Resilient in the Face of War

insights.glassnodeОпубликовано 2026-03-11Обновлено 2026-03-11

Введение

Bitcoin remains resilient despite geopolitical tensions, consolidating between $62.8k–$72.6k. On-chain data shows weak accumulation and sustained losses among short-term holders, indicating bearish pressure. Key support lies at the Realized Price ($54.4k), while resistance is at the True Market Mean ($78.4k). Off-chain, ETF inflows have turned positive, spot demand is recovering, and negative funding rates suggest crowded short positioning that could trigger a squeeze. Options markets show reduced hedging demand and growing call buying, signaling cautious optimism. Overall, the market is transitioning from deleveraging to stabilization, with potential for recovery if spot demand strengthens.

On-Chain Insights

Trapped in the Range

Bitcoin has spent more than a month consolidating within a $62.8k–$72.6k range, with multiple failed attempts to establish footing above $70k, each rejection accompanied by brief spikes in Net Realized Profit exceeding $5M per hour, indicative of opportunistic profit-taking rather than sustained demand. Zooming out, price is currently sandwiched between two structurally significant cost basis models: the Realized Price at $54.4k, representing the average acquisition cost of all circulating supply, and the True Market Mean at $78.4k, which tracks the cost basis of actively transacted coins.

In the absence of broader macro headwinds, this range could plausibly support a bear market relief rally capped by the True Market Mean. However, the layering of geopolitical uncertainty onto an already fragile structure that has repeatedly failed to hold above $70k tilts the mid-term return distribution toward the downside, with the Realized Price serving as the primary support level to monitor.

Live Chart

Accumulation Without Conviction

Building on the observed stability around the midpoint of the Realized Price to True Market Mean range, an on-chain accumulation cluster is beginning to take shape. Using the Cost-Basis Distribution Heatmap, accumulation clusters identify price levels where a significant volume of supply has changed hands recently, serving as a proxy for near-term investor conviction and potential support density.

However, the intensity of the current cluster is relatively modest when compared to prior accumulation phases that preceded decisive price expansions. Those earlier episodes were characterized by heavier capital commitment, whereas the present cluster reflects a more tentative repositioning. Therefore, while the emerging accumulation lends some credence to the bear market rally thesis outlined above, its lack of intensity suggests the foundation for a sustained mid-term expansion remains thin.

Live Chart

New Investors Under Pressure

Compounding the tepid accumulation signal, a key drag on market momentum is the sustained erosion of profitability among newer market participants. This dynamic is directly captured by the Short-Term Holder Spent Output Profit Ratio (STH-SOPR), which measures the ratio between the price at which short-term holders acquired their coins and the price at which they are spending them. A reading below 1 indicates that this cohort is, on aggregate, realizing losses.

The 7D-EMA of STH-SOPR has traded continuously below 1 since October 2025, and currently sits at 0.985, confirming that recent buyers lack meaningful unrealized profit to deploy or defend positions with. This is a textbook characteristic of a bear market regime, one that historically requires an extended period of base-building before conditions normalize.

Tactically, STH-SOPR also serves as a local top indicator. Spikes toward 1 during relief rallies tend to mark exhaustion points, as recent buyers seize the opportunity to exit near breakeven rather than hold for further upside.

Live Chart

Off-Chain Insights

ETF Inflows Reappear

US Spot Bitcoin ETFs experienced a sustained period of net outflows throughout the recent market correction, with the 7-day moving average remaining negative as prices declined toward the $65k region. This persistent redemption pressure reflected a broader institutional de-risking phase across regulated investment vehicles.

Over the past week however, flows have shifted meaningfully, with a strong burst of inflows emerging and pushing the 7-day average firmly back into positive territory. This marks the most significant demand impulse since the correction began, suggesting institutional buyers may be stepping in as Bitcoin stabilises near recent lows.

While it remains early to confirm a structural shift in demand, a continuation of positive ETF flows would signal improving institutional sentiment and could re-establish ETFs as an important source of spot-side support for the market.

Live Chart

Spot Demand Rebounds

Spot market order flow shows early signs of recovery following an extended period of aggressive sell-side pressure. The cumulative volume delta across major exchanges fell sharply during the recent market decline, with Binance and broader market flows reflecting persistent market sell pressure as BTC dropped toward the $60k–$70k range.

In recent sessions however, spot CVD has begun to reverse higher, indicating buyers are starting to absorb sell-side liquidity. The recovery is particularly visible across global exchange aggregates, suggesting a broad-based improvement in spot demand rather than isolated exchange activity.

While this shift points to a potential stabilisation in spot market conditions, sustained buyer dominance will be required to confirm that demand is strong enough to support a durable recovery in price.

Live Chart

Funding Turns Negative as Short Positioning Builds

Perpetual futures funding rates have shifted decisively negative in recent sessions, reflecting an increasing dominance of short-side positioning across derivatives markets. This shift comes as Bitcoin trades near the lower end of its recent range following the sharp drawdown toward the $60k–$70k region.

Negative funding indicates that short sellers are now paying a premium to maintain their positions, suggesting a growing consensus around downside continuation. However, such crowded short positioning can also create asymmetric conditions, where a sharp upward move forces shorts to cover.

Should spot demand continue to recover, the build-up of short exposure raises the potential for a short squeeze, which could amplify upside volatility if forced liquidations begin to cascade.

Live Chart

Implied Volatility: Front-End Premium Starts to Ease

Bitcoin has remained surprisingly resilient following the recent geopolitical shock. That resilience is now reflected in the options market, where short-dated implied volatility has begun to ease.

Over the last week, the decline has been most visible at the front of the curve, with near-term implied volatility falling back toward the mid-50 percent area. Implied volatility represents the price traders are willing to pay for optionality. When uncertainty spikes, protection becomes expensive. The recent move lower suggests that the market sees less immediate event risk than it did earlier in the week.

The chart shows that front-end volatility, represented by the 1-week tenor, is compressing faster than longer maturities such as the 1-month, confirming that immediate event risk is fading. This shift does not mean volatility has fully normalized. Levels remain elevated compared with recent months, showing that the market is still pricing a degree of uncertainty.

What has changed is the urgency. Traders appear less focused on immediate downside shocks and are gradually moving away from aggressive short-term hedging.

Live Chart

25 Delta Skew: Defensive Positioning Begins to Ease

With volatility cooling, skew offers insight into how traders are positioning for directional risk.

Across maturities, 25 delta risk reversals remain negative, meaning put options continue to trade at higher implied volatility than comparable calls. This reflects the fact that demand for downside protection is still present across the market.

However, the magnitude of that skew has started to compress. Over the past sessions, skew has tightened meaningfully, indicating that the intensity of defensive positioning is beginning to fade.

Skew essentially measures the relative demand for protection versus participation. When traders aggressively hedge downside risk, puts become significantly more expensive than calls. As that imbalance narrows, it typically signals that the market is becoming more comfortable taking directional exposure again.

As shown in the chart, the 1-week skew is now sitting around 10% put skew, down from the recent high of 31% reached on March 23. This shift suggests that while caution remains, the defensive tone that dominated during the shock is gradually easing.

Live Chart

Options Flow: Upside Exposure Gaining Traction

The largest options transactions observed over the past 24 hours have been concentrated in call buying, accounting for 40.3% of total options activity. Over the past week, call buying was already the dominant flow, representing 27.8% of options activity. This trend has accelerated, with the share of call buying climbing to 40.3% over the last 24 hours.

Calls provide exposure to upside moves while limiting downside risk, making them a common instrument for positioning during the early stages of a recovery.

What makes the current setup particularly interesting is the contrast between flow and pricing. Skew remains negative, meaning downside protection is still relatively expensive, yet traders are increasingly accumulating upside exposure through calls.

This pattern often appears when sentiment begins to improve but the broader market has not fully repriced risk. Participants start positioning for upside opportunities while still keeping some defensive structures in place.

Rather than signaling an outright bullish shift, the flow suggests a gradual transition, with traders cautiously testing the upside while maintaining protection against potential downside risks.

Gamma Exposure: $75K as the Key Upside Magnet

With Bitcoin trading around $69.5K at the time of writing, spot currently sits in a mild short gamma corridor between roughly $67K and $71K. Around $400 million of positive gamma sits on each side of this range, creating nearby levels where dealer hedging can temporarily stabilize price.

Gamma describes how dealer hedging flows react to price changes. When dealers hold positive gamma around a strike, they tend to sell rallies and buy dips to stay hedged, which can slow price movements and create short term support and resistance.

However, it would not take significant volume to break through either side of this corridor. The more important level sits higher.

Around the $75K strike, roughly $2 billion of negative gamma is concentrated. In a short gamma zone, dealer hedging flows reinforce the move. If price pushes into that region, hedging activity can accelerate the move higher toward the $80K area.

Notably, around $1.8 billion of this positioning expires on March 27, the end of Q1 expiry, meaning the gamma landscape could shift meaningfully once these options roll off.

Live Chart

Conclusion

Bitcoin remains under pressure, but several signals suggest the market may be entering a more stabilised phase. Illiquid supply continues to expand, pointing to ongoing conviction among long-term holders even as price trades below key on-chain cost basis levels.

Across off-chain markets, conditions are beginning to improve. US Spot ETF flows have turned positive after a prolonged outflow regime, and spot CVD is starting to recover, indicating buyers are beginning to re-engage. At the same time, perpetual funding has moved negative, reflecting increasingly crowded short positioning that could amplify upside if demand continues to strengthen.

Options markets add to this picture, with front-end implied volatility compressing as traders reduce short-term hedging demand. Delta skew remains relatively balanced, while dealer gamma positioning appears broadly neutral, suggesting options markets are no longer heavily skewed toward immediate downside protection.

Taken together, the market appears to be shifting from forced deleveraging toward early stabilisation, with scope for recovery if spot demand continues to build.


Disclaimer: This report does not provide any investment advice. All data is provided for informational and educational purposes only. No investment decision shall be based on the information provided here, and you are solely responsible for your own investment decisions.

Exchange balances presented are derived from Glassnode’s comprehensive database of address labels, which are amassed through both officially published exchange information and proprietary clustering algorithms. While we strive to ensure the utmost accuracy in representing exchange balances, it is important to note that these figures might not always encapsulate the entirety of an exchange’s reserves, particularly when exchanges refrain from disclosing their official addresses. We urge users to exercise caution and discretion when utilizing these metrics. Glassnode shall not be held responsible for any discrepancies or potential inaccuracies.

Похожее

Silicon Valley 'Startup Guru' Steve Hoffman: Web3 + AI Could Be a Trap

Silicon Valley investor and "Godfather of Startups" Steve Hoffman warns that combining Web3 with AI is likely a trap, not a promising venture. In an interview, Hoffman argues that while AI is a foundational technology touching all industries, Web3 adds complexity, friction, and regulatory risk without solving mainstream consumer or business needs. He advises founders to focus on deep, specialized applications where startups can out-iterate giants, rather than on generic features easily replicated by large tech companies. Hoffman observes that Silicon Valley will lead foundational AI research, while China excels at rapid, large-scale application and commercialization, particularly in robotics. He stresses that AI-driven autonomous agents capable of collaborative, multi-step tasks are 2-4 years away, which will cause significant job displacement. The solution is not to slow AI but to redesign business models around human-AI collaboration and reform social systems like education and retraining. For startups, Hoffman recommends focusing on vertical, expertise-heavy domains to build defensibility. He sees major opportunities in AI fraud detection and cybersecurity. Key founder mindsets include systemic thinking over feature-focus, relentless customer centricity, building adaptive teams, and deeply understanding AI's capabilities and limits. Hoffman is also leading a non-profit initiative to establish university centers aimed at training future leaders in responsible, human-value-aligned AI innovation.

marsbit6 мин. назад

Silicon Valley 'Startup Guru' Steve Hoffman: Web3 + AI Could Be a Trap

marsbit6 мин. назад

Token Inefficient, Economy Tokenless

The article "Tokens Aren't Economical, Economics Aren't Tokenized" analyzes a pivotal shift in the AI industry from a technology-driven narrative to one dominated by capital efficiency. It highlights two concurrent trends: a severe capital shortage due to the exorbitant and recurring costs of compute (e.g., OpenAI's high burn rate) and a wave of corporate spin-offs where major tech companies are separating their AI units (like Kuaishou's Kling and Baidu's Kunlunxin). The core argument is that AI's "anti-internet" business model, where user growth increases costs rather than profits, has created a disconnect between high valuations and actual cash flow. Spin-offs address this by allowing AI assets to be valued independently. Within a parent company, they are seen as cost centers, but as standalone entities, they are priced based on their growth potential and scarcity in the primary market, leading to massive valuation premiums (e.g., Kling's estimated value tripling post-spin-off). The industry is at an inflection point, moving from "model worship" to "value realization." The competition is evolving from a pure compute (GPU) race to a broader focus on systemic efficiency and full-stack engineering (involving CPUs and orchestration) to achieve viable commercialization. The year 2026 is framed as a critical moment where the industry must definitively answer how to economically translate AI capability into tangible business value, reshaping the sector's future power structure.

marsbit10 мин. назад

Token Inefficient, Economy Tokenless

marsbit10 мин. назад

Crossing the 'Memory Wall': The Wafer-Level Revolution and Computing Power Routes in the AI Inference Era

In 2026, a historic shift occurred in AI as major cloud providers' inference spending surpassed training spending for the first time, signaling a move from "building large models" to "using large models." This shifts the core challenge from computing power to the "memory wall"—the bottleneck of data movement (model weights, activations, KV Cache) between external DRAM and processors, where energy and latency from data transfer far exceed computation itself. Companies like Nvidia face GPU idle time due to bandwidth limits. In contrast, Cerebras Systems adopts a radical "wafer-scale" approach with its Wafer-Scale Engine (WSE). Instead of cutting a silicon wafer into many chips, Cerebras uses almost the entire wafer as one massive chip (WSE-3). This design provides 44GB of on-chip SRAM, delivering memory bandwidth thousands of times higher than traditional HBM (e.g., 21 PB/s vs. Nvidia B200). For LLM inference, weights are streamed layer-by-layer from external MemoryX storage to the chip, avoiding HBM bottlenecks. This results in token generation speeds 1.5–5 times faster than Nvidia's B200 in some models and significant advantages in first-token latency and long-context tasks. Additionally, Cerebras's architecture offers much lower interconnect power consumption (0.15 pJ/bit vs. GPU's ~10 pJ/bit). However, Cerebras faces challenges: SRAM scaling has slowed with advanced nodes, limiting future capacity gains; the chip requires specialized liquid cooling and custom software stacks; and its external I/O bandwidth (150 GB/s) is low compared to NVLink, hindering multi-system scaling for very large models. Competition is intensifying. Major players are pursuing three paths: 1) Developing proprietary inference ASICs (e.g., Google TPU, Microsoft Maia), 2) Leveraging advanced packaging (e.g., TSMC's SoW) to democratize wafer-scale-like integration, potentially eroding Cerebras's process advantage within a few years, and 3) Exploring optical interconnects for ultimate bandwidth. Commercially, Cerebras is transitioning from a hardware vendor to a service provider, facing the immense challenge of building high-power, specialized data centers to meet large contracts (e.g., 250MW/year from 2026–2028). In conclusion, the AI inference era presents a fundamental architectural trade-off. Cerebras opts for extreme physical optimization for low-latency, single-task performance, while Nvidia prioritizes versatility and massive cluster throughput. The path forward remains uncertain, with technology and business models still evolving in the race toward advanced AI.

marsbit16 мин. назад

Crossing the 'Memory Wall': The Wafer-Level Revolution and Computing Power Routes in the AI Inference Era

marsbit16 мин. назад

Has Bitcoin's 'Rebound Ended', Officially Entering the Late Bear Market Phase?

**Title: Has Bitcoin's Rebound Ended, Entering the Late Bear Market Phase?** **Summary:** Bitcoin's price has declined by 13% this week, signaling a potential return to late-stage bear market conditions. The price fell to around $67k, positioned between the Realized Price and Realized Cap Weighted Average. For the first time since early 2022, the Short-Term Holder cost basis has dropped below this key average, confirming a hallmark of late-cycle bear markets. Profitability metrics have collapsed sharply. The 7-day average of the Realized Profit/Loss ratio plummeted from a local high of 3.16 to 0.29, mirroring the February panic sell-off. Critically, the 90-day average never breached the threshold of 2, indicating the recent rally to $82k was a bear market bounce, not a structural shift. Realized losses surged to $1.35 billion daily, with $770 million coming from Long-Term Holders selling at a loss. This accelerating redistribution of supply from weak to strong hands is a necessary but ongoing process for a market bottom. The rally stalled almost precisely at the aggregate cost basis (~$83k) of US spot Bitcoin ETF investors, turning that level into strong resistance and leaving the average ETF holder underwater again. Spot market flows have turned decisively negative, showing sellers are dominating order books despite the price drop. While a significant futures long liquidation event cleared over $400 million in leverage, providing a potential reset, sustained spot demand is yet to materialize. Options markets continue to price in higher future volatility (Implied Volatility) than recent price action (Realized Volatility) has shown, with a persistent skew towards put options, indicating ongoing demand for downside protection. In conclusion, multiple metrics point to a fragile market structure. Resistance at the ETF cost basis, accelerating realized losses, dominant spot selling, and cautious options pricing all suggest the bear market trend persists. A sustainable recovery likely requires a resurgence of spot demand, ETF holders returning to profit, and a clear reduction in selling pressure.

marsbit16 мин. назад

Has Bitcoin's 'Rebound Ended', Officially Entering the Late Bear Market Phase?

marsbit16 мин. назад

TechFlow Intelligence Agency: Anthropic Calls for Global Pause in AI Development While Preparing for Trillion-Dollar IPO; SpaceX IPO Roadshow Heats Up, But S&P 500 Rejects Fast-Track Inclusion

In today's TechFlow Intelligence Briefing, several major tech stories highlight a growing theme of trust and credibility gaps across AI, crypto, and finance. AI company Anthropic has publicly called for a global pause in AI development, citing risks from Claude's "recursive self-improvement." Ironically, this coincides with reports the company is preparing for a massive IPO targeting a near $1 trillion valuation. This perceived hypocrisy, coupled with widespread user complaints about Claude's declining performance, is sparking debate over whether the safety warning is genuine or a competitive tactic. Meanwhile, in a substantive security move, Anthropic open-sourced a framework for AI-powered vulnerability discovery. In the crypto market, Bitcoin's price drop below $61,000 triggered over $1.16 billion in liquidations, flipping the market into a state where more BTC is held at a loss than at a profit, a historical bearish signal. On the corporate front, SpaceX's highly anticipated IPO is generating immense Wall Street excitement, with Goldman Sachs projecting 100x revenue growth by 2030. However, the S&P 500 has refused to fast-track the company's inclusion post-IPO, potentially limiting immediate institutional demand. Separately, ByteDance's AI app Doubao lost over 6 million monthly active users after introducing a subscription model, highlighting the challenges of AI monetization. Other notable developments include Nvidia certifying HBM4 memory from Samsung, SK Hynix, and Micron; Cloudflare's acquisition of front-end tooling company VoidZero; and its CEO warning that bot traffic now exceeds human traffic online. The underlying narrative connects these events: a trust crisis. From AI firms' contradictory actions and crypto volatility to the clash between SpaceX's hyped narrative and institutional rules, a pattern is emerging where stated intentions and actual practices are increasingly misaligned.

marsbit32 мин. назад

TechFlow Intelligence Agency: Anthropic Calls for Global Pause in AI Development While Preparing for Trillion-Dollar IPO; SpaceX IPO Roadshow Heats Up, But S&P 500 Rejects Fast-Track Inclusion

marsbit32 мин. назад

Торговля

Спот
Фьючерсы
活动图片