a16z: 3 Ways Crypto Will Outgrow Cryptocurrency by 2026

marsbitОпубликовано 2026-01-11Обновлено 2026-01-11

Введение

a16z: 3 Ways Crypto Will Move Beyond Crypto by 2026 The article outlines three key trends for 2026, as predicted by a16z crypto experts: 1. **Smarter, Broader Prediction Markets:** Prediction markets will become more sophisticated by integrating with AI and crypto. They will offer a wider range of contracts for detailed events, moving beyond major elections. This growth presents challenges, such as resolving disputed outcomes, which new decentralized governance and LLM oracles can address. AI agents trading on these platforms could uncover new predictive strategies. Prediction markets won't replace polls but will complement them, with crypto providing tools to verify respondents are human. 2. **Crypto Tech as a Foundational Tool Beyond Blockchains:** The cryptographic tool SNARKs (succinct proofs for verifying computations) will see drastically reduced overhead costs, dropping to around 10,000x the cost of the original computation. This efficiency, achievable on a single GPU, will make "verifiable cloud computing" practical. Users running CPU workloads in the cloud will be able to obtain cryptographic proofs of correctness at a reasonable cost, enabling trust in off-chain computations. 3. **The Rise of "Staked Media":** The traditional media model is being supplemented by a new paradigm where commentators use crypto tools to make verifiable commitments and back their opinions with action. This involves using tokenized assets, programmable locks, and prediction markets ...

Author: a16z crypto

Compiled by: Felix, PANews

1. Prediction Markets Will Become Larger, Broader, and Smarter

——Andy Hall, a16z Crypto Research Advisor, Professor of Political Economy at Stanford University

Prediction markets have gone mainstream, and by 2026, their scale, breadth, and intelligence will only increase as they integrate with cryptocurrency and AI, while also presenting builders with new and significant challenges.

First, more contracts will be listed this year. This means not only obtaining real-time odds for major elections or geopolitical events but also for detailed outcomes and complex intertwined events. As these new contracts disclose more information and integrate into news (which is already happening), they will raise important social questions, such as how to balance the value of this information and how to better design them to be more transparent, auditable, etc.—something cryptocurrency can achieve.

To handle the vast number of contracts, new methods for reaching agreement on contract outcomes are needed. While centralized platforms are important for determining whether an event actually occurred (and how to confirm it), controversial cases like the Zelensky "suit incident" and the Venezuelan election market highlight their limitations. To address these edge cases and help prediction markets expand into more practical applications, new decentralized governance and LLM oracles can help determine the truth of disputed outcomes.

AI opens up more possibilities for oracles beyond LLMs. For example, AI agents trading on these platforms can search for global signals, helping to achieve short-term trading advantages and revealing new worldviews and ways to predict future events. Beyond serving as complex political analysts that can be queried for insights, when studying the emerging strategies of these agents, they can also uncover new information about the fundamental predictors of complex social events.

Will prediction markets replace polls? No; they will make polls better (and poll information can be fed into prediction markets). As a political scientist, what is most exciting is how prediction markets can operate in tandem with a rich and vibrant polling system—but this will also rely on new technologies like AI, which can improve the polling experience, and crypto, which can provide new ways to verify that poll/survey respondents are not bots but real people, etc.

2. This Year, Crypto Will Provide a New Foundational Tool for Industries Beyond Blockchain

——Justin Thaler, Member of a16z Crypto Research Team, Associate Professor of Computer Science at Georgetown University

SNARKs (a type of cryptographic proof that verifies computations without re-executing them) have been used primarily in the blockchain space for years. The overhead was simply too high: proving a computation could require a million times more work than running it directly. This might be worthwhile when thousands of verifiers share the cost, but it was impractical in other scenarios.

But this is about to change. This year, the overhead of zkVM provers will drop to about 10,000 times, with memory footprints of just a few hundred megabytes—fast enough to run on mobile phones and cheap enough to run anywhere.

10,000 times might be a magic number for one reason: high-end GPUs have about 10,000 times the parallel throughput of laptop CPUs. By the end of 2026, a single GPU will be able to generate proofs for CPU executions in real time.

This promises to realize a vision from early research papers: verifiable cloud computing. If you are running CPU workloads in the cloud—because your computation isn't large enough to justify using a GPU, you lack the expertise, or for historical reasons—you will be able to obtain cryptographic proofs of correctness at a reasonable cost. The prover is optimized for GPUs; your code does not need to be optimized.

3. Witness the Rise of "Staked Media"

——Robert Hackett, a16z Crypto Editorial Team

The traditional media model (and its so-called objectivity) has long shown cracks. The internet has given everyone a voice, and increasingly, operators, practitioners, and builders are speaking directly to the public. Their views reflect their real-world interests, and surprisingly, audiences often do not dismiss them because of these interests but respect them for it.

What's new here is not the rise of social media but the emergence of crypto tools that allow people to make publicly verifiable commitments. As AI makes generating infinite content cheap and easy (with any opinion or identity, real or fictional, able to claim anything), relying solely on what the masses (or bots) say is no longer sufficient. Tokenized assets, programmable lock-ups, prediction markets, and on-chain history provide a firmer foundation for trust: commentators can express views and prove they practice what they preach. Podcast hosts can lock up tokens to show they are not hyping or "pump-and-dumping" speculatively. Analysts can tie predictions to publicly settled markets, building auditable track records.

This is the embryo of what I call "staked media": media that not only embraces the idea of being stake-aware but also provides proof. In this model, credibility comes not from "word of mouth" or unsubstantiated assertions; instead, it comes from having skin in the game through transparent and verifiable commitments. "Staked media" will not replace other forms of media but will complement them. It offers a new signal: not just "trust me, I'm neutral," but "here is the risk I'm willing to take, and here is how you can verify if what I say is true."

Related reading: a16z's 8 Major Crypto Trends Predictions for 2026: Rise of Privacy Chains, Transformation of Trading Platforms, etc.

Связанные с этим вопросы

QAccording to the article, what are the three main ways that crypto technology will transcend crypto itself by 2026?

AThe three main ways are: 1) Prediction markets becoming larger, more comprehensive, and more intelligent. 2) Crypto technology providing a new foundational tool for industries beyond the blockchain, specifically through the practical application of SNARKs. 3) The rise of 'staked media' where public, verifiable commitments build trust.

QWhat role does the article suggest AI will play in the evolution of prediction markets?

AAI will enhance prediction markets by acting as complex political analysts that can be queried for insights, searching for global signals to gain short-term trading advantages, and revealing new information about the underlying predictive factors of complex social events through their emergent strategies.

QWhat is the significance of the '10,000x' overhead reduction for zkVM provers mentioned by Justin Thaler?

AA 10,000x reduction in overhead is a 'magic number' because it makes the cost of generating a proof low enough that a single GPU will be able to generate proofs for a CPU's execution in real-time. This enables the vision of verifiable cloud computing at a reasonable cost.

QHow does 'staked media' differ from traditional media models according to Robert Hackett?

AUnlike traditional media models that claim objectivity, 'staked media' does not ask for trust based on neutrality. Instead, it is built on public, verifiable commitments using crypto tools like tokenized assets and prediction markets, allowing commentators to prove they are acting in good faith and have a verifiable track record.

QWhat new challenge for builders is highlighted in the expansion of prediction markets?

AAs prediction markets expand with more contracts covering a wider range of events, a new challenge for builders is creating new methods for achieving consensus to resolve issues within contracts, moving beyond the limitations of centralized platforms for determining the truth of disputed outcomes.

Похожее

When Doing Cryptocurrency Payment, the First Thing is Licenses, What is the Second?

When launching a crypto payment business, obtaining the necessary licenses is the crucial first step. However, the second, and arguably more critical, step is designing a comprehensive operational framework that forms a coherent business loop. This loop must be clearly understood and executable by all stakeholders: banks, payment partners, exchanges, on-chain analytics providers, regulators, and your internal team. Many projects mistakenly believe a single license permits all operations. Licenses merely grant entry; they don't define how the specific business functions. The real challenge lies in detailing every aspect of the workflow. This involves clarifying the customer base, the flow of fiat and crypto assets, the settlement process, and establishing clear lines of responsibility for risks like AML compliance, sanctions screening, chargebacks, and regulatory inquiries. A robust framework must answer seven core questions: Who are the clients and merchants? Who collects fiat and crypto? Who handles conversion and custody? And who is ultimately accountable for compliance and risk management? Projects often fail not from a lack of licensing, but during due diligence when they cannot convincingly explain these operational details. Therefore, beyond securing licenses, the priority must be constructing a closed-loop system. This system ensures the business model is transparent, risks are managed, responsibilities are delineated, contracts are aligned, and the entire process is comprehensible to partners and regulators. The true competitive edge in crypto payments lies not in acquiring a license quickly, but in integrating licensing, banking, compliance, and operations into a sustainable and executable whole.

marsbit22 мин. назад

When Doing Cryptocurrency Payment, the First Thing is Licenses, What is the Second?

marsbit22 мин. назад

Arthur Hayes Analysis: AI Bubble Nears Burst, Crypto Market Faces Short-Term Pressure

Arthur Hayes argues that the current AI market is a bubble poised to burst, which will exert downward pressure on the crypto market in the near term. The core trigger is rising oil prices due to the US-Iran conflict and a blockade of the Strait of Hormuz. Higher energy costs directly increase the operational expenses of AI data centers, squeezing profit margins for companies like Google, Anthropic, and OpenAI. Hayes predicts that persistent inflation from high oil prices will force Trump, in a bid to win the November election, to turn public sentiment against the AI industry. He may propose regulations and taxes on data centers and AI companies to appeal to voters concerned about costs and job displacement. Such political rhetoric could shatter market confidence. Furthermore, the market is unlikely to healthily absorb the massive concurrent IPOs of SpaceX, Anthropic, and OpenAI, which together seek valuations in the trillions. The combination of soaring energy costs, overwhelming equity supply, and negative political pressure will puncture the AI bubble. Hayes notes that nearly all new USD liquidity since 2022 has flowed into AI, leaving crypto like Bitcoin behind. When the AI bubble bursts, liquidity will contract sharply, pulling down all risk assets, including cryptocurrencies. In response, Hayes's fund, Maelstrom, has sold all AI-related stocks and non-core cryptocurrencies. It maintains core positions in Bitcoin and Ethereum while increasing exposure to energy sector equities, betting on rising oil and gas prices. He expects Bitcoin to bottom after the AI-led market decline, before rallying again with future monetary easing.

Foresight News36 мин. назад

Arthur Hayes Analysis: AI Bubble Nears Burst, Crypto Market Faces Short-Term Pressure

Foresight News36 мин. назад

To C, To B, and the Next Big Thing Called To A

After To C and To B, the Next Wave is To A: Serving AI Agents In a recent quarterly earnings call, Meituan's Wang Xing introduced a new concept: To A (To Agent), signifying that future business services will increasingly target AI Agents as primary clients, not just consumers or merchants. This shift implies that internet giants must now consider how to make their services more appealing for AI Agents to recommend, fundamentally altering traditional distribution logic. This "To A era" is prompting an unusual trend of alliances among major tech companies. Unlike previous competitive battles, firms like Meituan, Tencent, JD.com, Huawei, OPPO, and OpenAI are rapidly forming partnerships. The reason is strategic: as AI Agents become the primary user interface, handling tasks from a single command (e.g., "Book a Japanese restaurant for tomorrow"), the risk for platforms is being bypassed entirely. Companies are positioning themselves within this new value chain. Three primary strategies are emerging: 1. **Super-Entry Points + Service Providers:** Platforms like Tencent's Yuanbao, WeChat, and ChatGPT aim to be the first-stop Agent, integrating various services (food delivery, shopping, travel) from partners like Meituan and JD.com. 2. **Apps as Callable Services:** Companies like Meituan, JD.com, and Uber are ensuring their core services remain accessible and callable by external Agents, shifting from front-end apps to back-end capabilities. 3. **System-Level Agent Entry Points:** Smartphone makers (Huawei, Honor, OPPO) are leveraging their OS-level AI assistants to control the initial user command, redistributing it to relevant service apps. While alliances offer mutual benefit—entry points gain service capabilities, and service providers gain traffic—inherent conflicts of interest exist. A dominant Agent platform could eventually attempt to connect directly with suppliers (restaurants, hotels), bypassing current aggregators like Meituan or Ctrip. Other unresolved challenges include the potential for Agent recommendations to become a new form of paid ranking and unclear accountability for faulty recommendations. The current rush to form alliances is a defensive move by service providers to secure their position before the landscape solidifies. In this To A-driven restructuring, the greatest risk is not losing the race but failing to hear the starting gun.

marsbit45 мин. назад

To C, To B, and the Next Big Thing Called To A

marsbit45 мин. назад

The More Lifelike the Robot, the More Terrifying? Unveiling the 'Uncanny Valley Effect' in the Era of Humanoid Robots

As humanoid robots become increasingly lifelike, they confront a significant psychological barrier known as the "Uncanny Valley Effect," a concept proposed by Japanese roboticist Masahiro Mori in 1970. This phenomenon describes a dip in human comfort and acceptance when robots appear almost, but not perfectly, human. Minor imperfections in facial expressions, eye movements, or skin texture trigger a subconscious sense of unease, as the brain detects something trying, yet failing, to mimic a person. Examples range from the controversial human-like robot Sophia to animated characters in films like *The Polar Express*. The effect poses a key design challenge for robotics companies. Some, like Boston Dynamics, avoid it entirely by creating highly capable but visibly mechanical robots. Others, like Hanson Robotics, push for greater human likeness despite the risk. For consumer robots, especially in homes, most manufacturers opt for stylized or clearly mechanical designs to ensure broader acceptance. While the Uncanny Valley remains a powerful force, its impact may diminish over time through technological advancements that achieve near-perfect realism or through generational familiarity as people grow accustomed to interacting with humanoid machines. Ultimately, navigating this psychological frontier requires as much understanding of human perception as of robotics technology itself.

marsbit45 мин. назад

The More Lifelike the Robot, the More Terrifying? Unveiling the 'Uncanny Valley Effect' in the Era of Humanoid Robots

marsbit45 мин. назад

Торговля

Спот
Фьючерсы
活动图片