‘Disappointing’: U.S. DoJ seeks retrial of Tornado Cash founder

ambcryptoОпубликовано 2026-03-10Обновлено 2026-03-10

Введение

The U.S. Department of Justice is seeking a retrial of Tornado Cash founder Roman Storm on charges of money laundering and sanctions violations, a move that has drawn strong criticism from the crypto community. Storm was previously found guilty only of operating an unlicensed money-transmitting business. The DeFi community, including the DeFi Education Fund and Solana Policy Institute, expressed disappointment, arguing the case threatens legal protections for software developers. They point to a recent court ruling that exempted developers from liability on non-custodial platforms. Critics also accuse the DoJ of contradicting the U.S. Treasury's stance and undermining crypto innovation. Despite the negative news, Tornado Cash’s native token TORN saw a 4% price increase.

U.S. government agencies are eliciting conflicting views on crypto mixers and DeFi software developers.

The above rift has become evident in the latest push by the Department of Justice (DoJ) to retry the Tornado Cash founder, Roman Storm.

In a letter sent to the Southern District of New York’s (SDNY) Judge Katherine Polk Failla, the DoJ requested the retrial to begin in October 2026.

Community opposes DoJ’s push for retrial

However, the DeFi and crypto community has raised concerns about the planned retrial.

In particular, Amanda Tuminelli, chief legal officer and executive director at lobby group DeFi Education Fund, billed the update as ‘incredibly disappointing news.’

Last year, Tornado Cash founder Roman Storm was charged with three counts: conspiracy to operate an unlicensed money-transmitting business (MTB), money laundering, and violations of sanctions.

But he was only found guilty of running an unlicensed MTB, which attracted a five-year jail sentence. However, the jury was undecided on the two other counts, and each could fetch a 20-year sentence if Storm is found guilty. These are the charges the DoJ is seeking to retry.

Moreover, Roman Storm criticized SDNY prosecutors for overstepping their role, undermining President Donald Trump’s crypto agenda, and disregarding the U.S. Treasury’s latest directive.

Here, Storm was referring to the U.S. Treasury’s latest report on crypto mixers, which characterized the products as ‘unlawful.’

“Lawful users of digital assets may leverage mixers to enable financial privacy when transacting through public blockchains.”

DeFi developers’ protections at risk

Similarly, a recent landmark Uniswap ruling established that scammers were liable for any wrongdoing and losses incurred on non-custodial platforms.

The ruling exempted developers from legal liability and, by extension, was viewed by many policy watchers as a positive sign for DeFi. In fact, the Unsiwap ruling was issued by Judge Failla, who is handling the Storm case.

However, the DoJ’s push for a retrial runs counter to the above ruling and the U.S. Treasury statement, further putting DeFi developers’ protection in limbo.

Reacting to the update, Solana Policy Institute’s CEO Miller Whitehouse-Levine called the retrial push ‘depressing’ but vowed to support Storm.

For his part, David Hoffman of Bankless pleaded with the Trump Administration to drop the charges against Storm.

“If the USA wants to be the Crypto Capital of the world, we need to protect our open-source developers. Please simply pardon Roman Storm from a charge leftover from the Biden admin.”

Interestingly, TORN, Tornado Cash’s native token, surged 4% despite the negative update.


Final Summary

  • The DoJ is pushing for the retrial of Roman Storm for sanctions violations and money laundering.
  • The crypto community expressed disappointment with the update as software developers’ protections hang in the balance.

Связанные с этим вопросы

QWhat are the three charges that Tornado Cash founder Roman Storm was originally facing?

ARoman Storm was originally charged with three counts: conspiracy to operate an unlicensed money-transmitting business (MTB), money laundering, and violations of sanctions.

QWhy is the DeFi and crypto community concerned about the Department of Justice's push for a retrial?

AThe community is concerned because the retrial push runs counter to a recent landmark Uniswap ruling that exempted developers from legal liability, putting the protections for DeFi software developers in jeopardy.

QWhat was the outcome of Roman Storm's initial trial, and which charge was he found guilty of?

AIn the initial trial, the jury found Roman Storm guilty of running an unlicensed money-transmitting business (MTB), which carries a five-year jail term. The jury was undecided on the charges of money laundering and sanctions violations.

QHow did the U.S. Treasury's latest report characterize crypto mixers, and what did it say about their lawful users?

AThe U.S. Treasury's latest report characterized crypto mixers as 'unlawful.' However, it also noted that 'Lawful users of digital assets may leverage mixers to enable financial privacy when transacting through public blockchains.'

QWho is the judge presiding over the Roman Storm case, and why is her previous ruling significant in this context?

AJudge Katherine Polk Failla of the Southern District of New York (SDNY) is presiding over the case. She is significant because she issued the recent Uniswap ruling that established developers are not liable for scams on non-custodial platforms, a decision that contrasts with the DoJ's push for a retrial against Storm.

Похожее

OpenAI Post-Training Engineer Weng Jiayi Proposes a New Paradigm Hypothesis for Agentic AI

OpenAI engineer Weng Jiayi's "Heuristic Learning" experiments propose a new paradigm for Agentic AI, suggesting that intelligent agents can improve not just by training neural networks, but also by autonomously writing and refining code based on environmental feedback. In the experiment, a coding agent (powered by Codex) was tasked with developing and maintaining a programmatic strategy for the Atari game Breakout. Starting from a basic prompt, the agent iteratively wrote code, ran the game, analyzed logs and video replays to identify failures, and then modified the code. Through this engineering loop of "code-run-debug-update," it evolved a pure Python heuristic strategy that achieved a perfect score of 864 in Breakout and performed competitively with deep reinforcement learning (RL) algorithms in MuJoCo control tasks like Ant and HalfCheetah. This approach, termed Heuristic Learning (HL), contrasts with Deep RL. In HL, experience is captured in readable, modifiable code, tests, logs, and configurations—a software system—rather than being encoded solely into opaque neural network weights. This offers potential advantages in explainability, auditability for safety-critical applications, easier integration of regression tests to combat catastrophic forgetting, and more efficient sample use in early learning stages, as demonstrated in broader tests on 57 Atari games. However, the blog acknowledges clear limitations. Programmatic strategies struggle with tasks requiring long-horizon planning or complex perception (e.g., Montezuma's Revenge), areas where neural networks excel. The future vision is a hybrid architecture: specialized neural networks for fast perception (System 1), HL systems for rules, safety, and local recovery (also System 1), and LLM agents providing high-level feedback and learning from the HL system's data (System 2). The core proposition is that in the era of capable coding agents, a significant portion of an AI's learned experience could be maintained as an auditable, evolving software system.

marsbit51 мин. назад

OpenAI Post-Training Engineer Weng Jiayi Proposes a New Paradigm Hypothesis for Agentic AI

marsbit51 мин. назад

Your Claude Will Dream Tonight, Don't Disturb It

This article explores the recent phenomenon of AI companies increasingly using anthropomorphic language—like "thinking," "memory," "hallucination," and now "dreaming"—to describe machine learning processes. Focusing on Anthropic's newly announced "Dreaming" feature for its Claude Agent platform, the piece explains that this function is essentially an automated, offline batch processing of an agent's operational logs. It analyzes past task sessions to identify patterns, optimize future actions, and consolidate learnings into a persistent memory system, akin to a form of reinforcement learning and self-correction. The article draws parallels to similar features in other AI agent systems like Hermes Agent and OpenClaw, which also implement mechanisms for reviewing historical data, extracting reusable "skills," and strengthening long-term memory. It notes a key difference from human dreaming: these AI "dreams" still consume computational resources and user tokens. Further context is provided by discussing the technical challenges of managing AI "memory" or context, highlighting the computational expense of large context windows and innovations like Subquadratic's new model claiming drastically longer contexts. The core critique argues that this strategic use of human-centric vocabulary does more than market products; it subtly reshapes user perception. By framing algorithms with terms associated with consciousness, companies blur the line between tool and autonomous entity. This linguistic shift can influence user expectations, tolerance for errors, and even perceptions of responsibility when systems fail, potentially diverting scrutiny from the companies and engineers behind the technology. The article concludes by speculating that terms like "daydreaming" for predictive task simulation might be next, continuing this trend of embedding the idea of an "inner life" into computational processes.

marsbit53 мин. назад

Your Claude Will Dream Tonight, Don't Disturb It

marsbit53 мин. назад

Торговля

Спот
Фьючерсы
活动图片