SEI jumps 10% after zero-fee rollout: But this rise may not last

ambcryptoОпубликовано 2026-04-02Обновлено 2026-04-02

Введение

Sei's price surged over 10% in 24 hours following the integration of zero-fee swaps on platforms like MetaMask, Backpack, and YeiFinance, which removed gas costs and improved accessibility. Trading volume increased by 258%, indicating strong organic participation. However, SEI remains within a descending channel, facing resistance near $0.062 and $0.070. While RSI rebounded from oversold conditions, it stayed below the midline, showing limited bullish strength. Additionally, Total Value Locked (TVL) dropped 7.32% to $43.2 million, contrasting with the price increase and raising concerns about the rally's sustainability. The current structure suggests potential downside movement toward $0.048 before any stable upward continuation.

Sei has integrated zero-fee swaps across MetaMask, Backpack, and YeiFinance, removing gas costs and lowering barriers for users. This shift improves accessibility, which was directly reflected in market behavior as SEI gained over 10% in 24 hours.

Trading volume has surged by more than 258%, showing a sharp rise in participation rather than isolated buying. Users can now interact across multiple wallets without friction, showing that transaction activity supported organic demand rather than speculative spikes.

Can SEI break descending pressure?

SEI rebounded from the $0.050 support level after an extended decline, showing clear buyer interest at this demand zone.

The token traded within a descending channel at the time of writing, which continued to define the broader structure.

Although the rebound has pushed SEI toward mid-range levels, resistance near $0.062 and $0.070 still capped upside movement. This structure reflected controlled recovery rather than a confirmed reversal.

As price attempted to climb, each rejection within the channel reinforced SEI’s bearish pressure. However, holding above $0.050 will prevent a further breakdown.

A sustained push beyond the channel would be required to shift structure, yet current positioning still reflects compression under resistance.

RSI has rebounded from oversold conditions and sat around 40.78 at the time of writing, reflecting easing sell pressure after the recent drop. However, RSI remained below the midline, which limited confirmation of bullish strength.

Source: TradingView

TVL drop questions rally strength

SEI’s Total Value Locked stood at $43.2 million at press time after declining by 7.32% over the past 24 hours. This drop contrasted sharply with the rising price and increased trading activity.

While price and volume suggested growing interest, declining TVL indicated that capital within the network had reduced. This divergence raised concerns about the sustainability of the current move.

If network value does not expand alongside price, the rally risks relying on short-term participation rather than long-term commitment. However, accessibility improvements from zero-fee swaps could eventually attract new liquidity.

For now, the mismatch between TVL and price reflects an imbalance that weakens the foundation of the ongoing recovery.

Source: DefiLlama

To sum up, Sei’s utility expansion has improved accessibility and driven strong participation, yet structural pressure remains intact within the descending channel.

The RSI recovery supports a short-term bounce, though it does not confirm dominance. Meanwhile, declining TVL has weakened the rally’s foundation.

As a result, the current setup favors a downside sweep toward $0.048 before any stable upward continuation.


Final Summary

  • Zero-fee utility improves demand structure, yet price still reacts to liquidity imbalances rather than sustained capital inflows.
  • LIT’s recovery remains fragile despite improving short-term participation signals.

Связанные с этим вопросы

QWhat was the immediate market reaction to Sei's rollout of zero-fee swaps on major wallets?

AThe immediate market reaction was positive, with the price of SEI gaining over 10% in 24 hours and trading volume surging by more than 258%.

QAccording to the technical analysis, what key price level must SEI hold above to prevent a further breakdown?

ASEI must hold above the $0.050 support level to prevent a further breakdown.

QWhat concerning on-chain metric diverged from the price increase, raising questions about the rally's strength?

AThe Total Value Locked (TVL) on the network declined by 7.32% to $43.2 million, which contrasted with the rising price and created a divergence that weakened the rally's foundation.

QWhat does the RSI level of 40.78 at the time of writing indicate about the market momentum?

AAn RSI of 40.78 indicates that sell pressure has eased after recent oversold conditions, but it remains below the midline (50), limiting confirmation of strong bullish momentum.

QWhat is the overall conclusion of the article regarding the sustainability of SEI's price rise?

AThe overall conclusion is that the current setup is fragile and favors a downside sweep toward $0.048 before any stable upward continuation can occur, due to structural bearish pressure and a decline in TVL.

Похожее

After Tokenizing Assets, How to Exit?

After tokenization, a key unresolved issue is providing holders with a reliable exit mechanism, as underlying asset settlement (taking days to months) lags far behind on-chain token settlement. Three primary models for instant liquidity have emerged, differing in their capital structure and efficiency: 1. **Balance Sheet Model (e.g., Grove Basin):** A single, well-capitalized entity (like Sky) provides immediate liquidity from its own reserves. This offers simplicity and deep initial liquidity but is constrained by that single balance sheet's capacity and risk appetite, limiting scalability. 2. **Dedicated Vault Model (e.g., Upshift Clear):** Independent liquidity providers (LPs) fund separate vaults for each supported asset. This decentralizes capital sources but isolates liquidity and capital, which becomes inefficient as the number of tokenized assets grows. 3. **Shared Liquidity Layer Model (Symbiotic Liquid Lane):** Independent capital providers fund shared vaults that can support multiple tokenized assets simultaneously. Capital remains productive between redemptions (e.g., earning yield in DeFi markets). Exits are settled via a competitive RFQ market where market makers bid. The article argues that the shared layer model offers superior capital efficiency and scalability. It transforms exit liquidity from an asset-specific patch into shared market infrastructure, allowing liquidity capacity to grow with overall market participation rather than being fragmented per asset. This is particularly valuable for longer-duration assets like private credit, where reliable T+0 exits can significantly enhance their utility in DeFi.

链捕手3 мин. назад

After Tokenizing Assets, How to Exit?

链捕手3 мин. назад

Anthropic's Triple Moment: Code Leak, Government Confrontation, and Weaponization

This article analyzes Anthropic's recent conflicts and strategic moves following the U.S. government's emergency halt of its new Fable model, citing national security concerns over potential "jailbreaks." The author argues this incident reveals deeper tensions between AI labs, governments, and the software industry. While critics view Anthropic's safety-focused rhetoric as marketing fear, the author suggests it serves as a commercial moat masking the company's core economic imperative: moving closer to end-users and their valuable data to avoid being commoditized. The piece outlines a coming clash between frontier AI labs like Anthropic and established software companies. Labs need real-world usage data for model improvement via reinforcement learning, creating a cycle where better products attract more users and more data. This threatens software firms who, as Microsoft's Satya Nadella warns, risk having their value captured by a few dominant models. Anthropic's controversial policy changes—initially secretly degrading Fable's performance for LLM development and expanding data retention—are framed as assertions of control, justified by its safety narrative. The company's foundational belief that it alone is sufficiently concerned about superintelligent AI dangers legitimizes its actions, from resisting government demands to shaping usage policies. The author concludes that this alignment of mission, talent, and business strategy is powerful but concerning, as it concentrates immense potential power in the hands of those convinced of their own righteous understanding.

marsbit13 мин. назад

Anthropic's Triple Moment: Code Leak, Government Confrontation, and Weaponization

marsbit13 мин. назад

Xpeng and NIO Compete on Computing Power, Li Auto Shifts Architecture

On June 15, 2026, Li Auto unveiled details of its self-developed chip, Mahe M100, for its new L9 Livis model. CTO Xie Yan stated the goal was not just a faster chip, but a fundamentally different one, targeting the chip architecture itself. While competitors like NIO, Xpeng, and Huawei highlight TOPS (computing power) figures for their self-developed chips, Li Auto’s Mahe M100 focuses on redesigning the underlying architecture. It employs a "dynamic data flow architecture" to address memory bandwidth bottlenecks in large model inference, claiming up to 3x the effective computing power of Nvidia's Thor U for its specific workloads and a 40% reduction in latency. The chip's design was peer-reviewed and accepted at ISCA 2026. However, this performance is highly optimized for Li Auto's own VLA2.1 algorithm, meaning it may not generalize as well to other tasks. Li Auto aims to achieve full-stack in-house development with Mahe M100, covering chip, compiler, OS, AI algorithms, and domain controller—a level of vertical integration few competitors match. Beyond the chip, CEO Li Xiang introduced a new strategic narrative: the "embodied intelligent vehicle," defined as an integration of an EV, a professional driver, an AI computer, and a life assistant. This shifts competition from features like large screens to systemic AI capabilities. A key commitment was that Li Auto's Mahe VLA autonomous driving model will match Tesla's FSD V14 by Q4 2026, with specific OTA milestones set for July, September, and December. Financially, Li Auto faces pressure with declining revenue and vehicle gross margins since Q4 2025, while maintaining high R&D investment (approx. ¥12B in 2026, 50% AI-related). Its 2026 sales target is 550,000 vehicles, up from 406,000 in 2025. The new L9 Livis garnered over 10,000 pre-orders in two weeks. The effectiveness of these strategic moves—new products, OTAs, and the novel chip architecture—will begin to show in Q3 2026 financial results, with the year-end FSD V14 benchmark being the ultimate test.

marsbit1 ч. назад

Xpeng and NIO Compete on Computing Power, Li Auto Shifts Architecture

marsbit1 ч. назад

The Year of AI Applications: Saying 'Yes' While Ignoring Risks? A Comprehensive Open Source Log of Software Development's Journey

The Year of AI Applications: Blindly Saying "Yes" While Ignoring Risks? A Software Development Log Goes Fully Open Source. AI-generated code harbors risks hidden within seemingly correct programs, potentially leading to data leaks or asset loss. The open-source project "Narwhal AI Code Risks," from Peking University's Narwhal-Lab, compiles real-world cases, early warning signs, and typical risk pathways. Its goal is to help developers identify potential hazards early and avoid repeating past mistakes. In 2026, code is generated faster than ever but deployed with less scrutiny. The danger often lies not in glaring errors, but in code that appears normal—syntactically correct, passing all checks—yet introduces subtle but critical flaws like non-existent dependencies, excessive permissions, or exposed databases. A stark example is the Moonwell cbETH oracle incident. A configuration file error, where a cryptocurrency price was set to ~$1.12 instead of ~$2,200, slipped through 28 checks and a pull request signed by both AI (Claude, Copilot) and human developers. This "semantic deviation" resulted in a loss of $1.78 million. The risk is that AI can produce functionally valid code that is semantically wrong for the business context. As AI moves beyond simple code completion to modifying configurations, installing dependencies, and operating via autonomous agents, it traverses longer, less traceable paths within software engineering, blurring traditional boundaries and oversight points. The Narwhal AI Code Risks project structures information into three layers: `/cases` for documented real-world incidents, `/inferred` for early warning signals, and `/scenarios` for clear, generalized risk patterns not yet tied to specific events. This aims to create a lasting, public record to prevent collective amnesia about past AI-coding pitfalls. Risks are categorized into seven areas: Software Supply Chain (e.g., recommending fake packages), Code-Level Vulnerabilities (e.g., reintroducing path traversal bugs), Cloud & Infrastructure Misconfiguration (e.g., overly permissive settings), Agent Risks (from autonomous tool execution), Vertical Domain Risks (e.g., in finance, healthcare), Intellectual Property & Compliance issues, and Human Factors (like over-reliance on AI output). The project's core value is transforming isolated incidents into reusable knowledge—a foundational resource for developers to spot similar issues, for security researchers to build upon, for toolmakers to create detection rules, and for the community to contribute new findings. As AI integration accelerates, this open-source "logbook" serves as a crucial navigational aid, charting past errors to help future projects steer clear of the same traps.

marsbit1 ч. назад

The Year of AI Applications: Saying 'Yes' While Ignoring Risks? A Comprehensive Open Source Log of Software Development's Journey

marsbit1 ч. назад

Торговля

Спот
Фьючерсы

Популярные статьи

Как купить SEI

Добро пожаловать на HTX.com! Мы сделали приобретение Sei Network (SEI) простым и удобным. Следуйте нашему пошаговому руководству и отправляйтесь в свое крипто-путешествие.Шаг 1: Создайте аккаунт на HTXИспользуйте свой адрес электронной почты или номер телефона, чтобы зарегистрироваться и бесплатно создать аккаунт на HTX. Пройдите удобную регистрацию и откройте для себя весь функционал.Создать аккаунтШаг 2: Перейдите в Купить криптовалюту и выберите свой способ оплатыКредитная/Дебетовая Карта: Используйте свою карту Visa или Mastercard для мгновенной покупки Sei Network (SEI).Баланс: Используйте средства с баланса вашего аккаунта HTX для простой торговли.Третьи Лица: Мы добавили популярные способы оплаты, такие как Google Pay и Apple Pay, для повышения удобства.P2P: Торгуйте напрямую с другими пользователями на HTX.Внебиржевая Торговля (OTC): Мы предлагаем индивидуальные услуги и конкурентоспособные обменные курсы для трейдеров.Шаг 3: Хранение Sei Network (SEI)После приобретения вами Sei Network (SEI) храните их в своем аккаунте на HTX. В качестве альтернативы вы можете отправить их куда-либо с помощью перевода в блокчейне или использовать для торговли с другими криптовалютами.Шаг 4: Торговля Sei Network (SEI)С легкостью торгуйте Sei Network (SEI) на спотовом рынке HTX. Просто зайдите в свой аккаунт, выберите торговую пару, совершайте сделки и следите за ними в режиме реального времени. Мы предлагаем удобный интерфейс как для начинающих, так и для опытных трейдеров.

393 просмотров всегоОпубликовано 2024.03.29Обновлено 2026.06.02

Как купить SEI

Обсуждения

Добро пожаловать в Сообщество HTX. Здесь вы сможете быть в курсе последних новостей о развитии платформы и получить доступ к профессиональной аналитической информации о рынке. Мнения пользователей о цене на SEI (SEI) представлены ниже.

活动图片