a16z: 3 Ways Crypto Will Outgrow Cryptocurrency by 2026

marsbitОпубликовано 2026-01-11Обновлено 2026-01-11

Введение

a16z: 3 Ways Crypto Will Move Beyond Crypto by 2026 The article outlines three key trends for 2026, as predicted by a16z crypto experts: 1. **Smarter, Broader Prediction Markets:** Prediction markets will become more sophisticated by integrating with AI and crypto. They will offer a wider range of contracts for detailed events, moving beyond major elections. This growth presents challenges, such as resolving disputed outcomes, which new decentralized governance and LLM oracles can address. AI agents trading on these platforms could uncover new predictive strategies. Prediction markets won't replace polls but will complement them, with crypto providing tools to verify respondents are human. 2. **Crypto Tech as a Foundational Tool Beyond Blockchains:** The cryptographic tool SNARKs (succinct proofs for verifying computations) will see drastically reduced overhead costs, dropping to around 10,000x the cost of the original computation. This efficiency, achievable on a single GPU, will make "verifiable cloud computing" practical. Users running CPU workloads in the cloud will be able to obtain cryptographic proofs of correctness at a reasonable cost, enabling trust in off-chain computations. 3. **The Rise of "Staked Media":** The traditional media model is being supplemented by a new paradigm where commentators use crypto tools to make verifiable commitments and back their opinions with action. This involves using tokenized assets, programmable locks, and prediction markets ...

Author: a16z crypto

Compiled by: Felix, PANews

1. Prediction Markets Will Become Larger, Broader, and Smarter

——Andy Hall, a16z Crypto Research Advisor, Professor of Political Economy at Stanford University

Prediction markets have gone mainstream, and by 2026, their scale, breadth, and intelligence will only increase as they integrate with cryptocurrency and AI, while also presenting builders with new and significant challenges.

First, more contracts will be listed this year. This means not only obtaining real-time odds for major elections or geopolitical events but also for detailed outcomes and complex intertwined events. As these new contracts disclose more information and integrate into news (which is already happening), they will raise important social questions, such as how to balance the value of this information and how to better design them to be more transparent, auditable, etc.—something cryptocurrency can achieve.

To handle the vast number of contracts, new methods for reaching agreement on contract outcomes are needed. While centralized platforms are important for determining whether an event actually occurred (and how to confirm it), controversial cases like the Zelensky "suit incident" and the Venezuelan election market highlight their limitations. To address these edge cases and help prediction markets expand into more practical applications, new decentralized governance and LLM oracles can help determine the truth of disputed outcomes.

AI opens up more possibilities for oracles beyond LLMs. For example, AI agents trading on these platforms can search for global signals, helping to achieve short-term trading advantages and revealing new worldviews and ways to predict future events. Beyond serving as complex political analysts that can be queried for insights, when studying the emerging strategies of these agents, they can also uncover new information about the fundamental predictors of complex social events.

Will prediction markets replace polls? No; they will make polls better (and poll information can be fed into prediction markets). As a political scientist, what is most exciting is how prediction markets can operate in tandem with a rich and vibrant polling system—but this will also rely on new technologies like AI, which can improve the polling experience, and crypto, which can provide new ways to verify that poll/survey respondents are not bots but real people, etc.

2. This Year, Crypto Will Provide a New Foundational Tool for Industries Beyond Blockchain

——Justin Thaler, Member of a16z Crypto Research Team, Associate Professor of Computer Science at Georgetown University

SNARKs (a type of cryptographic proof that verifies computations without re-executing them) have been used primarily in the blockchain space for years. The overhead was simply too high: proving a computation could require a million times more work than running it directly. This might be worthwhile when thousands of verifiers share the cost, but it was impractical in other scenarios.

But this is about to change. This year, the overhead of zkVM provers will drop to about 10,000 times, with memory footprints of just a few hundred megabytes—fast enough to run on mobile phones and cheap enough to run anywhere.

10,000 times might be a magic number for one reason: high-end GPUs have about 10,000 times the parallel throughput of laptop CPUs. By the end of 2026, a single GPU will be able to generate proofs for CPU executions in real time.

This promises to realize a vision from early research papers: verifiable cloud computing. If you are running CPU workloads in the cloud—because your computation isn't large enough to justify using a GPU, you lack the expertise, or for historical reasons—you will be able to obtain cryptographic proofs of correctness at a reasonable cost. The prover is optimized for GPUs; your code does not need to be optimized.

3. Witness the Rise of "Staked Media"

——Robert Hackett, a16z Crypto Editorial Team

The traditional media model (and its so-called objectivity) has long shown cracks. The internet has given everyone a voice, and increasingly, operators, practitioners, and builders are speaking directly to the public. Their views reflect their real-world interests, and surprisingly, audiences often do not dismiss them because of these interests but respect them for it.

What's new here is not the rise of social media but the emergence of crypto tools that allow people to make publicly verifiable commitments. As AI makes generating infinite content cheap and easy (with any opinion or identity, real or fictional, able to claim anything), relying solely on what the masses (or bots) say is no longer sufficient. Tokenized assets, programmable lock-ups, prediction markets, and on-chain history provide a firmer foundation for trust: commentators can express views and prove they practice what they preach. Podcast hosts can lock up tokens to show they are not hyping or "pump-and-dumping" speculatively. Analysts can tie predictions to publicly settled markets, building auditable track records.

This is the embryo of what I call "staked media": media that not only embraces the idea of being stake-aware but also provides proof. In this model, credibility comes not from "word of mouth" or unsubstantiated assertions; instead, it comes from having skin in the game through transparent and verifiable commitments. "Staked media" will not replace other forms of media but will complement them. It offers a new signal: not just "trust me, I'm neutral," but "here is the risk I'm willing to take, and here is how you can verify if what I say is true."

Related reading: a16z's 8 Major Crypto Trends Predictions for 2026: Rise of Privacy Chains, Transformation of Trading Platforms, etc.

Связанные с этим вопросы

QAccording to the article, what are the three main ways that crypto technology will transcend crypto itself by 2026?

AThe three main ways are: 1) Prediction markets becoming larger, more comprehensive, and more intelligent. 2) Crypto technology providing a new foundational tool for industries beyond the blockchain, specifically through the practical application of SNARKs. 3) The rise of 'staked media' where public, verifiable commitments build trust.

QWhat role does the article suggest AI will play in the evolution of prediction markets?

AAI will enhance prediction markets by acting as complex political analysts that can be queried for insights, searching for global signals to gain short-term trading advantages, and revealing new information about the underlying predictive factors of complex social events through their emergent strategies.

QWhat is the significance of the '10,000x' overhead reduction for zkVM provers mentioned by Justin Thaler?

AA 10,000x reduction in overhead is a 'magic number' because it makes the cost of generating a proof low enough that a single GPU will be able to generate proofs for a CPU's execution in real-time. This enables the vision of verifiable cloud computing at a reasonable cost.

QHow does 'staked media' differ from traditional media models according to Robert Hackett?

AUnlike traditional media models that claim objectivity, 'staked media' does not ask for trust based on neutrality. Instead, it is built on public, verifiable commitments using crypto tools like tokenized assets and prediction markets, allowing commentators to prove they are acting in good faith and have a verifiable track record.

QWhat new challenge for builders is highlighted in the expansion of prediction markets?

AAs prediction markets expand with more contracts covering a wider range of events, a new challenge for builders is creating new methods for achieving consensus to resolve issues within contracts, moving beyond the limitations of centralized platforms for determining the truth of disputed outcomes.

Похожее

a16z: AI's 'Amnesia', Can Continuous Learning Cure It?

The article "a16z: AI's 'Amnesia' – Can Continual Learning Cure It?" explores the limitations of current large language models (LLMs), which, like the protagonist in the film *Memento*, are trapped in a perpetual present—unable to form new memories after training. While methods like in-context learning (ICL), retrieval-augmented generation (RAG), and external scaffolding (e.g., chat history, prompts) provide temporary solutions, they fail to enable true internalization of new knowledge. The authors argue that compression—the core of learning during training—is halted at deployment, preventing models from generalizing, discovering novel solutions (e.g., mathematical proofs), or handling adversarial scenarios. The piece introduces *continual learning* as a critical research direction to address this, categorizing approaches into three paths: 1. **Context**: Scaling external memory via longer context windows, multi-agent systems, and smarter retrieval. 2. **Modules**: Using pluggable adapters or external memory layers for specialization without full retraining. 3. **Weights**: Enabling parameter updates through sparse training, test-time training, meta-learning, distillation, and reinforcement learning from feedback. Challenges include catastrophic forgetting, safety risks, and auditability, but overcoming these could unlock models that learn iteratively from experience. The conclusion emphasizes that while context-based methods are effective, true breakthroughs require models to compress new information into weights post-deployment, moving from mere retrieval to genuine learning.

marsbit1 ч. назад

a16z: AI's 'Amnesia', Can Continuous Learning Cure It?

marsbit1 ч. назад

Can a Hair Dryer Earn $34,000? Deciphering the Reflexivity Paradox in Prediction Markets

An individual manipulated a weather sensor at Paris Charles de Gaulle Airport with a portable heat source, causing a Polymarket weather market to settle at 22°C and earning $34,000. This incident highlights a fundamental issue in prediction markets: when a market aims to reflect reality, it also incentivizes participants to influence that reality. Prediction markets operate on two layers: platform rules (what outcome counts as a win) and data sources (what actually happened). While most focus on rules, the real vulnerability lies in the data source. If reality is recorded through a specific source, influencing that source directly affects market settlement. The article categorizes markets by their vulnerability: 1. **Single-point physical data sources** (e.g., weather stations): Easily manipulated through physical interference. 2. **Insider information markets** (e.g., MrBeast video details): Insiders like team members use non-public information to trade. Kalshi fined a剪辑师 $20,000 for insider trading. 3. **Actor-manipulated markets** (e.g., Andrew Tate’s tweet counts): The subject of the market can control the outcome. Evidence suggests Tate’sociated accounts coordinated to profit. 4. **Individual-action markets** (e.g., WNBA disruptions): A single person can execute an event to profit from their pre-placed bets. Kalshi and Polymarket handle these issues differently. Kalshi enforces strict KYC, publicly penalizes insider trading, and reports to regulators. Polymarket, with its anonymous wallet-based system, has historically been more permissive, arguing that insider information improves market accuracy. However, it cooperated with authorities in the "Van Dyke case," where a user traded on classified government information. The core paradox is reflexivity: prediction markets are designed to discover truth, but their financial incentives can distort reality. The more valuable a prediction becomes, the more likely participants are to influence the event itself. The market ceases to be a mirror of reality and instead shapes it.

marsbit2 ч. назад

Can a Hair Dryer Earn $34,000? Deciphering the Reflexivity Paradox in Prediction Markets

marsbit2 ч. назад

Торговля

Спот
Фьючерсы
活动图片