# Сопутствующие статьи по теме Crypto

Новостной центр HTX предлагает последние статьи и углубленный анализ по "Crypto", охватывающие рыночные тренды, новости проектов, развитие технологий и политику регулирования в криптоиндустрии.

Strategy Takes a Hardline Stance Against MSCI: What's in the 12-Page Open Letter of Defense?

In October 2024, MSCI proposed excluding companies with over 50% of their assets in digital assets from its global investable market indices, directly threatening Digital Asset Treasury (DAT) companies like MicroStrategy. Analysts warned this could trigger up to $8.8 billion in outflows, with MicroStrategy alone facing $2.8 billion in passive selling pressure. In response, MicroStrategy submitted a 12-page public letter to MSCI, strongly opposing the proposal as "misleading and destructive." The company argued that digital assets represent a revolutionary financial technology, comparable to historic infrastructure investments like oil or telecommunications. It emphasized that DATs are operational businesses with active revenue models, not passive funds, and criticized the 50% threshold as arbitrary, discriminatory, and impractical due to Bitcoin's volatility. MicroStrategy also accused MSCI of violating index neutrality and contradicting the U.S. government's pro-digital asset strategy. The company demanded MSCI withdraw the proposal or extend the consultation period. It is not alone—over 300 entities, including Strive and Bitcoin for Corporations, have joined opposition efforts, suggesting alternative indices instead of exclusion. The outcome, expected by January 2026, will significantly impact the integration of digital asset companies into traditional financial markets.

marsbit12/11 19:52

Strategy Takes a Hardline Stance Against MSCI: What's in the 12-Page Open Letter of Defense?

marsbit12/11 19:52

Dogecoin Price Forecast for 2026: The Path to $1 Amid Meme Rally

Dogecoin (DOGE) is back in the spotlight as retail traders return to the meme segment. Analysts express cautious optimism, suggesting that under favorable conditions, including a continued bull market and increased risk appetite, DOGE could potentially reach the $1 mark in 2026. The price is currently consolidating after volatile swings, with significant trading volumes indicating ongoing speculative interest. Key drivers remain its meme narrative, support from high-profile figures, and its correlation with Bitcoin's cycles. The path to $1 is not linear. DOGE must hold key support levels, sustain derivatives interest without overheating, and receive fresh meme-driven momentum. Technical analysis highlights the importance of watching RSI levels and volume for signs of sustainable growth versus short-term pumps. Alongside DOGE, newer, more aggressive meme tokens like Maxi Doge (MAXI) are gaining attention. Having raised approximately $4.3 million in its presale, MAXI offers high-risk, high-reward speculation with features like staking rewards and trading tournaments. While it could amplify portfolio returns during a rally, it carries significant risks associated with early-stage projects, unlike the more established DOGE. The overall strategy for many investors is to combine a core position in DOGE with a smaller, speculative bet on tokens like MAXI to capitalize on the potential meme rally.

bitcoinist12/11 19:40

Dogecoin Price Forecast for 2026: The Path to $1 Amid Meme Rally

bitcoinist12/11 19:40

"The Market in Russia is Only Just Emerging": Anton Popov on Sber's Crypto Strategy

Sberbank is increasing its activity in the digital finance sector, offering clients investment products linked to crypto assets and developing its own blockchain platform. In an interview, Deputy Chairman Anatoly Popov discussed the bank's strategy, which is focused on expanding its range of digital financial assets (DFAs), participating in the development of regulations for decentralized finance (DeFi), and integrating with public blockchains. Sber is in constant dialogue with Russian regulators to build a secure infrastructure. It currently offers qualified investors products like structured bonds and DFAs that provide exposure to cryptocurrencies like Bitcoin and Ethereum within the Russian legal framework, with a total issuance volume of 1.5 billion rubles. The bank sees these regulated, ruble-based products as a safer alternative to direct purchases on unregulated crypto exchanges. While Sber plans to be an active player and liquidity provider on future regulated crypto platforms, it will act conservatively, prioritizing client interests and financial system stability. It does not view crypto as a vehicle for its own speculative investments. Looking forward, Sber believes a key trend is the convergence of traditional finance and DeFi. Its in-house blockchain lab has evolved into a full product unit, and its proprietary platform for issuing DFAs is already operational. The bank is exploring tokenization of real-world assets like movable property and shares in LLCs, pending new legislation. For the future, Sber anticipates the institutionalization of blockchain technology. Bitcoin will likely remain a core asset, while networks like Ethereum will form the technological base for tokenization and smart contracts. A crucial step is the legalization of a broad range of blockchain-based digital assets, starting with pilot projects to demonstrate utility and manage risks. The bank is interested in stablecoins and their potential future use in the Russian legal field, emphasizing the need for collaborative work with the central bank.

RBK-crypto12/11 11:16

"The Market in Russia is Only Just Emerging": Anton Popov on Sber's Crypto Strategy

RBK-crypto12/11 11:16

Institutional Dominance in the Crypto Market: The End of Decentralization or the Dawn of a New Era?

In 2025, institutional investors now account for approximately 95% of cryptocurrency inflows, while retail participation has declined to just 5–6%, marking a structural shift in the market. According to Aishwary Gupta of Polygon Labs, this transition is driven by maturing infrastructure rather than sentiment. Major asset managers like BlackRock and Apollo are allocating portions of their portfolios to digital assets via ETFs and on-chain tokenized products, leveraging blockchain for yield generation and operational efficiency. Gupta highlights that institutional adoption is progressing in two phases: first, through yield-bearing products like tokenized treasuries and regulated staking, and second, via efficiency gains such as faster settlement and programmable assets. While retail interest waned due to meme coin losses, he expects gradual return as more transparent, regulated products emerge. Addressing concerns about centralization, Gupta argues that institutional involvement can enhance blockchain’s without compromising decentralization, provided infrastructure remains open. He envisions a future financial system where DeFi, NFTs, and traditional assets coexist on public chains. Although compliance may limit some experimentation, it fosters more sustainable innovation. Increased institutional participation is expected to reduce volatility and accelerate growth in areas like real-world asset tokenization and cross-chain interoperability. Ultimately, this trend signifies crypto’s evolution from a speculative asset to a core component of global finance.

marsbit12/11 09:15

Institutional Dominance in the Crypto Market: The End of Decentralization or the Dawn of a New Era?

marsbit12/11 09:15

Strategy Takes a Hard Line Against MSCI: The Ultimate Defense of DAT

In a significant industry clash, digital asset treasury company Strategy has issued a forceful 12-page public letter to MSCI opposing its proposal to exclude companies with over 50% digital asset holdings from its global investable market indices. Strategy argues the move is discriminatory, misleading, and threatens billions in capital flow, potentially causing up to $2.8 billion in passive outflows from its stock alone. The company defends its business model, asserting that digital asset treasuries (DATs) are operational companies—not passive funds—with active strategies like issuing digital debt instruments to fund Bitcoin acquisitions and generate shareholder returns. It compares its role to historic infrastructure builders like Standard Oil and AT&T, emphasizing Bitcoin’s transformative potential in finance. Strategy highlights four key objections: the proposal is arbitrarily discriminatory against digital assets; it violates index providers' neutrality principles; it is impractical due to Bitcoin's volatility and accounting disparities; and it contradicts the U.S. government’s pro-digital asset strategy. The firm demands MSCI withdraw the proposal or extend consultations. Backed by industry advocates and data showing over 200 public companies hold more than 5% of Bitcoin’s supply, Strategy urges MSCI to let markets—not biased rules—determine the value of digital asset companies. The decision, expected by January 2026, could redefine the role of crypto-native firms in traditional finance.

深潮12/11 08:38

Strategy Takes a Hard Line Against MSCI: The Ultimate Defense of DAT

深潮12/11 08:38

Institutions Are Taking Over the Crypto Market: Is This the End of Decentralization, or the Prelude to a New Cycle?

The cryptocurrency market is undergoing a structural shift in 2025, with institutional investors now accounting for approximately 95% of capital inflows, while retail participation has declined to 5–6%. According to Aishwary Gupta of Polygon Labs, this transition is driven by maturing infrastructure rather than market sentiment. Major asset managers like BlackRock, Apollo, and Hamilton Lane are allocating portions of their portfolios to digital assets via ETFs and on-chain tokenized products, leveraging public blockchains that meet traditional finance compliance standards. Key drivers include yield generation through tokenized treasuries and institutional staking, followed by efficiency gains from faster settlements, shared liquidity, and programmable assets. While retail investors retreated due to losses from meme coin cycles, Gupta believes they will return as more regulated and transparent products emerge. He argues that institutional involvement does not undermine decentralization; instead, it enhances legitimacy and fosters a hybrid financial ecosystem where DeFi, NFTs, and traditional assets coexist on public chains. Although increased compliance may limit some experimentation, it promotes more sustainable innovation. Looking ahead, institutional liquidity is expected to reduce market volatility and accelerate the growth of real-world asset tokenization and cross-chain interoperability infrastructure. This evolution signals crypto’s transition from a speculative asset to a core component of the global financial system.

比推12/11 07:22

Institutions Are Taking Over the Crypto Market: Is This the End of Decentralization, or the Prelude to a New Cycle?

比推12/11 07:22

活动图片