Avalanche: Can AVAX’s 25% volume surge break its multi-year downtrend?

ambcryptoОпубликовано 2026-02-20Обновлено 2026-02-20

Введение

Avalanche (AVAX) showed signs of recovery with a 25% surge in trading volume, reaching $248.87 million, as the price approached a key descending trendline formed after a major selloff in October. Despite forming a bullish MACD crossover and improved RSI, the token remained below the critical resistance level. Both spot and futures markets indicated aggressive buying activity, suggesting underlying demand. However, the broader structure remained bearish, with the multi-year downtrend still acting as strong resistance. A weekly close above this trendline is necessary to confirm a potential trend reversal. Until then, AVAX remains within a larger bearish framework.

After months of losses, altcoins have begun showing signs of recovery, with Avalanche [AVAX] among them

On the 20th of February 2026, AVAX saw renewed activity as volume climbed 25 percent to $248.87 million. It traded around $9.25, pushing into the descending trendline formed after the October 10 crash. That violent selloff marked the start of a prolonged grind lower.

Since that crash, the descending resistance repeatedly rejected every recovery attempt. Meanwhile, $7.29 acted as key structural support and remained the level bulls could not afford to lose.

With price pressing resistance again, the real question was whether momentum finally had the strength to break it.

MACD forms a bullish crossover

On the daily chart, AVAX formed a bullish MACD crossover as it approached the downtrend channel from October’s crash. The histogram turned slightly positive, signaling short‐term momentum shifting away from bearish control.

At press time, RSI climbed toward 42, recovering from recent lows but still below 50. Therefore, momentum improved, yet it had not fully transitioned into bullish territory. AVAX remained directly under resistance, which limited the impact of the crossover.

Leverage market analysis

Spot Taker Buy Dominance stayed elevated on Cumulative Volume Delta, according to CryptoQuant, reflecting aggressive market buying.

Moreover, Futures Taker Buy Dominance also remained elevated, showing participation across leveraged markets.

This combination suggested active demand rather than passive bidding. However, despite strong taker activity, the price failed to decisively reclaim the descending resistance.

As a result, buyer aggression had not yet translated into structural change. However, the data implied accumulation was developing beneath price action. Only a structural breakout could validate that buildup.

Will AVAX break its the multi-year downtrend?

On the weekly chart, the multi-year downtrend continued to act as macro resistance. Every major rally since 2021 had stalled beneath this ceiling. This meant AVAX had remained in a bear market since 2021.

Weekly RSI remained near 31.78 and below its moving average, signaling weak momentum. Weekly MACD stayed below zero with a slightly negative histogram. Therefore, the broader structure remained bearish despite short-term improvement on lower timeframes.

Looking ahead, a weekly close above the multi-year downtrend would be required to confirm a shift. Until that happened, Avalanche remained within a larger bearish framework.


Final Summary

  • Elevated taker dominance and rising volume showed participation, not confirmation.
  • A weekly reclaim of macro resistance remained the defining requirement for trend reversal.

Связанные с этим вопросы

QWhat was the percentage increase in Avalanche (AVAX) trading volume on February 20th, 2026, and what was the resulting volume?

AAVAX saw a 25% increase in trading volume, reaching $248.87 million.

QWhat key technical indicator on the daily chart showed a bullish signal as AVAX approached the downtrend resistance?

AThe MACD formed a bullish crossover on the daily chart, and its histogram turned slightly positive.

QAccording to the analysis, what does the elevated Spot and Futures Taker Buy Dominance suggest about market activity?

AIt reflects aggressive market buying and participation across leveraged markets, suggesting active demand rather than passive bidding.

QWhat is the critical level that AVAX must reclaim on the weekly chart to confirm a shift from its multi-year bearish trend?

AAVAX needs a weekly close above the multi-year downtrend resistance to confirm a trend reversal.

QDespite short-term improvements, what do the weekly RSI and MACD readings indicate about AVAX's broader market structure?

AThe weekly RSI remained near 31.78 (signaling weak momentum) and the weekly MACD stayed below zero, indicating the broader structure remained bearish.

Похожее

a16z: AI's 'Amnesia', Can Continuous Learning Cure It?

The article "a16z: AI's 'Amnesia' – Can Continual Learning Cure It?" explores the limitations of current large language models (LLMs), which, like the protagonist in the film *Memento*, are trapped in a perpetual present—unable to form new memories after training. While methods like in-context learning (ICL), retrieval-augmented generation (RAG), and external scaffolding (e.g., chat history, prompts) provide temporary solutions, they fail to enable true internalization of new knowledge. The authors argue that compression—the core of learning during training—is halted at deployment, preventing models from generalizing, discovering novel solutions (e.g., mathematical proofs), or handling adversarial scenarios. The piece introduces *continual learning* as a critical research direction to address this, categorizing approaches into three paths: 1. **Context**: Scaling external memory via longer context windows, multi-agent systems, and smarter retrieval. 2. **Modules**: Using pluggable adapters or external memory layers for specialization without full retraining. 3. **Weights**: Enabling parameter updates through sparse training, test-time training, meta-learning, distillation, and reinforcement learning from feedback. Challenges include catastrophic forgetting, safety risks, and auditability, but overcoming these could unlock models that learn iteratively from experience. The conclusion emphasizes that while context-based methods are effective, true breakthroughs require models to compress new information into weights post-deployment, moving from mere retrieval to genuine learning.

marsbit2 ч. назад

a16z: AI's 'Amnesia', Can Continuous Learning Cure It?

marsbit2 ч. назад

Can a Hair Dryer Earn $34,000? Deciphering the Reflexivity Paradox in Prediction Markets

An individual manipulated a weather sensor at Paris Charles de Gaulle Airport with a portable heat source, causing a Polymarket weather market to settle at 22°C and earning $34,000. This incident highlights a fundamental issue in prediction markets: when a market aims to reflect reality, it also incentivizes participants to influence that reality. Prediction markets operate on two layers: platform rules (what outcome counts as a win) and data sources (what actually happened). While most focus on rules, the real vulnerability lies in the data source. If reality is recorded through a specific source, influencing that source directly affects market settlement. The article categorizes markets by their vulnerability: 1. **Single-point physical data sources** (e.g., weather stations): Easily manipulated through physical interference. 2. **Insider information markets** (e.g., MrBeast video details): Insiders like team members use non-public information to trade. Kalshi fined a剪辑师 $20,000 for insider trading. 3. **Actor-manipulated markets** (e.g., Andrew Tate’s tweet counts): The subject of the market can control the outcome. Evidence suggests Tate’sociated accounts coordinated to profit. 4. **Individual-action markets** (e.g., WNBA disruptions): A single person can execute an event to profit from their pre-placed bets. Kalshi and Polymarket handle these issues differently. Kalshi enforces strict KYC, publicly penalizes insider trading, and reports to regulators. Polymarket, with its anonymous wallet-based system, has historically been more permissive, arguing that insider information improves market accuracy. However, it cooperated with authorities in the "Van Dyke case," where a user traded on classified government information. The core paradox is reflexivity: prediction markets are designed to discover truth, but their financial incentives can distort reality. The more valuable a prediction becomes, the more likely participants are to influence the event itself. The market ceases to be a mirror of reality and instead shapes it.

marsbit3 ч. назад

Can a Hair Dryer Earn $34,000? Deciphering the Reflexivity Paradox in Prediction Markets

marsbit3 ч. назад

Торговля

Спот
Фьючерсы
活动图片