2026 Crypto Financing Reshuffle: Gaming and DePIN Are Dead, Two Prediction Market Deals Gobble Up 18% of Yearly Funding

marsbitОпубликовано 2026-05-09Обновлено 2026-05-09

Введение

Crypto Funding Shakeup in 2026: Gaming & DePIN Fade, Prediction Markets Dominate Analysis of crypto funding from January 1 to May 6, 2026, reveals a major sectoral shift. The industry raised $8.65 billion across 305 deals. However, a March surge to $4.57 billion was largely due to two mega-deals: BVNK's $1.8 billion acquisition and a $1 billion raise by Kalshi. Excluding these, monthly funding is a sluggish ~$1 billion. Capital concentration is extreme. The Payments ($3.74B) and Consumer ($2.48B) sectors absorbed 72% of all funds. Within Consumer, prediction markets were dominant: Kalshi's $1B and Polymarket's $600M raises together accounted for 18% of the year's total, surpassing all 47 DeFi deals combined ($1.06B). In contrast, Gaming and DePIN sectors saw funding nearly vanish. A strategic pivot is underway. Merger & Acquisition (M&A) activity reached 48 deals, nearly matching the 57 seed-stage rounds. This indicates capital is increasingly flowing toward acquiring established leaders rather than betting on new ideas. The most active investors so far in 2026 are Coinbase Ventures (18 deals), Tether (13 deals), Animoca Brands (11 deals), and GSR (11 deals). Notably, a16z's pace has slowed significantly compared to its 2021-2026 average.

Author: Memento Research

Compilation: TechFlow Deep Tides

Deep Tides Intro: Crypto financing data from the first four months of 2026 reveals a brutal reality: funding for the gaming and DePIN sectors has nearly dried up, while Kalshi and Polymarket, two prediction market companies, have taken more money than all DeFi projects combined for the entire year. More alarmingly, the number of M&A deals has caught up with seed rounds, indicating that capital is shifting from betting on new ideas to acquiring existing industry leaders.

Financing Overview: The March Surge Was Just an Illusion

From January 1 to May 6, 2026, the crypto industry completed 305 financing rounds, totaling $8.65 billion. However, the "surge" of $4.57 billion in March was essentially just two mega M&A deals: BVNK's $1.8 billion and Kalshi's $1 billion.

Excluding these two, the real financing pace is about $1 billion per month, which is even weaker than at the end of 2025.

Fund Flow: Payments and Consumer Gobble Up 72%

By sector:

Payments: $3.74 billion (56 deals)

Consumer: $2.48 billion (35 deals)

DeFi: $1.06 billion (47 deals, the highest number of transactions)

The payments and consumer sectors together account for 72% of the year's funding. Financing for gaming and DePIN has almost vanished.

Prediction Markets Dominate the Consumer Sector

The two prediction market companies accounted for 18% of the year's total funding:

Kalshi: $1 billion

Polymarket: $600 million

These two deals total $1.6 billion, exceeding the combined total of all 47 DeFi financing rounds.

M&A Becomes Mainstream

M&A deals reached 48 (23% of known-stage transactions), almost on par with 57 seed rounds (27%). This cycle has shifted from the early stage of investing in new ideas to acquiring industry leaders.

Investor Rankings Reshuffled

Most active funds in 2026:

Coinbase Ventures: 18 deals (Ranked 2nd during 2021-26)

Tether: 13 deals (New top lead investor)

Animoca Brands: 11 deals (Ranked 1st during 2021-26)

GSR: 11 deals

a16z: 7 deals (Significantly down from ~200 deals during 2021-26)

Связанные с этим вопросы

QWhat were the two major M&A deals that dominated the funding figures for March 2026, and what were their values?

AThe two major M&A deals were BVNK, which raised $1.8 billion, and Kalshi, which raised $1 billion.

QWhich two sectors accounted for 72% of total funding in early 2026, and what were the respective funding amounts?

AThe Payments and Consumer sectors accounted for 72% of total funding. Payments raised $3.74 billion across 56 deals, while Consumer raised $2.48 billion across 35 deals.

QHow much funding did the prediction market companies Kalshi and Polymarket receive collectively, and what percentage of the year's total funds does this represent?

AKalshi and Polymarket collectively received $1.6 billion in funding, which represents 18% of the total funds raised in early 2026.

QWhat significant trend is highlighted by the number of M&A transactions (48) nearly matching the number of seed rounds (57) in early 2026?

AThe trend highlights a market shift where capital is moving away from funding new ideas (seed-stage investments) and towards acquiring existing market leaders (M&A).

QAccording to the article, which were the most active investment funds in early 2026 by number of deals?

AThe most active funds were Coinbase Ventures with 18 deals, Tether with 13 deals, and Animoca Brands and GSR with 11 deals each.

Похожее

Why is China's AI Developing So Fast? The Answer Lies Inside the Labs

A US researcher's visit to China's top AI labs reveals distinct cultural and organizational factors driving China's rapid AI development. While talent, data, and compute are similar to the West, Chinese labs excel through a pragmatic, execution-focused culture: less emphasis on individual stardom and conceptual debate, and more on teamwork, engineering optimization, and mastering the full tech stack. A key advantage is the integration of young students and researchers who approach model-building with fresh perspectives and low ego, prioritizing collective progress over personal credit. This contrasts with the US culture of self-promotion and "star scientist" narratives. Chinese labs also exhibit a strong "build, don't buy" mentality, preferring to develop core capabilities—like data pipelines and environments—in-house rather than relying on external services. The ecosystem feels more collaborative than tribal, with mutual respect among labs. While government support exists, its scale is unclear, and technical decisions appear driven by labs, not state mandates. Chinese companies across sectors, from platforms to consumer tech, are building their own foundational models to control their tech destiny, reflecting a broader cultural drive for technological sovereignty. Demand for AI is emerging, with spending patterns potentially mirroring cloud infrastructure more than traditional SaaS. Despite challenges like a less mature data industry and GPU shortages, Chinese labs are propelled by vast talent, rapid iteration, and deep integration with the open-source community. The competition is evolving beyond a pure model race into a contest of organizational execution, developer ecosystems, and industrial pragmatism.

marsbit4 мин. назад

Why is China's AI Developing So Fast? The Answer Lies Inside the Labs

marsbit4 мин. назад

3 Years, 5 Times: The Rebirth of a Century-Old Glass Factory

Corning, a 175-year-old glass company, is experiencing a dramatic revival as a key player in AI infrastructure, driven by surging demand for high-performance optical fiber in data centers. AI data centers require vastly more fiber than traditional ones—5 to 10 times as much per rack—to handle high-speed data transmission between GPUs. This structural demand shift, coupled with supply constraints from the lengthy expansion cycle for fiber preforms, has created a significant supply-demand gap. Nvidia has invested in Corning, along with Lumentum and Coherent, in a $4.5 billion total commitment to secure the optical supply chain for AI. Corning's competitive edge lies in its expertise in producing ultra-low-loss, high-density, and bend-resistant specialty fiber, which is critical for 800G+ and future 1.6T data rates. Its deep involvement in co-packaged optics (CPO) with partners like Nvidia further solidifies its position. While not the largest fiber manufacturer globally, Corning's revenue from enterprise/data center clients now exceeds 40% of its optical communications sales, and it has secured multi-year supply agreements with major hyperscalers including Meta and Nvidia. Financially, Corning's optical communications revenue has surged, doubling from $1.3 billion in 2023 to over $3 billion in 2025. Its stock price has risen nearly 6-fold since late 2023. Key future catalysts include the rollout of Nvidia's CPO products and the scale of undisclosed customer agreements. However, risks include high current valuations and potential disruption from next-generation technologies like hollow-core fiber. The company's long-term bet on light over electricity, maintained even through the telecom bubble crash, is now being validated by the AI boom.

marsbit36 мин. назад

3 Years, 5 Times: The Rebirth of a Century-Old Glass Factory

marsbit36 мин. назад

In the Age of AI, the Organization Itself Is the Moat

In the AI era, where products, interfaces, and narratives are easily replicated, a company's true moat is its organizational structure. The article argues that exceptional companies like OpenAI, Anthropic, and Palantir differentiate themselves not merely through technology but by inventing new organizational forms that allow a specific type of talent to thrive and become a version of themselves they couldn't elsewhere. These companies compete on identity, offering ambitious individuals a sense of being special, chosen, close to power, and part of a historic mission. However, this emotional commitment must be matched by structural commitment—real power, ownership, status, and economic participation. For founders, the key question is not how to tell a better story, but what kind of person can only truly realize their potential within their specific company structure. For individuals evaluating opportunities, the distinction between "being chosen" (an emotional feeling) and "being seen" (a structural reality of tangible power and rewards) is crucial. The most dangerous promises are those priced in future time. While AI makes copying visible elements easy, it does not make building a great, novel organization any easier. The next frontier of competition is creating organizational vessels that attract, structure, and compound the judgment of the right people—those whom traditional boxes cannot contain. The company itself becomes the moat.

marsbit1 ч. назад

In the Age of AI, the Organization Itself Is the Moat

marsbit1 ч. назад

I've Been a Divorce Lawyer for 26 Years: How Has Cryptocurrency Become a New Tool for the Wealthy to Hide Assets?

Natalie Brunell reports on insights from divorce lawyer James Sexton, who has 26 years of experience. He argues that money itself is not the root of marital breakdown; rather, emotional disconnection is the core issue. While financial hardship increases divorce risk, excessive wealth can also make divorce easier by reducing the incentive to work on the relationship. Sexton discusses financial management in marriages, advocating for transparency and a "yours, mine, and ours" system that balances shared finances with individual autonomy and privacy. He notes the growing normalization of prenuptial agreements, especially among younger generations. A significant portion focuses on cryptocurrency's role in divorce. Sexton explains that crypto became a new tool for hiding assets due to its early anonymity and complexity. He highlights that many lawyers and spouses lack understanding, allowing knowledgeable parties to gain advantages. He cites a New York legal form that only added a specific crypto disclosure field in 2026. On saving relationships, Sexton emphasizes small, consistent acts of reconnection, affirmation, and expressing appreciation, which he finds more effective than criticism. He concludes that fostering warmth and kindness is a simple yet powerful way to strengthen bonds and, in his words, "put divorce lawyers out of business."

marsbit1 ч. назад

I've Been a Divorce Lawyer for 26 Years: How Has Cryptocurrency Become a New Tool for the Wealthy to Hide Assets?

marsbit1 ч. назад

Turing Award Laureate Sutton's New Work: Using a Formula from 1967 to Solve a Major Flaw in Streaming Reinforcement Learning

New research titled "Intentional Updates for Streaming Reinforcement Learning" (arXiv:2604.19033v1), involving Turing Award laureate Richard Sutton, addresses a core challenge in deep reinforcement learning (RL): the "stream barrier." Current deep RL methods typically rely on replay buffers and batch training for stability, failing catastrophically when learning online from single data points (streaming). The authors propose a fundamental shift: instead of prescribing how far to move parameters (a fixed step size), their "Intentional Updates" method specifies the desired change in the function's output (e.g., a 5% reduction in value prediction error). It then calculates the step size needed to achieve that intent. This idea is inspired by the Normalized Least Mean Squares (NLMS) algorithm from 1967. Applied to value and policy learning, this yields algorithms like Intentional TD(λ) and Intentional AC. The method inherently stabilizes learning by adapting the step size based on the local gradient landscape, preventing overshooting/undershooting. In experiments on MuJoCo continuous control and Atari discrete tasks, Intentional AC achieved performance rivaling batch-based algorithms like SAC in a streaming setting (batch size=1, no replay buffer), while being ~140x more computationally efficient per update. The work demonstrates significant robustness, reducing reliance on numerous stabilization tricks. A remaining challenge is bias in policy updates due to action-dependent step sizes. Overall, this approach advances efficient, online, "learn-as-you-go" RL, enabling adaptive systems without massive data buffers or compute clusters.

marsbit1 ч. назад

Turing Award Laureate Sutton's New Work: Using a Formula from 1967 to Solve a Major Flaw in Streaming Reinforcement Learning

marsbit1 ч. назад

Торговля

Спот
Фьючерсы
活动图片

Популярные категорииright-arrow

Популярные тегиright-arrow