2026-04-19 Воскресенье

Новостной центр - Страница 46

Получайте криптоновости и тенденции рынка в режиме реального времени с помощью Новостного центра HTX.

Six-Year Evolution of Web3 Airdrops: From Uniswap to Monad, How Should Ordinary People Properly 'Farm Airdrops' in 2026?

Web3 airdrops have evolved significantly from Uniswap's 2020 genesis event, where early users were simply rewarded for protocol usage, to complex systems emphasizing genuine participation, identity verification, and attention economics. Key phases include: - **Phase 1 (2020)**: DeFi airdrops like Uniswap, with no Sybil resistance or tasks—pure reward for usage. - **Phase 2 (2021)**: ENS introduced the concept of "users as shareholders," focusing on governance and contribution. - **Phase 3 (2022-2023)**: Airdrops became growth hacking tools (e.g., Aptos, Arbitrum, Celestia), using multi-tier scoring and cross-ecosystem criteria. - **Phase 4 (2024-2026)**: Points systems (e.g., Blast, EigenLayer) prioritize TVL, duration, and liquidity locking over transaction volume. Future trends indicate: - Chain-level airdrops are declining; ecosystem-level airdrops (e.g., restaking, lending) will dominate. - Rising capital requirements and AI-driven allocation using on-chain reputation and behavior analysis. - A shift from rewards to attention economics, where community influence and identity matter most. For 2026, focus on: - Technical contributions (e.g., testnet nodes). - Completed quests and points systems. - Active community engagement (Discord, social media). - Long-term participation and identity building. Airdrops are no longer just token distributions but tools for user acquisition, governance, and community building. Success requires strategy升级: avoid meaningless farming, contribute value, and maintain a persistent, authentic presence.

marsbit04/09 03:13

Six-Year Evolution of Web3 Airdrops: From Uniswap to Monad, How Should Ordinary People Properly 'Farm Airdrops' in 2026?

marsbit04/09 03:13

How Can an Average Person Identify if a Token Has a Whale Behind It in 10 Minutes?

This article argues that identifying whether a token has a "whale" (a large, controlling holder) is the wrong question, as all successful tokens have them. The key is determining the whale's current phase: accumulation, markup (pumping), distribution (dumping), or having already exited. It provides a framework using on-chain and off-chain signals to identify these phases. Key on-chain metrics include: analyzing linked wallets to find true concentration, not just top holders; checking if trading volume is real or fake based on volume/holder ratio; monitoring DEX liquidity pool changes; analyzing trade volume concentration and net buy volume; and comparing price action to holder growth rates to pinpoint the whale's phase. The core thesis is that whales are not a bug but a fundamental feature of the market; concentrated筹码 (chips/tokens) and capital are prerequisites for a pump. The structural disadvantage for retail is being "long-only"—entering at high prices with no safety net, making them vulnerable. The article proposes that decentralized shorting mechanisms could be a solution, allowing retail to profit from correctly identifying distribution phases and breaking the whale's monopoly on price control. However, shorting carries extreme risks like unlimited losses and being squeezed. It is framed not as a guarantee of profits but as a necessary tool for "symmetrical armament," allowing retail to participate in two-way betting and transition from being "prey" to a "hunter" on the playing field.

marsbit04/09 02:11

How Can an Average Person Identify if a Token Has a Whale Behind It in 10 Minutes?

marsbit04/09 02:11

活动图片