Securities or Commodities? A Decade-Long Tug-of-War Ends as the 'Crypto Market Structure Act' Races to the Senate

Odaily星球日报Опубликовано 2025-12-10Обновлено 2025-12-10

Введение

The "Cryptocurrency Market Structure Act" (CLARITY Act) is advancing to the U.S. Senate for final review after passing the House with strong support. The bill aims to resolve the long-standing regulatory debate over whether cryptocurrencies are classified as securities or commodities. It introduces a clear framework: tokens on decentralized blockchains are defined as "digital commodities" under CFTC oversight, while those meeting the Howey test remain securities regulated by the SEC. Key provisions include a "mature blockchain" exemption for highly decentralized networks like Bitcoin and Ethereum, a 360-day temporary registration pathway for trading platforms, and a fundraising exemption of up to $75 million for certain token offerings with enhanced disclosure. The bill also establishes a joint advisory committee to improve coordination between the CFTC and SEC and explicitly exempts non-custodial DeFi actors from broker-dealer regulations. This legislative effort aligns with the Trump administration's pro-crypto stance, including the appointment of industry-friendly leaders at key agencies like the SEC and CFTC, and recent moves to allow regulated spot crypto trading on CFTC-approved exchanges. If enacted, the law would provide regulatory clarity, encourage institutional adoption, and position the U.S. as a leader in the digital asset space.

Original / Odaily Planet Daily (@OdailyChina)

Author / DingDang (@XiaMiPP)

On December 10, U.S. Senators Gillibrand and Lummis stated at the Blockchain Association Policy Summit that the draft of the Crypto-Asset Market Structure Act (CLARITY Act) is expected to be released this weekend and enter the revision and hearing vote stage next week. This means this long-brewing legislative project has officially entered a decisive window.

The bill was first introduced in the U.S. House of Representatives on May 29, 2025, co-sponsored by House Financial Services Committee Chairman Patrick McHenry and Digital Assets and Innovation Subcommittee Chairman French Hill. It passed the House vote by an overwhelming majority (294 votes in favor) on July 17 and is now awaiting final review by the Senate.

Core Design of the Bill: Classification Over a One-Size-Fits-All Approach

The core of the Crypto-Asset Market Structure Act lies in its attempt to end the decade-long tug-of-war between U.S. regulators and the industry over "whether it's a security or a commodity." It is the first legislation to draw a clear boundary for digital assets, avoiding a "one-size-fits-all" regulatory model in favor of a classified regulatory framework. Specifically:

Legal Distinction Between "Digital Commodities" and "Digital Securities"

The bill explicitly defines the vast majority of tokens natively issued on decentralized blockchains as "digital commodities," placing them under the regulatory purview of the Commodity Futures Trading Commission (CFTC). Only those tokens that meet the Howey Test and possess typical "investment contract" characteristics will continue to be regulated by the SEC under securities laws.

"Mature Blockchain" Exemption Path

To prevent all tokens from being forcibly classified as securities, the bill establishes a "mature blockchain system" standard: a blockchain must simultaneously satisfy conditions of "high decentralization" (no single entity controls more than 20% of the token supply or validation power) and derive its value primarily from the actual use of the network to be exempt from SEC securities registration requirements. This provides a clear path for mainstream assets like Bitcoin and Ethereum, ensuring regulation does not stifle technological progress.

Comprehensive Shift of Secondary Market Regulation to the CFTC

The bill requires all platforms engaged in spot or derivative trading of digital commodities to register with the CFTC as a "Digital Commodity Exchange" (DCE), digital commodity broker, or dealer. Acknowledging industry realities, the bill also includes a 360-day "provisional registration" channel to ensure existing compliant platforms are not forced to shut down due to technical violations during the transition period, enabling a smooth handover.

Limited Fundraising Exemption

Even for initial token offerings on mature blockchains that are still deemed "investment contracts," issuers can apply for an exemption from the registration requirements of the 1933 Securities Act. However, the total annual fundraising amount must not exceed $75 million, and stricter information disclosure obligations must be fulfilled. This design seeks to balance encouraging innovation with protecting investors.

Division of Labor Between CFTC and SEC: From Confrontation to Collaboration

The prolonged jurisdictional tug-of-war between the SEC and CFTC over digital assets has long been described as the "Achilles' heel" of the crypto industry. Regulatory uncertainty has even been considered a significant hidden cost suppressing innovation vitality in the U.S. If the Crypto-Asset Market Structure Act officially takes effect, it will彻底 (completely) end this situation through legislation, establishing a clear division of responsibilities: the CFTC becomes the core regulator of the digital commodity secondary market, while the SEC focuses on token issuance and private placement activities in the primary market that still possess security attributes.

To ensure coordination between the two agencies in overlapping areas, the bill requires the establishment of a permanent "Joint Advisory Committee". Either agency must formally respond to non-binding recommendations put forward by the committee when formulating rules that might affect the other's jurisdictional scope. This mechanism aims to prevent future regulatory gaps or overlapping regulations.

Simultaneously, the bill provides clear protection for the decentralized finance (DeFi) ecosystem: protocol front-end developers, node validators, miners, and other non-custodial, non-profit roles will be explicitly excluded from the definitions of "broker" or "dealer," significantly reducing the compliance burden at the protocol level and preserving reasonable space for technological innovation.

Supporting Actions Progressing Simultaneously: CFTC is "Implementing First"

As the Senate review of the Crypto-Asset Market Structure Act enters a critical stage, on December 5, Acting Chairman of the U.S. Commodity Futures Trading Commission (CFTC), Caroline D. Pham, announced that spot cryptocurrency products will, for the first time, be permitted to trade on CFTC-registered regulated futures exchanges.

Pham stated that this move is part of the Trump administration's commitment to making the U.S. the "crypto capital of the world," aiming to address the lack of safeguards on offshore exchanges by providing a regulated domestic market.

Furthermore, as part of the "Crypto Sprint" plan, the CFTC will also promote the use of tokenized collateral (including stablecoins) in derivatives markets and revise rules to support the application of blockchain technology in infrastructure such as clearing and settlement. This will strengthen the CFTC's leadership role in the digital asset space, highly aligning with the spirit of the bill.

Trump's Nominations Accelerate: Crypto-Friendly Leadership in Place

Since Trump's second term, the personnel layout of major U.S. financial regulatory agencies has continued to tilt towards supporting digital assets. This shift has become a key catalyst for the accelerated development of the crypto industry.

U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) Chairman Paul Atkins stated in an interview with CNBC that the U.S. "resistance" to cryptocurrency has lasted "too long." Paul Atkins was appointed by Trump and took office in 2025. He views the Crypto-Asset Market Structure Act as part of "Project Crypto," an initiative aimed at bringing order and fairness to digital asset classification through legislation and rules.

Simultaneously, on October 25, 2025, Trump nominated Brian Quintenz to serve as CFTC Chairman and Commissioner. A former crypto lawyer, Quintenz represented numerous crypto companies (such as venture capital funds and blockchain projects) at the law firm Willkie Farr & Gallagher and has served as Chief Legal Counsel for the SEC's Crypto Task Force since March 2025, reporting directly to Atkins.

Trump also nominated Travis Hill to serve as Chairman of the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation (FDIC); he has been serving as Acting Chairman since 2025. Hill is also crypto-friendly, having publicly supported banks' involvement in crypto custody and stablecoin issuance, believing it can enhance financial inclusion. The FDIC regulates the interface between banks and crypto (e.g., stablecoin issuers), and his appointment may facilitate banks' entry into the crypto space.

After the government resumed operations, the SEC has successively introduced optimized systems to accelerate the ETF approval pace. The overall signal is very clear: regulatory logic is transitioning from defensive management to structural acceptance.

Conclusion: The U.S. is Completing the "Crypto Rule of Law Puzzle"

More importantly, the progress of the Crypto-Asset Market Structure Act may consolidate the effectiveness of the U.S. Stablecoin Innovation Act signed by Trump earlier this year, which already provides a safety framework for stablecoin issuance. This bill further completes the legislative puzzle for the crypto industry, filling the market structure gap and propelling the U.S. from a "follower" to a "leader" in global crypto regulation.

Overall, these policy and personnel changes预示 (foreshadow) structural opportunities for the U.S. crypto ecosystem. Regulatory clarity could attract more institutional capital inflows. However, challenges have not disappeared, such as coordinating DeFi regulatory details and aligning with international standards. But for global crypto practitioners, this is not just an American story; it is a crucial window period for the entire industry.

Связанные с этим вопросы

QWhat is the core design principle of the 'Cryptocurrency Market Structure Act' (CLARITY Act)?

AThe core design principle of the CLARITY Act is to end the decade-long debate over whether cryptocurrencies are securities or commodities by establishing a clear, categorical regulatory framework instead of a one-size-fits-all approach. It legally distinguishes between 'digital commodities' and 'digital securities'.

QWhich U.S. regulatory agency is given primary oversight of the secondary market for digital commodities under the proposed bill?

AThe Commodity Futures Trading Commission (CFTC) is given primary regulatory authority over the secondary market for digital commodities, including platforms trading digital commodity spots or derivatives.

QWhat is the 'mature blockchain system' exemption path outlined in the bill?

AThe 'mature blockchain system' exemption path allows a blockchain to be exempt from SEC securities registration if it is 'highly decentralized' (no single entity controls more than 20% of the token supply or validation power) and its value is primarily derived from the network's actual use.

QWho are the key political figures mentioned as driving the pro-crypto regulatory changes in the U.S.?

AKey political figures driving the pro-crypto regulatory changes include Senators Gillibrand and Lummis, who introduced the bill, and former President Trump, who appointed crypto-friendly leaders like SEC Chairman Paul Atkins and CFTC Chairman nominee Brian Quintenz.

QWhat is the significance of the CFTC's recent announcement regarding spot cryptocurrency products?

AThe significance of the CFTC's announcement is that it will, for the first time, allow spot cryptocurrency products to be traded on CFTC-regulated futures exchanges. This is part of a broader effort to provide a regulated onshore market and address the lack of safeguards on offshore exchanges.

Похожее

Is AI Creating a New Class of 'Information Poor'?

AI is generating a new kind of "information poverty." The core issue isn't that AI denies answers to the poor; it's that it provides abundant, cheap, and plausible-sounding answers to everyone. This availability shifts the true scarcity from obtaining answers to possessing the **judgment to evaluate them** and the access to turn them into real-world opportunities. New information poverty thus describes those who have AI tools and outputs, but lack the complementary skills, authorization, and contextual experience to critically assess and act on them. Research reveals a multi-layered divide: access to AI is stratified by income and platform design (e.g., premium vs. free, embedded tools). In workplaces, usage heavily favors higher-paid, more experienced, or formally trained employees, with AI often automating entry-level tasks that were traditional stepping stones. Crucially, the heaviest users are often mid-career professionals whose existing expertise allows them to effectively judge and leverage AI outputs, while novices risk over-relying on them without building judgment. While controlled experiments show AI can significantly boost low-skilled workers' performance, real-world adoption and benefit are constrained by unequal social and organizational structures. Historically, general-purpose technologies first reward those with existing complementary capital. AI, by affecting judgment-based work, may accelerate and deepen this initial inequality gap, even if it narrows over decades. The danger lies in the illusion of competence it creates, potentially stunting the very critical thinking needed in an era where judgment is paramount.

marsbit19 мин. назад

Is AI Creating a New Class of 'Information Poor'?

marsbit19 мин. назад

Jensen Huang 'Saves' South Korean Stock Market: Locks In SK Hynix Memory, Chip Shortage to Continue

On June 5th, South Korea's stock market experienced a sharp decline, with major chipmakers like Samsung and SK Hynix dropping nearly 10%. Amidst the turmoil, NVIDIA CEO Jensen Huang's visit to Seoul played a dramatic role in boosting market sentiment. Following a dinner meeting with SK Group Chairman Chey Tae-won and SK Hynix CEO Kwak Noh-Jung, Huang confirmed that NVIDIA's new Vera CPU will utilize SK Hynix DRAM. The companies announced a multi-year technical partnership to co-develop next-generation memory for NVIDIA's AI infrastructure, covering products from data centers to personal AI and robotics. This collaboration extends beyond memory supply. SK Hynix is integrating NVIDIA's AI and Omniverse platform into its own semiconductor design and manufacturing processes, including computational lithography and creating digital twins of its fabrication plants for autonomous operation. While strengthening ties with SK Hynix, NVIDIA is diversifying its supply chain for the upcoming HBM4 memory, with Samsung, SK Hynix, and Micron all certified as suppliers for its Vera Rubin platform. Despite this, Huang warned that the global chip shortage, driven by relentless demand from AI factory construction, is expected to persist for several years across the entire supply chain. His visit underscores NVIDIA's systematic effort to deepen integration with South Korea's broader tech industry.

marsbit1 ч. назад

Jensen Huang 'Saves' South Korean Stock Market: Locks In SK Hynix Memory, Chip Shortage to Continue

marsbit1 ч. назад

Nasdaq Plunges 4.2% in a Single Day: Does "Black Friday" Burst the U.S. Stock Market Bubble?

The Nasdaq plunged 4.18% on June 5, 2026, its worst single-day drop in over a year, as a much stronger-than-expected US jobs report triggered fears of economic overheating and delayed Federal Reserve interest rate cuts. The selloff, centered on high-valuation tech and AI stocks like Nvidia and Broadcom, spread across major indices. The article examines whether this signals a market top. The strong May non-farm payrolls data, nearly double expectations, pushed bond yields higher, directly hurting rate-sensitive tech stocks. This exposed vulnerabilities in the crowded AI trade, where valuations had soared on narratives of infinite growth, despite emerging signs of slowing order momentum and corporate AI monetization challenges. Prior to the drop, market indicators flashed warning signs: historically high valuations (e.g., Shiller CAPE ratio near 39.5), extreme bullish sentiment, and high levels of leverage. Technical charts showed key support levels being breached. Wall Street is divided on the outlook. Bears, citing risks of "stagflation" and AI bubble comparisons to the dot-com era, warn of a potential significant correction. Bulls view the drop as a healthy correction within a bull market, underpinned by a strong economy and expected corporate earnings growth of around 7% in 2026. The immediate future hinges on upcoming key events: the May CPI inflation data and the mid-June FOMC meeting. Their outcomes will critically shape market expectations for the Fed's rate path. The article concludes that conditions for a major market top are aligning, marking a fragile transition from narrative-driven gains to a phase demanding validation from macroeconomic data and corporate fundamentals. Caution is advised.

marsbit1 ч. назад

Nasdaq Plunges 4.2% in a Single Day: Does "Black Friday" Burst the U.S. Stock Market Bubble?

marsbit1 ч. назад

Nasdaq Plunges 4.2% in a Single Day, Did 'Black Friday' Pop the U.S. Stock Bubble?

The Nasdaq Composite plummeted 4.18% on June 5, its biggest single-day drop since April 2025, triggering widespread debate over whether the U.S. stock market has peaked. The sell-off was sparked by a stronger-than-expected U.S. non-farm payrolls report, which fueled fears of economic overheating and pushed back market expectations for Federal Reserve rate cuts, leading to a sharp rise in Treasury yields. The AI sector, the primary driver of the recent bull market, suffered severe losses, with the Philadelphia Semiconductor Index crashing over 10%. Stocks like Nvidia, Broadcom, and Micron led the decline. Concerns are mounting about the sustainability of AI capital expenditures and high valuations, with signs of order cuts for next-generation chips emerging. Analyses point to several warning signs: historically high market valuations (e.g., elevated Shiller CAPE ratio, Buffett Indicator), extreme bullish sentiment indicators, and significant insider selling. The sell-off also caused a key technical breakdown, with the S&P 500 breaking below its short-term moving average and testing its 200-day moving average. Wall Street is divided on the outlook. Bears warn this could be the start of a bubble deflation or a "stagflation" scenario, while bulls view it as a healthy, overdue correction within a bull market driven by solid corporate earnings growth. A more moderate view suggests the easy liquidity-driven rally is over, and markets are entering a phase of fundamental stock-picking with potential for consolidation. The immediate future hinges on key upcoming events: the May CPI report and the mid-June FOMC meeting. Their outcomes will be critical in determining whether this is a temporary pullback or the beginning of a more significant trend reversal. The consensus is that the era of one-directional market gains may be ending, requiring increased investor caution.

Odaily星球日报1 ч. назад

Nasdaq Plunges 4.2% in a Single Day, Did 'Black Friday' Pop the U.S. Stock Bubble?

Odaily星球日报1 ч. назад

The First Case on AI Agents: What Was Adjudicated?

"The First 'Agent' Ruling: What Was Decided?" On April 30, the Guangzhou Internet Court issued a ruling—China's first behavior preservation order in the intelligent agent (AI agent) field. The defendant, an open-source AI agent software, was ordered to stop downloads, cease actions that bypassed a platform's technical protection measures, and delete related tutorials and data. The core issue: the software used the operating system's "accessibility service" permissions to automate user interactions within other apps without those platforms' authorization. This mirrors a recent US case where Amazon sued Perplexity for similar reasons—bypassing Amazon's API to directly scrape and interact with its pages—and won a preliminary injunction. Both rulings establish a crucial legal boundary for the AI agent era: agents cannot operate unchecked. The article argues the fundamental legal principle emerging is one of **dual authorization**. An AI agent requires both **user consent** AND **platform consent** to operate legitimately within that platform's ecosystem. Bypassing platform rules through system-level permissions, even with user permission, undermines platform responsibilities for content moderation, data security, and user privacy, creating liability issues. The piece uses the evolution of "Doubao Phone" (an AI-integrated smartphone) as a case study. Its initial, aggressive version that bypassed platform controls faced roadblocks. Its upcoming 2.0 version is reportedly pivoting to negotiate API access and authorization deals with major platforms (like Alibaba's ecosystem), seen as a strategic adaptation to the new regulatory reality. A global trend is identified: the era of unregulated, "wild west" growth for AI agents is ending, replaced by a **compliance race**. This raises barriers to entry, as securing platform authorizations becomes a new cost. Open-source status is also not a legal shield if the code facilitates bypassing technical protections. In conclusion, these first rulings target not the largest, but the most **aggressive and representative** cases. By setting precedent with them, regulators are efficiently steering the entire industry towards a new, more regulated operating paradigm defined by dual authorization and platform cooperation.

marsbit1 ч. назад

The First Case on AI Agents: What Was Adjudicated?

marsbit1 ч. назад

Торговля

Спот
Фьючерсы

Популярные статьи

Как купить ZEST

Добро пожаловать на HTX.com! Мы сделали приобретение Zest Protocol (ZEST) простым и удобным. Следуйте нашему пошаговому руководству и отправляйтесь в свое крипто-путешествие.Шаг 1: Создайте аккаунт на HTXИспользуйте свой адрес электронной почты или номер телефона, чтобы зарегистрироваться и бесплатно создать аккаунт на HTX. Пройдите удобную регистрацию и откройте для себя весь функционал.Создать аккаунтШаг 2: Перейдите в Купить криптовалюту и выберите свой способ оплатыКредитная/Дебетовая Карта: Используйте свою карту Visa или Mastercard для мгновенной покупки Zest Protocol (ZEST).Баланс: Используйте средства с баланса вашего аккаунта HTX для простой торговли.Третьи Лица: Мы добавили популярные способы оплаты, такие как Google Pay и Apple Pay, для повышения удобства.P2P: Торгуйте напрямую с другими пользователями на HTX.Внебиржевая Торговля (OTC): Мы предлагаем индивидуальные услуги и конкурентоспособные обменные курсы для трейдеров.Шаг 3: Хранение Zest Protocol (ZEST)После приобретения вами Zest Protocol (ZEST) храните их в своем аккаунте на HTX. В качестве альтернативы вы можете отправить их куда-либо с помощью перевода в блокчейне или использовать для торговли с другими криптовалютами.Шаг 4: Торговля Zest Protocol (ZEST)С легкостью торгуйте Zest Protocol (ZEST) на спотовом рынке HTX. Просто зайдите в свой аккаунт, выберите торговую пару, совершайте сделки и следите за ними в режиме реального времени. Мы предлагаем удобный интерфейс как для начинающих, так и для опытных трейдеров.

277 просмотров всегоОпубликовано 2026.05.19Обновлено 2026.06.02

Как купить ZEST

Обсуждения

Добро пожаловать в Сообщество HTX. Здесь вы сможете быть в курсе последних новостей о развитии платформы и получить доступ к профессиональной аналитической информации о рынке. Мнения пользователей о цене на A (A) представлены ниже.

活动图片