Regulatory Policy

Focuses on global regulatory developments, policy changes, and compliance requirements. It provides in-depth analysis of government regulations and their impact on the cryptocurrency and blockchain industries, helping businesses and investors proactively manage policy-related risks.

How Do Stablecoins Touch the Most Profitable Nerve of Banks?

U.S. banks are fiercely opposing interest-bearing stablecoins, not because they cause deposit outflows, but because they threaten the core profitability of large commercial banks. When funds flow into stablecoins like USDC, the money eventually returns to the banking system as reserves held in cash or short-term liquid assets. The real concern is the total amount of deposits, but a shift in deposit structure. Large U.S. banks rely heavily on "low-rate banking," where they hold massive amounts of non-interest or ultra-low-interest transaction deposits (used for payments, transfers, and settlements). These deposits are extremely cheap for banks, costing only 0-11 basis points in interest, while the Fed funds rate is 3.5%-3.75%. This spread, along with transaction fees, generates over $360 billion in annual revenue for banks. Interest-bearing stablecoins directly compete with these transaction deposits. If stablecoins offer yield, users may move funds from traditional bank transaction accounts into stablecoins for both utility and returns. Although the money remains in the banking system, stablecoin issuers would likely place most reserves in higher-yielding non-transaction accounts, forcing banks to pay market rates for these funds. This erodes banks' profit margins and reduces their fee income from payment services. The battle over the CLARITY法案 revolves around this profit redistribution. Banks want to ban all forms of yield on stablecoins to protect their lucrative low-cost deposit base and dominant position in the payment ecosystem.

比推01/19 14:58

How Do Stablecoins Touch the Most Profitable Nerve of Banks?

比推01/19 14:58

Balancing Compliance and Innovation: A Study of France's Crypto Asset Taxation and Regulatory System

This research examines France's evolving regulatory and tax framework for crypto assets, balancing compliance and innovation. As a key EU member, France has developed a system aligned with EU directives while retaining national characteristics. Key developments include the 2019 PACTE Law, which established the legal status of crypto assets, and the transition from the DASP (Digital Asset Service Provider) regime to the EU's MiCAR (Markets in Crypto-Assets Regulation) framework by December 2024. Additionally, the implementation of DAC8 and CARF will enable automatic exchange of crypto transaction information from 2026, ending anonymity for tax purposes. France employs a categorized taxation approach: occasional investors face a flat 30% tax rate, while professional investors are subject to progressive income tax rates (0%–45%). Different rules apply to miners, DeFi participants, NFT traders, exchanges, and institutional investors based on their activities. For instance, mining rewards are taxed as non-commercial profits (BNC), and crypto-to-crypto trades are not taxable events for individuals until converted to fiat. The regulatory landscape involves the AMF (financial markets authority) and ACRP (prudential supervision), with stricter capital and operational requirements under MiCAR. The upcoming DAC8/CARF framework will mandate CASPs to collect and report user data from 2026, enhancing tax transparency. However, areas like DeFi and NFT taxation remain uncertain and lack clear guidelines. The article concludes that both individual and institutional participants must maintain detailed records, ensure accurate reporting, and prepare for increased regulatory compliance and data exchange obligations.

marsbit01/19 11:28

Balancing Compliance and Innovation: A Study of France's Crypto Asset Taxation and Regulatory System

marsbit01/19 11:28

活动图片