Hiring at $200K Annual Salary: Wall Street Advances into Prediction Markets

marsbitОпубликовано 2026-01-15Обновлено 2026-01-15

Введение

Wall Street firms are aggressively entering the prediction markets, with trading giants like DRW, Susquehanna, and Tyr Capital building specialized teams. DRW is offering up to $200,000 in base salary to hire traders who can monitor and trade on platforms like Polymarket and Kalshi. Trading volume in these markets surged from under $100 million in early 2024 to over $8 billion by December 2025, attracting institutional interest. Unlike retail traders who often bet on single events, institutions focus on cross-platform arbitrage and structural opportunities. For example, hedge funds can use prediction markets to hedge investments with greater precision by pairing positions—such as buying "no recession" contracts on Polymarket while shorting overvalued bonds in credit markets. Market makers like Susquehanna, which has privileged access to lower fees and higher limits on platforms like Kalshi, are set to reduce arbitrage opportunities and improve liquidity. This professionalization may lead to more complex products, such as multi-event combos and conditional probability contracts. The entry of well-capitalized, technologically advanced institutions signals a maturation of prediction markets, mirroring the historical pattern of散户-driven innovation eventually dominated by professional players. While retail traders may find niches in long-tail events, the era of easy profits from informational edges is likely over.

Author: Niusike, Deep Tide TechFlow

It has finally arrived. The prediction markets, once built by political supporters, speculative retail investors, and airdrop hunters, are now welcoming a group of silent yet deadly new players.

According to a Thursday report by the Financial Times, several well-known trading firms, including DRW, Susquehanna, and Tyr Capital, are forming specialized prediction market trading teams.

DRW posted a job advertisement last week, offering a base annual salary of up to $200,000 for traders capable of "monitoring and trading active markets in real-time" on platforms like Polymarket and Kalshi.

Options trading giant Susquehanna is recruiting prediction market traders who can "detect incorrect fair value," identify "anomalous behavior" and "inefficiencies" in prediction markets, and is also building a dedicated sports trading team.

Crypto hedge fund Tyr Capital is continuously hiring prediction market traders who are "already running complex strategies."

Data supports this ambitious expansion.

Monthly trading volume surged from less than $100 million at the beginning of 2024 to over $8 billion by December 2025, with a record single-day trading volume of $701.7 million on January 12.

When the pool of funds becomes deep enough to accommodate the size of giants, Wall Street's entry becomes inevitable.

Arbitrage First

In prediction markets, institutions and retail investors are not playing the same game.

Retail investors often rely on fragmented information to predict single events, which is essentially gambling, while institutional players focus on cross-platform arbitrage and structural market opportunities.

In October 2025, Boaz Weinstein, founder of hedge fund Saba Capital Management, stated at a closed-door meeting that prediction markets allow portfolio managers to hedge investments with greater precision, particularly regarding the probability of specific events occurring.

Standing next to Polymarket CEO Shayne Coplan at the time, he said, "A few months ago, Polymarket showed a 50% probability of recession, while the credit market indicated a risk of about 2%. You can think of countless paired trades that were previously impossible."

According to Weinstein's view, a fund manager could buy the "no recession" contract on Polymarket. Because the market believed there was a 50% chance of recession, this contract was relatively cheap.

At the same time, in the credit market, one could short some bonds or credit products that would fall sharply in a recession. Because the credit market only assigned a 2% probability to a recession, these products were still priced high.

If a recession did occur, you would lose a small amount on Polymarket, but make a large profit in the credit market as those overvalued bonds plummet.

If no recession occurred, you would make money on Polymarket and might incur a small loss in the credit market, but overall still profit.

The emergence of prediction markets has provided traditional financial markets with a new "price discovery tool."

The Arrival of the Privileged Class

What tilts the scales even further is privilege at the regulatory level.

Susquehanna is the first market maker on Kalshi and has reached an event contract agreement with Robinhood.

Kalshi offers market makers numerous benefits: lower fees, special trading limits, and more convenient trading channels. The specific terms are not public.

The entry of market makers will quickly change this market.

Previously, prediction markets often suffered from insufficient liquidity, especially for niche events. When you wanted to buy or sell a large number of contracts, you might face wide spreads or simply no counterparty.

Professional institutions will quickly eliminate obvious pricing errors. For example, price differences for the same event on different platforms, or clearly unreasonable probability pricing, will be rapidly smoothed out.

This is not good news for retail investors. Previously, you might find that "Trump wins" was at a 60% probability on Polymarket and 55% on Kalshi, allowing for simple arbitrage. In the future, such opportunities will基本ally not exist.

With Wall Street's PhDs earning hundreds of thousands of dollars, future prediction contracts may also enter an era of specialization and diversification, not just单一 event prediction, such as:

1. Multi-event combination contracts, similar to parlays in sports betting

2. Time series contracts, predicting the probability of an event occurring within a specific time period

3. Conditional probability products, e.g., if A happens, what is the probability of B happening

......

Looking back at financial history, from foreign exchange to futures, to cryptocurrencies, the development of every emerging market follows a similar trajectory: ignited by retail investors, eventually taken over by institutions.

Prediction markets are repeating this process. Technological advantages, capital scale, and privileged access will ultimately determine who stays in this game of probability until the end.

For retail investors, although there may still be a glimmer of hope in long-cycle predictions or niche areas, they must face reality. When Wall Street's精密 machines start running at full speed, the狂欢 period of easy profits from information asymmetry may be gone forever.

Связанные с этим вопросы

QWhat is the reported base salary that DRW is offering to traders for monitoring and trading on prediction market platforms?

A$200,000

QWhich specific prediction market platforms are mentioned in the article as being targeted by the new trading teams from firms like DRW?

APolymarket and Kalshi

QAccording to Boaz Weinstein, how can hedge fund managers use prediction markets to hedge their investments more precisely?

AThey can use prediction markets to hedge against the probability of specific events occurring, such as by creating trades that pair a position on a prediction market with an opposite position in a traditional market like credit.

QWhat advantage does the article state that market makers like Susquehanna have on platforms such as Kalshi?

AThey receive benefits such as lower fees, special trading limits, and more convenient trading channels, the specific terms of which are not publicly disclosed.

QWhat does the article suggest is the likely outcome for retail traders as large institutional players enter the prediction market space?

AThe era of easy profits from information asymmetry is likely over for retail traders, as institutions will quickly eliminate pricing errors and arbitrage opportunities, though some opportunity may remain in long-cycle predictions or niche areas.

Похожее

What Happens to Ethereum Developer Tools After the Grants Run Out?

On February 27th, the Ethereum Foundation (EF) announced Project Odin, a structured sustainability support program designed for a select group of strategic, previously grant-funded teams. Unlike a standard grant, Odin offers a long-term advisory mechanism focused on helping these teams establish credible, sustainable paths within a two-year framework, thereby reducing long-term dependence on single funding sources. The program addresses a critical post-grant challenge: how essential public goods, especially major developer tools, can achieve financial sustainability beyond initial funding. While grants from EF and programs like Gitcoin or RetroPGF remain vital for startups and research, they often fall short for mature, widely-used infrastructure. Tools like compilers, languages, and network stacks are deeply embedded but struggle with monetization, trapped between being too foundational to lose and too public to generate natural revenue. Project Odin provides teams with a dedicated Strategic Advisor to guide them through a three-phase process: 1) analyzing current funding and realistic options, 2) validating potential paths with stakeholders, and 3) executing plans, which may include crafting support contracts, service agreements, or other recurring revenue models. The first pilot participant is Vyper, a critical smart contract language for the EVM, highlighting the need for sustainable models for core infrastructure. The initiative reframes the public goods conversation from "who should be funded" to "how do already-proven teams avoid perpetual funding crises?" It encourages ecosystem participants—protocols and projects that depend on these tools—to view sustainable support not just as charity, but as essential risk management for their own operational supply chains.

marsbit22 мин. назад

What Happens to Ethereum Developer Tools After the Grants Run Out?

marsbit22 мин. назад

MARA Reports Q1 Revenue Below Expectations, Net Loss of $1.3 Billion, Stock Plunges After Hours

Bitcoin mining firm MARA Holdings reported disappointing Q1 2024 results, causing its stock to erase all daily gains and fall 3.44% in after-hours trading. Revenue dropped 18% year-over-year to $174.6 million, missing Wall Street estimates of $192.7 million. The company posted a net loss of $1.3 billion, a significant increase from a $533.4 million loss a year ago, primarily driven by unrealized losses on its holdings of 38,689 Bitcoin, which depreciated in value during the quarter. MARA also sold over 15,100 BTC in late March to repurchase debt at a discount. The broader mining environment remains challenging due to a 35% decline in Bitcoin's price from its all-time high and a nearly 30% increase in mining difficulty over the past year. MARA's market cap ranking among U.S. miners has slipped to seventh. Critically, the company announced a strategic pivot away from Bitcoin mining expansion. It stated it has no plans to purchase new mining equipment and is fully transitioning toward AI data centers. Its strategy involves retrofitting existing mining sites for AI and high-performance computing (HPC) and leveraging its recent $1.5 billion acquisition of Long Ridge Energy & Power, a gas-fired power plant and data center. This infrastructure could eventually support 600 MW of AI compute capacity, allowing MARA to redeploy up to 90% of its non-custodial mining power for AI and IT workloads.

marsbit22 мин. назад

MARA Reports Q1 Revenue Below Expectations, Net Loss of $1.3 Billion, Stock Plunges After Hours

marsbit22 мин. назад

The AI Investment Landscape Is Being Reshaped: Beyond the 'Magnificent Seven', What Opportunities Lie in the Semiconductor Supply Chain?

AI Investment Map is Reshaping: Opportunities Beyond the 'Magnificent Seven' Since ChatGPT ignited the AI wave, investment initially focused on the "Magnificent Seven" tech giants dominating cloud infrastructure. However, the rise of DeepSeek and debates on AI capital expenditure effectiveness are shifting this dynamic. Investors now recognize opportunities deeper in the supply chain—the companies providing the essential "picks and shovels." Early concerns about an AI investment "arms race" and potential low returns were partly alleviated by strong Q1 earnings from cloud providers, validating robust compute demand. This has highlighted a more certain investment thesis: regardless of which AI applications ultimately win, massive capital expenditure will first fuel demand for semiconductors and related components. This "pick-and-shovel" logic has driven semiconductor ETFs to record highs. Key beneficiaries include: * **Memory Chipmakers (e.g., SK Hynix, Samsung, Micron)**: High Bandwidth Memory (HBM) is a critical bottleneck for AI training. * **Photonics Companies**: Crucial for high-speed data transfer within AI data centers. * **The Broader "AI-11" Semiconductor Ecosystem**: This encompasses foundries & lithography (TSMC, ASML), logic & custom chips (AMD, Broadcom, Intel, Marvell), and enterprise storage (SanDisk, Western Digital). Every dollar of AI infrastructure spending flows through this chain. While the "Magnificent Seven" remain dominant in market size, their earnings growth premium over the rest of the S&P 500 ("S&P 493") is narrowing. Market attention and marginal investment are shifting towards the expanding semiconductor supply chain. The investment narrative is evolving from "betting on the ultimate AI winner" to "investing in the certainty of the infrastructure build-out." Understanding this shift from the demand side to the supply side is key to identifying future AI investment opportunities.

marsbit51 мин. назад

The AI Investment Landscape Is Being Reshaped: Beyond the 'Magnificent Seven', What Opportunities Lie in the Semiconductor Supply Chain?

marsbit51 мин. назад

Торговля

Спот
Фьючерсы
活动图片