2026-04-16 Четверг

Новостной центр - Страница 461

Получайте криптоновости и тенденции рынка в режиме реального времени с помощью Новостного центра HTX.

After Mainland China's Document No. 42 Sets the Tone, What is the Best RWA Token Standard?

China's "Document No. 42" (Yin Fa [2026] No. 42), issued by the People's Bank of China and eight other departments, formally recognizes and regulates Real World Asset (RWA) tokenization, defining it as the use of encryption and distributed ledger technology to convert asset ownership or rights into tokens. The document establishes a compliance pathway, requiring domestic entities to file with the China Securities Regulatory Commission (CSRC) and separating RWA from unregulated virtual currencies. Globally, the RWA market has grown significantly, reaching $23.7 billion. The article analyzes various token standards and their evolution. Early standards like ERC-3525 and ERC-3475, designed for bonds and contracts, saw limited adoption due to complexity. In contrast, successful application-first models like Aave's aToken (using a scaled balance mechanism for automatic interest accrual) and Lido's stETH (using a daily rebase model) thrive by prioritizing user experience and compatibility. For equity tokenization, platforms like Ondo and xStock on Solana use a "chain shares + multiplier" rebase model within the Token-2022 standard, adjusting display values for corporate actions like stock splits. Major exchanges and wallets (Jupiter, Binance, MetaMask) are increasingly supporting these tokenized assets. The author concludes that while China's regulatory clarity is positive, true success depends on leveraging blockchain's advantages—24/7 liquidity, fractionalization, transparency, and automation—to create practical value, rather than just defining perfect standards. The evolution should focus on user-centric solutions that address real market gaps.

marsbit02/12 06:10

After Mainland China's Document No. 42 Sets the Tone, What is the Best RWA Token Standard?

marsbit02/12 06:10

Ads During the American Super Bowl Look Like Scams

The 2026 Super Bowl, often called the "American Super Bowl," was a spectacle of sports, entertainment, and high-stakes marketing. This year’s event featured three notable incidents that highlight the intersection of prediction markets, insider information, and viral marketing. First, a newly created account on the prediction market Polymarket placed nearly $80,000 in bets—with 17 out of 19 wagers correctly predicting details of the halftime show, including appearances by Lady Gaga and the absence of Travis Scott. The account’s near-perfect accuracy led to suspicions of insider trading, possibly linked to the event’s production team. Second, a trader named Alex Gonzalez ran onto the field during the game with promotional messages painted on his body. Reports indicate he had previously bet on such a field invasion occurring, after accounting for legal fees and bail, netted around $70,000. His actions blurred the line between predicting and creating events for profit. Finally, a viral “leaked” video showed influencer Logan Paul apparently betting $1 million on Polymarket during the game. It was later revealed to be a marketing stunt orchestrated by Polymarket itself, in which Paul has investment ties. Together, these events illustrate how prediction markets can be manipulated through insider knowledge, performative acts, and staged publicity—raising questions about authenticity in high-profile events.

marsbit02/12 05:55

Ads During the American Super Bowl Look Like Scams

marsbit02/12 05:55

The Next Earthquake in AI: Why the Real Danger Isn't the SaaS Killer, But the Computing Power Revolution?

The next seismic shift in AI isn't about SaaS disruption but a fundamental revolution in computing power. While many focus on AI applications like Claude Cowork replacing traditional software, the real transformation is happening beneath the surface: a dual revolution in algorithms and hardware that threatens NVIDIA’s dominance. First, algorithmic efficiency is advancing through architectures like MoE (Mixture of Experts), which activates only a fraction of a model’s parameters during computation. DeepSeek-V2, for example, uses just 9% of its 236 billion parameters to match GPT-4’s performance, decoupling AI capability from compute consumption and slashing training costs by up to 90%. Second, specialized inference hardware from companies like Cerebras and Groq is replacing GPUs for AI deployment. These chips integrate memory directly onto the processor, eliminating latency and drastically reducing inference costs. OpenAI’s $10 billion deal with Cerebras and NVIDIA’s acquisition of Groq signal this shift. Together, these trends could collapse the total cost of developing and running state-of-the-art AI to 10-15% of current GPU-based approaches. This paradigm shift undermines NVIDIA’s monopoly narrative and its valuation, which relies on the assumption that AI growth depends solely on its hardware. The real black swan event may not be an AI application breakthrough but a quiet technical report confirming the decline of GPU-centric compute.

marsbit02/12 04:38

The Next Earthquake in AI: Why the Real Danger Isn't the SaaS Killer, But the Computing Power Revolution?

marsbit02/12 04:38

活动图片