Tether Urged To Transfer $344M In Frozen USDT To Terror Victims

bitcoinistОпубликовано 2026-05-16Обновлено 2026-05-16

Введение

A US federal court in Manhattan is being asked to order Tether to transfer $344 million in frozen USDT to victims of Iran-linked terrorist attacks. The plaintiffs, including a Jerusalem family affected by a 1997 Hamas bombing, hold unpaid court judgments against Iran. They target two Tron blockchain wallets, frozen earlier this year by the US Treasury's OFAC as linked to Iran's Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps. Their lawsuit argues that because Tether, as a centralized issuer, can freeze wallets, it can also be compelled by court order to move the equivalent funds to satisfy the judgments. This case could set a significant legal precedent for centralized stablecoin issuers and is part of a broader legal campaign targeting frozen crypto assets linked to sanctioned entities.

A Jerusalem family that lost relatives in a 1997 Hamas suicide bombing is among the plaintiffs pushing a US federal court to order Tether to hand over hundreds of millions in frozen digital currency.

The case, filed in Manhattan, could set a significant legal precedent for how courts treat centralized stablecoin issuers.

A Decades-Old Debt

The plaintiffs are survivors and family members of victims from Iran-linked terrorist attacks. They hold court judgments against Iran that were awarded years ago — judgments that have never been paid.

Now they are targeting a pile of frozen cryptocurrency as a way to collect what they are owed.

Attorney Charles Gerstein filed the lawsuit Thursday in the US District Court for the Southern District of New York.

Filing against Tether submitted by Attorney Charles Gerstein.

His clients say they have a legal claim to two Tron blockchain wallet addresses holding roughly 344 million USDT. Those wallets were frozen earlier this year by the US Treasury Department’s Office of Foreign Assets Control, which identified them as linked to Iran’s Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps.

The plaintiffs are not asking Tether to simply release those specific wallets. According to reports, they want a court order directing Tether to transfer an equivalent amount of USDT to their legal team’s wallet address.

Why Tether Can Be Compelled

Unlike Bitcoin or Ethereum, USDT is controlled by a central company. Tether can freeze wallets, block transactions, and move funds when ordered to do so. That centralized structure is at the heart of Gerstein’s legal argument.

Because a prior order already froze the wallets — something only possible because Tether has direct operational control — he contends the company can also be ordered to move the funds.

BTCUSD trading at $78,115 on the 24-hour chart: TradingView

The ownership question, he argues, is already largely settled: OFAC has already declared the wallets to be IRGC-controlled assets, which clears a path for seizure under US terrorism statutes.

Broader Legal Campaign

This is not Gerstein’s only case of this kind. Based on reports, he has filed similar actions involving North Korea-linked cyber operations against the Arbitrum platform. He is also handling a separate case involving Railgun DAO, a privacy-focused crypto protocol.

The Manhattan filing is part of what appears to be a coordinated legal push to test whether courts can compel crypto platforms with centralized control to act on frozen assets held in sanctioned wallets.

Featured image from CEPA, chart from TradingView

Связанные с этим вопросы

QWhat is the plaintiffs' primary demand to Tether in this case?

AThe plaintiffs are asking the US federal court to order Tether to transfer approximately $344 million worth of frozen USDT (an equivalent amount to the funds in two sanctioned wallet addresses) to a wallet address controlled by their legal team.

QWhat is the legal basis for Attorney Charles Gerstein's argument that Tether can be compelled to move the funds?

AThe argument hinges on Tether's centralized control over USDT. Gerstein contends that because Tether can and has frozen the specific wallets (as ordered by OFAC), demonstrating direct operational control, the company can similarly be ordered by a court to move the funds.

QWhat entity froze the Tron blockchain wallets containing the 344 million USDT, and why were they frozen?

AThe wallets were frozen earlier this year by the US Treasury Department's Office of Foreign Assets Control (OFAC), which identified them as assets linked to Iran's Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps (IRGC).

QWho are the plaintiffs in this lawsuit against Tether?

AThe plaintiffs are survivors and family members of victims from Iran-linked terrorist attacks, including a Jerusalem family that lost relatives in a 1997 Hamas suicide bombing. They hold unpaid court judgments against Iran.

QWhat potential legal significance does this case hold beyond the immediate dispute?

AThe case could set a significant legal precedent for how US courts treat centralized stablecoin issuers, testing whether courts can compel such platforms to act on frozen assets held in wallets linked to sanctioned entities under terrorism statutes.

Похожее

No Coding Required: Build Your First AI Agent in 2 Days (Complete Tutorial)

A No-Code Guide to Building Your First AI Agent in a Weekend This article presents a weekend, zero-code tutorial for beginners to build a functional AI Agent using tools like Claude. It clarifies the core difference between a chatbot, which responds to queries, and an Agent, which autonomously plans and executes multi-step tasks using tools to deliver a final result. The process is broken into four stages over two days: 1. **Saturday Morning: Understanding Agents.** Learn that an Agent requires a clear Goal, a Plan, necessary Tools, and an execution Loop. Identify a simple, multi-step task from your own work/life as your first project. 2. **Saturday Afternoon: Building with Claude.** Create a one-page "Agent Blueprint" answering: the Goal, sequential Steps, required Tools, the desired Output format, and error-handling rules. Implement this blueprint in Claude (Desktop Cowork or web Projects) and run the Agent for the first time. 3. **Sunday Morning: Debugging & Optimization.** Review the initial (often 60-70% accurate) output. Identify flaws, trace them back to vague instructions in your blueprint, and refine it with more specific criteria and error handling. Iterate this run-review-refine cycle 3-4 times to reach ~90% reliability. 4. **Sunday Afternoon: Expansion.** Apply the learned workflow to quickly build a second, different Agent (e.g., for research, content repurposing, or meeting prep), experiencing the compounding efficiency gains. The core skill is not writing a perfect blueprint initially, but rapidly iterating based on output. By the end of the weekend, you'll have built two usable Agents, moving beyond just chatting with AI to automating multi-step workflows, fundamentally changing how you approach repetitive tasks.

marsbit7 ч. назад

No Coding Required: Build Your First AI Agent in 2 Days (Complete Tutorial)

marsbit7 ч. назад

Торговля

Спот
Фьючерсы
活动图片