimed its lending pools were "risk-isolated," preventing cross-contamination between assets. However, Kamino contends that Jupiter Lend's design, which allows for the rehypothecation (re-use) of collateral across pools, creates a risk of contagion, contradicting its marketing. In response, Jupiter's COO, Kash Dhanda, admitted the initial "zero contagion risk" social media posts were inaccurate and apologized. The debate highlights a core disagreement on the definition of "risk isolation." Jupiter and its supporters argue the term has design flexibility, noting that while pools share a liquidity layer, each has independent parameters. Kamino and its allies insist that any rehypothecation negates true risk isolation. The dispute escalated when Tushar Jain, a partner at Kamino investor Multicoin Capital, strongly criticized Jupiter, accusing the team of being either incompetent or deliberately misleading. In contrast, Solana Foundation President Lily Liu urged for cooperation, emphasizing that the Solana lending market is much smaller than Ethereum's and that internal conflict only helps competitors. The clash is seen as an inevitable result of intense competition. Kamino was long the Solana lending leader, but Jupiter Lend has rapidly gained significant market share. In a tighter market with reduced liquidity and heightened safety concerns, the competition between the two protocols has become increasingly fierce.

marsbit12/08 10:22

Solana's Two Leading Lending Protocols Clash, Foundation Steps In to Mediate

marsbit12/08 10:22

活动图片