Kalshi and Coinbase Receive CFTC Approval, Ushering in the Most Regulation-Friendly Era for the Crypto Industry?

marsbitОпубликовано 2026-05-30Обновлено 2026-05-30

Введение

The U.S. Commodity Futures Trading Commission (CFTC) took two landmark actions on May 29. It approved Kalshi's application to list a Bitcoin perpetual futures contract and issued a no-action letter to Coinbase Financial Markets. This allows Coinbase to offer certain perpetual futures products to U.S. customers through a subsidiary, with digital assets permitted as collateral. These moves, coupled with a new CFTC policy statement, provide a clearer regulatory pathway for perpetual contracts in the U.S., moving them from a regulatory gray area. CFTC Chair Mike Selig stated this is a key step for U.S. crypto leadership but noted the policy is not yet permanent. The article explains that CFTC's previous reluctance stemmed from legal ambiguities, as perpetual contracts lack an expiration date. However, such contracts dominate global crypto derivatives, accounting for ~78% of centralized exchange volume in 2025, forcing U.S. regulators to adapt to competition from offshore platforms like Hyperliquid. The approvals offer two compliance paths: Kalshi's direct listing and Coinbase's model using foreign futures. This is expected to attract institutional capital back to regulated U.S. venues, stimulate the launch of more products like ETH perpetuals, and enhance U.S. competitiveness in the global crypto derivatives market. The author suggests this may signal a "regulatorily friendly" era for crypto.

Author: Ma He, Foresight News

On May 29th, the U.S. Commodity Futures Trading Commission (CFTC) announced two landmark actions on the same day: it formally approved the Bitcoin perpetual contract submitted by KalshiEX, LLC (Kalshi). Additionally, the CFTC issued a no-action letter to Coinbase, allowing Coinbase to offer certain perpetual futures products to U.S. customers through its subsidiary.

The CFTC also released a "Policy Statement on the Listing of Perpetual Contracts," providing a clear guidance framework for the listing of perpetual products on regulated markets. This combination of actions signifies a crucial step away from the longstanding regulatory gray area for U.S. crypto derivatives, moving toward a compliant path for genuine perpetual contracts.

Kalshi and Coinbase Both Receive Regulatory Approval

The CFTC's review determined that Kalshi's Bitcoin perpetual contract complies with the core principles of the Commodity Exchange Act and Designated Contract Market (DCM) regulations, including the depth and liquidity of the underlying Bitcoin spot market, contract design, and risk management capabilities. The approval order requires Kalshi to maintain ongoing compliance and clarifies that the perpetual contract design "may not be suitable for all asset classes," encouraging other market participants to engage with regulators and submit formal applications for perpetual products based on different underlying assets.

Furthermore, the CFTC's Division of Market Participants issued an interpretive letter and a no-action letter to the registered futures commission merchant Coinbase Financial Markets (CFM), permitting it to offer crypto options and perpetual contracts listed on Deribit to U.S. users. The letter confirms that these perpetual contracts can be classified as foreign futures under CFTC Regulation 30.1. Under specified conditions, the CFTC stated it would not recommend enforcement action against CFM for transferring customer-held digital commodities and payment stablecoins to its foreign broker affiliate for margin purposes, where the affiliate may exercise rehypothecation rights over such customer assets.

Previously, the U.S. market lacked genuine perpetual contracts (with no expiration date). Coinbase Derivatives had self-certified and launched "perpetual-style" futures in July 2025 (with contract terms up to 5 years), designed to mimic perpetual economic characteristics but still retaining an expiration date. Today's approval and no-action letters provide a dual compliance pathway for "true perpetuals": Kalshi follows the standard DCM futures route, while Coinbase reaches U.S. customers via the foreign futures + crypto collateral route.

Mike Selig

CFTC Chairman Mike Selig emphasized in his statement that perpetual contracts are important tools for risk management and price discovery in the global crypto asset market. Introducing true perpetual contracts in the U.S. is a significant step toward establishing the U.S. as a global crypto hub. He noted that the CFTC has established a workable regulatory framework for crypto asset perpetual contracts and will maintain market integrity by limiting excessive leverage, market volatility, and systemic risk.

Selig also acknowledged that the CFTC's current regulatory stance has not yet been formalized into a permanent rule, and future policies may adjust as the regulatory environment evolves.

The Trillion-Dollar Market Opportunity

So, why had the CFTC not approved true Bitcoin perpetual contracts until now?

Perpetual contracts were considered a "novel" product within the traditional commodity futures framework. They lack an expiration date and final settlement, which conflicts with the conventional understanding under the Commodity Exchange Act that traditional futures "must have an expiration date and a convergence mechanism." The CFTC internally debated whether to classify them as futures or swaps, as different classifications entail entirely different regulatory requirements (including clearing, margin, reporting obligations, etc.). This legal ambiguity made it difficult for platforms to secure a solid compliance path.

Furthermore, concerns about their high leverage and speculative nature, along with fears of market manipulation, have kept the CFTC's approach cautious.

BTCPERP, as a perpetual contract tracking the Bitcoin spot price, has no fixed expiration date. It uses a funding rate mechanism for periodic settlements between long and short positions to maintain a tight peg between the contract price and the spot price.

Perpetual contracts have long dominated the global crypto derivatives market. According to CoinGecko's 2025 annual report, the cumulative trading volume of crypto derivatives on centralized exchanges globally was approximately $85.7 trillion, with perpetual contracts accounting for about 78%. In 2025, the cumulative volume of perpetual contracts on decentralized exchanges reached about $6.7 trillion (a 346% year-over-year increase).

Ironically, while traditionalist regulators in Washington debated compliance, offshore decentralized perpetual platforms like Hyperliquid had already extended their reach to S&P 500, crude oil, and gold through on-chain synthetic assets. By the end of May 2026, Hyperliquid's perpetual trading volume had risen to $586.12 billion, and according to Allium on-chain data, the total open interest for Hyperliquid's network-wide derivatives also hit a record high of nearly $60 billion at the end of May. An increasing number of individuals and institutions are choosing to trade on its platform.

Hyperliquid Latest Open Interest

This unprecedented approval by the CFTC is not just an accommodation to the crypto market; it is a necessary "onshore defense battle" forced upon the compliant world by the innovative pressure from offshore "everything-as-a-perpetual-asset."

In contrast, while regulated Bitcoin futures like those on CME provide stable hedging tools for institutions, their leverage and trading characteristics differ from the perpetual products favored by retail/professional traders.

This approval by the CFTC undoubtedly opens a new battleground for Kalshi in the prediction market. The boundary between prediction markets and traditional crypto derivatives markets has completely blurred; Kalshi can leverage its compliant event-settlement logic to tap into the perpetual capital pool originally belonging to centralized exchanges. For Coinbase, the trading volume and revenue from its perpetual contracts will likely be reflected concretely in its next financial report.

U.S. traders previously relied heavily on offshore platforms, facing custody risks, regulatory uncertainty, and barriers to institutional access. The release of this regulatory policy, which supports crypto collateral, will attract traditional institutions like hedge funds and family offices to participate. Traders can hold leveraged positions long-term to hedge spot exposure without frequent operations; it will also attract some offshore traffic back to U.S. compliant channels.

Simultaneously, the approval for Kalshi and Coinbase will stimulate the accelerated launch of other products like ETH perpetuals, forming a more complete crypto derivatives matrix. In the long term, this policy may enhance the U.S.'s competitiveness in the global crypto derivatives ecosystem, attracting more capital, talent, and infrastructure, creating favorable conditions for deeper integration between crypto assets and traditional finance.

Now may indeed be the most regulation-friendly era for the crypto industry.

Связанные с этим вопросы

QWhat were the two major actions taken by the CFTC on May 29th regarding crypto derivatives?

AOn May 29th, the CFTC officially approved Kalshi's application to list a Bitcoin perpetual contract, and issued a no-action letter to Coinbase Financial Markets, allowing it to offer certain perpetual futures products to U.S. customers through a foreign affiliate.

QWhy was the approval of a 'true' Bitcoin perpetual contract in the U.S. considered a significant step?

AIt was significant because, under the traditional Commodity Exchange Act framework, perpetual contracts (with no expiry date) conflicted with the conventional definition of futures. The approval moves crypto derivatives from a regulatory gray area towards a clear, compliant path for truly perpetual products within the U.S.

QAccording to the article, what percentage of global centralized crypto derivatives trading volume do perpetual contracts represent?

AAccording to CoinGecko's 2025 annual report data cited in the article, perpetual contracts accounted for approximately 78% of the cumulative trading volume on global centralized crypto derivatives exchanges.

QWhat does CFTC Chairman Mike Selig say is an important step in making the U.S. a global crypto hub?

ACFTC Chairman Mike Selig stated that introducing true perpetual contracts in the United States is an important step in advancing the U.S. as a global crypto hub.

QHow does the article characterize the CFTC's approval in relation to offshore platforms like Hyperliquid?

AThe article characterizes the CFTC's approval as a defensive move 'onshore,' a compromise by the regulated world in response to the innovation and growth of offshore platforms that have already popularized perpetual contracts for a wide range of assets, including traditional ones like the S&P 500.

Похожее

Seeking Alpha's Hot Article: Why Might the U.S. Stock Market Crash in June?

In a recent Seeking Alpha article, financial professor and analyst Damir Tokic argues that the US stock market may be poised for a significant crash in June 2026. The core thesis centers on a "mega-bubble" in equities, particularly within the technology sector, which has driven the S&P 500 to near-record valuations, with a Shiller P/E ratio exceeding 40—a level comparable to the 2000 dot-com bubble. Tokic identifies two primary catalysts for a potential collapse. First, he points to unsustainable market exuberance fueled by what he terms the "Trump Stimulus"—massive AI capital expenditure by tech giants, which he believes is politically driven and cannot last. Second, and more urgently, he highlights the escalating Iran war as a critical threat. The ongoing closure of the Strait of Hormuz has created a severe global energy supply crunch. Strategic petroleum reserves are projected to hit critically low operational levels by June, potentially causing oil prices to spike above $200 per barrel and triggering a severe, supply-driven inflationary shock. This scenario, Tokic warns, would force the Federal Reserve's hand. Despite currently maintaining a dovish bias, the Fed would likely be compelled to officially pivot to a hawkish stance at its June FOMC meeting to combat soaring inflation and bond yields. He contends that such a shift—or even a failure to act, which would destroy Fed credibility—could be the trigger that punctures the market bubble. The resulting downturn, he concludes, could rival the bear markets of 2000 and 2008, advising investors to prepare for a major correction.

marsbit15 мин. назад

Seeking Alpha's Hot Article: Why Might the U.S. Stock Market Crash in June?

marsbit15 мин. назад

AI PC Battle: Bet on the Toll Booth, Not the Camp

**Title:** The AI PC Battle: Don't Bet on Sides, Bet on the Tollbooth **Summary:** The AI PC competition is moving beyond simple "x86 vs. Arm" narratives. The core investment thesis should focus on identifying which players can sustain margins, cash flow, and pricing power throughout the upgrade cycle, rather than backing a particular architecture. The opportunity is analyzed in three layers: 1. **The Advanced Foundry Tollbooth:** TSMC is positioned to collect "tolls" regardless of which chip designer wins, due to its dominant ~70% share in advanced semiconductor manufacturing, which is essential for high-end AI PC chips. 2. **Compute & Platform Spillover:** AMD represents an offensive in the x86 CPU+GPU space, while NVIDIA leverages its GPU and CUDA software stack dominance. Both benefit from the demand for increased local AI compute. 3. **Architecture Diffusion & Turnaround Plays:** ARM and Intel offer potential for significant upside (elasticity), but investments here require stricter discipline due to higher execution risks and competitive challenges. The industry is transitioning from concept to shipment validation. While short-term forecasts for AI PC adoption have been revised down slightly due to tariffs and procurement delays, the long-term trend towards AI becoming a standard PC feature remains intact. The key driver for upgrade cycles will be whether compelling enterprise applications (e.g., privacy-sensitive computing, low-latency inference) emerge beyond consumer-focused features like meeting summarization. Investment strategy should prioritize companies with platform-level advantages and recurring revenue streams. TSMC offers high certainty as the foundational tollbooth. AMD presents a strong offensive play within the established ecosystem. ARM and Intel are higher-risk, higher-potential-reward turnaround bets. The report cautions against chasing short-term hype and emphasizes a disciplined, long-term approach focused on buying ecosystem strength and cash-flow certainty after market enthusiasm subsides. **Key Risks:** Underwhelming AI PC applications slowing upgrade cycles; slow improvement in Windows on Arm compatibility; macro/tariff impacts on PC demand; potential advanced node supply-demand mismatches affecting TSMC; high overall AI sector valuations making stocks vulnerable to a risk-off shift in markets.

marsbit30 мин. назад

AI PC Battle: Bet on the Toll Booth, Not the Camp

marsbit30 мин. назад

Ten-Thousand-Word Analysis: From $10 to $290, MRVL Wins the Entire AI Era by 'Not Making GPUs'

Marvell Technology's stock price surged from under $10 in 2016 to a record $290 in June 2026, fueled not by making GPUs, but by dominating AI infrastructure connectivity. This analysis argues the market misvalues MRVL as merely a smaller Broadcom in custom AI chips, overlooking its true, unique position. Marvell's core strength lies in enabling high-speed data flow for AI clusters through three interconnected businesses. First, it holds a commanding ~70% market share in high-speed optical DSPs (essential for data center light modules), a deep-moat business with accelerating growth. Second, its custom AI chip design business serves hyperscalers like AWS, Microsoft, and Google, with a significant revenue pipeline despite lower margins. Third, stable cash flows come from Ethernet switch chips and enterprise storage controllers. Together, they form a full-stack "AI data movement" platform. CEO Matt Murphy's transformative leadership since 2016, involving strategic divestments, key acquisitions (like Inphi for optical DSPs), and securing long-term agreements with major cloud providers, repositioned the company. A pivotal $2 billion strategic investment from NVIDIA in 2026 underscored Marvell's critical role in the AI ecosystem, particularly through collaborations like NVLink Fusion. While Marvell faces risks—including client concentration (losing the Amazon Trainium3 design), lower-margin business mix, competitive threats, insider selling, and complex supply chains—its fundamentals remain strong. The optical interconnect moat is widening with the acquisition of Celestial AI (photonics fabric), and financial metrics show accelerating revenue growth and operating leverage. With a PEG ratio suggesting undervaluation relative to its growth, the thesis is that the market undervalues Marvell's monopolistic position in AI "plumbing" while overemphasizing its competitive custom chip segment. The story transcends investing, symbolizing how in any complex system—from the internet to AI—the value of "connection" ultimately surpasses that of individual "nodes."

marsbit1 ч. назад

Ten-Thousand-Word Analysis: From $10 to $290, MRVL Wins the Entire AI Era by 'Not Making GPUs'

marsbit1 ч. назад

AI Relay Stations Spark Heated Debate on Zhihu: Behind Cheap Tokens, What Are Users Really Worried About?

A discussion on Zhihu about "AI relay stations" shifted the niche developer topic of "cheap tokens" into broader user awareness. Users moved beyond simply questioning the legitimacy of these services to focus on practical concerns: Where do cheap tokens truly come from? Is the model being accessed the real one? Can relay stations see prompts, code, and API keys? For occasional users, are the risks worth it? The core debate centered less on price and more on trust. A primary worry is model authenticity—the risk of "model swapping," where users paying for a premium model might be routed to a cheaper one, creating an information asymmetry. Others argued that cost comparisons matter; while cheaper than official pay-as-you-go APIs, relay stations may not be the lowest-cost option versus subscriptions, domestic models, or free tiers, making user needs assessment crucial. Speculation about token sources ranged from legitimate bulk discounts to gray-area methods like account sharing or exploiting regional pricing. This opacity makes risk assessment difficult for users. Data security emerged as a critical concern, especially for enterprise use. When processing sensitive information like code, contracts, or client data, the inability to verify a relay station's data handling, retention, or access policies poses significant compliance and confidentiality risks. The evolving consensus suggests relay stations can be used cautiously for low-sensitivity, disposable tasks (e.g., summarizing public info, simple translation). However, they should not be the default for sensitive, professional, or production workflows involving proprietary data, Agents, or automated systems. Recommendations include avoiding large prepayments, not relying on a single service, using test prompts to monitor quality, anonymizing data where possible, and keeping official channels as backups. Ultimately, the discussion framed tokens not just as a billing unit but as a measure of real cost encompassing price, model integrity, data security, and service stability. The popularity of relay stations highlights user demand for affordable access, but the debate underscores a key trade-off: the savings from cheap tokens may come at the price of trust, transparency, and control over one's data and AI experience.

marsbit1 ч. назад

AI Relay Stations Spark Heated Debate on Zhihu: Behind Cheap Tokens, What Are Users Really Worried About?

marsbit1 ч. назад

Торговля

Спот
Фьючерсы

Популярные статьи

Как купить ERA

Добро пожаловать на HTX.com! Мы сделали приобретение Caldera (ERA) простым и удобным. Следуйте нашему пошаговому руководству и отправляйтесь в свое крипто-путешествие.Шаг 1: Создайте аккаунт на HTXИспользуйте свой адрес электронной почты или номер телефона, чтобы зарегистрироваться и бесплатно создать аккаунт на HTX. Пройдите удобную регистрацию и откройте для себя весь функционал.Создать аккаунтШаг 2: Перейдите в Купить криптовалюту и выберите свой способ оплатыКредитная/Дебетовая Карта: Используйте свою карту Visa или Mastercard для мгновенной покупки Caldera (ERA).Баланс: Используйте средства с баланса вашего аккаунта HTX для простой торговли.Третьи Лица: Мы добавили популярные способы оплаты, такие как Google Pay и Apple Pay, для повышения удобства.P2P: Торгуйте напрямую с другими пользователями на HTX.Внебиржевая Торговля (OTC): Мы предлагаем индивидуальные услуги и конкурентоспособные обменные курсы для трейдеров.Шаг 3: Хранение Caldera (ERA)После приобретения вами Caldera (ERA) храните их в своем аккаунте на HTX. В качестве альтернативы вы можете отправить их куда-либо с помощью перевода в блокчейне или использовать для торговли с другими криптовалютами.Шаг 4: Торговля Caldera (ERA)С легкостью торгуйте Caldera (ERA) на спотовом рынке HTX. Просто зайдите в свой аккаунт, выберите торговую пару, совершайте сделки и следите за ними в режиме реального времени. Мы предлагаем удобный интерфейс как для начинающих, так и для опытных трейдеров.

723 просмотров всегоОпубликовано 2025.07.17Обновлено 2026.06.02

Как купить ERA

Обсуждения

Добро пожаловать в Сообщество HTX. Здесь вы сможете быть в курсе последних новостей о развитии платформы и получить доступ к профессиональной аналитической информации о рынке. Мнения пользователей о цене на ERA (ERA) представлены ниже.

活动图片