Rhythm X Zhihu Event Agenda Released: Skills Demo + Keynote Speech + Roundtable to Thoroughly Explain Agents and On-Chain Finance

marsbitОпубликовано 2026-04-17Обновлено 2026-04-17

Введение

The recent dispute between EvoMap and Hermes over alleged抄袭, similar to the Claude and OpenClaw case, highlights a growing trend in the Agent ecosystem. These conflicts arise from competition over user choice—specifically, which Agent users select for similar tasks—and the definition of original core competencies. Such public disagreements indicate that competition among Agents has intensified to the point where founders are losing their composure. Ultimately, users hold the decision-making power. This issue foreshadows a broader challenge: as Agents become more numerous and capable, how should individuals navigate this evolving landscape? This topic will be explored in-depth at the upcoming event.

You must have some understanding of the incident where EvoMap accused Hermes of plagiarism.

Just like Claude accusing OpenClaw of plagiarism, similar incidents are bound to become increasingly common.

Because fundamentally, it's about territory: which Agent users choose for similar tasks, or where the boundaries of original core competitiveness lie within Agents. This dispute illustrates one thing—the competition among Agents has become so real that it can make founders lose their composure. The choice rests in the hands of users.

This is also an issue we will all soon face: as Agents become more numerous and capable of handling many tasks, what should we do? This is precisely the question we will explore at our event.

Связанные с этим вопросы

QWhat is the main topic of the upcoming event mentioned in the article?

AThe event will focus on Agent technology and on-chain finance, featuring Skills Demo, keynote speeches, and roundtable discussions to thoroughly explain these topics.

QWhat recent controversy in the Agent space does the article reference?

AThe article references the controversy where EvoMap accused Hermes of plagiarism, similar to how Claude accused OpenClaw of copying, indicating increasing competition among Agents.

QWhat does the article suggest about user choice in the Agent ecosystem?

AThe article suggests that users have the ultimate choice in selecting which Agent to use for similar tasks, and this user preference is driving intense competition among Agent developers.

QAccording to the article, why are founders of Agent projects becoming less calm?

AFounders are losing冷静 because competition among Agents has become so real and intense that it is leading to public accusations of plagiarism and disputes over original boundaries of core competitiveness.

QWhat key question does the article say the event will address regarding Agents?

AThe event will address the question of how users should navigate the growing number of Agents and the many tasks they can perform, exploring the challenges and choices in the Agent ecosystem.

Похожее

Why Not Short Even When Bearish? Munger Did the Math on a 'Losing Trade'

Why Not Short Even When Bearish? Charlie Munger's Calculated "Loss-Making Account" Many traders, drawn to speculative tools like futures contracts, often face repeated failures. As the article notes, unless one is a genius, such instruments should be avoided for long-term profit-seeking. Similarly, the practice of short selling is viewed with caution. The author firmly states a policy of not shorting, even when bearish, preferring to simply wait. The core reason? Successful short selling requires exceptionally difficult conditions to profit. Legendary investors Warren Buffett and Charlie Munger have themselves reflected on painful short-selling experiences. Munger highlights two critical flaws in the mathematical logic of shorting: 1. Asymmetrical Risk/Reward: A long position has a maximum loss of 100% but unlimited upside. A short position caps profit at 100% (if a stock falls to zero) but carries theoretically unlimited loss potential. 2. The "Promoter" Problem: Fraudulent or struggling companies can prolong their decline. As Munger said, "You can run out of money before the promoter runs out of ideas," meaning short sellers may be forced to cover positions at a loss before the company's true fate unfolds. The article cites Stanley Druckenmiller, a famed hedge fund manager. He once shorted 12 companies that all eventually went bankrupt. However, intense market rallies forced him to cover his positions within three weeks, resulting in massive losses—$200 million of his capital plus an additional $600 million. He concluded he likely never made money shorting in his career. His experience perfectly illustrates Munger's points: facing unlimited losses and being wiped out before being proven right. The conclusion is clear: for most investors, complex instruments like short selling and derivatives are not viable paths to stable, long-term gains. Self-reflection is advised before repeatedly wasting time and capital on such speculative strategies.

marsbit1 мин. назад

Why Not Short Even When Bearish? Munger Did the Math on a 'Losing Trade'

marsbit1 мин. назад

For Hedging, Buy Gold and Oil; For Explosive Growth, Buy AI; Bitcoin, the 'Outdated' Asset, Enters a Bear Market

Bitcoin’s price has recently fallen sharply, hitting a two-month low near $66,000, with Ethereum also dropping to a three-month low. While surface explanations point to ETF outflows, geopolitical tensions, and corporate selling, a deeper issue is emerging: Bitcoin is losing a crucial asset competition. For years, Bitcoin thrived in a low-rate environment where investors sought alternatives amid inflation fears and dissatisfaction with traditional options. Now, the market landscape has shifted, leaving Bitcoin stuck in an "awkward middle ground," facing challenges on three fronts: 1. **As an inflation hedge, gold is winning.** Investors worried about persistent inflation are turning to tangible assets like gold, energy stocks, and commodity producers, which offer more direct pricing power and physical backing. 2. **For growth exposure, AI is winning.** Those seeking high growth now favor AI-related companies with actual revenues and profits, an area where Bitcoin's lack of cash flow puts it at a disadvantage. 3. **Within crypto, infrastructure and stablecoins are winning.** Even investors wanting crypto exposure have alternatives like exchanges, stablecoin issuers, and tokenization firms, whose performance is directly tied to real-world adoption and offers clearer operational leverage. The recent market reaction to inflation warnings highlights this shift. Instead of boosting Bitcoin as "digital gold," such news now drives flows toward traditional inflation-sensitive assets. Therefore, recent events like ETF outflows and corporate selling are seen not as causes, but as symptoms of this new reality. Capital has more compelling options, and investors are becoming more selective. The emerging bear case for Bitcoin is no longer about it being a fraud or failed technology, but rather that **scarcity alone is no longer enough**. It is no longer seen as the best hedge, the best growth asset, or the only crypto play.

marsbit17 мин. назад

For Hedging, Buy Gold and Oil; For Explosive Growth, Buy AI; Bitcoin, the 'Outdated' Asset, Enters a Bear Market

marsbit17 мин. назад

SaaS Battle Royale: The Survivors Who Win All Share One Common Trait

**Summary** The AI revolution has triggered a "SaaS apocalypse," forcing a brutal market shakeout. The key dividing line is the pricing model. Companies like Snowflake and Datadog, which charge based on consumption (e.g., data processed or compute used), are thriving. AI workloads actively *generate* more demand for their services, fueling growth. Datadog's accelerating revenue is a prime example. Microsoft and Palantir, as platform/ecosystem players, also benefit by acting as essential channels for AI deployment. In contrast, traditional SaaS firms built on per-seat or per-task licensing (e.g., Intuit, Adobe) face direct pressure, as AI threatens to automate the very human tasks their software supports. Companies like Salesforce, a per-seat giant, are caught in the middle. While showing strong AI monetization (e.g., its Agentforce platform) and experimenting with consumption-based "Flex Credits," its stock remains under pressure, illustrating that the market rewards *completed* transitions, not just the intent. The recent Microsoft Build conference underscored key trends: AI is evolving from an assistant to an autonomous "agent," and platform providers like Microsoft are consolidating their control. The market's recovery is highly selective, focused on identifying which companies are "fed by AI" versus "eaten by AI." Future focus will be on the diffusion of this recovery to transforming companies and the real-world adoption data of AI agents like Microsoft Copilot.

marsbit35 мин. назад

SaaS Battle Royale: The Survivors Who Win All Share One Common Trait

marsbit35 мин. назад

XRP Falters In Face Of Rival XLM: Why Retail Traders Are Dumping One For The Other

Rival cryptocurrencies XRP and XLM are seeing a shift in retail trader preference, particularly in South Korea. Data from the Upbit exchange shows XLM's 24-hour trading volume ($252.3M) has surpassed XRP's ($125.7M) for the first time. This shift is attributed to increased interest in Stellar's role in tokenized finance, fueled by news linking the network to the US DTCC. While XLM's price surged over 55% to $11, XRP fell below $1.3 despite its historical popularity in Asian markets. A separate analyst suggests XRP could follow with a significant rally, potentially targeting new highs, though this remains speculative.

bitcoinist35 мин. назад

XRP Falters In Face Of Rival XLM: Why Retail Traders Are Dumping One For The Other

bitcoinist35 мин. назад

Trend in US Stocks: Jensen Huang's One Sentence Triggers $47 Billion Surge; Google Raises Funds for First Time in 20 Years

U.S. markets reached record highs on June 2nd, but the real story was the intensifying AI arms race, now pivoting from chip supremacy to a scramble for capital to fund compute infrastructure. The day highlighted two stark realities: Nvidia CEO Jensen Huang's endorsement of Marvell Technology as the "next trillion-dollar company" at Computex fueled a historic 32.5% surge, adding $47 billion to its value. Conversely, Alphabet announced its first equity raise in two decades—an $80 billion plan—signaling that even its massive cash flow can't keep pace with soaring AI capital expenditures, forecast to exceed $180 billion in 2026. While the S&P 500 closed above 7,600 for the first time, led by tech and semiconductor stocks (SOXX +5.79%), sector performance was mixed. Alphabet's 4% drop dragged down communications services, illustrating market anxiety over the unsustainable cost of the AI buildout. Hewlett Packard Enterprise soared 25% on stellar earnings, proving AI's benefits extend beyond chip designers to infrastructure providers. Beneath the index highs, concerns linger over extreme concentration in a few AI stocks and geopolitical tensions. The focus now shifts to upcoming economic data, particularly Friday's nonfarm payrolls, which could challenge the market's current "ignore rates, chase AI" mentality.

marsbit1 ч. назад

Trend in US Stocks: Jensen Huang's One Sentence Triggers $47 Billion Surge; Google Raises Funds for First Time in 20 Years

marsbit1 ч. назад

Торговля

Спот

Фьючерсы