Legendary Investor: 'Absolutely No Way' for Walsh to Cut Rates, AI Bull Market Could Last 1-2 More Years

marsbitОпубликовано 2026-05-08Обновлено 2026-05-08

Введение

Billionaire hedge fund manager Paul Tudor Jones says incoming Fed Chair Wash is highly unlikely to cut rates and could even consider raising them, citing FOMC pushback and persistent inflation. He remains bullish on the AI-driven stock market rally, comparing it to historical tech revolutions like Microsoft's founding (1981) and the commercialization of the internet (1995). Jones believes this AI bull market is only about 50-60% complete and could continue for another 1-2 years, though he warns the current period resembles the late stages of the 1999 dot-com bubble, setting the stage for a potential sharp correction if valuations become extreme. He also cautions that AI requires eventual government regulation to mitigate long-term risks.

Source: Jinshi Data

Billionaire hedge fund manager Paul Tudor Jones made a significant statement in an interview with CNBC on Thursday, predicting that incoming Fed Chair Walsh is not only unlikely to cut interest rates but may even consider raising them. Meanwhile, he remains optimistic about the AI-driven U.S. stock bull market, believing it is in a middle stage with another 1-2 years of gains possible, though it will ultimately face the risk of a sharp correction.

No Hope for Walsh to Cut Rates, Possibly Even a Rate Hike

Regarding the policy direction of the incoming Federal Reserve Chair Walsh, Jones stated unequivocally: "Will he cut rates? Absolutely no way."

Walsh has previously expressed a dovish leaning, with the Fed's benchmark rate currently held in the 3.5%-3.75% range, unchanged since last December. However, his inclination towards easing will face significant resistance from the Federal Open Market Committee (FOMC) – the most recent meeting saw the highest number of dissenting votes in nearly 34 years, with most regional Fed presidents opposing the statement's hint at possible further easing "after three rate cuts by the end of 2025."

Jones believes that even a rate hike could be justified in the current environment: "I would consider raising rates, of course depending on the data, but I would definitely consider it. And I think he will be constrained before the midterm elections."

The current policy backdrop is complex: the labor market is stabilizing, but inflation remains persistently above the Fed's 2% target due to the war in Iran and Trump's tariff policies. According to CME Group's FedWatch tool, futures traders expect the Fed to keep rates unchanged this year, with probabilities for cuts or hikes being roughly equal and both relatively low.

Drawing Parallels to Historical Tech Waves, AI Bull Market Has 1-2 Years Left

Regarding the stock market, Jones is firmly bullish on the AI-driven rally, revealing he has recently increased his holdings in related stocks. He compares the current AI development to two major historical tech revolutions: "I think the emergence of the Claude large model in January this year is equivalent to the founding of Microsoft in 1981; and the current stage of AI proliferation is similar to the release of Windows 95 in 1995 and the acceleration of internet commercialization."

Jones noted that both those technological revolutions ushered in sustained "productivity miracles" lasting 4 to 5.5 years, driving long-term stock market gains. "This current AI bull market has probably run about 50% to 60% of its course. If I had to pick a timeframe, it could last another 1 to 2 years."

In recent years, U.S. stocks have continued hitting new highs driven by AI transformation expectations, with mega-cap tech stocks related to AI infrastructure leading the gains. Chips, cloud computing, and generative AI companies have become magnets for capital, pushing the S&P 500 index to repeated all-time highs.

Analogous to Pre-1999 Dot-com Bubble, U.S. Stocks May Face Sharp Correction Risk in Future

Despite his bullish short-term outlook, Jones draws a parallel between the current market and the prelude to the 1999 dot-com bubble – about a year before it peaked in early 2000. He warns: "Imagine the market going up another 40%, the total market cap to GDP ratio could reach 300% to 350%, and at that point, there will inevitably be a breathtakingly sharp correction."

As a macro trader, Jones said he employs a basket allocation strategy, while also emphasizing: "I always like to look for historical precedents, and this is a very unique period."

Additionally, he issued a warning about the long-term risks of AI: "The government will eventually need to step in with regulation. If left unchecked, artificial intelligence could pose a danger to humanity."

Jones gained fame for successfully predicting and profiting from the 1987 "Black Monday" stock market crash. He is also a co-founder of the non-profit organization Just Capital, which rates U.S. public companies based on social and environmental metrics.

Связанные с этим вопросы

QAccording to Paul Tudor Jones, what is the likelihood of the incoming Fed Chair Walsh cutting interest rates?

AAccording to Paul Tudor Jones, the likelihood of the incoming Fed Chair Walsh cutting interest rates is absolutely none. Jones stated: 'He will cut rates? Absolutely not.'

QWhat historical technological revolutions does Paul Tudor Jones compare the current AI boom to?

APaul Tudor Jones compares the current AI boom to two historical technological revolutions. He compares the emergence of Claude's large model in January of this year to Microsoft's founding in 1981. He then compares the current stage of AI proliferation to the period following the release of Windows 95 in 1995, which accelerated the commercialization of the internet.

QHow much longer does Paul Tudor Jones believe the AI-driven bull market can continue?

APaul Tudor Jones believes the AI-driven bull market can continue for another 1 to 2 years. He estimates the current bull run is about 50% to 60% complete.

QWhat market period does Jones use as a cautionary analogy for the potential end of the current AI bull market?

AJones uses the period preceding the 1999-2000 dot-com bubble as a cautionary analogy. He warns that the market could resemble 1999, roughly a year before the peak in early 2000, and ultimately face a sharp correction.

QWhat long-term risk associated with AI does Paul Tudor Jones highlight?

APaul Tudor Jones highlights the long-term risk that artificial intelligence could pose a danger to humanity if left unchecked. He warns that 'government will ultimately have to step in to regulate it, and if left unchecked, artificial intelligence could be dangerous to humans.'

Похожее

3 Years, 5 Times: The Rebirth of a Century-Old Glass Factory

Corning, a 175-year-old glass company, is experiencing a dramatic revival as a key player in AI infrastructure, driven by surging demand for high-performance optical fiber in data centers. AI data centers require vastly more fiber than traditional ones—5 to 10 times as much per rack—to handle high-speed data transmission between GPUs. This structural demand shift, coupled with supply constraints from the lengthy expansion cycle for fiber preforms, has created a significant supply-demand gap. Nvidia has invested in Corning, along with Lumentum and Coherent, in a $4.5 billion total commitment to secure the optical supply chain for AI. Corning's competitive edge lies in its expertise in producing ultra-low-loss, high-density, and bend-resistant specialty fiber, which is critical for 800G+ and future 1.6T data rates. Its deep involvement in co-packaged optics (CPO) with partners like Nvidia further solidifies its position. While not the largest fiber manufacturer globally, Corning's revenue from enterprise/data center clients now exceeds 40% of its optical communications sales, and it has secured multi-year supply agreements with major hyperscalers including Meta and Nvidia. Financially, Corning's optical communications revenue has surged, doubling from $1.3 billion in 2023 to over $3 billion in 2025. Its stock price has risen nearly 6-fold since late 2023. Key future catalysts include the rollout of Nvidia's CPO products and the scale of undisclosed customer agreements. However, risks include high current valuations and potential disruption from next-generation technologies like hollow-core fiber. The company's long-term bet on light over electricity, maintained even through the telecom bubble crash, is now being validated by the AI boom.

marsbit30 мин. назад

3 Years, 5 Times: The Rebirth of a Century-Old Glass Factory

marsbit30 мин. назад

In the Age of AI, the Organization Itself Is the Moat

In the AI era, where products, interfaces, and narratives are easily replicated, a company's true moat is its organizational structure. The article argues that exceptional companies like OpenAI, Anthropic, and Palantir differentiate themselves not merely through technology but by inventing new organizational forms that allow a specific type of talent to thrive and become a version of themselves they couldn't elsewhere. These companies compete on identity, offering ambitious individuals a sense of being special, chosen, close to power, and part of a historic mission. However, this emotional commitment must be matched by structural commitment—real power, ownership, status, and economic participation. For founders, the key question is not how to tell a better story, but what kind of person can only truly realize their potential within their specific company structure. For individuals evaluating opportunities, the distinction between "being chosen" (an emotional feeling) and "being seen" (a structural reality of tangible power and rewards) is crucial. The most dangerous promises are those priced in future time. While AI makes copying visible elements easy, it does not make building a great, novel organization any easier. The next frontier of competition is creating organizational vessels that attract, structure, and compound the judgment of the right people—those whom traditional boxes cannot contain. The company itself becomes the moat.

marsbit58 мин. назад

In the Age of AI, the Organization Itself Is the Moat

marsbit58 мин. назад

I've Been a Divorce Lawyer for 26 Years: How Has Cryptocurrency Become a New Tool for the Wealthy to Hide Assets?

Natalie Brunell reports on insights from divorce lawyer James Sexton, who has 26 years of experience. He argues that money itself is not the root of marital breakdown; rather, emotional disconnection is the core issue. While financial hardship increases divorce risk, excessive wealth can also make divorce easier by reducing the incentive to work on the relationship. Sexton discusses financial management in marriages, advocating for transparency and a "yours, mine, and ours" system that balances shared finances with individual autonomy and privacy. He notes the growing normalization of prenuptial agreements, especially among younger generations. A significant portion focuses on cryptocurrency's role in divorce. Sexton explains that crypto became a new tool for hiding assets due to its early anonymity and complexity. He highlights that many lawyers and spouses lack understanding, allowing knowledgeable parties to gain advantages. He cites a New York legal form that only added a specific crypto disclosure field in 2026. On saving relationships, Sexton emphasizes small, consistent acts of reconnection, affirmation, and expressing appreciation, which he finds more effective than criticism. He concludes that fostering warmth and kindness is a simple yet powerful way to strengthen bonds and, in his words, "put divorce lawyers out of business."

marsbit1 ч. назад

I've Been a Divorce Lawyer for 26 Years: How Has Cryptocurrency Become a New Tool for the Wealthy to Hide Assets?

marsbit1 ч. назад

Turing Award Laureate Sutton's New Work: Using a Formula from 1967 to Solve a Major Flaw in Streaming Reinforcement Learning

New research titled "Intentional Updates for Streaming Reinforcement Learning" (arXiv:2604.19033v1), involving Turing Award laureate Richard Sutton, addresses a core challenge in deep reinforcement learning (RL): the "stream barrier." Current deep RL methods typically rely on replay buffers and batch training for stability, failing catastrophically when learning online from single data points (streaming). The authors propose a fundamental shift: instead of prescribing how far to move parameters (a fixed step size), their "Intentional Updates" method specifies the desired change in the function's output (e.g., a 5% reduction in value prediction error). It then calculates the step size needed to achieve that intent. This idea is inspired by the Normalized Least Mean Squares (NLMS) algorithm from 1967. Applied to value and policy learning, this yields algorithms like Intentional TD(λ) and Intentional AC. The method inherently stabilizes learning by adapting the step size based on the local gradient landscape, preventing overshooting/undershooting. In experiments on MuJoCo continuous control and Atari discrete tasks, Intentional AC achieved performance rivaling batch-based algorithms like SAC in a streaming setting (batch size=1, no replay buffer), while being ~140x more computationally efficient per update. The work demonstrates significant robustness, reducing reliance on numerous stabilization tricks. A remaining challenge is bias in policy updates due to action-dependent step sizes. Overall, this approach advances efficient, online, "learn-as-you-go" RL, enabling adaptive systems without massive data buffers or compute clusters.

marsbit1 ч. назад

Turing Award Laureate Sutton's New Work: Using a Formula from 1967 to Solve a Major Flaw in Streaming Reinforcement Learning

marsbit1 ч. назад

From KYC to KYA, Is It Time to Give AI Agents Their Own 'ID Cards'?

Titled "From KYC to KYA: Is It Time to Issue 'Identity Cards' for AI Agents?", this article discusses the emerging concept of Know Your Agent (KYA) as AI agents become increasingly autonomous. In Agent-to-Agent (A2A) scenarios, where agents execute contracts, payments, and trades without human intervention, the lack of a shared identity standard creates risks like unauthorized transactions, fraud, and accountability gaps. KYA acts as a trust layer to verify an agent's origin, authority, and accountability. The need for KYA is most critical outside centralized platforms (like Google or Coinbase), such as in decentralized exchanges (DEX), A2A payments, and merchant payments. Several key players are building KYA infrastructure: - **ERC-8004**: A proposed Ethereum standard that issues a unique AgentID as an NFT, building on-chain identity, reputation, and validation systems. - **Visa TAP**: Visa's solution issues agent identity credentials, with transactions verified via triple signatures (legitimacy, delegator, payment method). - **Trulioo**: Extends its KYC/KYB compliance infrastructure using a Digital Passport for Agents (DAP), issued after verifying both the developer and user, and refreshed per transaction. - **Sumsub**: Focuses on post-issuance real-time verification, detecting agent anomalies during transactions using its existing compliance systems. Regulatory bodies are also acting. The EU AI Act mandates operator identification in logs for high-risk AI systems, the US NIST prioritizes agent identity management standards, and Singapore has released a national AI governance framework. Similar to how the 2019 FATF Travel Rule impacted crypto exchanges, possessing KYA infrastructure may determine market entry in the AI agent era. The market is expected to segment rather than produce a single winner, with success depending on integrations with merchants, payment networks, and KYC client bases.

marsbit2 ч. назад

From KYC to KYA, Is It Time to Give AI Agents Their Own 'ID Cards'?

marsbit2 ч. назад

Торговля

Спот
Фьючерсы
活动图片

Популярные категорииright-arrow

Популярные тегиright-arrow