2026-04-18 Суббота

Новостной центр - Страница 365

Получайте криптоновости и тенденции рынка в режиме реального времени с помощью Новостного центра HTX.

AI Era's 'Scarce Assets'? Goldman Sachs: HALO—Heavy Assets, Low Obsolescence

In the AI era, market focus is shifting from scalable, light-asset business models to valuing hard-to-replicate physical assets and infrastructure, a trend Goldman Sachs terms "HALO" (Heavy Assets, Low Obsolescence). This reflects a repricing of scarcity driven by higher real interest rates, geopolitical fragmentation, supply chain restructuring, and massive AI-driven capital expenditure. HALO assets—such as power grids, pipelines, utilities, and critical industrial capacity—have high replication barriers (cost, regulation, engineering complexity) and remain economically durable across technology cycles. Meanwhile, AI is undermining the profitability and terminal value of some light-asset sectors (e.g., software, IT services) by reducing information costs and increasing competition. Notably, major tech firms are now becoming large-scale capital spenders, with projected Capex of $1.5 trillion from 2023-2026—surpassing their cumulative historical investment. Since 2025, Goldman’s heavy-asset portfolio (GSSTCAPI) has outperformed its light-asset counterpart (GSSTCAPL) by 35%, driven by valuation rerating rather than broad de-rating of light assets. Macro factors support this shift: higher rates compress valuations of long-duration growth stocks, while manufacturing and capex cycles benefit heavy-asset firms. Earnings momentum is also stronger for heavy-asset companies, with higher expected CAGR (14% vs. 10%) and improving ROE. Despite recent gains, institutional positioning remains underweight value/heavy-asset stocks, suggesting further potential for outperformance.

marsbit02/25 08:50

AI Era's 'Scarce Assets'? Goldman Sachs: HALO—Heavy Assets, Low Obsolescence

marsbit02/25 08:50

February's Major Adjustment: Is the Crypto Market Bottoming Out?

February witnessed a significant crypto market downturn, with Bitcoin briefly falling below $61,000, marking one of the worst starts to a year in over a decade. The sell-off was driven by risk aversion, declining liquidity, and ongoing de-leveraging rather than a fundamental collapse in value. Key indicators, such as the negative Coinbase Premium Index and substantial outflows from Bitcoin ETFs, reflected weakened institutional demand and persistent selling pressure, particularly in the U.S. market. Market liquidity thinning exacerbated volatility, with order book depth significantly reduced. Stablecoin growth also stalled, indicating a pause in new capital inflow rather than a broad exodus. Despite the correction, structural advancements continued, exemplified by Hyperliquid’s expansion into real-world asset (RWA) perpetual contracts—such as commodities and equities—showcasing deeper integration between crypto and traditional finance. Bitcoin’s decline approached its realized price, suggesting the market is entering a potential accumulation phase. While valuation metrics like MVRZ indicate undervaluation, they haven’t reached historical bear-market extremes. The ongoing institutional adoption of DeFi infrastructure and regulatory developments, like CME’s 24/7 crypto futures, highlight continued maturation beneath surface volatility. In summary, February’s downturn was largely a liquidity and risk-sentiment stress test. The market’s foundation remains intact, with catalysts like regulatory clarity and capital flow reversal poised to influence future recovery.

marsbit02/25 07:27

February's Major Adjustment: Is the Crypto Market Bottoming Out?

marsbit02/25 07:27

活动图片