Ethereum Completes Another Key Technical Advancement, Can It Achieve a Leap Forward by 2026?

marsbitОпубликовано 2025-12-22Обновлено 2025-12-22

Введение

The Ethereum Foundation (EF) has announced a major technical breakthrough in zkEVM development, achieving a dramatic reduction in block proof generation time—from 16 minutes to just 16 seconds—with a 45-fold decrease in cost. Certain zkVMs can now prove 99% of mainnet blocks in under 10 seconds on target hardware. However, EF emphasizes that raw speed is meaningless without proven security. Several mathematical conjectures underlying popular STARK-based zkEVMs have recently been disproven, reducing their security guarantees. The core focus has now shifted from throughput to provable safety, with L1 zkEVMs required to meet a 128-bit security standard to prevent risks like token forgery or state corruption. EF released a three-phase roadmap aiming for full compliance by December 2026: 1. By end-February 2026, all zkEVM teams must integrate with EF’s soundcalc security tool. 2. By end-May, achieve intermediate goals like 100-bit provable security. 3. By end-December, reach 128-bit provable security with formal verification of recursive proof systems. Key technologies like WHIR and JaggedPCS are being deployed to improve efficiency. Challenges remain, including on-chain implementation, dynamic security parameter adjustments, and uneven progress among teams. Once achieved, secure zkEVMs could allow Ethereum to increase gas limits safely, enhance L1 capacity, and blur the lines between L1 and L2 execution. The race for reliability is now the central theme for Ethereum in 2026.

The zkEVM ecosystem has achieved a performance leap after a year of intensive efforts, reducing Ethereum block proof time from 16 minutes to 16 seconds, with a cost reduction of 45 times. Participating zkVMs can now complete proofs for 99% of mainnet blocks within 10 seconds on target hardware.

On December 18, the Ethereum Foundation (EF) announced the implementation of a real-time proof mechanism and the elimination of performance bottlenecks. However, it emphasized that the real challenge lies in reliability, as speed without security support becomes a burden. Additionally, several zkEVMs based on STARK algorithms have had their underlying mathematical conjectures disproven in recent months, leading to a reduction in security levels.

Previously, in July, EF set comprehensive real-time proof goals covering multiple dimensions such as latency, hardware, and security. These have now been met through the EthProofs benchmark tests.

The core shift is from pursuing throughput to prioritizing provable security, clearly stating that L1-level zkEVMs must achieve a 128-bit security standard, aligning with mainstream cryptographic norms. This is because forged proofs could lead to critical risks such as token counterfeiting and L1 state tampering, making security margins non-negotiable.

EF simultaneously unveiled a three-phase security roadmap:

  1. By the end of February 2026, all zkEVM teams must integrate their proof systems with EF's soundcalc security assessment tool to standardize security calculations;
  2. Achieve the Glamsterdam standard by the end of May, meeting interim goals like 100-bit provable security;
  3. Complete the H-star final goal by the end of December, achieving 128-bit provable security and providing formal security arguments for recursive topological structures.

To meet these goals, EF mentioned key technical tools like WHIR and JaggedPCS, which can improve efficiency by optimizing proof generation and avoiding computational waste, while techniques like recursive topologies help reduce proof size.

However, multiple challenges remain: real-time proofs have not yet been implemented on-chain, leaving actual validator performance in question; security parameters need dynamic adjustment as mathematical conjectures are disproven; it is uncertain if all teams can meet deadlines; and formal verification projects for recursive architectures are still in early stages, with uneven ecosystem development.

Notably, compliant zkEVMs could enable Ethereum to increase the Gas limit, enhancing block capacity while ensuring staking feasibility, promoting L1 as a trusted settlement layer, and blurring the boundaries between L2 and L1 execution.

With the performance sprint concluded, the core focus of the zkEVM ecosystem has shifted to achieving sufficiently reliable security proofs without relying on easily disprovable conjectures, to support trillion-dollar asset scales. The security competition has now officially begun, and it will be the main theme for Ethereum in 2026.

Связанные с этим вопросы

QWhat major technical achievement did the Ethereum Foundation announce on December 18th regarding zkEVM?

AThe Ethereum Foundation announced the implementation of a real-time proof mechanism and the elimination of performance bottlenecks, reducing block proof time from 16 minutes to 16 seconds and cutting costs by 45 times.

QWhat is the core shift in focus for zkEVM development according to the Ethereum Foundation?

AThe core shift is from pursuing throughput to prioritizing provable security, requiring L1-level zkEVMs to achieve a 128-bit security standard to prevent risks like token forgery and L1 state tampering.

QWhat are the three phases of the security roadmap set by the Ethereum Foundation for zkEVM teams?

A1. By February 2026, all zkEVM teams must integrate their proof systems with EF's soundcalc security assessment tool. 2. By May 2026, achieve the Glamsterdam standard with 100-bit provable security. 3. By December 2026, complete the H-star goal with 128-bit provable security and formal security arguments for recursive topology structures.

QWhat challenges remain for zkEVM despite the performance improvements?

AChallenges include real-time proofs not yet being on-chain, security parameters needing dynamic adjustments due to disproven mathematical conjectures, uncertainty about teams meeting deadlines, and early-stage formal verification for recursive architectures.

QHow could achieving the security goals for zkEVM benefit Ethereum's future?

AIt could enable Ethereum to increase Gas limits, enhance block capacity while ensuring staking feasibility, solidify L1 as a trusted settlement layer, and blur the boundaries between L2 and L1 execution.

Похожее

If Hyperliquid Is the New Nasdaq, Which Projects Are Playing the Role of Brokers?

Amidst sluggish market conditions, several crypto startups are pivoting towards building on the Hyperliquid ecosystem, positioning it as a potential "on-chain Nasdaq." These projects are developing trading frontends, strategy platforms, AI Agents, and custom markets using HIP-3, aiming to capture value by acting as "brokerages" that interface with users. The core idea is that while Hyperliquid provides the foundational liquidity and matching engine (like an exchange), these upper-layer applications handle user acquisition, product design, and experience optimization (like brokerages such as Robinhood). Their primary revenue models include transaction fee sharing and the potential appreciation of the HYPE token required for deployment. Key projects highlighted include: * **Trade.xyz**: Dominates the HIP-3 space by bringing traditional finance assets (indices, commodities, stocks) onto Hyperliquid. * **Dreamcash**: Focuses on mobile user growth with a simplified, gamified interface to lower the barrier to entry. * **Ventuals**: Targets the Pre-IPO market, creating perpetual contracts for unicorn company valuations. * **Based**: Aims to be a "super app" combining trading, prediction markets, and crypto payments, introducing yield-generating collateral via its HyENA protocol. * **Minara AI**: Explores an AI Agent future, allowing users to execute trades on Hyperliquid via natural language commands to AI tools. The article concludes that this open, composable ecosystem is Hyperliquid's key competitive advantage. It is evolving from a user-facing platform into a financial operating system (Financial OS). This creates a symbiotic network where each new application brings more users and liquidity to Hyperliquid, while the applications benefit from its robust infrastructure. This network effect could define the next phase of competition among decentralized financial networks.

Odaily星球日报11 мин. назад

If Hyperliquid Is the New Nasdaq, Which Projects Are Playing the Role of Brokers?

Odaily星球日报11 мин. назад

Different Choices After the Plunge: Institutions Buy the Dip, Traders Shift to US Stocks

Title: Diverging Strategies After the Crash: Institutions Buying the Dip, Traders Shifting to US Stocks Following a sharp decline where Bitcoin briefly fell below $60,000 on June 6th, market sentiment remains "extreme fear" despite a partial recovery. This has led to varied responses from major market participants. Several institutional figures and analysts present a cautiously optimistic long-term view for Bitcoin. Glassnode's co-founder identifies $46k-$54k as a probable key bottom range based on historical on-chain models, while a Standard Chartered executive suggests the bottom is nearly formed. Strive's CEO points to Bitcoin touching its 200-week moving average as a historically reliable buy signal. Analysts highlight metrics like MVRV ratio and the "Power Law" model indicating Bitcoin is in an extremely undervalued zone. Conversely, some traders are exiting the crypto space. One trader cited a more attractive risk/reward profile and deeper research opportunities in US stocks, particularly with AI-related equities outperforming and capital rotating away from crypto. This shift is partly attributed to perceived ongoing risks, including those related to Strategy's Bitcoin sales. Market prediction data suggests a high probability (72%) of Bitcoin falling below $55,000, but lower odds for a deeper crash below $35k-$40k. The overall picture is one of division: institutions and long-term analysts see a accumulating opportunity, while some active traders are seeking alpha elsewhere amidst the volatility and shifting capital flows.

marsbit59 мин. назад

Different Choices After the Plunge: Institutions Buy the Dip, Traders Shift to US Stocks

marsbit59 мин. назад

Tech Stocks in the Midst of Deleveraging: Rather Than Rushing to Buy the Dip, Wait for the Macro Environment to Stabilize First

"Technology Stocks in Deleveraging Phase: Wait for Macro Stability Before Buying the Dip" The current sell-off in tech/AI stocks is primarily driven by macro headwinds, not a breakdown in AI fundamentals. After a parabolic rise, the market faced a perfect storm: an overcrowded trade, a massive SpaceX IPO draining liquidity, pre-CPI/PPI/FOMC hedging, and strong jobs data renewing "higher-for-longer" rate fears. This triggered a concentrated deleveraging in hot tech names. Key historical context: Unlike the December 2023 sell-off focused on AI capex returns, the current correction centers on the "denominator" – rising concerns over rates, inflation, the Fed, geopolitics, and liquidity. Leading memory stocks like Micron have seen ~20% pullbacks, significant but not yet at panic levels seen in March. The intense selling wave may be largely over, but a quick V-shaped recovery is unlikely. The market will likely churn in high volatility, awaiting clarity. The immediate catalyst needed for a sustainable reversal is a "stop-bleeding" signal from macro conditions. This doesn't require a major positive shock (like the April Iran ceasefire), but simply a halt to further deterioration: CPI not surprising hotter, Treasury yields stabilizing, the Fed not turning more hawkish, and post-SpaceX IPO liquidity easing. Once macro pressure plateaus, the intact AI investment thesis – centered on persistent compute/memory shortages and accelerating commercialization – can quickly regain market focus. The strategy is clear: prioritize monitoring macro stabilization over rushing to bottom-fish individual AI stories. Patience is key.

marsbit1 ч. назад

Tech Stocks in the Midst of Deleveraging: Rather Than Rushing to Buy the Dip, Wait for the Macro Environment to Stabilize First

marsbit1 ч. назад

South Korean Stocks Plunge, Global Funds Liquidate: Has the Semiconductor Fundamentals Really Changed?

South Korean stocks experienced their sharpest decline of the year, with the KOSPI index plunging nearly 9% on Monday, triggering a market circuit breaker. Leading semiconductor firms Samsung Electronics and SK Hynix were heavily sold off, raising questions about whether the AI-driven bull market has reached an inflection point. This sell-off was largely triggered by a significant drop in the U.S. semiconductor sector late last week. Concurrently, NVIDIA CEO Jensen Huang visited Seoul over the weekend, meeting with top executives from SK Group, Samsung, LG, and NAVER. He announced a new multi-year partnership with SK Hynix to co-develop next-generation memory products for AI data centers. Huang emphasized that AI infrastructure build-out remains in its early stages, creating a stark contrast between market panic and ongoing, strengthened industry collaboration. The article argues that South Korea has become one of the most sensitive markets for global AI-related capital flows, functioning like a large AI memory ETF due to the heavy weighting of its chipmakers. The current market turmoil reflects a shift in investor focus: from simply betting on overall AI growth to scrutinizing which companies will actually capture the profits from that growth. This "profit pool reassessment" phase is causing high volatility based on supply chain news and earnings guidance. Ultimately, the direction of the Korean market will be determined by external factors—NVIDIA's orders, HBM supply-demand dynamics, and capital expenditures from cloud service providers—rather than domestic conditions. The disconnect between sharp price corrections and continued strong signals from the industry core leaves the market at a crossroads, awaiting clearer data on the durability of AI infrastructure demand.

marsbit1 ч. назад

South Korean Stocks Plunge, Global Funds Liquidate: Has the Semiconductor Fundamentals Really Changed?

marsbit1 ч. назад

Торговля

Спот
Фьючерсы

Популярные статьи

Как купить ZEST

Добро пожаловать на HTX.com! Мы сделали приобретение Zest Protocol (ZEST) простым и удобным. Следуйте нашему пошаговому руководству и отправляйтесь в свое крипто-путешествие.Шаг 1: Создайте аккаунт на HTXИспользуйте свой адрес электронной почты или номер телефона, чтобы зарегистрироваться и бесплатно создать аккаунт на HTX. Пройдите удобную регистрацию и откройте для себя весь функционал.Создать аккаунтШаг 2: Перейдите в Купить криптовалюту и выберите свой способ оплатыКредитная/Дебетовая Карта: Используйте свою карту Visa или Mastercard для мгновенной покупки Zest Protocol (ZEST).Баланс: Используйте средства с баланса вашего аккаунта HTX для простой торговли.Третьи Лица: Мы добавили популярные способы оплаты, такие как Google Pay и Apple Pay, для повышения удобства.P2P: Торгуйте напрямую с другими пользователями на HTX.Внебиржевая Торговля (OTC): Мы предлагаем индивидуальные услуги и конкурентоспособные обменные курсы для трейдеров.Шаг 3: Хранение Zest Protocol (ZEST)После приобретения вами Zest Protocol (ZEST) храните их в своем аккаунте на HTX. В качестве альтернативы вы можете отправить их куда-либо с помощью перевода в блокчейне или использовать для торговли с другими криптовалютами.Шаг 4: Торговля Zest Protocol (ZEST)С легкостью торгуйте Zest Protocol (ZEST) на спотовом рынке HTX. Просто зайдите в свой аккаунт, выберите торговую пару, совершайте сделки и следите за ними в режиме реального времени. Мы предлагаем удобный интерфейс как для начинающих, так и для опытных трейдеров.

272 просмотров всегоОпубликовано 2026.05.19Обновлено 2026.06.02

Как купить ZEST

Обсуждения

Добро пожаловать в Сообщество HTX. Здесь вы сможете быть в курсе последних новостей о развитии платформы и получить доступ к профессиональной аналитической информации о рынке. Мнения пользователей о цене на A (A) представлены ниже.

活动图片