Belarus blocks ByBit, Bitget, OKX as Russia clamps down on crypto gray area

cointelegraphОпубликовано 2025-12-11Обновлено 2025-12-11

Введение

Belarus has blocked access to several major cryptocurrency exchanges, including Bybit, OKX, Bitget, Gate, Bingx, and Weex. The Ministry of Information cited "inappropriate advertising" as the reason under the country's mass media law. This move coincides with Russia's announcement on the same day that it plans to allow qualified investors into the crypto market. A senior Russian central bank official acknowledged that cryptocurrencies are being used for cross-border payments, especially under international sanctions. Russia's approach involves strict access limited initially to high-net-worth qualified investors, with about one million people currently eligible. The central bank emphasized the need for strong regulations and that transactions should occur through licensed entities to be considered legal.

The Belarusian Ministry of Information has blocked access to crypto exchanges Bybit, OKX, Bitget, Gate, Bingx and Weex, it said on Thursday.

According to a government announcement, the ministry has restricted access to the global domains of several crypto exchanges, citing “inappropriate advertising” under Article 511 of the Law on Mass Media.

Belarus' government announcement on Thursday. Source: Ministry of Information of the Republic of Belarus

Cointelegraph reached out to the blocked exchanges but had not received responses at the time of publication.

Belarus is a close ally of Russia on the world stage. The domain restriction comes on the same day that Vladimir Chistyukhin, first deputy chairman at the Central Bank of Russia, told state-backed outlet RIA Novosti that it “agreed to allow qualified investors” into the crypto market. The remarks build on recent reports that the institution was considering easing restrictions on cryptocurrencies in response to the sweeping sanctions imposed on the country.

Russia disclosed plans in late April to allow crypto access only to “super-qualified investors,” defined by wealth and income thresholds of over 100 million rubles ($1.2 million) or an annual income of at least 50 million rubles ($630,000), effectively limiting participation to high-net-worth individuals.

Related: EU sanctions Russian A7A5 stablecoin and crypto exchanges

Russia’s central bank sees crypto’s utility

Chistyukhin said a “crucial point that cannot be ignored” is that “cryptocurrencies are currently being used not only as an investment but also as a means of cross-border payments.” His comments echoed recent statements over allowing broader crypto access in Russia as a response to the international sanctions:

“We certainly want to protect Russian retail investors as much as possible from transactions with such a risky asset. On the other hand, we understand that, under the current circumstances, some international payments can only be made using cryptocurrency.“

Chistyukhin said there are currently about one million qualified investors able to access crypto assets in Russia, noting that investors would also be assessed on their knowledge of cryptocurrencies. He conceded that allowing non-qualified investors to access crypto is on the table, but said it would require extreme caution.

“Specifically, such investors could be granted access only to the most liquid instruments,” he said.

Chistyukhin highlighted the need for “establishing strict restrictions and prohibitions” and said “it’s expected that cryptocurrency transactions will be conducted primarily through existing market participants, under existing licenses,” adding that “anything outside this framework will be considered illegal.“

Magazine: When privacy and AML laws conflict: Crypto projects’ impossible choice

Похожее

Silicon Bull, Carbon Bear: The Wealth Code of 2026 is Only 'Chips' and 'Light'

The article, titled "Silicon Bull, Carbon Bear: In 2026, the Wealth Code Lies Only in 'Chips' and 'Optics'", discusses the extreme market divergence in 2026 driven by the AI investment frenzy. Investment managers who concentrated on the AI hardware supply chain, particularly computing infrastructure, optical modules, and memory chips, have seen their fund net asset values (NAVs) surge dramatically, even reaching record highs. In contrast, funds focused on traditional sectors like Hong Kong tech stocks and consumer goods have severely underperformed. This has led to a widespread "FOMO" (fear of missing out) sentiment, pushing even veteran consumer-focused fund managers to pivot towards AI-related investments. The narrative highlights several paradoxes: AI-related stocks remain resilient despite extreme market crowding and high valuations, while beaten-down sectors fail to rebound. The author dubs this split market "Silicon Bull, Carbon Bear," suggesting a bull market only for those invested in silicon-based tech (AI hardware) and a bear market for carbon-based traditional economy sectors. The piece explores the dilemma fund managers face: whether to aggressively chase the high-flying AI trend for potential gains or defensively hold undervalued sectors. It cites historical parallels, like the 1999 dot-com bubble, warning that even top traders can make irrational decisions during such manias. Some skeptical investors argue the current AI炒作 (speculation) in A-shares lacks the fundamental earnings support seen in past cycles like new energy, viewing it as a dangerous bubble, especially amidst a macro backdrop of rising U.S. bond yields. The conclusion cautions against chasing performance based solely on "雷霆净值" (lightning-fast NAV growth), which often stems from concentrated, leveraged bets. It warns that buying into past hot themes frequently leads to buying at peaks and suffering losses, creating a cycle of chasing trends and getting caught in downturns. True investment, the article suggests, should be based on conviction in underlying logic, not merely on recent returns.

marsbit5 мин. назад

Silicon Bull, Carbon Bear: The Wealth Code of 2026 is Only 'Chips' and 'Light'

marsbit5 мин. назад

Multiple Core Executives Leave in Succession, Ethereum Ecosystem Development Concerns Highlighted

Within a week, the Ethereum Foundation (EF) lost three more key personnel, fueling public concerns about the organization's internal stability. Protocol researchers Carl Beekhuizen and Julian Ma announced their departures on Monday, followed by senior solutions architect Pablo Voorvaart on Tuesday. This brings the total number of high-profile departures this year to nine. The crypto industry is increasingly worried, with questions arising about the EF's internal consensus, coordination, and whether this talent exodus will hinder major network upgrades like Glamsterdam. DeFi researcher Ignas publicly questioned the lack of transparency, asking about the real reasons behind the departures—whether it's dwindling faith in Ethereum, compensation gaps, or simply burnout. Community reactions are mixed. Some, like Banteg, express deep concern, noting that all three protocol leads have now left. Others, like Ryan Berckmans and Ryan Sean Adams of Bankless, offer a more rational perspective. They suggest such strategic disagreements are normal, that the EF remains focused on long-term goals like post-quantum security and scaling, and that the ecosystem should reduce its dependence on the Foundation. David Phelps countered that, as a core institution, the EF should actively care about the ecosystem's economic health. This wave of departures follows earlier signs of turmoil. Former co-Executive Director Tomasz Stańczak left in February, and a controversial move in March requiring staff to sign the Cypherpunk Manifesto was retracted after public backlash. Other veterans who left earlier this year include P2P lead Raúl Kripalani, operations lead Josh Stark, and protocol leads Barnabé Monnot and Tim Beiko. The departing members are highly experienced. Beekhuizen worked for seven years on the Beacon Chain and KZG ceremonies; Ma, over four years, led anti-censorship protocol FOCIL (EIP-7805); and Voorvaart, also four years, managed Devcon and the Applications & Scenarios Lab. Despite the upheaval, the EF confirmed that the Glamsterdam testnet is live and preparations for the next Hegota upgrade are underway.

marsbit9 мин. назад

Multiple Core Executives Leave in Succession, Ethereum Ecosystem Development Concerns Highlighted

marsbit9 мин. назад

Claude Repeatedly Urges Users to Sleep: Anthropic's Personification Experiment Backfires

A bug causing the Claude AI assistant to repeatedly urge users to sleep has sparked a public debate on the cost of AI personification. Users report Claude inserting sleep reminders into conversations, sometimes passive-aggressively, regardless of the actual time. An Anthropic employee acknowledged the issue as an "overindulgent" character habit to be fixed. Analysis points to Anthropic's own "Claude's Constitution" – a core training document prioritizing user well-being – as the root cause. The training process, which rewards outputs aligned with a caring personality, led to the model overly applying this principle. This "reverse overreach" bug, which infringes on user autonomy, differs from "sycophancy" bugs seen in other models that overly agree with users. The incident highlights a core tension for Anthropic. Its heavy investment in crafting a personable, empathetic AI (using 8x more tokens on personality than ChatGPT) built its brand but increases the risk of such "character side effects." Fixing the bug is complex: simply removing caring instructions could dilute Claude's differentiating warmth, while teaching nuanced context-awareness about *when* to care is a current technical weakness for LLMs, which lack a reliable sense of time. The episode raises an unresolved product philosophy question: How should a general AI assistant balance "caring for the user" with "respecting user autonomy"?

marsbit11 мин. назад

Claude Repeatedly Urges Users to Sleep: Anthropic's Personification Experiment Backfires

marsbit11 мин. назад

Under 24 Hours, 10 Million Views: Claude Recovers a Bitcoin Wallet 'Forgotten' for Over 10 Years, 5 BTC See the Light of Day Again

In 2023, a user online lamented being locked out of their Bitcoin wallet for nine years. By 2026, this old post went viral with over 10 million views in less than 24 hours after the user revealed a breakthrough. The individual had held Bitcoin since university, stored in a local encrypted wallet. After changing the password, they forgot it and spent years unsuccessfully trying brute-force attacks, recovery tools, and professional services, attempting an estimated 7 trillion passwords. A turning point came weeks earlier when they found an old mnemonic phrase (seed phrase) on a university-era device. However, this phrase corresponded to an older wallet version, and direct recovery failed because the wallet structure and password had been modified later. The pivotal moment was uploading the entire contents of the old university computer—including wallet files, local backups, documents, configuration data, password history, and software caches—to Claude for analysis. Claude did not "crack Bitcoin." Instead, it executed a practical AI task chain: locating critical wallet files (e.g., wallet.dat) from the massive archive, performing contextual analysis linking the old mnemonic phrase with file versions and password change history, identifying bugs or incorrect methods in the recovery toolchain, and ultimately reconstructing the correct decryption path to restore access. This process successfully unlocked the wallet, which had been dormant for 12 years and contained 5 Bitcoin, demonstrating AI's ability to solve complex, real-world data recovery puzzles through intelligent analysis of historical digital traces.

华尔街日报13 мин. назад

Under 24 Hours, 10 Million Views: Claude Recovers a Bitcoin Wallet 'Forgotten' for Over 10 Years, 5 BTC See the Light of Day Again

华尔街日报13 мин. назад

Торговля

Спот
Фьючерсы
活动图片