Behind USDH's Acquisition by Coinbase: Hyperliquid's Interest-Driven Choice

marsbitОпубликовано 2026-05-15Обновлено 2026-05-15

Введение

Coinbase announces its integration with Hyperliquid, becoming the official USDC treasury deployer on the platform. The native stablecoin USDH, issued by Native Markets, will be gradually phased out as Coinbase acquires its brand assets. Users can convert USDH to USDC or fiat without fees during the transition. The move solidifies USDC as Hyperliquid's official stablecoin and pricing asset. The arrangement is framed as a three-way win: Coinbase deepens its ties to the Hyperliquid ecosystem; Hyperliquid gains the vast majority of future USDC reserve yield revenue (estimated at up to 90%); and Native Markets exits with compensation from the asset sale. However, some community members criticize the outcome, viewing USDH's shutdown as a retreat from decentralization and arguing that the original governance vote favored internal interests over users. The partnership also sees Circle and Coinbase staking HYPE tokens to support the network's AQAv2 upgrade. Ultimately, the article suggests the resolution underscores pragmatic economic interests over earlier community-centric rhetoric.

Original | Odaily Planet Daily (@OdailyChina)

Author | Wenser (@wenser 2010)

Last September, the battle over Hyperliquid's native stablecoin USDH once became an industry focus; now, this once highly anticipated stablecoin has suddenly reached its "exit moment."

Last night, Coinbase announced it will become the official treasury deployer for USDC on Hyperliquid, while USDH issuer Native Markets granted Coinbase the rights to purchase USDH brand assets. Subsequently, the USDH market will be gradually phased out, during which users can still convert USDH to USDC or fiat currency without fees.

Thus, the once famous USDH has become an asset acquired by Coinbase, while USDC has been officially established as Hyperliquid's official stablecoin and pricing asset. Odaily Planet Daily will briefly analyze the details and subsequent impacts in this article.

USDH Exits, USDC Rises: The Economic Calculations Behind $5 Billion

The grand drama of the "Hyperliquid Ecosystem Stablecoin Battle" has concluded with a win-win-win outcome for Coinbase & Circle, Hyperliquid, and USDH issuer Native Markets.

Coinbase further deepens its ties with the Hyperliquid ecosystem; Hyperliquid gains the majority of the stablecoin reserve income from USDC within its ecosystem; Native Markets, as the ultimate winner of the past USDH era, receives its reward by "selling the USDH brand assets."

Coinbase & Circle: Deepening Integration with Hyperliquid's On-Chain Economy, Continuously Increasing HYPE Investment

Currently, the scale of USDC on Hyperliquid is approximately $5.164 billion, a two-fold year-on-year increase.

As the official partner and revenue-sharing party for USDC, Coinbase's move undoubtedly aims to deeply integrate with the Hyperliquid ecosystem.

Furthermore, according to Hyperliquid's official announcement, both Coinbase (capital deployer) and Circle (responsible for technical deployment of CCTP and native cross-chain infrastructure) have committed to staking HYPE to activate AQAv2 (Aligned Quote Asset v2).

It is worth mentioning that in September last year, Circle already purchased HYPE tokens, and its current HYPE token staking scale has increased to around 500,000 tokens.

Hyperliquid: Receiving the Lion's Share of USDC Reserve Income, Benefiting from Coinbase Alliance

As for the biggest winner of this collaboration, it is undoubtedly Hyperliquid as the ecosystem foundation.

According to the official announcement, Coinbase will subsequently share the vast majority of reserve income revenue with the Hyperliquid protocol. Although the specific sharing ratio has not been disclosed, if based on the previous USDH revenue-sharing mechanism, Hyperliquid will actually receive approximately 90% of the reserve income.

Based on calculations by Hyperliquid community members, with a scale of $4.7 billion and an interest rate return of 3.8%, this corresponds to about $160 million in income; in other words, it equates to a daily $440,000 HYPE token buyback.

Moreover, with the CLARITY Act passing a vote in the US Senate Banking Committee, Hyperliquid's deep ties with Coinbase also imply that HYPE and Hyperliquid have gained a degree of support at the US regulatory level.

Native Markets: USDH's Historical Mission Accomplished

As the issuer of Hyperliquid's native stablecoin USDH, Native Markets appears to be the biggest loser in this "acquisition event," but judging from its official statement, its outcome can be considered a "successful retreat."

On one hand, USDH provided a model and template for the revenue-sharing agreement between Coinbase and the Hyperliquid protocol for USDC income; on the other hand, Coinbase likely directly acquired the USDH-related brand assets, meaning the USDH stablecoin issued by the Native Markets team was "acquired by Coinbase," thus providing the team with some economic return.

Subsequently, Native Markets also stated it would remain independent and seek development in other areas.

After USDH's Exit: In the Win-Win-Win Scenario, Only USDH Users Get Hurt

Of course, Native Markets' exit is not met with unanimous "praise." Hyperliquid community users also expressed criticism regarding its so-called "having a seat at the negotiation table" narrative.

Some believe that USDH's exit signifies a complete regression of the decentralization era;

Others pointed out that during the initial USDH stablecoin issuer vote, they should have chosen Paxos, as they at least considered users and stablecoin growth, while those who voted for Native Markets did so merely for alignment and internal interests. In the end, users gained nothing. These remarks also garnered considerable agreement and support.

Thus, the drama from a year ago, featuring "CEO romance" and "defying giants," has finally come to an end.

However, looking at the current scene of Hyperliquid "shaking hands and making peace" with Coinbase and Circle is somewhat sigh-inducing and even slightly ironic.

Everything, it turns out, was just about interest distribution, not the once-loudly chanted slogans of "for the community" or "for Hyperliquid."

Recommended Reading

Hyperliquid Stablecoin USDH Becomes "Industry Sweetheart," Giants Engage in Chaotic Distribution Rights Battle

USDH Vote in Progress: "Predetermined Script," "CEO Romance," "Retreating at the Height of Success" Take Turns on Stage

Связанные с этим вопросы

QWhat major change was announced regarding the native stablecoin USDH on Hyperliquid, and who was involved in the announcement?

ACoinbase announced it will become the official treasury deployer for USDC on Hyperliquid, and the USDH issuer Native Markets granted Coinbase the right to purchase the USDH brand assets. The USDH market will be gradually shut down.

QWhat is the primary reason for Coinbase's involvement in this deal according to the article, especially regarding its relationship with Hyperliquid and HYPE tokens?

ACoinbase aims to deepen its binding with the Hyperliquid ecosystem. Both Coinbase and Circle have committed to staking HYPE tokens to activate AQAv2. Circle has already purchased HYPE tokens, increasing its stake to around 500,000 HYPE.

QHow is the Hyperliquid protocol expected to benefit financially from this new arrangement with Coinbase and the shift to USDC?

AHyperliquid is set to receive the vast majority (estimated around 90%) of the reserve yield income from the USDC deposits on its platform. Based on community calculations using $47 billion in assets and a 3.8% yield, this could amount to approximately $44 million per year, used for daily HYPE buybacks.

QWhat was the outcome for Native Markets, the issuer of USDH, in this transition, and what are its future plans?

ANative Markets received economic compensation through the sale of the USDH brand assets to Coinbase. The company considers USDH's historical mission complete and stated it will remain independent and seek development in other areas.

QWhat criticism did some Hyperliquid community members express regarding the phasing out of USDH and the original vote for its issuer?

ASome community members criticized the move as a step back for decentralization. Others argued that voters should have chosen Paxos as the USDH issuer, as they were more focused on user and stablecoin growth, while those who voted for Native Markets were motivated by factionalism and internal interests, leaving end-users with nothing.

Похожее

Seeking Alpha's Hot Article: Why Might the U.S. Stock Market Crash in June?

In a recent Seeking Alpha article, financial professor and analyst Damir Tokic argues that the US stock market may be poised for a significant crash in June 2026. The core thesis centers on a "mega-bubble" in equities, particularly within the technology sector, which has driven the S&P 500 to near-record valuations, with a Shiller P/E ratio exceeding 40—a level comparable to the 2000 dot-com bubble. Tokic identifies two primary catalysts for a potential collapse. First, he points to unsustainable market exuberance fueled by what he terms the "Trump Stimulus"—massive AI capital expenditure by tech giants, which he believes is politically driven and cannot last. Second, and more urgently, he highlights the escalating Iran war as a critical threat. The ongoing closure of the Strait of Hormuz has created a severe global energy supply crunch. Strategic petroleum reserves are projected to hit critically low operational levels by June, potentially causing oil prices to spike above $200 per barrel and triggering a severe, supply-driven inflationary shock. This scenario, Tokic warns, would force the Federal Reserve's hand. Despite currently maintaining a dovish bias, the Fed would likely be compelled to officially pivot to a hawkish stance at its June FOMC meeting to combat soaring inflation and bond yields. He contends that such a shift—or even a failure to act, which would destroy Fed credibility—could be the trigger that punctures the market bubble. The resulting downturn, he concludes, could rival the bear markets of 2000 and 2008, advising investors to prepare for a major correction.

marsbit15 мин. назад

Seeking Alpha's Hot Article: Why Might the U.S. Stock Market Crash in June?

marsbit15 мин. назад

AI PC Battle: Bet on the Toll Booth, Not the Camp

**Title:** The AI PC Battle: Don't Bet on Sides, Bet on the Tollbooth **Summary:** The AI PC competition is moving beyond simple "x86 vs. Arm" narratives. The core investment thesis should focus on identifying which players can sustain margins, cash flow, and pricing power throughout the upgrade cycle, rather than backing a particular architecture. The opportunity is analyzed in three layers: 1. **The Advanced Foundry Tollbooth:** TSMC is positioned to collect "tolls" regardless of which chip designer wins, due to its dominant ~70% share in advanced semiconductor manufacturing, which is essential for high-end AI PC chips. 2. **Compute & Platform Spillover:** AMD represents an offensive in the x86 CPU+GPU space, while NVIDIA leverages its GPU and CUDA software stack dominance. Both benefit from the demand for increased local AI compute. 3. **Architecture Diffusion & Turnaround Plays:** ARM and Intel offer potential for significant upside (elasticity), but investments here require stricter discipline due to higher execution risks and competitive challenges. The industry is transitioning from concept to shipment validation. While short-term forecasts for AI PC adoption have been revised down slightly due to tariffs and procurement delays, the long-term trend towards AI becoming a standard PC feature remains intact. The key driver for upgrade cycles will be whether compelling enterprise applications (e.g., privacy-sensitive computing, low-latency inference) emerge beyond consumer-focused features like meeting summarization. Investment strategy should prioritize companies with platform-level advantages and recurring revenue streams. TSMC offers high certainty as the foundational tollbooth. AMD presents a strong offensive play within the established ecosystem. ARM and Intel are higher-risk, higher-potential-reward turnaround bets. The report cautions against chasing short-term hype and emphasizes a disciplined, long-term approach focused on buying ecosystem strength and cash-flow certainty after market enthusiasm subsides. **Key Risks:** Underwhelming AI PC applications slowing upgrade cycles; slow improvement in Windows on Arm compatibility; macro/tariff impacts on PC demand; potential advanced node supply-demand mismatches affecting TSMC; high overall AI sector valuations making stocks vulnerable to a risk-off shift in markets.

marsbit29 мин. назад

AI PC Battle: Bet on the Toll Booth, Not the Camp

marsbit29 мин. назад

Ten-Thousand-Word Analysis: From $10 to $290, MRVL Wins the Entire AI Era by 'Not Making GPUs'

Marvell Technology's stock price surged from under $10 in 2016 to a record $290 in June 2026, fueled not by making GPUs, but by dominating AI infrastructure connectivity. This analysis argues the market misvalues MRVL as merely a smaller Broadcom in custom AI chips, overlooking its true, unique position. Marvell's core strength lies in enabling high-speed data flow for AI clusters through three interconnected businesses. First, it holds a commanding ~70% market share in high-speed optical DSPs (essential for data center light modules), a deep-moat business with accelerating growth. Second, its custom AI chip design business serves hyperscalers like AWS, Microsoft, and Google, with a significant revenue pipeline despite lower margins. Third, stable cash flows come from Ethernet switch chips and enterprise storage controllers. Together, they form a full-stack "AI data movement" platform. CEO Matt Murphy's transformative leadership since 2016, involving strategic divestments, key acquisitions (like Inphi for optical DSPs), and securing long-term agreements with major cloud providers, repositioned the company. A pivotal $2 billion strategic investment from NVIDIA in 2026 underscored Marvell's critical role in the AI ecosystem, particularly through collaborations like NVLink Fusion. While Marvell faces risks—including client concentration (losing the Amazon Trainium3 design), lower-margin business mix, competitive threats, insider selling, and complex supply chains—its fundamentals remain strong. The optical interconnect moat is widening with the acquisition of Celestial AI (photonics fabric), and financial metrics show accelerating revenue growth and operating leverage. With a PEG ratio suggesting undervaluation relative to its growth, the thesis is that the market undervalues Marvell's monopolistic position in AI "plumbing" while overemphasizing its competitive custom chip segment. The story transcends investing, symbolizing how in any complex system—from the internet to AI—the value of "connection" ultimately surpasses that of individual "nodes."

marsbit59 мин. назад

Ten-Thousand-Word Analysis: From $10 to $290, MRVL Wins the Entire AI Era by 'Not Making GPUs'

marsbit59 мин. назад

AI Relay Stations Spark Heated Debate on Zhihu: Behind Cheap Tokens, What Are Users Really Worried About?

A discussion on Zhihu about "AI relay stations" shifted the niche developer topic of "cheap tokens" into broader user awareness. Users moved beyond simply questioning the legitimacy of these services to focus on practical concerns: Where do cheap tokens truly come from? Is the model being accessed the real one? Can relay stations see prompts, code, and API keys? For occasional users, are the risks worth it? The core debate centered less on price and more on trust. A primary worry is model authenticity—the risk of "model swapping," where users paying for a premium model might be routed to a cheaper one, creating an information asymmetry. Others argued that cost comparisons matter; while cheaper than official pay-as-you-go APIs, relay stations may not be the lowest-cost option versus subscriptions, domestic models, or free tiers, making user needs assessment crucial. Speculation about token sources ranged from legitimate bulk discounts to gray-area methods like account sharing or exploiting regional pricing. This opacity makes risk assessment difficult for users. Data security emerged as a critical concern, especially for enterprise use. When processing sensitive information like code, contracts, or client data, the inability to verify a relay station's data handling, retention, or access policies poses significant compliance and confidentiality risks. The evolving consensus suggests relay stations can be used cautiously for low-sensitivity, disposable tasks (e.g., summarizing public info, simple translation). However, they should not be the default for sensitive, professional, or production workflows involving proprietary data, Agents, or automated systems. Recommendations include avoiding large prepayments, not relying on a single service, using test prompts to monitor quality, anonymizing data where possible, and keeping official channels as backups. Ultimately, the discussion framed tokens not just as a billing unit but as a measure of real cost encompassing price, model integrity, data security, and service stability. The popularity of relay stations highlights user demand for affordable access, but the debate underscores a key trade-off: the savings from cheap tokens may come at the price of trust, transparency, and control over one's data and AI experience.

marsbit1 ч. назад

AI Relay Stations Spark Heated Debate on Zhihu: Behind Cheap Tokens, What Are Users Really Worried About?

marsbit1 ч. назад

Торговля

Спот
Фьючерсы

Популярные статьи

Как купить S

Добро пожаловать на HTX.com! Мы сделали приобретение Sonic (S) простым и удобным. Следуйте нашему пошаговому руководству и отправляйтесь в свое крипто-путешествие.Шаг 1: Создайте аккаунт на HTXИспользуйте свой адрес электронной почты или номер телефона, чтобы зарегистрироваться и бесплатно создать аккаунт на HTX. Пройдите удобную регистрацию и откройте для себя весь функционал.Создать аккаунтШаг 2: Перейдите в Купить криптовалюту и выберите свой способ оплатыКредитная/Дебетовая Карта: Используйте свою карту Visa или Mastercard для мгновенной покупки Sonic (S).Баланс: Используйте средства с баланса вашего аккаунта HTX для простой торговли.Третьи Лица: Мы добавили популярные способы оплаты, такие как Google Pay и Apple Pay, для повышения удобства.P2P: Торгуйте напрямую с другими пользователями на HTX.Внебиржевая Торговля (OTC): Мы предлагаем индивидуальные услуги и конкурентоспособные обменные курсы для трейдеров.Шаг 3: Хранение Sonic (S)После приобретения вами Sonic (S) храните их в своем аккаунте на HTX. В качестве альтернативы вы можете отправить их куда-либо с помощью перевода в блокчейне или использовать для торговли с другими криптовалютами.Шаг 4: Торговля Sonic (S)С легкостью торгуйте Sonic (S) на спотовом рынке HTX. Просто зайдите в свой аккаунт, выберите торговую пару, совершайте сделки и следите за ними в режиме реального времени. Мы предлагаем удобный интерфейс как для начинающих, так и для опытных трейдеров.

1.4k просмотров всегоОпубликовано 2025.01.15Обновлено 2026.06.02

Как купить S

Sonic: Обновления под руководством Андре Кронье – новая звезда Layer-1 на фоне спада рынка

Он решает проблемы масштабируемости, совместимости между блокчейнами и стимулов для разработчиков с помощью технологических инноваций.

2.3k просмотров всегоОпубликовано 2025.04.09Обновлено 2025.04.09

Sonic: Обновления под руководством Андре Кронье – новая звезда Layer-1 на фоне спада рынка

HTX Learn: Пройдите обучение по "Sonic" и разделите 1000 USDT

HTX Learn — ваш проводник в мир перспективных проектов, и мы запускаем специальное мероприятие "Учитесь и Зарабатывайте", посвящённое этим проектам. Наше новое направление .

1.8k просмотров всегоОпубликовано 2025.04.10Обновлено 2025.04.10

HTX Learn: Пройдите обучение по "Sonic" и разделите 1000 USDT

Обсуждения

Добро пожаловать в Сообщество HTX. Здесь вы сможете быть в курсе последних новостей о развитии платформы и получить доступ к профессиональной аналитической информации о рынке. Мнения пользователей о цене на S (S) представлены ниже.

活动图片