AI New Money, $5,000-an-Hour Companionship: Silicon Valley in 2026 and Night City in 2077

marsbitОпубликовано 2026-06-11Обновлено 2026-06-11

Введение

In 2026, San Francisco's AI boom has reshaped the city. While companies like OpenAI and Anthropic drive a commercial real estate revival and create a new class of tech millionaires, profound inequality deepens. Rental prices soar in AI districts, pricing out many who service the industry. A new, expensive social phenomenon emerges: tech "nouveaux riches," often lonely despite wealth, pay $3,000-$6,000 per hour for "high-end companionship." This service, provided by smart, tech-literate individuals (often women), offers not just beauty but engaged conversation about AI, longevity, and crypto—fulfilling a deep need for validation. This mirrors historic gold rushes, where service industries bloom around new wealth. The narrative draws parallels to Cyberpunk 2077's Night City, depicting a "high-tech, low-life" society where technological advancement exacerbates social divides, creating separate worlds within the same city.

By Sleepy

Silicon Valley has also started "hooking up with old men."

Of course, not in that way. There are no small-town girls calling middle-aged men "brother" here, nor are there 20-yuan WeChat red packets with a "you're so amazing" message attached. The Silicon Valley version is more respectable, and much more expensive.

Here, the "old men" are a group of twenty- and thirty-something tech nouveau riche, holding Nvidia options or OpenAI stock, living in high-rise apartments in the SoMa district. They aren't old, but they already carry an aura of age. They have money, their heads are full of ideas but they can't find anyone to tell them to, and when they do speak, no one takes them seriously. Eventually, they discover that "someone listening to me seriously" is something you can buy. In a small town, it costs twenty yuan; in Silicon Valley, it's three thousand to six thousand dollars an hour.

In June 2026, San Francisco has two faces.

The daytime face is easy to recognize. OpenAI and Anthropic have successively submitted confidential IPO filings to the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission, with the two AI giants preparing to go public almost simultaneously. Even earlier, OpenAI allowed over six hundred employees to cash out approximately $66 billion through the secondary market. Jensen Huang also said Nvidia has minted quite a few billionaires.

This is the daytime story, the wealth-creation story written in funding news and financial headlines.

The nighttime face is rarely shown to the public. In the same city, a group of young women who claim to understand AI, GPUs, longevityism, and cryptocurrency have begun offering high-end companionship services to Silicon Valley tech people for several thousand dollars an hour. A significant portion of their clientele are the very people who appear in those funding news stories during the day.

AI sucks money in, the money changes the shape of the city, the city changes the people living in it, and their loneliness and dignity also grow a price tag.

First, Money Changed the City's Shape

Three years ago, everyone thought San Francisco was finished.

The pandemic hollowed out downtown office buildings. Remote work sent programmers to Austin, Miami, even Bali. In the Mid-Market district where Twitter's headquarters was located, tents lined the streets, and faded 'For Lease' signs on empty storefronts went untorn.

Back then, if you told people you were still in San Francisco, they looked at you with pity. An American city built on "innovation" was being described as "in decline" for the first time.

Then AI brought the money.

According to a CBRE report in May 2026, AI companies are strongly driving office leasing recovery in the San Francisco Bay Area. Anthropic has leased large swaths of office space in the SoMa district, OpenAI moved into a new landmark in Mission Bay, and large and small AI companies have filled up South Beach and the Design District. Three years ago, half these buildings were empty; now, you have to queue to rent an office on this street.

Once the office buildings filled up, residential rents followed.

By June 2026, the median rent for a one-bedroom in San Francisco had risen to $4,000, 20% higher than a year ago. SoMa saw a 36% increase, Mission Bay 22%, South Beach 21%. These numbers seemed to ripple outward, following the locations of AI company offices.

There's an Edwardian-style house listed for $2.995 million whose property description even includes a special note: "Seller accepts Anthropic or OpenAI stock as payment."

This is how a city comes back to life, sometimes down to this level of detail. In the past, buying a house relied on cash, loans, and family help. Now, you can also rely on stock from a pre-IPO AI company.

Luxury homes get more expensive, ordinary people's homes become increasingly unaffordable. The same city, the same wave of prosperity, but which world you belong to depends entirely on whether you are part of the AI food chain.

San Francisco and Oakland are only separated by a bay bridge, but rents on either side feel like two different worlds. By the end of 2025, one-bedroom rents in San Francisco were about 70% higher than in Oakland. Some stay in the city, writing code, wiping tables, serving coffee, delivering food for these companies; others have to go farther to find housing they can still afford.

San Francisco has indeed come back to life. But this time, it revived around a small group of people. Office buildings are rented for them, housing prices rise following them, the entire city increasingly operates as if it were built for this small group.

Next to Every Gold Rush, a Street Grows

Once the city's shape is altered, what follows is the alteration of its inhabitants' lives. This is nothing new. California's own history has played it out in full.

Gold was discovered in California in 1849, and hundreds of thousands flocked to San Francisco. Later, everyone knew most gold miners didn't get rich. Levi Strauss got rich selling dry goods, fabrics, and workwear; Wells Fargo got rich handling remittances for mining areas; hotels, taverns, and gambling houses in Sacramento got rich. The gold miners walked ahead, and the businesspeople followed.

Common sense explains it. A bunch of people suddenly have money, all crammed in one place. They need to eat, have somewhere to live, and find some entertainment after a hard day's work. Where there's demand, supply follows. First come the shovel and tent sellers, then the bankers and postmasters, finally the tavern, casino, and brothel owners. From survival to pleasure, it's always been in that order.

The AI wave is the same. The shovel sellers arrived first: GPUs, cloud computing, data centers—these are upfront businesses anyone can see. Then came the VCs, lawyers, headhunters, wealth managers.

After the money lands in personal accounts, some help them buy houses, some teach them how to live longer, some accompany them to the gym, some manage their charitable giving.

And then, it's "hooking up with old men."

A wealth advisor said many of the AI nouveaux riches he has met show no interest in luxury cars or watches, and don't even know what to do with the money. They are too young, inexperienced with spending, and have few friends. But they share one thing: each has a complete set of ideas about the world's future in their head—AGI, longevity, entropy reduction, how civilization should develop—they can talk for hours without repeating themselves. The problem is no one listens; people around them start looking at their phones after three sentences.

Lots of money, little time, poor at making friends, heads full of ideas with nowhere to share them. Put these together, and you have a very clear demand, clear enough for someone to build a business around it.

Knowing GPUs Is Better Than Knowing How to Flirt

Forbes recently published a report interviewing a few of these people. Through them, you can see what this city is becoming.

Meida Marek originally wanted to go into finance.

Fresh out of school, she was a junior analyst at a company, running data, building models, writing reports every day. The work wasn't hard, and the path was clear. Then she did the math: language models could write reports ten times faster than her, for free. How long could her job last?

After the calculation, she felt uncertain.

But she had other skills. She was smart, a good conversationalist, and she genuinely understood AI, cryptocurrency, biohacking, and longevityism—not just surface-level knowledge. These topics just happened to be Silicon Valley nouveau riche's favorites. So she switched directions, starting a high-end companionship service, with clients being AI tech people, charging $3,500 an hour. Her schedule filled up quickly within months, and her rates nearly doubled.

A young person afraid of AI taking her job took a turn and made more money from the wealthy created by AI. Inspiring and absurd.

She wasn't the only one eyeing this business.

Ada Hopper charges $5,000 an hour. She once said something spot-on: talking about AI with these clients works very well; tech guys get excited because a beautiful woman knows what a GPU is.

Think about what that sentence means. The client pays five thousand dollars an hour, not just for beauty; a vase isn't worth that price. What's worth it is a beautiful person who also understands what you're saying, who can keep up when you talk about GPUs, who won't zone out when you discuss your worldview, and who you dare not look down upon.

Talia Sable is a former programmer, her bio says huge nerd, loves Dungeons & Dragons, AI, and supply chain management. Charges $3,000 an hour, schedule also fully booked.

Aella entered the scene earlier, reportedly charging up to $6,000 an hour. She promoted a concept called "nerd-first." The idea is that beautiful women should not just accompany the client's time and body, but also take their intellect and ideas seriously. In plain language: I don't just listen to your worldview; I genuinely find it interesting.

This business is new, but the need it fulfills is older than Silicon Valley.

In the karaoke bars of the eighties and nineties, the most valuable skill of a hostess wasn't beauty, it was knowing how to say, "Boss, you're amazing." The boss knew this was fake. But it didn't matter. Outside, he was a nobody; inside the bar, spending a few hundred yuan, he could be a big shot for a night. He knew it was bought, but bought was fine.

They had one good point: they didn't lie to themselves.

These Silicon Valley folks don't have that virtue. They pay five thousand dollars an hour to chat with a beautiful woman about AGI and humanity's future, then tell themselves this is high-quality intellectual exchange. Maybe it is. But if it's truly intellectual exchange, why must the other person be both beautiful and skilled at complimenting you? You could have an intellectual exchange with an MIT professor for free.

The reason is simple. He doesn't want exchange; he wants someone sitting across from him, taking him seriously. Exactly like the karaoke bars.

When he talks about AGI with friends, no one listens; when he chats about transformers, people lose interest after three sentences. Now, an intelligent and attractive person sits opposite him and says, "Go on." He finally feels taken seriously. This feeling costs three to six thousand dollars an hour, market price, fair and square.

In this brave new world, knowing GPUs works better than knowing how to flirt.

Longevity, Ketogenic Diets, and Local Models

Ada Hopper was terribly nervous before meeting her first client. Only after sitting down did she realize what the client most wanted to talk about aligned with her own interests: intermittent fasting, metabolic health, ketogenic diets. They discussed research papers half the night. Five-thousand-dollar-an-hour high-end companionship spent debating how to eat meat more scientifically.

Traditional wealthy people spend money to be seen. Buying a Ferrari, wearing a Patek Philippe—the money spent needs to be visible. Silicon Valley folks are the opposite. They spend money for themselves to see, or rather, for their bodies to see. They don't buy luxury cars or watches; ask a recently cashed-out engineer worth tens of millions what he's bought lately, and he'll say a Mac Mini to run local models. Ask another, and he'll say he's on a ketogenic diet, aiming to live to 120.

Marek has a client who completely adopted the longevityist ideas from her, even seeing it as a moral responsibility. He believed if technology could make people live longer, not pursuing it was a form of negligence. Later, influenced by Marek, he lost 50 pounds.

Another client gifted Marek a Mac Mini. Not a designer bag, not jewelry, but a small computer that can run AI models locally, because he thought Marek should have her own local inference capability. Someone else created AI-generated digital art specifically for her.

International travel, shopping trips to Europe, even indoor wingsuit flying. She herself, however, prefers older things. Antique jewelry, Edwardian-era vintage clothing, and mechanical movements hidden in small objects. She likes watching those tiny gears spin round and round. This hobby and her clients' study of Transformers share a common thread.

This isn't the sensual extravagance of traditional wealth. Today's wealthy study how to live twenty years longer while also running a large model at home. They are very meticulous about their bodies, like a diligent engineer tending to a newly purchased machine.

What to eat each day, how many hours to sleep, heart rate, body fat percentage—best to record it all. As long as there is a curve graph, they feel a bit more at ease. The act of living, in their hands, becomes very much like a long-term experiment, with themselves as the subject. Qin Shi Huang sent people overseas; San Francisco's wealthy watch their sleep curves. The methods have advanced considerably, but the desire hasn't changed much.

Unfortunately, some things aren't so cooperative. Like a person sitting across from you, listening to you say things of little use. You don't know when they'll get bored, or why they suddenly laugh. This can't be quantified and doesn't offer stable returns. Precisely because of that, it's expensive.

Before models change the world, they first change the nights of the wealthy.

Wake Up, Night City

Now, we can almost see what this city looks like.

Here, companies don't need to be mayors to decide who stays and who leaves. Someone just sold part of their options, adding thirty million dollars to their account. They study longevity, sleep, how to optimize their bodies to peak condition. When bored at night, they can spend a few thousand dollars to have an intelligent, attractive person sit down and talk with them.

The lives of others are much simpler. Wake up at six in the morning, set out from Oakland or farther away, commute over an hour into the city. Some write code for these companies, some wipe office tables, some serve coffee, deliver food, drive for ride-sharing apps. With a monthly rent of $3,415 on the table, they can only live farther and farther away.

This city deeply believes in technology. Believes bodies can be optimized, sleep can be optimized, work efficiency can be optimized. Human relationships can also be turned into a service. Open your phone, choose, book, pay, cancel. Not much different from calling a car.

Those who have played Cyberpunk 2077 might find this somewhat familiar. Developer CD Projekt Red wrote this introduction for Night City: It's a megalopolis obsessed with power, glamour, and body modification.

Replace body modification with longevityism and Biohacking, replace glamour with AGI, replace power with AI companies and valuation tables, and this sentence could almost be pasted verbatim onto San Francisco's 2026 city introduction page.

Cyberpunk has never been an aesthetic. Neon lights on the streets don't make it cyberpunk, nor do robots. It's a social structure of high technology and low quality of life for most.

Technology becomes increasingly advanced, but people become less and less like the same species. Some have already started considering how to surpass natural limitations, make their bodies live longer, keep their minds sharp, and outsource all the annoying parts of life. Others are still calculating how far they need to move to stay in this city.

Night City didn't start with mechanical prosthetics.

It started when a city gradually accepted this arrangement. Some constantly upgrade, others constantly retreat. They ride the same elevator in a building, wait at the same traffic light on a street, then return to completely different worlds.

San Francisco doesn't have that many neon lights, and it rarely rains. But it always makes you think of Night City.

Связанные с этим вопросы

QWhat significant shift has occurred in San Francisco's office real estate market by 2026, and what is driving it?

ABy 2026, San Francisco's office real estate market has experienced a strong recovery driven by the AI boom. Major AI companies like OpenAI, Anthropic, and others are aggressively leasing large office spaces in areas like SoMa, Mission Bay, and South Beach, filling buildings that were half-vacant just three years prior. This demand has revitalized the downtown core.

QWhat is the core service being offered by individuals like Meida Marek and Ada Hopper, and what makes it valuable to their clients?

AThey offer high-end companionship services, charging $3,000 to $6,000 per hour. The core value lies not just in physical appearance, but in their ability to engage in intelligent, knowledgeable conversations about topics their tech-savvy clients are passionate about, such as AI, GPUs, longevity, and crypto. They provide a sense of being truly heard and intellectually validated, which their wealthy but isolated clients crave.

QHow does the article draw a parallel between the 1849 California Gold Rush and the current AI boom in Silicon Valley?

AThe article draws a parallel by noting that in both historical events, while the primary prospectors (miners/AI engineers) seek fortune, it's the surrounding ecosystem of service providers who often build sustainable wealth. Just as merchants selling supplies, banks, and saloons thrived during the Gold Rush, today's AI boom fuels businesses selling GPUs, cloud services, legal counsel, wealth management, and, ultimately, niche personal services like high-end companionship.

QAccording to the article, what key difference exists between the spending habits of traditional wealthy individuals and the new AI-affluent tech workers?

ATraditional wealthy individuals often spend on conspicuous consumption like luxury cars and watches to signal status to others. In contrast, the new AI-affluent tech workers focus their spending on self-optimization and personal intellectual interests. They invest in things like longevity research (e.g., ketogenic diets, sleep tracking), running local AI models, and high-intellect companionship, viewing their bodies and minds as systems to be upgraded.

QWhat is the central irony or critique the article presents about San Francisco's transformation, linking it to the concept of 'Cyberpunk'?

AThe article critiques that San Francisco's revival, fueled by concentrated AI wealth, is creating a society reminiscent of 'Cyberpunk'—characterized by 'high tech, low life.' While technology advances dramatically for a privileged few who can afford life optimization and personalized services, it widens the inequality gap, forcing many service workers to live farther away due to rising costs. The city becomes divided into different worlds, not by neon and implants, but by economic disparity masked by technological progress.

Похожее

After the Passage of the GENIUS Act and the CLARITY Act, What Is the Correct Architecture for On-Chain Yield?

The article discusses the evolution of on-chain credit, distinguishing three markets: overcollateralized crypto lending, unsecured lending (largely unsuccessful), and asset-backed credit (ABC). ABC, backed by identifiable real-world collateral with legal recourse, is identified as the fastest-growing category and the only one credibly addressing adverse selection—the core problem in credit where the riskiest borrowers self-select. Current growth in on-chain Real World Assets (RWAs), particularly tokenized private credit funds (e.g., Maple Finance, Centrifuge), is substantial but often merely "wraps" existing fund structures, inheriting their risks rather than solving adverse selection at the protocol level. The regulatory landscape is a key driver, with the US GENIUS Act (prohibiting stablecoin issuers from paying yield) and the proposed CLARITY Act (closing loopholes on indirect yield) set to redefine permissible yield-bearing products. This makes vaults (like ERC-4626) the critical architecture—they become the primary compliant vehicle for delivering yield, functioning as issuance, disclosure, distribution, and recovery mechanisms. The author's thesis is that the correct post-GENIUS/CLARITY architecture involves building ABC solutions where credit assessment, structure, and recovery are encoded directly into the smart contract vault layer, moving beyond mere tokenized fund wrappers to solve adverse selection fundamentally and ensure regulatory compliance.

Foresight News21 мин. назад

After the Passage of the GENIUS Act and the CLARITY Act, What Is the Correct Architecture for On-Chain Yield?

Foresight News21 мин. назад

TechFlow Intelligence Bureau: Anthropic's New Model Fable Sparks Controversy by Restricting Biosafety Research, US CPI Soars to 4.2%, a Three-Year High

**Summary of TechFlow Intelligence Report:** The newsletter covers several key tech and finance developments. In AI, Anthropic's new Fable model faced backlash for secretly limiting biomedical research capabilities and enforcing a 30-day data retention policy, prompting the company to promise more transparent adjustments. In a related story, Anthropic's founder revealed his departure from OpenAI was due to dishonesty from Sam Altman, not safety concerns. Meanwhile, OpenAI is considering significant price cuts to compete with Anthropic, potentially sparking a price war. In crypto/Web3, BlackRock filed a new amendment for a yield-generating Bitcoin ETF, while Bank of America's CEO warned that stablecoin yields could drain trillions from traditional banks. U.S. Senator Cynthia Lummis advocated for the U.S. to officially accumulate Bitcoin reserves. In hardware, Nvidia released the DiffusionGemma-2-6B image model optimized for efficient inference, and AMD promoted its unified memory architecture to challenge Nvidia's dominance. TSMC's CFO hinted at possible price increases due to soaring AI chip demand. A major legal ruling in Germany held Google legally responsible for inaccurate information generated by its AI Overviews feature. Google Chrome also moved to fully block ad-blocker workarounds like uBlock Origin. Macroeconomic headlines included U.S. CPI rising to 4.2% (a 3-year high) and Iran's complete closure of the Strait of Hormuz, raising oil price and inflation fears. South Korean markets saw continued volatility with massive foreign capital outflow. Other notable stories: Microsoft expanded its Copilot AI assistant "Mico" globally; a study found r/wallstreetbets users' stock picks outperformed Wall Street; a fully autonomous drone killed a human soldier for the first time, raising AI ethics concerns; and a Chinese hospital used brain-computer interface technology to help a blind person "see." The overarching theme connects debates over AI boundaries and responsibility (Anthropic's restrictions, Google's liability, lethal autonomous drones) with real-world economic and geopolitical turmoil (inflation, Strait of Hormuz closure, market instability), highlighting the tense interplay between technological advancement and global chaos.

marsbit34 мин. назад

TechFlow Intelligence Bureau: Anthropic's New Model Fable Sparks Controversy by Restricting Biosafety Research, US CPI Soars to 4.2%, a Three-Year High

marsbit34 мин. назад

Alibaba's Yet Another New Business Division: What Signal Does It Send?

Alibaba has established a new "Token Foundry" business unit, merging its Tongyi large model division and Future Life Lab. Led directly by Group CEO Wu Yongming, this marks the company's third significant AI organizational reshuffle in 2026, following the creation of the Alibaba Token Hub (ATH) and a Group Technology Committee. The move signals a strategic shift from consolidating AI resources to accelerating productization and commercialization. The "Token Foundry" name reflects Alibaba's ambition to become a foundational supplier in the AI era, focusing on model development and commercial application. Key teams, including those behind the high-performing HappyHorse video generation model, have been integrated into the new unit. Concurrently, Zhou Jingren, architect of the Qwen model series, has been appointed Group Chief Scientist to lead a new AI Future Research Institute, focusing on long-term technological breakthroughs like Agent capabilities. This restructuring creates a clear four-layer AI architecture within Alibaba: the research institute for frontier exploration, Token Foundry for core models and commercialization, MaaS for platform services, and business units like Qianwen (C端) and Wukong (B端) for end-user applications. The adjustments align with a global trend among tech giants like Google and Microsoft to centralize AI leadership under the CEO and deeply integrate research with business units. The urgency is driven by a narrowing competitive window. Alibaba has announced its AI business is now entering a commercialization phase, with AI-related revenue seeing triple-digit growth for eleven consecutive quarters. The company faces intense competition in the MaaS (Model-as-a-Service) sector from rivals like ByteDance and Tencent. The Token Foundry initiative represents Alibaba's effort to streamline execution and enhance competitiveness in this critical, fast-evolving landscape.

marsbit58 мин. назад

Alibaba's Yet Another New Business Division: What Signal Does It Send?

marsbit58 мин. назад

From Return to Resignation: Chen Hang's 437 Days at DingTalk

The 437-Day Return and Departure of Chen Hang at DingTalk This article chronicles the 437-day period from March 31, 2025, to June 11, 2026, when Chen Hang (also known as "No Move") returned as CEO of DingTalk, the enterprise communication platform he originally founded, only to later step down. Chen Hang, the creator of DingTalk in 2015, was brought back by Alibaba in 2025 after the company acquired his subsequent startup, HHO. His return was driven by Alibaba's renewed focus on AI and DingTalk's strategic role as its key to-B AI application. However, his aggressive management style, marked by strict work policies like mandatory clock-ins and extended hours, quickly caused internal friction and was criticized as being at odds with Alibaba's culture. Despite the internal turmoil, Chen Hang drove significant product launches. In August 2025, he unveiled "AI DingTalk 1.0," featuring new products like the AI-native entry point "DingTalk ONE." By March 2026, he announced "Wukong," touted as the world's first enterprise-grade AI-native work platform, representing a fundamental rebuild of DingTalk's architecture. The turning point came in early June 2026. A detailed internal post criticizing DingTalk's work culture went viral, followed by a public critique from a former executive. This prompted an unprecedented public rebuke from the Alibaba Partners Committee, which stated such management was not aligned with company values. One day later, on June 11, Alibaba announced Chen Hang's departure. He was succeeded by Chen Yusen, a 32-year-old technical expert known for founding cybersecurity firm Changting Technology. While Chen Hang's tenure laid the technical foundation for DingTalk's AI transformation with "Wukong," his leadership style ultimately led to his replacement as the company seeks a new direction under younger leadership.

marsbit1 ч. назад

From Return to Resignation: Chen Hang's 437 Days at DingTalk

marsbit1 ч. назад

Торговля

Спот
Фьючерсы

Популярные статьи

Как купить NIGHT

Добро пожаловать на HTX.com! Мы сделали приобретение Midnight (NIGHT) простым и удобным. Следуйте нашему пошаговому руководству и отправляйтесь в свое крипто-путешествие.Шаг 1: Создайте аккаунт на HTXИспользуйте свой адрес электронной почты или номер телефона, чтобы зарегистрироваться и бесплатно создать аккаунт на HTX. Пройдите удобную регистрацию и откройте для себя весь функционал.Создать аккаунтШаг 2: Перейдите в Купить криптовалюту и выберите свой способ оплатыКредитная/Дебетовая Карта: Используйте свою карту Visa или Mastercard для мгновенной покупки Midnight (NIGHT).Баланс: Используйте средства с баланса вашего аккаунта HTX для простой торговли.Третьи Лица: Мы добавили популярные способы оплаты, такие как Google Pay и Apple Pay, для повышения удобства.P2P: Торгуйте напрямую с другими пользователями на HTX.Внебиржевая Торговля (OTC): Мы предлагаем индивидуальные услуги и конкурентоспособные обменные курсы для трейдеров.Шаг 3: Хранение Midnight (NIGHT)После приобретения вами Midnight (NIGHT) храните их в своем аккаунте на HTX. В качестве альтернативы вы можете отправить их куда-либо с помощью перевода в блокчейне или использовать для торговли с другими криптовалютами.Шаг 4: Торговля Midnight (NIGHT)С легкостью торгуйте Midnight (NIGHT) на спотовом рынке HTX. Просто зайдите в свой аккаунт, выберите торговую пару, совершайте сделки и следите за ними в режиме реального времени. Мы предлагаем удобный интерфейс как для начинающих, так и для опытных трейдеров.

407 просмотров всегоОпубликовано 2025.12.08Обновлено 2026.06.02

Как купить NIGHT

Обсуждения

Добро пожаловать в Сообщество HTX. Здесь вы сможете быть в курсе последних новостей о развитии платформы и получить доступ к профессиональной аналитической информации о рынке. Мнения пользователей о цене на NIGHT (NIGHT) представлены ниже.

活动图片