2026-04-16 Четверг

Новостной центр - Страница 1016

Получайте криптоновости и тенденции рынка в режиме реального времени с помощью Новостного центра HTX.

Axelar Team Acquired, Token Abandoned: Circle's 'Take the Team, Not the Token' Move Sparks Heated Debate in Crypto Community

Circle, the stablecoin giant, has announced the acquisition of the core team and intellectual property of Interop Labs, the initial development team behind the cross-chain protocol Axelar Network. The move aims to advance Circle’s cross-chain infrastructure strategy and improve interoperability for its core products like Arc and CCTP. However, the acquisition explicitly excludes the Axelar Network itself, its foundation, and its native token AXL, which will continue to operate under community governance. Another contributing team, Common Prefix, will take over Interop Labs' former activities. Following the news, the price of AXL dropped sharply, falling 15% to around $0.115. The “acquire-the-team-but-not-the-token” approach has sparked intense debate within the crypto community. Critics, including VCs and industry figures, argue that the move unfairly disadvantages token holders, who supported the project early on but received nothing from the acquisition. Some have called it a “rug pull” and raised ethical and legal concerns, emphasizing the misalignment between team incentives and token holder interests. Supporters counter that this reflects standard market reality where tokens sit at the bottom of the capital structure—below debt and equity—and aren’t inherently entitled to proceeds in acquisitions. They see Circle’s decision as a rational business move that follows conventional corporate finance hierarchies. The incident highlights a recurring conflict in crypto: the ambiguous legal and economic status of tokens. While often treated as “quasi-equity” during bullish phases, tokens lack formal rights in events like acquisitions or liquidations. The Axelar situation underscores the need for clearer definitions and structures around token rights and incentives.

marsbit12/17 10:05

Axelar Team Acquired, Token Abandoned: Circle's 'Take the Team, Not the Token' Move Sparks Heated Debate in Crypto Community

marsbit12/17 10:05

BitMEX Alpha: Could Western Union Be an Asymmetric Trade Opportunity in the Stablecoin Arena?

BitMEX Alpha explores whether Western Union (WU) represents an asymmetric investment opportunity in the stablecoin space. While stablecoins have reached a $250B market cap and serve as a critical "dollar API" for crypto, the most obvious investment target—Circle ($CRCL)—may not offer the best risk-reward due to high distribution costs and reliance on partners like Coinbase. In contrast, Western Union, with its established global distribution network of 200k+ physical agents and deep penetration in cash-heavy remittance corridors, is positioning itself to leverage stablecoin technology from the distribution side. WU already owns the last-mile channels that Circle must pay to access. By integrating its own dollar stablecoin (USDPT) and digital asset network, WU can maintain fee and FX spread revenue from its existing front-end while adding new income streams from on-chain settlement and float. WU trades at a distressed valuation (4x P/E, 10% dividend yield), pricing in digital disruption fears. However, it offers a deep-value, asymmetric bet on stablecoin adoption—a free option on its digital transformation, backed by strong cash flow. Circle, though a pure-play stablecoin issuer, faces margin compression and high customer acquisition costs. The report concludes that in the race for digital dollar adoption, controlling user access may be more valuable than minting tokens.

marsbit12/17 09:44

BitMEX Alpha: Could Western Union Be an Asymmetric Trade Opportunity in the Stablecoin Arena?

marsbit12/17 09:44

Crypto Is Dead, Long Live Crypto

Crypto Is Dead, Long Live Crypto The author argues that "crypto" as a self-contained, insular industry is dying. This is not a failure of the technology, but the demise of a closed ecosystem built by and for a narrow group of "crypto natives." This world, optimized for activities like yield farming, airdrops, and speculation, functions like a high-liquidity MMO game but has limited potential for mainstream adoption. The "death" signifies the end of this isolated world. Crypto will no longer be a separate industry but will instead integrate into everything else as a foundational technology. The label "crypto" will become a burden, and successful companies will simply be those that use blockchain without branding themselves as such. The future lies in serving "normal people," not just crypto natives. Success will be measured by users who benefit from the technology—like those using USDT for fast payments or stablecoins to hedge inflation—without knowing or caring how it works. The bottleneck is no longer user experience but intent: builders must create products that solve real-world problems. While the "casino" of speculation will persist, it will become just one vertical. The core values worth preserving are permissionless access, global liquidity, composability, and user ownership. The old playbook of liquidity mining and airdrops is failing; it merely recirculates capital within the same small group. Winners will be those who build for broad, real-world use cases in areas like payments and identity. Losers will be those who continue to serve only the crypto echo chamber. This transition may be difficult for early adopters whose identity is tied to the industry, but it is the inevitable path of any successful foundational technology. The mission was never to turn everyone into a crypto native, but to build tools that improve the world—even if the world forgets their name.

marsbit12/17 09:16

Crypto Is Dead, Long Live Crypto

marsbit12/17 09:16

活动图片