After the U.S. Banned Fable 5, Zhipu's Stock Soared 47%

marsbitОпубликовано 2026-06-16Обновлено 2026-06-16

Введение

On June 15, Chinese AI company Zhipu's stock surged up to 47.6% in Hong Kong, closing with a 32.82% gain. This sharp rise followed two key industry events. On June 12, Anthropic was compelled by a U.S. government export control order to suspend global access to its latest flagship models, Claude Fable 5 and Claude Mythos 5, impacting developers and businesses reliant on them. The next day, Zhipu announced it was opening access to its new open-source flagship model, GLM-5.2, for all Coding Plan users, with API and model weights (under the MIT license) to follow. The Anthropic incident highlighted a critical shift in the AI industry: beyond raw capability, the stability, continuous accessibility, and control over AI models are becoming equally vital, especially as AI integrates deeper into business workflows. Zhipu's move, emphasizing that "frontier intelligence should not belong to a few nor be subject to arbitrary revocation," positioned its open, accessible model as an alternative. GLM-5.2 focuses on "Long Horizon Tasks" with a 1M context window, aiming for consistency in complex, extended projects. Market analysts suggest this event exposes the risk of dependency on closed-source models subject to single jurisdiction policies, potentially accelerating a shift toward domestic base models and localized deployments. The investment response indicates a new valuation metric is emerging—prioritizing which companies can provide AI capabilities that are not only advanced but also...

On June 15th, when the Hong Kong stock market opened, Zhipu AI's stock price surged continuously, reaching an intraday peak gain of 47.6%, setting a new record for single-day trading volume since its listing. By the close, the gain narrowed to 32.82%, with the total market capitalization surpassing HKD 649.6 billion.

The immediate catalyst came from two industry announcements two days prior.

On June 12th, due to U.S. government export control requirements, Anthropic suspended access to its latest flagship models, Claude Fable 5 and Claude Mythos 5. A day later, Zhipu announced that its latest open-source model, GLM-5.2, would be available to all Coding Plan users, with API access and model weights to be released the following week under the MIT license.

01 When the Most Advanced Models Become 'Potentially Unavailable'

On June 12th, Anthropic issued an official announcement stating that the U.S. government, exercising national security-related authority, issued an export control directive requiring the suspension of access to Claude Fable 5 and Claude Mythos 5 for all foreign nationals. The restrictions applied to foreign users both inside and outside the U.S., even including foreign employees within Anthropic.

Limited by the technical inability to accurately distinguish user nationality in real-time, Anthropic ultimately chose to temporarily disable the two models for all global customers to ensure compliance. This occurred only three days after the models' official release. As of now, both models are shown as unavailable on Anthropic's website, with no clear timeline for restoration.

As top-tier closed-source models in terms of current performance, the Claude series has been deeply integrated by numerous developers and enterprises for long-range tasks, code development, and complex document processing. The sudden service suspension directly disrupted many teams' workflows, sparking rapidly increasing discussions within the community about alternative solutions.

Just as the suspension news was gaining traction, on June 13th, Zhipu announced that its open-source flagship GLM-5.2 would be available to all Coding Plan users, covering Lite, Pro, Max, and Team editions. It also previewed that the API and model weights would be launched the following week, open-sourced under the MIT license.

In recent years, competition in the large model industry has primarily revolved around capability.

Whose reasoning is stronger, whose coding ability is better, who can first break through new capability boundaries—these factors almost dictated the choices of developers and enterprise customers.

However, the Anthropic incident highlights another issue previously often overlooked: beyond capability, whether a model can be accessed continuously and stably.

In this Anthropic event, for many developers and enterprises relying on overseas models for R&D work, even if they have accounts and paid subscriptions, they may face the risk of models suddenly becoming unavailable.

This is why this incident triggered far more discussion in the developer community than typical product updates.

As AI gradually evolves from a chat tool into infrastructure for software development, business operations, and even production processes, the stability, sustainability, and controllability of models are beginning to become metrics as crucial as model capability itself.

Zhipu stated in its announcement, "Cutting-edge intelligence should not belong only to a few, nor should it be subject to revocation by a few rules at any time." This statement, in essence, corresponds to the new reality facing the global AI industry today.

02 From 'Who is Stronger' to 'Who is More Accessible'

The capital market's swift reaction essentially represents an early pricing-in of this shift in industrial logic. Beyond the stock price performance, the market is more focused on the signals released by GLM-5.2 itself.

According to information disclosed by Zhipu, GLM-5.2 is its most capable open-source model to date, supporting a 1M context window and significantly enhancing long-horizon coding task capabilities. Zhipu positions it as a "truly usable 1M context" model, aiming to address the issue of models forgetting context during lengthy, multi-step engineering tasks.

A core keyword here is "Long Horizon Task." As AI Agents evolve from conversational tools into execution tools, models need to continuously handle thousands of tool calls, tens of thousands of lines of code, and large amounts of intermediate state information. The longer the context window, the stronger the model's ability to maintain project state and task continuity.

Current industry competition has shifted from "answering questions" to "sustained work." For developers, what truly matters is not parameter scale, but whether the model can maintain consistency and reliability over complex tasks lasting hours or even days.

Judging by the market reaction, investors have clearly recognized this change.

Oriental Securities pointed out in a research report that the Anthropic model incident exposed the risk of closed-source model access being subject to a single jurisdiction, which may drive more enterprises to shift their core AI capabilities toward domestic foundation models and localized deployment. Simultaneously, GLM-5.2 being open-sourced under the MIT license further lowers the barrier for enterprises to trial and integrate the model.

Over the past year, valuations assigned to large model companies by the capital market were largely based on model capability and market share. Today, as the global regulatory environment intensifies, a new valuation dimension is emerging—who can provide developers and enterprises with AI capabilities that are stable, sustainable, and reliably accessible in the long term.

When access to the world's most advanced models begins to be influenced by external factors, openness, accessibility, and autonomous controllability are becoming new bargaining chips in the AI competition.

Связанные с этим вопросы

QWhat was the direct trigger for the sharp rise in Zhipu's stock price on the Hong Kong stock exchange on June 15th?

AThe direct trigger was two industry news events from two days prior. On June 12th, Anthropic suspended access to its latest flagship models, Claude Fable 5 and Claude Mythos 5, due to U.S. government export control requirements. The next day, Zhipu announced that its latest open-source model, GLM-5.2, was available to all Coding Plan users, with API access and model weights to be released the following week under the MIT license.

QAccording to the article, what new factor is becoming as important as model capability in the AI industry competition?

AThe article states that the stability, sustainability, and controllability of model access are becoming as important as raw model capability. The Anthropic incident highlighted that even with accounts and paid access, developers and enterprises relying on overseas models could face sudden unavailability of the models they depend on.

QWhat key feature of Zhipu's GLM-5.2 model does the article highlight as particularly important for the evolution of AI Agents?

AThe article highlights its support for a 1M context window and enhanced capabilities for long-horizon coding tasks. This is important as AI Agents evolve from conversation tools to execution tools, requiring models to handle thousands of tool calls, tens of thousands of lines of code, and maintain consistency over long, complex tasks.

QHow did the U.S. export control instructions affect Anthropic's model deployment, according to its official announcement?

AAccording to Anthropic's official announcement, the U.S. government's export control instructions required suspending access to Claude Fable 5 and Claude Mythos 5 for all foreign nationals, including those outside the U.S. and even foreign employees within Anthropic. Due to technical difficulties in precisely distinguishing user nationality in real-time, Anthropic chose to temporarily disable the two models for all global customers to ensure compliance.

QWhat shift in the competitive landscape for large AI models is signaled by the market's reaction to the Zhipu and Anthropic news, according to the article's analysis?

AThe article's analysis suggests the market reaction signals a shift from competition based primarily on "who is stronger" (model capability) to competition based on "who is more accessible." As access to the most advanced models becomes susceptible to external factors like geopolitics, providing open, accessible, independently controllable, and sustainably available AI capabilities is becoming a new competitive advantage and valuation factor.

Похожее

Has the Crypto Market Bottomed? Here's What Institutions Think

The crypto market is in a period of significant debate, with leading institutions offering differing views on whether a bottom has been reached. Three prominent firms have published detailed analyses: * **Galaxy Digital** argues Bitcoin has **not yet bottomed**. Their analysis of 13 historical indicators across six dimensions (valuation, profit-taking, miner pressure, etc.) shows only four are fully met. They project a potential bottom range between $30k and $54k. * **NYDIG** states a bottom is **possible but not likely**. While metrics are close to historic bear market extremes, they note the absence of a classic panic-selling event. They also suggest increased institutional adoption may have structurally altered the market cycle, potentially leading to a shallower downturn. * **Standard Chartered Bank** asserts the **bottom has already occurred** at around $59k. They cite two key factors: potential US-Iran diplomatic progress and the anticipated SpaceX IPO, which they believe absorbed capital and caused ETF selling pressure that is now subsiding. They forecast a year-end price target of $100k. Despite the surface-level disagreement, the reports share critical common ground more valuable for long-term investors: 1. All three believe the market bottom will form **within this year**. 2. All agree the current price is **closer to the bottom than to previous highs**. 3. All maintain a **bullish long-term outlook** for Bitcoin and a new cycle. The core takeaway is that while the exact bottom price ($40k, $50k, or $60k) is debated, the consensus is that a bottom is imminent. For long-term holders, the primary focus should not be pinpointing the absolute low, but on the future potential for prices to reach $100k, $200k, or higher. The fundamental thesis for Bitcoin—sovereign debt accumulation, inflation, declining trust in centralized institutions, global digitization, and improved accessibility—remains intact and is arguably strengthening. The overall landscape is viewed as more favorable than in previous crypto winters.

marsbit9 мин. назад

Has the Crypto Market Bottomed? Here's What Institutions Think

marsbit9 мин. назад

The 'Chip' Challenge and Breakthroughs in China's Optical Industry Chain

China's Photonics Industry: Bottlenecks and Breakthroughs In the global AI race, computing chips dominate the narrative, but the underlying bottleneck increasingly defining the scale of AI clusters is light—or more specifically, optical connectivity. Optical modules, which translate electrical signals to light and vice versa, are crucial for connecting thousands of GPUs in AI data centers, preventing data congestion and ensuring efficient model training. High-speed modules (800G, 1.6T) are now standard, with performance hinging on advanced DSP (Digital Signal Processor) chips. This is where a critical dependency lies. Two US giants—Marvell and Broadcom—collectively dominate over 90% of the high-end DSP chip market. Chinese optical module leaders like Zhongji Innolight and Eoptolink rely on these chips to manufacture modules for overseas AI customers, primarily in North America. While this creates a supply chain vulnerability, complete decoupling is difficult. Marvell derives over half its revenue from Greater China, and the US firms depend on Chinese partners for chip packaging and optical components. The risk from laser chips (e.g., from Lumentum), another key component, is considered more manageable due to multiple global suppliers and faster progress in domestic alternatives from companies like YOFC and Accelink. To mitigate risks, China's industry is pursuing a multi-pronged strategy: diversifying supply chains and locking in long-term orders; fostering a domestic market ecosystem to adopt homegrown DSPs from firms like Huawei HiSilicon and CETC; accelerating R&D in high-speed DSPs and advanced packaging; and investing in next-gen technologies like silicon photonics and Co-Packaged Optics (CPO) to reduce reliance on discrete DSPs. The ultimate solution lies not in short-term博弈 but in persistent advancement of domestic high-end chip R&D and manufacturing. While challenges remain in performance, certification, and ecosystem building, China's vast domestic market and manufacturing base provide a crucial buffer, buying time for the industry to achieve greater technological independence.

marsbit22 мин. назад

The 'Chip' Challenge and Breakthroughs in China's Optical Industry Chain

marsbit22 мин. назад

Behind SpaceX's $2 Trillion Market Cap: Why Does Musk Always Have the Next Move Planned?

On June 12th, SpaceX debuted on the Nasdaq, reaching a valuation that briefly touched $2 trillion. This marked the culmination of a 24-year journey from its founding in 2002, driven by Elon Musk's frustration at the high cost of buying rockets. The company's path was defined by early failures, with its first three Falcon 1 launches ending in explosions before a successful 2008 flight opened the era of commercial spaceflight. Key to its model was a fixed-price NASA contract, incentivizing cost reduction. SpaceX mastered rocket reusability, first achieving a Falcon 9 landing in 2015, which drastically cut launch costs. This enabled its profitable Starlink satellite internet constellation, envisioned years before reusability was proven, to create an internal market for frequent launches. Similarly, the next-generation Starship rocket was in development long before its first flight, with its business case evolving from Mars colonization to supporting the emerging concept of in-orbit data centers for AI—a story now central to its valuation. The company's recent IPO, a reversal of its long-standing "no IPO" stance, is funding this ambitious "space-based compute" vision. While major tech players like Google, Blue Origin, and others are investing heavily, significant technical and cost hurdles remain. Ultimately, SpaceX's history is one of creating its own demand: first with Starlink and now with space-based AI compute, betting that its next rocket will enable its next giant market.

marsbit25 мин. назад

Behind SpaceX's $2 Trillion Market Cap: Why Does Musk Always Have the Next Move Planned?

marsbit25 мин. назад

When Crypto Meets the World Cup: CoinW and Modrić's Art of "Navigating Cycles"

When Encryption Meets the World Cup: CoinW and Modrić's "Transcending Cycles" Philosophy In the context of the 2026 FIFA World Cup and its massive global audience, the crypto exchange CoinW announced football legend Luka Modrić as its global brand ambassador. This move is framed not merely as a marketing tactic, but as a strategic experiment in user profile migration. It targets mature, financially stable football fans—particularly in Europe, Southeast Asia, and Latin America—who traditionally have low crypto awareness but value trusted, time-tested authority figures like Modrić. The article draws parallels between Modrić's enduring, disciplined career—marked by consistency and success at the highest level over two decades—and CoinW's own development path. Founded in 2017 during a volatile industry period, CoinW focused on building robust infrastructure and risk management. It weathered the 2022 industry crisis without major security incidents, subsequently earning recognition like "Europe's Most Trusted Exchange" and growing to over 20 million registered users. This "long-termism" is translated into user-centric products. CoinW Academy lowers the initial knowledge barrier. Its integrated ecosystem (CoinW, GemW, DeriW, PropW) and the recent launch of a TradFi section—offering perpetual contracts on traditional assets like stocks, gold, and oil—aim to create a unified platform for diverse assets. For the World Cup, CoinW launched the "We Are The Game" campaign, collaborating with Alchemy Pay to offer zero-fee deposits and local payment options, aiming to transform spectators into participants and lower entry barriers. Ultimately, CoinW's sports partnerships and product strategy are presented as a concerted effort to build trust and accessibility for the "silent majority" still outside crypto—shifting the industry narrative toward inclusivity and long-term value.

Foresight News31 мин. назад

When Crypto Meets the World Cup: CoinW and Modrić's Art of "Navigating Cycles"

Foresight News31 мин. назад

Торговля

Спот
Фьючерсы

Популярные статьи

Как купить S

Добро пожаловать на HTX.com! Мы сделали приобретение Sonic (S) простым и удобным. Следуйте нашему пошаговому руководству и отправляйтесь в свое крипто-путешествие.Шаг 1: Создайте аккаунт на HTXИспользуйте свой адрес электронной почты или номер телефона, чтобы зарегистрироваться и бесплатно создать аккаунт на HTX. Пройдите удобную регистрацию и откройте для себя весь функционал.Создать аккаунтШаг 2: Перейдите в Купить криптовалюту и выберите свой способ оплатыКредитная/Дебетовая Карта: Используйте свою карту Visa или Mastercard для мгновенной покупки Sonic (S).Баланс: Используйте средства с баланса вашего аккаунта HTX для простой торговли.Третьи Лица: Мы добавили популярные способы оплаты, такие как Google Pay и Apple Pay, для повышения удобства.P2P: Торгуйте напрямую с другими пользователями на HTX.Внебиржевая Торговля (OTC): Мы предлагаем индивидуальные услуги и конкурентоспособные обменные курсы для трейдеров.Шаг 3: Хранение Sonic (S)После приобретения вами Sonic (S) храните их в своем аккаунте на HTX. В качестве альтернативы вы можете отправить их куда-либо с помощью перевода в блокчейне или использовать для торговли с другими криптовалютами.Шаг 4: Торговля Sonic (S)С легкостью торгуйте Sonic (S) на спотовом рынке HTX. Просто зайдите в свой аккаунт, выберите торговую пару, совершайте сделки и следите за ними в режиме реального времени. Мы предлагаем удобный интерфейс как для начинающих, так и для опытных трейдеров.

1.5k просмотров всегоОпубликовано 2025.01.15Обновлено 2026.06.02

Как купить S

Sonic: Обновления под руководством Андре Кронье – новая звезда Layer-1 на фоне спада рынка

Он решает проблемы масштабируемости, совместимости между блокчейнами и стимулов для разработчиков с помощью технологических инноваций.

2.3k просмотров всегоОпубликовано 2025.04.09Обновлено 2025.04.09

Sonic: Обновления под руководством Андре Кронье – новая звезда Layer-1 на фоне спада рынка

HTX Learn: Пройдите обучение по "Sonic" и разделите 1000 USDT

HTX Learn — ваш проводник в мир перспективных проектов, и мы запускаем специальное мероприятие "Учитесь и Зарабатывайте", посвящённое этим проектам. Наше новое направление .

1.8k просмотров всегоОпубликовано 2025.04.10Обновлено 2025.04.10

HTX Learn: Пройдите обучение по "Sonic" и разделите 1000 USDT

Обсуждения

Добро пожаловать в Сообщество HTX. Здесь вы сможете быть в курсе последних новостей о развитии платформы и получить доступ к профессиональной аналитической информации о рынке. Мнения пользователей о цене на S (S) представлены ниже.

活动图片