Earnings Report, CLARITY Bill, and Warsh's Arrival: CRCL Faces Three Major Tests This Week

marsbitОпубликовано 2026-05-11Обновлено 2026-05-11

Введение

Circle (CRCL) faces three major tests this week that will significantly impact its stock price and valuation. First, on May 11, it will release its Q1 2026 earnings. Key metrics to watch are overall revenue and EPS, the proportion of revenue paid to distributors like Coinbase, and growth in non-interest income. The market also awaits Circle's stance on renegotiating its revenue-sharing contract with Coinbase, which expires in August. Second, on May 14, the U.S. Senate Banking Committee will vote on the CLARITY Act. This bill aims to establish a clear federal regulatory framework for digital assets. A recent compromise proposal would ban yield on static stablecoin reserves but allow rewards for active ones. Its passage, currently seen as likely by prediction markets, would be a major positive for the industry and Circle. Finally, on May 15, Kevin Warsh will succeed Jerome Powell as Federal Reserve Chair. Warsh's proposed policy of quantitative tightening combined with interest rate cuts could pose a short-term headwind for CRCL, as lower rates reduce Circle's primary revenue from USDC reserves. However, long-term prospects may improve as Warsh, a known crypto investor who opposes a Fed CBDC, is seen as potentially favorable to regulated private stablecoins like USDC.

Author|Azuma(@azuma_eth)

The Q1 earnings report on May 11th, the CLARITY bill's Senate hurdle on May 14th, and the Federal Reserve leadership change on May 15th... Circle (CRCL) is set to face three major tests this week. Each challenge will directly impact CRCL's price movement and may even redefine its valuation logic.

In the following, Odaily Planet Daily will analyze the progress and expectations of these three key events one by one and predict their potential impact on CRCL (Odaily Note: The following content does not constitute any investment advice).

Event One: 2026 Q1 Earnings Report

Tonight at 20:00, Circle will release its 2026 first-quarter earnings report before the US stock market opens, followed by an earnings conference call.

There are three main focal points for this earnings report.

  • The first is Circle's consolidated revenue and profit data for Q1 this year. Current market expectations for Circle's Q1 revenue are $715 million, with an expected earnings per share (EPS) of $0.178.
  • The second is the proportion of Circle's distribution costs (primarily to Coinbase) relative to its overall revenue. This represents Circle's dependence on distribution platforms like Coinbase. This ratio has shown a slight downward trend over the past few quarters and is expected to continue this trend in Q1.
  • The third is the growth status of non-interest income, meaning revenue from payments, enterprise, and on-chain businesses. This is the most important long-term data for Circle, indicating whether it can find a second major revenue stream beyond US Treasury interest.

Regarding the distribution contract with Coinbase, analysts are certain to ask about this during the earnings call, and Circle's response will be crucial. In August 2023, Circle signed a three-year contract with Coinbase, stipulating that Coinbase would receive all interest income generated by USDC on its platform, with interest from off-platform USDC split 50/50 between Coinbase and Circle.

This contract expires this August. However, last week the Coinbase CFO emphasized that the contract "renews every three years and never changes." If renewed under the original terms, it would certainly be unfavorable for Circle. Nevertheless, considering the current significant financial pressure on Coinbase and its strong reliance on Circle — all contracts are negotiated — this might be a favorable factor for Circle to seek amendment of the revenue-sharing terms.

  • Odaily Note: Refer to "Q1 Net Loss of $394.1 Million, Coinbase Has No Choice But to Hold Tight to Circle's Thigh".

Personally, I am cautiously optimistic about tonight's earnings report, expecting solid performance, but the focus lies more on Circle's stance regarding the August renewal.

Event Two: CLARITY Bill's Senate Hurdle

On May 14th, US local time, the US Senate Banking Committee will hold a vote hearing on the "Clarity for Digital Assets" bill (CLARITY Act). This will be a critical step for CLARITY to subsequently pass the Senate and become formal legislation.

The CLARITY Act aims to establish a regulatory framework for digital assets, clearly distinguish the classification of digital assets, and delineate the regulatory responsibilities of the US Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) and the Commodity Futures Trading Commission (CFTC).

On July 17th last year, CLARITY passed the US House of Representatives with an overwhelming majority (vote count approximately 294–134) but encountered resistance when subsequently transferred to the Senate due to disagreements among various parties.

Controversies primarily centered around stablecoin yields, the regulatory approach to DeFi, and the ethics of the Trump family, especially the issue of stablecoin yields. Banking and crypto industries engaged in fierce debate, with Coinbase temporarily exiting negotiations, stalling the bill's progress (Recommended reading "Why Banks Insist on Banning Stablecoin Yields?").

The situation recently took a crucial turn. Senators Tom Tillis and Angela Alsbrooks have reached a compromise proposal, intending to ban yields on static stablecoin reserves but allowing rewards for actively used stablecoins.

Currently, on the prediction market Polymarket, the probability of CLARITY becoming law this year is as high as 76%, indicating relatively positive market sentiment regarding the bill's future progress.

Once CLARITY becomes formal law, it will establish a clear, functional federal regulatory framework for the US digital asset market, addressing long-standing issues of regulatory ambiguity and inconsistent enforcement. This would be a significant positive for all industry participants, including Circle. My prediction on this is relatively optimistic.

Event Three: Federal Reserve Leadership Change

On May 15th, Jerome Powell's term as Federal Reserve Chairman officially ends (he will remain as a Board member until 2028), and his successor will be Kevin Warsh.

On April 29th, the US Senate Banking Committee voted to approve Warsh's nomination. Although it hasn't been confirmed by the full Senate vote yet, that is expected to happen in the coming days.

Unlike Powell, Warsh advocates for an unconventional combination of "balance sheet reduction + interest rate cuts," supporting inflation control through quantitative tightening (QT) while lowering interest rates to provide liquidity for the real economy. He believes QT targets the financial sector, while rate cuts benefit the industrial sector.

For Circle, which still relies primarily on US Treasury interest as its main income source, a market shift towards a rate-cutting cycle would be a direct bearish factor for CRCL. Simultaneously, QT could lead to tightened financial market liquidity in the short term, suppressing the stock market.

However, Warsh himself is a cryptocurrency holder. He is the first Federal Reserve Chair in history to have directly invested in the cryptocurrency field and places extreme importance on "the digital upgrade of US financial competitiveness." Warsh has also explicitly opposed the Fed issuing an official CBDC, arguing that its credit is deeply tied to national sovereignty; if the US dollar's credibility is damaged, the CBDC would also collapse. Therefore, he hopes to bring private stablecoins like USDC into the Federal Reserve's regulatory system, making them "shadow dollars."

Therefore, from a long-term perspective, Warsh taking office could potentially provide Circle with some policy tailwinds at the operational level, aiding its expansion.

So, regarding expectations, the short-term outlook may lean towards pessimism, but the long-term view could shift to neutral or optimistic.

Связанные с этим вопросы

QWhat are the three key events that Circle (CRCL) is facing this week according to the article?

AThe three key events are: 1) The Q1 2026 earnings report release on May 11. 2) The U.S. Senate Banking Committee hearing and vote on the CLARITY Act on May 14. 3) The transition of the Federal Reserve Chair from Powell to Kevin Warsh on May 15.

QWhat is the main concern regarding Circle's expiring contract with Coinbase?

AThe main concern is the terms of renewal. The current three-year contract, which gives Coinbase all interest from USDC on its platform and a 50% share of interest from off-platform USDC, expires in August 2026. The article suggests Circle may seek more favorable terms in the renewal, especially given Coinbase's current financial pressures.

QWhat is the significance of the CLARITY Act for the cryptocurrency industry, particularly for Circle?

AThe CLARITY Act aims to establish a clear federal regulatory framework for digital assets by distinguishing their classification and defining the regulatory roles of the SEC and CFTC. Its passage would be a major positive for industry participants like Circle by resolving long-standing regulatory ambiguity and inconsistent enforcement.

QAccording to the article, what is the potential market impact of Kevin Warsh's expected policy approach as the new Fed Chair?

AKevin Warsh's expected unconventional policy of 'shrinking the balance sheet (QT) + cutting interest rates' could create a short-term headwind for Circle. Rate cuts would directly reduce the interest income from its Treasury holdings (a primary revenue source), while QT could tighten financial market liquidity and pressure equity markets, including CRCL's stock price.

QWhat is the author's long-term view on Circle's prospects under a Kevin Warsh-led Federal Reserve?

AThe author holds a more optimistic long-term view. Despite potential short-term monetary policy headwinds, Kevin Warsh is described as a cryptocurrency holder who strongly supports the digital upgrade of U.S. financial competitiveness, opposes a Fed-issued CBDC, and favors bringing private stablecoins like USDC under the Fed's regulatory umbrella, which could provide favorable policy support for Circle's business expansion.

Похожее

GitHub, Transfixed by AI

On the night of February 9th, GitHub suffered a major outage caused by a simple configuration change—reducing a cache refresh interval from 12 to 2 hours—that triggered a cascade of failures. This was not an isolated event, but part of a broader pattern. In early 2026, GitHub experienced at least 8 major incidents, failing to meet its promised 99.9% availability. These outages stemmed from structural issues: explosive growth in load, tight service coupling, and insufficient protection against abnormal traffic. This unprecedented load is driven by AI Agents. In 2025, GitHub handled ~1 billion commits. By 2026, weekly commits reached 275 million, projecting to ~14 billion for the year—a 14x increase. AI tools like Claude Code now contribute 4.5% of all public repository commits, with weekly submissions surging 25x in just three months. AI-generated pull requests jumped from 4 million to 17 million per month in half a year. Unlike human developers, AI Agents work continuously, generating commits at a scale that overwhelms infrastructure designed for human rhythms. The surge also shattered GitHub's business model. Copilot's flat-rate pricing, based on assisting human developers, became unsustainable as Agentic AI sessions consumed resources worth hundreds of dollars for a few dollars in fees. In response, GitHub imposed usage limits and, by June 1st, shifted to a pay-per-use "AI Credits" system. Facing this new reality, GitHub realized a 10x scaling plan was insufficient. It announced a need to *redesign* its architecture for 30x current scale—decoupling services, adding fault isolation, and improving change management to prevent cascading failures. Other platforms like Stripe and AWS are facing similar challenges with AI Agents. Fundamentally, GitHub is transitioning from a human collaboration platform to an "exhaust pipe" for automated AI workflows. Its detailed post-mortem reports aim to maintain trust during this turbulent rebuild. The February outage was not just a technical glitch, but a signal of the software industry's entry into a new, AI-driven era.

marsbit17 мин. назад

GitHub, Transfixed by AI

marsbit17 мин. назад

Both Suffer Massive Losses Exceeding $90 Billion, Which Is in Greater Peril: Strategy or Bitmine?

Facing massive paper losses exceeding $90 billion each amidst a sharp market downturn, "Digital Asset Treasury" (DAT) giants Strategy and Bitmine find themselves in a precarious position, but with different underlying risks. Strategy, heavily invested in Bitcoin (BTC), faces significant financial strain. Its strategy relies heavily on debt, including convertible notes and preferred stock (STRC) requiring substantial dividend payments. With its cash reserves dwindling and BTC offering no staking yield for cash flow, Strategy's high leverage makes it vulnerable. A continued price decline could force asset sales to meet obligations, potentially creating a negative feedback loop. Its market value has already fallen sharply. In contrast, Bitmine, an Ethereum (ETH) holder, appears on firmer financial ground. It primarily funds its purchases through equity offerings (like ATM programs), avoiding debt pressure. It also generates income by staking a large portion of its ETH holdings. While not immune to market drops and shareholder dilution concerns, Bitmine maintains more flexibility, recently announcing a new preferred share offering to raise further capital. The core divergence lies in their financing: Bitmine uses equity (investor money), while Strategy uses debt (borrowed money). Consequently, Bitmine currently faces less immediate liquidity pressure than Strategy, which must navigate the dual challenge of servicing debt/dividends and a declining core asset (BTC) price.

marsbit24 мин. назад

Both Suffer Massive Losses Exceeding $90 Billion, Which Is in Greater Peril: Strategy or Bitmine?

marsbit24 мин. назад

Where the AI Bubble Really Is: Which Layer of Players Are Naked

AI Bubble: Where It Really Is and Who's Swimming Naked This analysis dissects the AI industry not as a single entity but as a five-layer pyramid, arguing that bubbles are concentrated in specific tiers, not uniformly distributed. **Key Distinction from the 2000 Dot-com Bubble:** Unlike 2000, where companies had stock prices before revenue, today's leading AI players have massive, contract-backed revenue driving their valuations. Core infrastructure demand is real, with every GPU running at full capacity for paying customers. **The Five-Layer Pyramid & Bubble Assessment:** * **L0 (Fab/Manufacturing) & Top L4 (Leading AI Apps): NO BUBBLE.** Companies like TSMC, NVIDIA, major cloud providers (Microsoft, Google, Meta, Amazon), and top AI labs have real revenues and orders. Supply is tightly constrained by TSMC's disciplined capacity control and physical limits like power/land for data centers, preventing a supply glut. * **L1 (Memory): BATTLEGROUND.** Sky-high HBM margins could signal a new structural cycle or a classic "boom before bust." The oligopoly of three major players may enforce supply discipline, making this a high-stakes bet. * **L2 (Interconnect/Optical Modules): BUBBLE TERRITORY.** Companies like Lumentum and AAOI have seen stock surges (4-10x) far outpacing revenue growth. This hardware segment has lower physical barriers to expansion than fabs, allowing speculation. It mirrors the 2000 bubble's epicenter—optics. * **L3 (Infrastructure/"GPU Landlords"): VULNERABLE.** GPU leasing companies profit from the current compute shortage but own no long-term moat. Their business model relies on a temporary bottleneck that will ease as big tech expands and new tech (e.g., potential space-based data centers) emerges. * **L4 Long Tail (VC-backed Startups): STRONG BUBBLE SIGNALS.** VC funding concentration in AI is twice that of the 1999 peak. Many startups with little revenue use the valuation logic of successful giants to justify their own, creating high risk of a "valuation crunch" when funding dries up. **Critical Risks to Monitor:** 1. **GPU Depreciation & Accounting:** Companies extending the assumed useful life of GPUs artificially boost profits. The true economic life depends on future generational leaps from NVIDIA. 2. **"GPU Credit" & Off-Balance-Sheet Leverage:** Emerging structures where shell companies borrow to buy GPUs and lease them out (with chipmakers sometimes investing) move debt off major balance sheets. This echoes the "vendor financing" of 2000 and the securitization risks of 2008, though currently small-scale. 3. **TSMC Abandoning Caution:** If the primary supply bottleneck (TSMC's conservative capacity planning) breaks, runaway supply could trigger a bust. 4. **Algorithmic Efficiency Breakthrough:** A major leap in software efficiency could drastically reduce the need for raw compute hardware, undermining the investment thesis. **Conclusion:** The AI boom is expensive and has frothy areas, but its core is underpinned by real demand and physical supply constraints. The bubble risk is layered: most present in optical components, GPU leasing, and the long-tail startup ecosystem, while the foundational chip manufacturing and leading application layers remain relatively solid—for now.

marsbit36 мин. назад

Where the AI Bubble Really Is: Which Layer of Players Are Naked

marsbit36 мин. назад

Торговля

Спот
Фьючерсы

Популярные статьи

Как купить S

Добро пожаловать на HTX.com! Мы сделали приобретение Sonic (S) простым и удобным. Следуйте нашему пошаговому руководству и отправляйтесь в свое крипто-путешествие.Шаг 1: Создайте аккаунт на HTXИспользуйте свой адрес электронной почты или номер телефона, чтобы зарегистрироваться и бесплатно создать аккаунт на HTX. Пройдите удобную регистрацию и откройте для себя весь функционал.Создать аккаунтШаг 2: Перейдите в Купить криптовалюту и выберите свой способ оплатыКредитная/Дебетовая Карта: Используйте свою карту Visa или Mastercard для мгновенной покупки Sonic (S).Баланс: Используйте средства с баланса вашего аккаунта HTX для простой торговли.Третьи Лица: Мы добавили популярные способы оплаты, такие как Google Pay и Apple Pay, для повышения удобства.P2P: Торгуйте напрямую с другими пользователями на HTX.Внебиржевая Торговля (OTC): Мы предлагаем индивидуальные услуги и конкурентоспособные обменные курсы для трейдеров.Шаг 3: Хранение Sonic (S)После приобретения вами Sonic (S) храните их в своем аккаунте на HTX. В качестве альтернативы вы можете отправить их куда-либо с помощью перевода в блокчейне или использовать для торговли с другими криптовалютами.Шаг 4: Торговля Sonic (S)С легкостью торгуйте Sonic (S) на спотовом рынке HTX. Просто зайдите в свой аккаунт, выберите торговую пару, совершайте сделки и следите за ними в режиме реального времени. Мы предлагаем удобный интерфейс как для начинающих, так и для опытных трейдеров.

1.4k просмотров всегоОпубликовано 2025.01.15Обновлено 2026.06.02

Как купить S

Sonic: Обновления под руководством Андре Кронье – новая звезда Layer-1 на фоне спада рынка

Он решает проблемы масштабируемости, совместимости между блокчейнами и стимулов для разработчиков с помощью технологических инноваций.

2.3k просмотров всегоОпубликовано 2025.04.09Обновлено 2025.04.09

Sonic: Обновления под руководством Андре Кронье – новая звезда Layer-1 на фоне спада рынка

HTX Learn: Пройдите обучение по "Sonic" и разделите 1000 USDT

HTX Learn — ваш проводник в мир перспективных проектов, и мы запускаем специальное мероприятие "Учитесь и Зарабатывайте", посвящённое этим проектам. Наше новое направление .

1.8k просмотров всегоОпубликовано 2025.04.10Обновлено 2025.04.10

HTX Learn: Пройдите обучение по "Sonic" и разделите 1000 USDT

Обсуждения

Добро пожаловать в Сообщество HTX. Здесь вы сможете быть в курсе последних новостей о развитии платформы и получить доступ к профессиональной аналитической информации о рынке. Мнения пользователей о цене на S (S) представлены ниже.

活动图片